Re: Docker NiFi Container superuser password

2018-03-28 Thread Joseph Niemiec
please ignore, i managed to do this by telling docker to login as root and not the default... *docker exec -i -t --user root 39dbe311249e bash * On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 2:06 PM, Joseph Niemiec <josephx...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone. > > Looking to change the nameservers

Docker NiFi Container superuser password

2018-03-28 Thread Joseph Niemiec
Hi everyone. Looking to change the nameservers in the default docker image apache/nifi:latest but am unsure of the password... nifi@39dbe311249e:/opt/nifi/nifi-1.5.0$ su Password:

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NiFi distribution has grown too large

2018-01-12 Thread Joseph Niemiec
just a random thought. Drop In Lib packs... All the Hadoop ones in one package for example that can be added to a slim Nifi install. Another may be for Cloud, or Database Interactions, Integration (JMS, FTP, etc) of course defining these groups would be the tricky part... Or perhaps some type of

Re: NIFI Expression Language to Evaluate custom function

2017-07-18 Thread Joseph Niemiec
I believe what your asking for is possible, I am not very familiar with Spring though. Check out this commit for the base64encode/decode, lemme know if it helps you out. https://github.com/apache/nifi/commit/6f1af31ff28f60d0eddbee5dafe909bc66cc9c71 On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 7:04 AM, hemantvsn

Re: [EXT] Re: NiFi Throughput and Slowness

2017-07-03 Thread Joseph Niemiec
Is there a reason your using a RAID-5 Array? Write speed on RAID-5 is greatly influenced by the controller itself. We typically do setups using RAID-10 today now for better read/write performance. The 'parity' bits of RAID5 cause a number of re-writes & re-reads (4 iops) before it writes out the

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFI C++ 0.2.0 (RC1)

2017-05-08 Thread Joseph Niemiec
+0 (1 Test is failing for me) * Sig Validated * Hashes Validated * Built on Ubuntu 14.04 [Used Ubuntu Package libleveldb1 & cmake 3.2 successfully: Linux edge1 4.4.0-75-generic #96~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Apr 20 11:06:30 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux] * Running tests I hit a segfault,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.2.0 (RC2)

2017-05-08 Thread Joseph Niemiec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 +1 * Verified Hashes * Verified Signature * LICENSE and NOTICE appear ok (but its my first time looking at these too) * Build with - mvn -T 4C -Pcontrib-check clean install and passing * OS: Ubuntu 14.04, Oracle JDK - jdk1.8.0_77-b03 [Linux edge1

Re: [CALL FOR ACTION] Peer reviews & testing of new code

2017-05-02 Thread Joseph Niemiec
Thanks for pointing out that *contributions *of Reviewing code are still valid and that its not a *committer *only job! On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Andre wrote: > Dev, > > Those following the git commit log probably noticed that there has been a > lot of action by some

Re: [DISCUSS] Component deprecation annotation

2017-05-01 Thread Joseph Niemiec
It would be really nice if this could be part of a summary or bulletin list that an Admin/Ops could check frequently to find out if any of the tenants on the NiFi service are using deprecated processors//controllers. On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Rob Moran wrote: > I agree

Re: Deep Dive into NiFi's Site2Site

2017-04-04 Thread Joseph Niemiec
Not all of what your looking for but there are a number of details on the HTTP implementation here. - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Support+HTTP%28S%29+as+a+transport+mechanism+for+Site-to-Site On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 5:32 AM, Pushkara R wrote: > Hi, >

Re: NiFi Processors show 30 Second Execution time, 0 executions

2017-03-31 Thread Joseph Niemiec
> change. I kicked off a GenerateFlowFile processor and the milliseconds are > going up, but the 30 minutes is remaining the same... > > > > -Original Message- > From: Joseph Niemiec [mailto:josephx...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 10:41 PM > To:

Re: NiFi Processors show 30 Second Execution time, 0 executions

2017-03-31 Thread Joseph Niemiec
in my screenshot has > never run; not even once. I don't think it's had the opportunity to yield. > > -Original Message- > From: Joseph Niemiec [mailto:josephx...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 9:37 PM > To: dev@nifi.apache.org > Subject: Re: NiFi Processors s

Re: NiFi Processors show 30 Second Execution time, 0 executions

2017-03-31 Thread Joseph Niemiec
I just built the latest and am unable to see the issue as well. I also played with yield duration with no luck. Can you provide us what build your on so I can check that one out exactly? I did my last trunk test as of - 6a64b3cd9cca70e6a27b9034eba520ae0c0cb6ca git rev-parse HEAD On Fri, Mar

Re: NiFi Processors show 30 Second Execution time, 0 executions

2017-03-31 Thread Joseph Niemiec
Are you attempting to also attach a screenshot? My Email seems to think so but no photo is coming out. The zero tasks makes sense (see below) but I am not 100% sure where your getting 30 seconds from, maybe another dev has an idea on that one... Can we get a screenshot? ~~ Ran on 1.1.1... Zero

Re: Processor missing when attempting Add Processor

2017-03-28 Thread Joseph Niemiec
t;> (Sheesh. I apologize for trying to do something else concurrently. I >> meant no disrespect. I'm on board now and the changes are up there again. >> I'm awaiting NiFi to recycle now.) >> >> On 03/28/2017 06:33 PM, Joseph Niemiec wrote: >> >>> The

Re: Processor missing when attempting Add Processor

2017-03-28 Thread Joseph Niemiec
R updated (and still not working) on > windofkeltia.com/preview. > > On 03/28/2017 06:22 PM, Joseph Niemiec wrote: > >> Can you please also update the Nifi Version in your parent pom as well to >> 1.1.1 like your attempting to run on, its currently set for 1.0.0. >> &

Re: Processor missing when attempting Add Processor

2017-03-28 Thread Joseph Niemiec
Can you please also update the Nifi Version in your parent pom as well to 1.1.1 like your attempting to run on, its currently set for 1.0.0. *1.0.0* 1.7.214.12truetrue.. 1.0.01.7.214.12truetrue.. On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Joseph Niemiec <josephx...@gmail.com> wrote: > So once

Re: Processor missing when attempting Add Processor

2017-03-28 Thread Joseph Niemiec
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 7:50 PM, Joseph Niemiec <josephx...@gmail.com> wrote: > its called tika-1.0.1.jar without the nifi prefix in the bundled depnds. > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Russell Bateman <r...@windofkeltia.com> > wrote: > >> Joseph, &

Re: Processor missing when attempting Add Processor

2017-03-28 Thread Joseph Niemiec
gt; Thanks very much for the second pair of eyes. I will insist upon checking > for this in my up-coming post, etc. > > Russ > > On 03/28/2017 05:34 PM, Joseph Niemiec wrote: > >> So just exploring the nars I was unable to find any class or resources or >> services folde

Re: Processor missing when attempting Add Processor

2017-03-28 Thread Joseph Niemiec
gt; should contain (as originally noted): > > com.imatsolutions.nifi.processor.TikaProcessor > > I use the /nifi-nar-maven-plugin/ to manufacture the NAR from the JAR. I > will double-check to see if the META-INF stuff didn't make it into the JAR > (and thence into the NAR). > >

Re: Processor missing when attempting Add Processor

2017-03-28 Thread Joseph Niemiec
> > http://www.windofkeltia.com/preview/ > > > On 03/28/2017 04:59 PM, Joseph Niemiec wrote: > >> Sure please share, I have alittle time tonight. >> >> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Russell Bateman <r...@windofkeltia.com> >> wrote: >> >>

Re: Processor missing when attempting Add Processor

2017-03-28 Thread Joseph Niemiec
> available /pom.xml/ files and/or the NAR. > > On 03/28/2017 04:31 PM, Joseph Niemiec wrote: > >> Just a simple idea, but try clearing your browser cache out and reloading >> the entire canvas. I have had some funny behaviours before with a stale >> cache not seeing anyth

Re: Processor missing when attempting Add Processor

2017-03-28 Thread Joseph Niemiec
Just a simple idea, but try clearing your browser cache out and reloading the entire canvas. I have had some funny behaviours before with a stale cache not seeing anything. On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Russell Bateman wrote: > I've built a NAR containing a custom