Folks,
I have been privately working on a number of "processors" focused on
orchestration of cyber security related activities (eg update firewall
rules with data provided via an HTTP endpoint) etc.
While some of these tasks can be easily solved with generic NiFi components
or with little (or
John,
In addition to what Andrew said, if by ESM you refer to McAfee ESM, then
you need to be mindful it expects the system to send data in a particular
format and the data source to be configured on what the call a Forwarder.
Cheers
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 11:49 PM, John Smith
Sending again as my previous vote seems to not have reached the mailing
list:
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 3:36 PM, James Wing wrote:
> +1 (binding). Ran through the release helper, checked the signature,
> hashes, the license/notice changes, etc. Tested the binary
Aldrin for getting this started and folks like
> Andre and Pierre who have tweaked it to make it more usable as well.
> After a long run of it helping us out as we all know it went poorly
> with every build failing for what seemed like months.
>
> After some improvements and update
Joe & Joey,
I believe setting the maven compilation job to noisy - instead of the
current quiet setting - should help solving the issue.
Have we tried that?
Cheers
On 5 Dec 2017 6:26 AM, "Joe Witt" wrote:
I agree this would be extremely nice to get back on track. The
was happening.
Will upload to gist soon.
Cheers
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 2:07 AM, Mark Payne <marka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Andre,
>
> So I am guessing that backpressure is not an issue then if you're not
> seeing it run :)
> Have you tried reducing the scheduling period fro
Mark,
Timer driven, Primary Node, 5 min
Yield is set to 1 sec
Backpressure = 10k flows or 1GB
nifi.administrative.yield.duration=30 sec
Cheers
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Mark Payne <marka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Andre,
>
> I have not seen this personally. Can you sha
Folks,
Has anyone ever seen a situation where ListSFTP simply stops working?
I have observed a few occurrences of seems to be some weird bug.
Symptoms are:
- Processor looks healthy (i.e. no bulletins)
- State is stalled (i.e. no changes to new files or timestamps)
- No signs of a stuck thread
Matt,
Yes. It seems to be the case. Reason being the Config Mgmt techniques used
to populate the files are different.
Cheers
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 12:07 AM, Matt Gilman <matt.c.gil...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Andre,
>
> Based on the error, it looks like you've retaine
but I reckon we should document it.
Cheers
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Matt Gilman <matt.c.gil...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Andre,
>
> While 1.4.0 introduces a more granular authorizers configuration, the
> existing 1.3.0 configurations should still be valid. What was breaking f
Folks,
I was looking at the upgrade process from 1.3.x to 1.4.0 and it seems to me
we introduced a breaking change around the authorizations?
When I look at the 1.4.0 authorizers.xml and its version 1.3.0 there's a
massive discrepancy on the XML tree and the existing 1.3.x version does not
seem
Folks,
I was recently asked by a user if we have a DeleteSFTP processor to handle
file deletion AFTER some logic has been performed.
I noticed we don't have a processor covering that, and while ExecuteScript
could be used to make this happen I wondered if it we should support that?
The logic is
Milan,
Would you be able to comment on the differences between NIFI-4360 and
NIFI-1922 ?
Cheers
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Milan Chandna <
milan.chan...@microsoft.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can admins please make me a contributor so that I can assign
>
Chris,
I was planning to address the netflow processor sometime in August once I
finish the work I am doing around consuming TAXII endpoints but I am also
happy for someone to give it a go...
The plan was to process IPFIX (as this is the open standard) and later on,
depending on documentation
Folks,
Flowfile expiration is a great feature in NiFi however I noticed a small
oddity in how one can detect expiration of Flowfiles.
>From what I understand, currently, the only way possible to do that is
searching the provenance events for the EXPIRE event type.
I've searched JIRA and noticed
into a directory and
then have it be useable in the flow could be helpful.
On Jul 5, 2017 9:00 AM, "Andre" <andre-li...@fucs.org> wrote:
dev,
As I continue to explore the Record based processors I got myself wondering:
Does it make sense to have a file-system based schema r
dev,
As I continue to explore the Record based processors I got myself wondering:
Does it make sense to have a file-system based schema registry?
Idea would be creating something like AvroSchemaRegistry but instead of the
adding each schema as a controller service property, we would have a
, Andrew Psaltis <psaltis.and...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Andre,
> I may be totally off-base here as it relates to the record related
> processing in NiFi. From a pure Avro viewpoint the same JSON will not work
> between those two schemas that you provided. The second one has a nest
;
},
{
"name":"deviceVendor",
"type":[
"null",
"float"
],
"default":null
}
]
}
}
]
}
It fails.
intelliJ seems to sugge
Joey,
Using Chrome on Windows. Tried with Firefox and faced the same issue.
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Joey Frazee <joey.fra...@icloud.com>
wrote:
> Andre, if there are any line breaks in the schema and leading spaces on
> those new lines, then this occurs. So if you min
All,
I was playing with the AvroSchemaRegistry and noticed it seems to not play
ball when the DFM pastes the schema into the dynamic property value.
To test it I basically copied the demo schema from Mark's blog post[1] and
pasted into a NiFi 1.3.0 instance. To my surprise the controller would
PM, Joey Frazee <joey.fra...@icloud.com> wrote:
> Andre, there's a flag for "Include Empty Values". If set to false then the
> effect is that non-matches result in a transfer to unmatched. The default
> is true so I'd expect to see what you're seeing.
>
> The desc
Hi all,
I have been playing with the lookup attribute and noticed a behavior that
seems counter intuitive to me:
When using the SimpleCSVLookupService I noticed that whenever the service
fails to find a match to a particular value, the LookupAttribute processor
still populated the respective
+1 binding
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Aldrin Piri wrote:
> +1, binding
>
> Hashes and signature looks good
> Build and contrib check was clean
> README, L look good
> Verified some simple flows
>
>
> Environment:
> Apache Maven 3.3.1
Folks,
Is anyone aware of conditions where the WAL repo may hold deleted files
open?
Cheers
Pierre,
Your contribution to NiFi takes many forms but I would like to thank you
for the amazing blogs you have put together!
I am sure many in the user and dev lists will vouch that your blog contains
some of the first posts people will refer to when they start to use NiFi
and when they try to
Yolanda,
Congratulations and it is great to have you onboard!
Cheers
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Tony Kurc wrote:
> On behalf of the Apache NiFi PMC, I am pleased to announce that Yolanda
> Davis has accepted the PMC's invitation to join the Apache NiFi PMC. We
>
Bryan,
Thank you for putting this together. Tested on flow with a diverse set of
processors.
+1 binding.
Only notes:
- I believe the release notes should mention the change of the randomness
source. While I suspect most will simply ignore, I wouldn't be surprised
some people will develop
Hi,
could it be that the windows firewall is enabled and blocking the ZK
communication between nodes?
Cheers
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 10:53 PM, shahbazatta wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to setup the 3 node NiFi but i am unable to set it up. I
> already
> setup it on
All,
For some reason my canvas did not refresh after a process bounce (which
generally occurs) but reloading page allows for modifications.
Cheers
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Andre <andre-li...@fucs.org> wrote:
> folks,
>
> I was just working to debug the final thorns found
folks,
I was just working to debug the final thorns found reviewing NIFI-3726 and
noticed an odd behavior and wanted to confirm.
If I recall correctly in the past users could simply replace a processor
NAR file and even if that NAR existed the flow would continue to work.
I just replaced
cp
Dev,
Those following the git commit log probably noticed that there has been a
lot of action by some of the developers behind some significant
improvements in 1.2.0.
As these developers get busy I would like to remind the rest of the list
about importance of our contribution around code review
> the canvas and the dialog to add components, with additional
> explanation
> >>>> (and maybe a target release for full deprecation) in the help notes.
> >>>>
> >>>> Andy LoPresto
> >>>> alopre...@apache.org
> >>>>
dev,
In light of the some recent deprecations (ListenLumberjack) and some
potential deprecation (PutJMS/GetJMS) I started some progress on how to
document the depreciation of NiFi components using annotations.
In the absence of any better name I called the annotation
@DeprecationWarning (so not
Anshuman,
The GCS processors have been merged to master a few weeks ago so in my
personal opinion it should be a fairly safe bet to assume they will make to
1.2.0. Emphasis on assume. :-)
>From what I gather the code base is reaching stability and as per email
from Bryan earlier this week we
dev,
What do you think about the idea of allowing an user to configure overrides
for the "master" configuration files in order to smooth upgrades?
In my opinion candidates would be_ bootstrap.conf_ and _nifi.properties_
as they contain the links to all other files (logback.xml excluded).
Upon
Joe,
I get them as well. I strongly suspect is caused by your server (GMAIL)
bouncing a ezlm message due to its original sender or perhaps message
volumes.
I happen to just have received one of those emails a few minutes ago
(regarding another NiFi list).
I also believe the issue tends to solve
Pradeep,
As Bryan mentioned, load balancing of clusters boils down to the input
protocol you are using and desired load balance outcome.
In general if using TCP based load balancing you will have to make up your
mind on how to configure your load balancer. Common approaches are round
robin, byte
Johny,
Tell me more... tell me more... have you ensure the cluster cross
communication has been set to https?
I remember seeing something like that in the summer days when I partially
setup the cluster nodes to use TLS (forgetting to do the whole job).
Can you confirm the settings for:
e the assist.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Apr 10, 2017 11:51 AM, "James Wing" <jvw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1, please close. It's worth adding that all of the above PRs were asked
> > to provide proof-of-life back in February.
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 10,
dev,
The PR queue is back at 80 contributions and unless someone suggest
otherwise I would love to be able to close the following four PRs:
PR#254 - NIFI-1583 Added ConvertJSONtoCSV processor (No update since Oct
2016)
PR#293 - NIFI-1613 Initial version, try to improve conversion for different
Joe,
Thanks for doing this.
+1
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Aldrin Piri wrote:
> +1 with the changes noted, thanks for constructing
>
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Joe Witt wrote:
>
> > Tony
> >
> > Good call yes.
> >
> > Off-list it was
congrats Bin!
Looking forward for building a NiFi-CPP cluster in the future (Late
April fool... happy to keep it as MiNiFi-CPP :-) )
Cheers
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 6:17 AM, Tony Kurc wrote:
> Apache NiFi community,
>
>
> On behalf of the Apache NiFI PMC, I am very
Oleg,
Thank you for accepting the invitation to join the PMC and welcome aboard!
Cheers
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:51 AM, Tony Kurc wrote:
> Apache NiFi Community,
>
> On behalf of the Apache NiFi PMC, I am pleased to announce that Oleg
> Zhurakousky has accepted the PMC's
David,
The original email is part of the content produced by ListenSMTP itself.
The challenge with emails is that sometimes the body itself may be encoded
and this may or may not be extracted via ExtractEmailAttachments.
Do you have a particular example of message you want to process?
Cheers
Russell,
Not sure if this is a typo but have you noticed this?
p//rocessor.Processor
Cheers
On 29 Mar 2017 8:57 AM, "Russell Bateman" wrote:
I've built a NAR containing a custom processor that loads in NiFi, but the
processor cannot be found. At the top of
Trying to save key strokes?
Just use gitg No wasted keystrokes, just use the
mouse/trackball/touchpad/whatever
:-D
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Matt Burgess wrote:
> +1 for Yetus, also this for saving keystrokes :)
>
> https://dev.to/sendra/git-faster-with-mingit
to potentially scrap caching in Travis?
> > >
> > > This is another time we have missed something like this that no caching
> > > would have prevented. Additionally, given the large footprint of the
> > > repository download it seems as though its benefit ma
dev,
Just as a friendly heads up:
The last remaining issue of tests failing when using certain locales was
fixed today when NIFI-3466 was merged into master.
This means the test units are now working with 4 different Locales without
any know issues and travis is back to green (yay!).
Moving
Aldrin,
Another point for consideration is the scope of this information. Core
NiFi flows and those components are very much about data whereas those IPs
may not necessarily be data for consumption, per se, but context that
governs how the data flow is operating. In this case, there is a
t, AMQ AWS's SQS/SNS whatever makes sense in the context.
There's no need to modify or extend Nifi then.
S
Aldrin Piri <mailto:aldrinp...@gmail.com>
> Thursday, March 16, 2017 1:07 PMvia Postbox <https://www.postbox-inc.com/?
> utm_source=email_medium=sumlink_campaign=reach&
dev,
I recently created a demo environment where two remote MiNiFi instances (m1
and m2) were sending diverse range of security telemetry (suspicious email
attachments, syslog streams, individual session honeypot logs, merged
honeypot session logs, etc) from edge to DC via S2S Input ports
Once
Aditya,
MapR Stream is Kafka compatible so you could in theory just push from NiFi
into the MapR cluster and get Spark to consume from there. However, if you
want to bypass MapR streams then you can use Output ports as documented
here:
rowse/NIFI-3554, just my
> first contribution, not sure if I missed something in the process :-), let
> me know.
>
> - purbon
>
> On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 2:11 PM Andre <andre-li...@fucs.org> wrote:
>
> > dev,
> >
> > Seems the name has always been jBCrypt.
dev,
I was wondering if anyone else is having trouble building NiFi after
purging their maven repositories?
$ git rebase apache/master
Current branch NIFI-871 is up to date.
$ mvn -U -DskipTests=true clean install
...
[WARNING] The POM for de.svenkubiak:jBcrypt:jar:0.4.1 is missing, no
James,
There's no doubt the Sign-off-by is redundant (as GIT itself holds that
information, reason why GH is still able to show the information without
the sign-of-by stamp), however, I agree with your view around positive
action and easy to refer as Bryan pointed.
Joe,
Thanks for the
dev,
May I remind you to ensure we follow the Contributor Guide and use:
git commit --amend -s
when merging commits from your peers?
While git pretty-format can be used to reveal the committer, I am sure that
all of us will agree that as an inclusive community we value both the
pretty and ugly
ST API together with the InvokeHTTP processor
(payload content must be processed to the desired format before reaching
InvokeHTTP)"
Cheers
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:58 PM, Andre <andre-li...@fucs.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Writing to OpenTSDB is a reasonably common pattern that can b
processor
(payload content must be processed to the desired format before reaching
PutTCP)
Hope this help.
Andre
PS-Due to its (higher) number of subscribers, the user mailing list is
usually a better channel for messages requesting guidance on use cases.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 6:55 PM, sczylbh <s
it back to dev as that is a more appropriate forum.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Mikhail Sosonkin <mikh...@synack.com>
wrote:
> Andre,
>
> I would love to get the PubSub processors into nifi proper. I'm not too
> familiar with your development processes, can you give me some d
Hi there,
Quick question on proper licensing:
When bundling Processors, Services and APIs, where should the NOTICES and
LICENSES be added to?
The PR in question is https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1541
My current reading is that all NAR levels will have to include the proper
references
Joe,
Thanks for the comments!
Slightly deviating from code consistency discussion but I think you raised
some important points.
I may on the glass half empty side, but being a user who witnessed many
time how modularity played on other communities i am not particular excited
about the prospect.
Andrew,
Thank you for contributing.
On 22 Feb 2017 10:21 AM, "Andrew Grande" <apere...@gmail.com> wrote:
Andre,
I came across multiple NiFi use cases where going through the HDFS layer
and the fs plugin may not be possible. I.e. when no HDFS layer present at
all, so
dev,
I was having a chat with Pierre around PR#379 and we thought it would be
worth sharing this with the wider group:
I recently noticed that we merged a number of PRs and merges around
scale-out/cloud based object store into the master.
Would it make sense to start considering adopting a
dev,
I was having a chat with Pierre around PR#379 and we thought it would be
worth sharing this with the wider group:
I recently noticed that we merged a number of PRs and merges around
scale-out/cloud based object store into the master.
Would it make sense to start considering adopting a
Joey,
At the moment I am experimenting with
https://github.com/kohsuke/winsw
On 16 Feb 2017 01:53, "iCloud" <joey.fra...@icloud.com> wrote:
Andre, can you share any details on how you’re approaching this? Are you
using an existing service wrapper? The javapackager tool adde
7, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Andre <andre-li...@fucs.org> wrote:
>
> > dev,
> >
> > Would you mind if I configured the NiFi, MiNiFi and MiNiFI-CPP travis-ci
> > integration to perform auto-cancellation when new commits are pushed to
> the
> > same branch or PR?
> &g
+1 binding.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 6:51 AM, Matt Gilman
wrote:
> +1 (binding) Release this package as nifi-0.7.2
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Andy LoPresto
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source
+1 - release
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Andy LoPresto wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi
> nifi-1.1.2.
>
> The source zip, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
dev,
Would you mind if I configured the NiFi, MiNiFi and MiNiFI-CPP travis-ci
integration to perform auto-cancellation when new commits are pushed to the
same branch or PR?
This should significantly reduce the number of builds we do per busy days
and offer benefits to the whole community.
dev,
I am starting to work on NIFI-329 and plan to soon introduce processors
capable of interacting with IRC servers.
At this stage I am looking to implement only PublishIRC, however, given the
processor will use a controller service this may be later on expanded to
handle IRC message
that since
commit 7e97946c359bfcb62ef39a2ce37083554501f1b0, parallel test runs now
seem to be far more stable. If things continue stable, we may later on
re-introduce parallel test runs to travis.
Cheers
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Andre <andre-li...@fucs.org> wrote:
> devs,
>
Chris,
Not that I am aware of but I am working on this atm. Should have something
baked until the weekend.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Chris Bulleri wrote:
> Are there any instructions for starting the latest apache NiFi as a windows
> service? Server 2012 in particular.
Marc,
I would say that lack IPv6 support was not intentional and certainly in
favor of addressing it.
Cheers
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 6:00 AM, Marc P. wrote:
> Good Afternoon,
>Given the plethora of devices that MiNiFi may be installed onto, would
> it make sense to
Joe,
Perhaps we should float the following feature to the Apache INFRA folks?
https://github.com/travis-ci/beta-features/issues/3
I am sure most ASF projects would incredibly benefit from travis queue
deduping.
Cheers
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 7:49 AM, Joe Witt wrote:
>
+1 binding
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:40 AM, Bryan Bende wrote:
> All,
>
> Following a solid discussion for the past few days [1] regarding the
> establishment of Registry as a sub-project of Apache NiFi, I'd like to
> call a formal vote to record this important community
devs,
In order to improve our ability to detect locale related bugs during
development, Pierre and I have been working on getting the surefire-plugin
to support user defined languages and to add some of these languages to the
travis-ci environment matrix.
It took a bit of trial and error but it
Aldrin,
I am also aware of someone trying to use googletest to streamline the
creation of cpp test coverage. I believe we may see a PR sometime later
this week.
Cheers
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Aldrin Piri wrote:
> Marc,
>
> I think that makes a lot of sense and
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:40 AM, Mark Payne <marka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Andre,
>
> "This design choice seems to trigger" -- I don't think this is a design
> choice but rather, a bug :)
>
Given you are the authoritative source I will trust your assessmen
devs,
As part of NIFI-940 I am crafting test coverage for the PutFTP processor.
Upon testing I noticed the following discrepancy:
The port property lacks Expression Language Support
devs,
I was working on NIFI-940 when I noticed that PutFile and PutHDFS, while
similar in nature have different ways of handling some of its common
properties, more precisely, permissions (there may be others).
While PutHDFS validates permissions via custom validators[1], PutFile will
only
AM, Andy LoPresto <alopre...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 to Russell’s point and thanks Andre for bringing up the topic. I’d
> hesitate to change the default now because people probably are depending on
> the default, but I wouldn’t object to a shift in the default at a major
>
devs,
Currently calling 'mvn clean install' creates a ZIP, a TAR.GZ and a
directory containing the same code. This leads to wasted disk space and a
lot of wasted disk writes (something that a lot of folks using SSDs prefer
to avoid).
Would anyone oppose the idea of moving the ZIP and TAR.GZ
Congratulations Joe!
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 5:02 AM, Aldrin Piri wrote:
> All,
>
> On behalf of the Apache NiFi PMC, I am pleased to announce that Joe Skora has
> accepted the PMC's invitation to join the Apache NiFi PMC. Joe has been
> with NiFi for quite some time, even
+1 binding.
built and tested on CentOS OpenJDK 8
Had a few initial issues getting to building with -T 2.0C but once
completed NiFi seems to work
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Joe Percivall <
joeperciv...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hello Apache NiFi Community,
>
> I am pleased to be calling
Welcome aboard Jeremy and thank you for the contributions!
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Aldrin Piri wrote:
> On behalf of the Apache NiFI PMC, I am very pleased to announce that Jeremy
> Dyer has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer on the
> Apache NiFi
Martian macnificent is a dependency via ParCEFone (ParseCEF processor).
Will have a look
On 16 Dec 2016 01:56, "Oleg Zhurakousky"
wrote:
> Actually, i’ll take that back. I believe I never did the ‘purge’ step,
> just ‘clean install’, and that is where I thought
devs,
I may be missing something but for some reason I am unable to use RAW
protocol in secure mode.
As par documentation I've set:
nifi.remote.input.host=node1.textbed.internal
nifi.remote.input.secure=true
nifi.remote.input.socket.port=54321
nifi.remote.input.http.enabled=false
Bryan,
Yes, I am trying to avoid creating one user for each MiNiFi.
I am here thinking, what if I install MiNiFi n ephemeral EC2 machine or
even containers? As instances are turned on an off as required, users.xml
would keep growing, Unless you remove a machine after its use. My view is
that it
y thoughts?
Cheers
-- Forwarded message ------
From: Andre <andre-li...@fucs.org>
Date: Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 8:40 AM
Subject: Large scale Secure MiNiFi deployments
To: us...@nifi.apache.org
All,
Is anyone else using a large number of MiNiFi agents together with secure
Si
(and validated by you).
Once again, thank you for testing the scenario, much appreciated.
Kind regards
On 27 Nov 2016 6:27 PM, "Yolanda Davis" <yolanda.m.da...@gmail.com> wrote:
Andre,
I attempted to reproduce your test case with a three node cluster
(unsecured in my case since
Joe,
+1 (binding).
Verified signature, built with mvn -Pcontrib (success), built with -Pmapr
(non-blocking failure on range processors - will raise JIRA), performed a
rolling upgrade into secure test cluster (success with no side effect),
processed a few GB of generated data (using multiple
<joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No problem. Thanks
>
> On Nov 25, 2016 10:42 AM, "Andre" <andre-li...@fucs.org> wrote:
>
> Joe,
>
> The non-binding was more in the sense it is not a show stopper (as I don't
> foresee too many people upgrading that
before the version change.
Testing again with the source packages...
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 2:25 AM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Andre
>
> BTW as a member of the PMC your votes are binding.
>
> I am not quite sure the state of your snapshot version relative to
Joe,
-0 (non-binding)
When testing "rolling upgrade" I noticed that as nodes restarted they were
given new Node Ids (I suspect the NodeId is related to the version they
run?). This results on a cluster with 50% of nodes showing up as
disconnected.
Not sure if this is particular to my test
Search 5.0
> >> >>> >- new ParseCEF to parse CEF formatted logs
> >> >>> >- improve ExtractEmail now supports TNEF files
> >> >>> >- new Validate CSV
> >> >>> >- improved Solr processors now sup
gt;
> to
>
> squeeze in a much goodness as possible into the release, but the
>
> important
>
> bug fixes should come first. Getting 1.x into a state where the
>
> release
>
> notes don't say that it is geared toward developers and testers is
>
> really
>
> huge.
>
Rick,
Can you confirm the certificate has a chain of trust with the default JDK
trusted certs? (i.e. trusted by the JVM)
Cheers
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:38 AM, Ricky Saltzer wrote:
> Hey Andy -
>
> Thanks again for the help.
>
> The error message seems indicative that it
thanks folks! Now I can finally retire.
:-)
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Joe Witt <joew...@apache.org> wrote:
> Team,
>
> On behalf of the Apache NiFi PMC, I am pleased to announce that Andre
> Fucs de Miranda has accepted the PMC's invitation to join the Apache
&g
+1 as well.
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Joe Witt wrote:
> Team,
>
> In the 1.x line bcprov made its way into the root of the classpath/lib
> folder to support the encrypted sensitive properties features. This
> can be reworked to isolate it a bit more if we need to.
>
>
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo