Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi Registry 0.1.0

2017-12-29 Thread Koji Kawamura
+1 binding This is really awesome! I confirmed hashes and basic usages. Looks great for the 1st release. Found couple of minor possible improvements on the NiFi side, and posted comments to NiFi PR2219. https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2219 Thanks for your work and effort, looking forward to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi Registry 0.1.0

2017-12-29 Thread Ben Qiu
+1 On 2017-12-28 10:09, Bryan Bende wrote: > Hello,> > > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache> > NiFi Registry 0.1.0.> > > The source zip, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi Registry 0.1.0

2017-12-29 Thread Yolanda Davis
+1, binding Have been looking forward to this contribution; it is a great addition to the community! Following the release helper I verified signatures, hashes as well as the README, NOTICE, and LICENSE. Successfully built the project per instructions and built the NiFi project using the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi Registry 0.1.0

2017-12-29 Thread Aldrin Piri
+1, binding Awesome stuff and a very welcomed enhancement to the NiFi ecosystem. Definitely a lot of neat potential to build on from here. Comments: hashes and signatures good build and contrib-check looked good. Had some intermittent issues with NPM in a clean environment, repeating the build

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi Registry 0.1.0

2017-12-29 Thread Marc
+1 binding to release this package as nifi-registry-0.1.0 verified sigs, commits, readme. Ran some basic tests, including validating creating groups, committing versions, verifying that there was a way to identify that uncommitted changes existed. Ensured that my bucket's flow's change

Re: Apache NiFi Registry 0.1.0 RC1 Release Helper Guide

2017-12-29 Thread Aldrin Piri
+1, binding Awesome stuff and a very welcomed enhancement to the NiFi ecosystem. Definitely a lot of neat potential to build on from here. Comments: hashes and signatures good build and contrib-check looked good. Had some intermittent issues with NPM in a clean environment, repeating the build

Re: 答复: Re: 答复: Re: NiFi starts very slowly

2017-12-29 Thread Michael Moser
I was thinking that with 16000 processors, you would need a large amount of heap space allocated to the JVM. A small heap would slow NiFi's ability to do its work, because the JVM garbage collector would be consuming more CPU time than what is healthy. A 64 GB heap size, allocated in the NiFi

Re: 答复: Re: 答复: Re: NiFi starts very slowly

2017-12-29 Thread Mike Thomsen
How many of these 1600 processor groups represent distinct functionality that cannot be genericized? Thanks, Mike On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 8:54 PM, wrote: > Thanks for your help. > > Actually we are using Kylo (https://kylo.io/) which uses NiFi to do the > work. > > There