Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate TLS Toolkit for Removal?

I agree that tis toolkit can probably be removed in 2.0, and I would add that tinycert.org provides another option for teams that need to setup dev/test environments with trusted certificates. Thanks, Kevin On Sep 13, 2023 at 11:46:19, David Handermann wrote: > Hi Isha, > > Thanks for the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New nifi PMC Member Nandor Soma Abonyi

Congrats! Well deserved. From: Peter Turcsanyi Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 5:04:58 AM To: dev@nifi.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New nifi PMC Member Nandor Soma Abonyi Congrats, Soma! On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 1:11 AM Joe Witt wrote: > On behalf of the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.5.1

+1 (binding) Thanks for RM’ing this time around! Kevin On Jun 16, 2023 at 12:44:18, Joe Witt wrote: > +1 (binding) thanks! > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 9:45 AM Matt Burgess wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > Verified signatures and hashes, built with the system below, built > > NiFi NARs and

Re: [DISCUSS] Release NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.5.1

+1 On Jun 12, 2023 at 05:35:57, Nandor Soma Abonyi wrote: > Hello Apache NiFi Community, > > I'd like to initiate a discussion about the next release of > nifi-nar-maven-plugin. > > Currently, nifi-nar-maven-plugin doesn’t use remote repositories, which was > fixed in [1]. Though it is the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.22.0 (RC1)

+1 binding. Ran through the steps in the Release Helper Guide to verify the sigs/hashes, build, build docker, and run. Congrats to the community on this release, and thanks for RM’ing, Joe! Kevin On Jun 6, 2023 at 17:38:25, Joe Witt wrote: > Hello, > > I am pleased to be calling this vote

Re: [discuss] nifi 2.0 and Java 17...

Yeah I agree it makes sense to move to 17… as long as we are introducing a potential disruptive migration, we should move to the version we can support longer rather than 11 which will land us back in the same situation we were in with 8 EOL From: Pierre Villard

Re: Use ubi9/OpenJDK-11 as base image

Hi Christian, Thank you for your interest in the Apache NiFi project. At a high-level, I think this proposal is aligned with the overall long term goals of the project. One of the many wished for Docker image improvements [1] is to support image variants and a more modular image definition that

Re: [DISCUSS] MiNiFi C++ 0.14.0 release

+1 from me, it seems like a good time for the next release of MiNiFi C++ On Apr 3, 2023 at 07:34:44, Gábor Gyimesi wrote: > Hi community, > > I'd like to initiate a discussion about the next release of MiNiFi C++. The > last release was almost four months ago, and there have been many new >

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.5.0 - RC2

Apache NiFi Community, I am pleased to announce that the NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.5.0 release of passes with 5 +1 (binding) votes 1 +1 (non-binding) votes 0 0 votes 0 -1 votes Thanks to all who helped make this release possible. On Mar 15, 2023 at 22:09:21, Kevin Doran wrote

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.5.0 - RC2

80f63) > Java version: 11.0.18, vendor: Eclipse Adoptium > Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8 > OS name: "mac os x", version: "13.1", arch: "x86_64", family: “mac” > > Thanks for RM’ing Kevin! > > Regards, > Soma > > O

Apache NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.5.0 RC2 Release Helper Guide

Hello Apache NiFi community, Please find the associated guidance to help those interested in validating/verifying the release so they can vote. # Download latest KEYS file:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nifi/KEYS # Import keys file: gpg --import KEYS # [optional] Clear out local maven

[VOTE] Release Apache NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.5.0 - RC2

Hello Apache NiFi Community, Issues with RC1 have been addressed in RC2, and I am pleased to again be calling this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.5.0. The source being voted upon, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:

[CANCELED][VOTE] Release Apache NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.5.0

tension/definition/extraction/ExtensionClassLoaderFactoryTest.java:[127] > > (regexp) RegexpSinglelineJava: Line has trailing whitespace. > > > After actually removing/changing the mentioned lines it works as expected. > > > Thanks > > Joe > > > On Mon, Mar 1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.5.0

Edit: I meant to say that due to the narrow scope of this release and the fact that it is currently blocking release of Apache NiFi 1.21.0, this vote will be open for 24 hours as opposed to the normal 72 hours. On Mar 13, 2023 at 15:56:22, Kevin Doran wrote: > Hello Apache NiFi Commun

Apache NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.5.0 RC1 Release Helper Guide

Hello Apache NiFi community, Please find the associated guidance to help those interested in validating/verifying the release so they can vote. # Download latest KEYS file:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nifi/KEYS # Import keys file: gpg --import KEYS # [optional] Clear out local maven

[VOTE] Release Apache NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.5.0

Hello Apache NiFi Community, I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.5.0. The source being voted upon, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:

Re: [discuss] plan to kick out NiFi 1.20.1

release. Worth considering > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 9:55 AM Kevin Doran wrote: > > > I'm fine with 1.21.0 vs 1.20.1. > > > Either way, It might be worthwhile waiting for the NiFi NAR Maven Plugin > > 1.5.0 to be released, so we can use that in NiFi 1.21.0. > >

Re: [discuss] plan to kick out NiFi 1.20.1

I'm fine with 1.21.0 vs 1.20.1. Either way, It might be worthwhile waiting for the NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.5.0 to be released, so we can use that in NiFi 1.21.0. For external NAR projects that inherit from nifi-nar-bundles as their parent, they are stuck on NiFi 1.19.0 due to NIFI-11217 fixed in

[DISCUSS] Release NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.5.0

Hi NiFi dev community, Thank you all for participating in the recent 1.40 release of the NiFi NAR Maven plugin. Unfortunately, it introduced a bug that prevents building some NARs outside of the apache/nifi repository [1]. Thanks to community member Julien G on Apache NiFi Slack for reporting and

Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.20 and NiFi 2.0

gt;>>>>>>>; It's exactly this case, that an early 2.0 release > might not have had time to fully work its way through existing production > deployments, that's concerning. The pace and voting of an "RC" is much too > short to get any quality feedback from users in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.20.0 (RC1)

+1 (binding) Ran through the normal verification steps / checked signatures and hashes. All looks good. Thanks for RM’ing, Joe! Kevin On Feb 8, 2023 at 14:33:31, Nissim Shiman wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > verified source release sha256/512 checksums > > > built and ran successfully

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.4.0

/thread/tvqqpy4w0nv6w8m05y749f9gv35f5268 I will finalize the release artifacts and send the announcement email tomorrow. On Feb 2, 2023 at 18:17:56, Kevin Doran wrote: > +1, binding > > On Feb 2, 2023 at 16:23:17, David Handermann > wrote: > >> +1 binding >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.4.0

iFi main branch build using NAR Plugin > - Ran build of selected NAR modules using new duplicate-nar-dependencies > goal > > Thanks Kevin! > > Regards, > David Handermann > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 5:19 PM Kevin Doran wrote: > > Hello Apache NiFi Community, > > &

Apache NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.4.0 RC1 Release Helper Guide

Hello Apache NiFi community, Please find the associated guidance to help those interested in validating/verifying the release so they can vote. # Download latest KEYS file:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nifi/KEYS # Import keys file: gpg --import KEYS # [optional] Clear out local maven

[VOTE] Release Apache NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.4.0

Hello Apache NiFi Community, I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.4.0. The source being voted upon, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:

Re: Reference parameters within execute script processor?

Hi Carson, Yes, it is possible. You want to add dynamic (user-defined) properties in the processor config that reference your parameters. For ExecuteScript [1] these will be passed to your python script as variables with the same name. For ExecuteStreamCommand [2] these will be passed to your

Re: [DISCUSS] Release NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.4.0

ues mentioned here don't sound specific > > to the NAR plugin, but sound like general Maven issues? or am I > > mis-interpreting? > > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 6:56 PM Joe Witt wrote: > > > > > > Thanks Kevin. Sounds good. > > > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Release NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.4.0

> settings.xml files, and pom.xml repo declarations were taking precedence. > Of course, this fails immediately if you're behind a firewall. > > I'll try to dig up where we got to with our investigation, but this was a > blocker for us moving to Java 17. > ___

Re: [DISCUSS] Release NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.4.0

:00, Kevin Doran wrote: > Thanks, Bryan! There is no urgency around this release, so I'm happy to > wait for that. > > On Nov 30, 2022 at 14:24:02, Bryan Bende wrote: > >> Thanks Kevin! >> >> There is actually one change I was planning to start working on, and

Re: Access To Apache Jira

Hi Harry, The ASF JIRA account harryclarke has been created and added to the NIFI project. Welcome! Regards, Kevin On Jan 18, 2023 at 06:23:12, "Clarke, Harry" wrote: > Hi there! > > Please can I have an ASF Jira account for creating and contributing to > issues on NiFi

Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.20 and NiFi 2.0

the 2.0 milestones coming from > the field > > I don't mind the known-unknowns. But it's really the unknown-unknowns that > are going to drive a delay in the 2.0 release. I think it's smart to be > able to get some of the unknowns ironed out before we finalize the 2.0 > release ceremon

Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.20 and NiFi 2.0

rovide as we need to make > the bridge as solid and stable as possible to help someone move from 1.x to > 2.x. I dont know how related these two concepts (milestone releases and > 1.x to 2.x ease really are). > > Thanks > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:27 AM Kevin Doran

Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.20 and NiFi 2.0

sure what ASF guidance is on the topic, but if it could be beneficial we could look into that. Cheers, Kevin On Jan 11, 2023 at 12:22:43, Kevin Doran wrote: > I think this is a good, practical discussion. > > On the one hand, we can't put off 2.x any longer as we really need to > updat

Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.20 and NiFi 2.0

I think this is a good, practical discussion. On the one hand, we can't put off 2.x any longer as we really need to updated the minimum required Java to 11. Updating main development to target 2.x feels like a good way drive progress on that along with the other 2.0 goals. On the other hand,

Re: [VOTE] Adopt NiFi 2.0 Proposed Release Goals

+1 (binding) On Dec 12, 2022 at 12:41:16, Matt Gilman wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 12:02 PM David Handermann < > exceptionfact...@apache.org> wrote: > > Team, > > > Following positive feedback on NiFi 2.0 Proposed Release Goals [1] on the > > recent discussion thread [2],

Re: [DISCUSS] Finalizing Release Goals for NiFi 2.0

Thanks, David. The updated wiki page looks good and I’m very supportive of the proposal I support a narrower scope for 2.x and an eventual 3.x line sooner rather than later. It takes some pressure off trying to fit everything into this 2.x change / migration Kevin On Dec 7, 2022 at 18:07:35,

Re: [DISCUSS] Release NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.4.0

t; > > Regards, > > David Handermann > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 7:36 AM Mark Bean wrote: > > > > Sounds great Kevin. Thanks! > > > > > > Can you give a little more detail on the dependency duplication > detection? > > > How does it work?

[DISCUSS] Release NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.4.0

Hi all, There’s been a few improvements and bug fixes to the NAR Maven Plugin. One nice new feature is a new maven goal that detects duplicate dependencies in NARs. Another contribution improves our NiFi build reproducibility. Given all this, I’d like to release a new version of the plugin that

Re: [DISCUSS] MiNiFi C++ 0.13.0 release

+1, seems like a great time for a new release On Nov 28, 2022 at 05:14:59, Ferenc Gerlits wrote: > Hi community, > > I'd like to initiate a discussion about the next release of MiNiFi C++. The > last release was almost six months ago, and there have been many new > features, > bug fixes and

Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.19.0

NIFI-10701 is merged. If folks are ok holding off a day or two more for 1.19, I'll look into following the work Ferenc Kis did for that to knock out NIFI-10820. On Nov 15, 2022 at 19:43:57, Matt Burgess wrote: > Awesome, thanks all! I'd like to wait for Github actions to be happy > and then

Re: Latest NiFi-arm64 docker image

Hi James, NiFi arm64 images are not yet available, though there is some work in progress to add arm64 platform support, so they might be made available as part of the next regular NiFI release. On Nov 3, 2022 at 02:22:06, James Li wrote: > Hi, > > Could you provide latest NiFi-arm64 docker

Re: proposal to extend several component key properties to use Expression Lng instead of VarRegs only (based off https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-8214)

Hi Rogier, Thanks for your message. This is an interesting use case. In a way it inverts the typical use of NiFi, which is where the flow files are the data being moved and the flow logic is in the flow definition / processor config. Instead this puts the parameters of the job/workflow into the

Re: JUnit errors

Hi Akshara, I suspect it could be related to Java 18. I believe we require Java 17 or Java 11 (or Java 8, although we are about to drop support for that). Can you try that? Thanks, Kevin On Sep 8, 2022 at 02:38:11, Akshara Uke wrote: > Hello, > > I took the latest codebase, and am trying to

Re: New NiFi PMC Member Nathan Gough

Congrats Nathan! On Sep 7, 2022 at 12:24:17, Otto Fowler wrote: > Congratulations, thanks for all you do > > > > > From: David Handermann > > Reply: dev@nifi.apache.org > Date: September 7, 2022 at 12:10:21 > To: dev@nifi.apache.org > Subject: New NiFi PMC Member Nathan Gough > > Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.17.0 (RC2)

+1 (binding) Ran through the release helper guide on: Apache Maven 3.8.4 (9b656c72d54e5bacbed989b64718c159fe39b537) Java version: 1.8.0_333 Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8 OS name: "mac os x", version: "12.4", arch: "aarch64", family: "mac" Thanks for RM’ing Joe! Kevin On Jul

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.17.0 (rc1)

+1 (binding) Verified using the steps from the RC helper guide on an Apple Silicon (arm64) Mac: Apache Maven 3.8.4 (9b656c72d54e5bacbed989b64718c159fe39b537) Maven home: /Users/kdoran/.sdkman/candidates/maven/current Java version: 1.8.0_333, vendor: BellSoft, runtime:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.3.5

+1 (binding) Ran through the steps in the Release Helper Guide; everything checked out. Thanks for the bugfix and RM'ing Bryan! Kevin On Jul 20, 2022 at 16:37:16, Bryan Bende wrote: > Hello Apache NiFi Community, > > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache >

Re: [DISCUSS] Release for NAR Maven Plugin

+1 for cutting a release - thanks Bryan! On Jul 20, 2022 at 15:30:59, Bryan Bende wrote: > If there are no objections, I'm planning to kick out another minor > release for the NAR plugin to release a fix for a bug that was just > resolved [1] . > > [1]

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.3.4

Apache NiFi Community, I am pleased to announce that the Apache NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.3.4 release vote passes with: 4 +1 (binding) votes 2 +1 (non-binding) votes 0 +0 votes 0 -1 votes Thanks to all who helped make this release possible! Here is the vote thread:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.3.4

t; David Handermann > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 4:11 PM Kevin Doran wrote: > > Hello Apache NiFi Community, > > > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache > > NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.3.4. > > > The source being voted upon,

Apache NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.3.4 RC1 Release Helper Guide

Hello Apache NiFi community, Please find the associated guidance to help those interested in validating/verifying the release so they can vote. # Download latest KEYS file:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nifi/KEYS # Import keys file: gpg --import KEYS # [optional] Clear out local maven

[VOTE] Release Apache NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.3.4

Hello Apache NiFi Community, I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.3.4. The source being voted upon, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nifi/nifi-nar-maven-plugin-1.3.4/ The Git tag

Re: [DISCUSS] Strategy for Dropping Java 8 Support in NiFi 2.0

I'd even love to go straight to Java 17 since it's the new LTS version... > > but this may be quite a big jump for our community and users. > > I guess we can envision a "short" 2.x release line and consider Java 17 for > > 3.x. > > Definitely approve the proposal! >

Re: [DISCUSS] Strategy for Dropping Java 8 Support in NiFi 2.0

Thanks for reviving this discussion David. In light of those core dependencies dropping support for Java 8, this plan seems necessary for NiFi. I support the proposal. Thanks, Kevin On Jun 15, 2022 at 11:48:05, David Handermann wrote: > Team, > > With multiple major projects in the process of

[DISCUSS] Release for NAR Maven Plugin

All, If there are no objections, I would like to put out a maintenance release (1.3.4) of the NAR Maven plugin, which has had some recent bug fixes and improvements: 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-10011 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9856 3.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.16.3 (RC1)

+1 (binding) - verified sigs and hashes - build on macOS 12.3.1 - jdk 1.8.0_332 - built all docker images, and verified using docker compose test env Thanks for RM'ing! Kevin On Jun 14, 2022 at 16:41:25, Peter Turcsanyi wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - Verified signatures and hashes.

Re: [DISCUSS] MiNiFi C++ 0.12.0 release

+1 On May 17, 2022 at 08:29:35, Marc Parisi wrote: > Really awesome work from a great team so I think a release is in order as > well. +1 > > On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 5:48 AM Gábor Gyimesi wrote: > > +1 > > > On Tue, 17 May 2022 at 11:30, Pierre Villard > > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > > > Le

Re: Jira contributor access

can jump in who > does. > > Marton > > On Mon, 2 May 2022 at 15:42, Kevin Doran wrote: > > > Hi and welcome to the community and thanks for your interest in > > contributing ! I've added you as a contributor to our NIFI Jira project. > > > Thanks! > > Kev

Re: Jira contributor access

Hi and welcome to the community and thanks for your interest in contributing ! I've added you as a contributor to our NIFI Jira project. Thanks! Kevin On Apr 28, 2022 at 23:10:59, Nesa Simon David wrote: > Hello my username on Jira is "hellznrg". I would like to contribute to > development on

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache NiFi Committer Adam Markovics

Congrats, Adam! On Mar 28, 2022 at 10:08:24, Otto Fowler wrote: > Congratulations! > > From: Marton Szasz > Reply: dev@nifi.apache.org > Date: March 25, 2022 at 08:50:07 > To: dev@nifi.apache.org > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache NiFi Committer Adam Markovics > > Apache NiFi community, >

Re: Java 17 and GitHub Workflow Updates

Thanks for your contributions David, Mike, and Paul! These are all great updates. On Mar 17, 2022 at 15:04:32, David Handermann wrote: > Development Team, > > Thanks to reviews from Mike Thomsen and Paul Grey, support for building the > NiFi project on Java 17 is now in the main branch. > > The

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.16.0 (rc3)

+1 Ran through the release helper guide steps verified signature and hashes verified build verified docker images and nifi+registry integration Thanks for RM'ing Joe! Kevin On Mar 21, 2022 at 17:41:41, Joe Witt wrote: > Hello, > > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release

Re: Question on NiFi Installation

Bharath and I already spoke on Apache NiFi Slack, but for the record here on the dev mailing list: NiFi is not currently ARM compatible, though some of us in the community are working on it. If you would like to contribute to or track our progress building and running on arm64/aarch64 platforms,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache NiFi Committer Paul Grey

Congrats Paul! We’ll deserved From: Nathan Gough Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2022 9:12:21 PM To: dev@nifi.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache NiFi Committer Paul Grey Congrats, Paul! Thanks for your contributions so far. On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 9:06 PM

Re: What is the minimum ram storage required to install NiFi

Hi Ricky, NiFi is a data processing tool. The system requirements are almost entirely dependent on your specific use case: how much data will flow through NiFi and what type of processing will be done on it? For that processing, how will it utilize cpu, memory, disk, network, etc? NiFi itself

Re: apache/nifi convenience Docker Image - publish JDK 11 version?

> > > --- > *Chris Sampson* > IT Consultant > chris.samp...@naimuri.com > > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 at 16:38, Kevin Doran wrote: > >> Thanks, Chris! I’ve incorporated these ideas into the Confluence page. >> I’ll look into getting you edit permissions -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi Flow Design System 0.3.0 RC2

+1 binding - Verified signature and hashes - Checked License, Notice, Readme files - Built using Node 16.13.2 (darmin-arm64) - Ran demo app and it was working as expected Thanks for this release, Scott! -Kevin > On Jan 26, 2022, at 09:26, David Handermann > wrote: > > +1 binding > > - Ran

Re: [DISCUSS] release nifi-fds 0.3.0

+1 Thanks Scott! From: Joe Witt Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 11:33:08 AM To: dev@nifi.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] release nifi-fds 0.3.0 Scott Super good to see us getting this back up to date and thanks for RM. Joe On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 9:27 AM

Re: apache/nifi convenience Docker Image - publish JDK 11 version?

fluence page that > you think would be worthwhile to add to the pile for consideration. > > > --- > *Chris Sampson* > IT Consultant > chris.samp...@naimuri.com > > > On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 18:01, Kevin Doran wrote: > >> Hi Chris, >> >> I like

Re: Apache NiFi support for Apple arm64 processors

Hi Aleksander, Sorry for the (very) delayed response, but I recently ran into this myself and opened a Jira [1] to track making progress on support for Apple Silicon platforms. Once that is completed, I plan to look into building arm64 Docker images as well. Improvement ideas for Apache NiFi

Re: apache/nifi convenience Docker Image - publish JDK 11 version?

Hi Chris, I like this idea and have been thinking of a number of other improvements we could make for container images of Apache NiFi, including (I think discussed on another thread) consolidating Dockerfiles for dockerhub / dockermaven, as the only significant difference is where the nifi

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache NiFi Committer Margot Tien

Congratulations Margot! Well deserved. > On Dec 15, 2021, at 13:47, Joe Witt wrote: > > Congrats Margot! And thanks > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 11:46 AM Matt Gilman wrote: > >> Apache NiFi community, >> >> On behalf of the Apache NiFi PMC, I am very pleased to announce that Margot >> has

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ 0.11.0 RC2

+1 (binding) Checked sigs and hashes and did my usual docker-based build and test. Looks good, nice work everyone! Kevin > On Dec 8, 2021, at 11:48, Marton Szasz wrote: > > +1 (binding) > Went through the usual checks, built, ran tests and packaged on gentoo > with gcc 11.2.1 and clang

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi NAR Maven Plugin 1.3.3

+1, binding Verified sigs/hashes/license/notice. Tried it out and it works as described. Thanks Bryan! > On Dec 2, 2021, at 12:09, Matt Gilman wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Ran through the release helper. Looked great! Thanks for RMing Bryan! > > Matt > > On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 11:28 AM Matt

Re: [DISCUSS] The future of (Mi)NiFi Command and Control (C2)

Hi Matt, Thanks for kicking of this thread. The discussion here puts into words some things that have been on my mind for a while, and its really exciting to see a revival of these conversations. Overall, I support the proposal. Here are some specific thoughts, in no particular order. One

Re: [DISCUSS] MiNiFi C++ 0.11.0 release

+1 thanks all! > On Nov 18, 2021, at 11:30 AM, Arpad Boda wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 5:23 PM Ádám Markovics wrote: > >> I also agree on releasing. Let's do it! >> >> Ádám >> >> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 4:05 PM Joe Witt wrote: >> >>> Sounds like a great time to cut a new

Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.15

line the Dockerfiles for NiFi builds, >> there is a lot of duplication between dockermaven and dockerhub, so >> unifying the modules and parameterizing necessary differences would be a >> helpful improvement. >> >> Regards, >> David Handermann >> >> On

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.15.0 (rc3)

+1 (binding) - Verified sigs and hashes (see note below) - Built from source - Built docker images for nifi, registry, minifi, minifi-c2, nifi-toolkit - Ran nifi and nifi-registry in docker compose - Used nifi to create a versioned PG to save to registry - Used minify-toolkit to test converting

Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.15

m sources and then ran "mvn install -pl :dockermaven -P docker" to build >> the Docker image. When starting with the following command, I was able to >> use the generated username and password to access the running NiFi >> container: >> >> docker run --name nifi

Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.15

Oh meant to send a link to this too: > ARG > NIFI_BINARY_PATH=${NIFI_BINARY_PATH:-/nifi/${NIFI_VERSION}/nifi-${NIFI_VERSION}-bin.zip} https://github.com/apache/nifi/blob/373498445fe589e2d4855a0730fbb9127f0b4452/nifi-docker/dockerhub/Dockerfile#L30 > On Nov 4, 2021, at 9:09 PM, Ke

Re: [discuss] NiFi 1.15

Hi Joe and Chris, Our Dockerfile that we use to build the Dockerhub image defaults to looking for 1.15.0 instead of NiFi-1.15.0, but it is a variable that we can override, so this is easy to workaround incase the release folder does change. Agree its nice to keep the tree structure consistent

Re: Minifi Docker Image

[1] https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp <https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp> Cheers, Kevin > On Oct 19, 2021, at 10:32, Kevin Doran wrote: > > Hi all, > > I was also not aware we had been publishing docker image

Re: Minifi Docker Image

Hi all, I was also not aware we had been publishing docker images for nifi-minifi-cpp to Docker Hub. I can update the those image repositories to have the latest, and I will help document the process on our wiki that is used so that others can follow it in the future as part of a normal

Re: Jira Contributor Access Request

Hi Mikayla, You should have access to the NiFi Jira projects now. Let me know if you need anything else, and welcome to the project! Cheers, Kevin > On Sep 27, 2021, at 14:29, Mengke Yang wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm new to the NiFi project and my username is *mikayla.yang*. I would love > to

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New NiFi PMC Member David Handermann

Congratulations, David! > On Sep 17, 2021, at 10:09, Joe Gresock wrote: > > Congrats, David! > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 9:57 AM Marton Szasz wrote: > >> Congratulations David! >> >> On Fri, 17 Sept 2021 at 13:07, Chris Sampson >> wrote: >>> >>> Congrats David, very well deserved! >>>

Re: Flood of JIRAs and presumably PRs to follow for junit-5 migration?

Hi all, JUnit 5 certainly contains a number of benefits, so I’m glad to see some interest and effort around it. As long as we are taking the time to update tests in each module and line up reviewers for these bulk refactoring, I agree with David that we should make improvements aside from

Re: [DISCUSS] NiFi 2.0 Release Goals

Outside of core NiFi, for MiNiFi, I think it would be beneficial to align MiNiFi Java and MiNiFI C++ to use the same method(s) for command and control / flow deployment. This was discussed when MiNiFi Java was merged into the NiFi codebase [1]. My proposal would be to create a Java

Re: [DISCUSS] NiFi Registry -> NiFi consensus

+1. > On Jul 16, 2021, at 2:28 PM, Joe Witt wrote: > > Yep definitely. Thought this was sorted via the JIRA. > > +1 > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 11:26 AM David Handermann > wrote: >> >> Thanks for handling this, Matt. As one of the reviewers on the PR, I vote >> +1 (non-binding). >> >>

Re: wget during build

GitHub artifacts to use the maven artifact: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFIREG-456 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFIREG-456> Thanks again, Mark! > On Jul 16, 2021, at 10:15 AM, Kevin Doran wrote: > > Good find! At a glance, I think this maven

Re: wget during build

s a more general question, can you explain what option uses the Swagger > UI? What feature or capability is not available without this component > being available at build time? > > Thanks, > Mark > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 4:52 PM Kevin Doran wrote: > >> It’s ce

Re: wget during build

o me that if a necessary component or dependency can't be > obtained from the user-configured maven repository, then that resource > should be included in the source for the project. Comments? > > Thanks, > Mark > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 2:11 PM Kevin Doran wrote: >

Re: wget during build

Hi Mark, I’m not sure the two errors are related, but for the first one you can pass -Pno-swagger-ui to mvn when building: See: https://github.com/apache/nifi/blob/main/nifi-registry/nifi-registry-core/nifi-registry-web-api/pom.xml#L136

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache NiFi Committer Denes Arvay

Congrats, Denes! Well deserved. > On Jun 25, 2021, at 07:19, Chris Sampson > wrote: > > Congrats, look forward to your continued contributions! > > --- > *Chris Sampson* > IT Consultant > chris.samp...@naimuri.com > > > > On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 at 11:41, Pierre

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New NiFi PMC Member Marton Szasz

Well done, Marton! > On Jun 25, 2021, at 07:20, Chris Sampson > wrote: > > Congrats, well deserved! > > > --- > *Chris Sampson* > IT Consultant > chris.samp...@naimuri.com > > > > On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 at 11:42, Pierre Villard > wrote: > >> Congrats Marton! >>

Re: Request for review - NIFI-5573

Hi Lars, Thanks for the contribution! This is an area I should be able to help out in. I will take a look at your PR sometime in the next couple days and collaborate directly with you over on GitHub. Cheers, Kevin > On Jun 16, 2021, at 10:56, Lars Francke wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I've

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ (RC2)

+1 (binding) verified sig / hashes built using docker makefile targets and verified resulting images Nice work all! Thank you for RM’ing Ferenc. > On Jun 10, 2021, at 13:20, Tony Kurc wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Went through the release helper, verified signatures and hashes, reviewed >

Re: Jira contributor access

Welcome and thanks for your interest in contributing! I’ve added you to Jira. -Kevin > On Apr 29, 2021, at 08:39, Guillaume Schaer wrote: > > Hey, > > could you please give me Jira contributor access? > > My username is gschaer. > > Thanks > G

Re: request Jira contributor access

Welcome! I’ve added you, and you should have access to all the NiFi Jira projects now. Cheers, Kevin > On Apr 6, 2021, at 11:03, Paul Grey wrote: > > Jira username: pgrey

Re: Dropping support for Java 8

gt;> On Mar 26, 2021, at 8:13 AM, Joe Witt wrote: >> >> Good thread. I'd say when a NiFi 2 line happens Java 8 would be gone >> completely and we would/should consider only supporting the latest LTS >> line perhaps. >> >>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 8:05 AM Ke

Re: Dropping support for Java 8

Hi JL, It’s worth discussing/considering changes such as this periodically, so thanks for bringing it up. Personally, I would be hesitant to make such a large change. While it would likely be a net-positive for the NiFi image itself, I think it would impact a number of community members that

  1   2   3   >