Re: [VOTE] Adopt NiFi 2.0 Proposed Release Goals

+1 (binding) On Mon, Dec 12, 2022, 12:02 PM David Handermann wrote: > Team, > > Following positive feedback on NiFi 2.0 Proposed Release Goals [1] on the > recent discussion thread [2], I am calling this vote to adopt the following > as Release Goals for NiFi 2.0: > > 1. Remove Java 8 support

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ 0.12.0 (RC1)

+1 (binding) Verified signature, hashes, didn't see issues with LICENSE or NOTICE aside from what Joe mentioned. Build was a little bit of a challenge because of my environment (had some weird issues with dependency versions (MX Linux)), but powered through to a successful build and test. Tony

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.16.0 (rc3)

+1 (binding) Verified hashes and signatures. Reviewed notice and license and readme and did not see any issues. Build went without issue and ran a simple flow. Tony On Mon, Mar 21, 2022, 5:42 PM Joe Witt wrote: > Hello, > > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.15.3 (rc1)

+1 (binding) Verified sign/hash. Build without issue. Notice and license files look good. On Tue, Jan 18, 2022, 11:08 AM Mark Payne wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - Verified the hashes > - Build on Java 8, mac os Big Sur > - Ran all system tests (including nifi stateless system tests) and all >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.15.2

+1 (binding) Verified signatures and hashes, and built without issue. On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 9:39 AM Matt Gilman wrote: > +1 (binding) Release this package as nifi-1.15.2 > > Ran through the release helper. Looks great. Thanks for RMing Joe! > > Matt > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 5:52 PM Joe

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.15.0 (rc3)

+1 (binding) Struggled a bit to build on my rig, primarily due to environment issues more than anything else (older Ubuntu), but did build successfully and made working binary build (tested very simple flow). Verified signature and hashes, and saw no issues with LICENSE, NOTICE. On Sat, Nov 6,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New NiFi PMC Member Marton Szasz

congratulations! On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 6:23 PM Joe Witt wrote: > Congrats and thanks Marton > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 3:10 PM Otto Fowler > wrote: > > > Congratulations! > > > > > > > > > > From: Arpad Boda > > Reply: dev@nifi.apache.org > > Date: June 24, 2021 at 15:01:31 > > To: NiFi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ (RC2)

+1 (binding) Went through the release helper, verified signatures and hashes, reviewed NOTICE and LICENSE, and built without issues on Amazon Linux 2. Qualifier on my +1 vote - I only tested the build with simple a very simple flow. On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 3:50 PM Ferenc Gerlits wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.13.1

+1 (binding) Verified checksums and signature. Build and ran simple flow on Amazon Linux 2, openjdk 1.8.0, maven 3.6.3. Saw no issues with LICENSE or NOTICE On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 11:29 AM Joe Witt wrote: > Hello, > > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ 0.9.0 (RC2)

+1 (binding) Built on Amazon Linux 2 with the below build configuration (using bootstrap.sh). Verified signature and checksum files. Reviewed LICENSE and NOTICE, which looked good. Had some test failures, but appear to be environmental rather than an issue. Ran a simple flow without issue. The

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.13.0 (rc4)

+1 (binding) Built with java 8. Verified checksums and signature. Ran a really simple flow without issue. On Sat, Feb 13, 2021, 6:56 PM David Handermann wrote: > +1 non-binding > > Verified release signatures and expected files. > Verified build on Ubuntu 20.10 using Apache Maven 3.6.3 with

Re: [discuss] we need to enable secure by default...

Joe, In addition to your suggestions, were you thinking of making this processor disabled by default as well? Tony On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, 11:04 PM Joe Witt wrote: > Team > > While secure by default may not be practical perhaps ‘not blatantly wide > open’ by default should be adopted. > > I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1 (rc2)

+1 (binding) Verified signature and hashes. Built without issue on ubuntu 18.04 x86_64 with openjdk11. Saw no issues with LICENSE or NOTICE. Tony On Wed, Sep 23, 2020, 6:10 PM Joe Witt wrote: > Hello, > > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi > 1.12.1. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.1

+1 (binding) Built with openjdk 1.8, reviewed license,notice, and checked signature and hashes. On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 9:25 AM Kotaro Terada wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Verified signatures and hashes. > Built packages with OpenJDK 1.8 and OpenJDK 11. > Set up a secure 3-node cluster. >

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.0

yeah!! On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 4:50 PM Mark Payne wrote: > Awesome! Thanks for doing all the work to get the release out, Joe! > > -Mark > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Aug 18, 2020, at 4:48 PM, Joe Witt wrote: > > > > Apache NiFi Community, > > > > I am pleased to announce that the 1.12.0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.12.0

+1 (binding) Verified checksums and signature. No issues building or running. Did not see any issues with LICENSE or NOTICE. On Mon, Aug 17, 2020, 5:07 AM Pierre Villard wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Went through the usual steps. Deployed a secured cluster on GCP and tried a > few flows. Confirmed

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache NiFi Committer Marton Szasz

Congrats Marton! On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 4:02 AM Arpad Boda wrote: > Apache NiFi community, > > On behalf of the Apache NiFI PMC, I am very pleased to announce that Marton > has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer on the Apache NiFi > project. We greatly appreciate all of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi Registry 0.7.0

+1 (binding) Built on an ubuntu 16.04 x64 w/openjdk 11 without issues. Verified signatures and hashes. Saw no issues with LICENSE or NOTICE. Tony On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:10 PM Marc Parisi wrote: > +1 binding > > Verified sigs and hashes > > Built and run on Linux LXC (Java 11) w/ Secured

Re: [DISCUSS] rename master branch, look through code for other related issues

for that. Most prevalent in my grep analysis related to master/slave were carrying over terms from dependencies (e.g. MySQL, zookeeper, or third-party libs in nifi-cpp) and "master key" crypt related stuff. On Mon, Jul 6, 2020, 6:02 PM Tony Kurc wrote: > Mike, > I did a qu

Re: [DISCUSS] rename master branch, look through code for other related issues

; > > like those teams are missing the mark on that. If we do find > language > > > > that > > > > > needs to be changed in descriptor name fields, I think it would > also > > > > > prevent any problems by making part of the messaging bein

Re: AWS S3

I did testing of a set of s3 processors a long while ago without AWS using https://s3ninja.net/ On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 2:17 PM younggyu Chun wrote: > Hi all, > > I am working https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7579 but I think > we > need an AWS S3 account to test. > > thanks, >

Re: [DISCUSS] rename master branch, look through code for other related issues

che.org > > > > > > > alopresto.apa...@gmail.com > > > > > > > He/Him > > > > > > > PGP Fingerprint: 70EC B3E5 98A6 5A3F D3C4 BACE 3C6E F65B 2F7D > > EF69 > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] rename master branch, look through code for other related issues

proponent of making this change and also using allow/deny list, > >> meddler-in-the-middle, etc. > >> > >> Here is a blog [1] with easy instructions for executing the change in > git, > >> although I don’t know if there is any Apache-integration specific >

[DISCUSS] rename master branch, look through code for other related issues

All, I've seen the discussion started on other projects [1][2], so I wanted to kick off a discussion to determine whether this is something nifi could look at too. Allen Wittenauer's post to yetus captures the why and some of the how, so rather than copy and pasting, you can take a look at what

[ANNOUNCE] New NiFi PMC member Drew Lim

NiFi Community, On behalf of the Apache NiFi PMC, I am pleased to announce that Drew Lim has accepted the PMC's invitation to join the Apache NiFi PMC. Drew has been doing an amazing job for several years making NiFi more approachable and usable. He's contributed to almost every part of NiFi;

[ANNOUNCE] New NiFi PMC member Arpad Boda

NiFi Community, On behalf of the Apache NiFi PMC, I am pleased to announce that Arpad Boda has accepted the PMC's invitation to join the Apache NiFi PMC. In addition to being a regular code contributor and engaged community member with the project, (especially MiNiFi C++!) for quite some time,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi Registry 0.6.0

+1 (binding) Ran through the helper, compiled no problem, ran without issue, and didn't see issues with licenses. On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 11:54 AM Arpad Boda wrote: > Hello, > > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache > NiFi Registry nifi-registry-0.6.0. > > The

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.11.4

+1 (binding) Ran through "helper" on ubuntu without issue. On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 7:23 PM Matt Gilman wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks for RMing Joe! > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 6:06 PM M Tien wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > - Verified checksums, signatures, and commit hash > > - Ran

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.11.0 (rc3)

+1 (binding) successfully went through the helper guide on mxlinux 18, did not discover any issues with the signature, hashes, or build. On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 8:48 AM Aldrin Piri wrote: > +1, binding > > comments: > signature - good > hashes - good > L - good > built and tested some simple

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ 0.7.0 (RC1)

Looks like I missed the vote by a smidge, but I did work through the helper guide on mxlinux 18 with no issues. So, I'll cast a post-vote +1! On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 12:33 PM Arpad Boda wrote: > Apache NiFi Community, > > I am pleased to announce that the 0.7.0 release of Apache NiFi MiNiFi >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.10.0 (rc3)

+1 (binding) verified signature and checksums. built without issue on my ubuntu rig. On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 8:00 PM Koji Kawamura wrote: > +1 (biding) > > Ran through the release helper guid. Built successfully and ran > example flows worked as expected. > > Note for others using old macOS. >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache NiFi Committer Dániel Bakai

Congratulations Dániel! On Fri, Oct 25, 2019, 8:21 PM Otto Fowler wrote: > std::cout << “Congratulations” << std::endl; > > > > > On October 25, 2019 at 12:38:20, Aldrin Piri (ald...@apache.org) wrote: > > Apache NiFi community, > > On behalf of the Apache NiFI PMC, I am very pleased to

Re: Re: [Discuss] Data prioritization - A proposed solution

On FBP purity - even absent this implementation, there are "global" resources being contended over (disk, network, threads). Absent infinite capacity in all those things, I don't think a pure implementation is possible. In my opinion, what is being discussed is the best way of coping with one

[ANNOUNCE] New Apache NiFi Committer Rob Fellows

Apache NiFi community, On behalf of the Apache NiFI PMC, I am very pleased to announce that Rob has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer on the Apache NiFi project. We greatly appreciate all of Rob's hard work and generous contributions to the project. We look forward to his

Re: [VOTE] Create NiFi Standard Libraries sub-project

+1 (binding) On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 12:29 AM Aldrin Piri wrote: > +1, binding > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 19:46 Yolanda Davis > wrote: > > > +1 Create NiFi Standard Libraries (binding) > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 7:03 PM Koji Kawamura > > wrote: > > > > > +1 Create NiFi Standard Libraries

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache NiFi PMC member Peter Wicks

Congratulations Peter!! On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 11:21 AM Aldrin Piri wrote: > NiFi Community, > > On behalf of the Apache NiFi PMC, I am pleased to announce that Peter Wicks > has accepted the PMC's invitation to join the Apache NiFi PMC. > > Peter's contributions have been plentiful in code,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.9.1 (rc1)

+1 (binding) went through helper with clean mvn repo, everything checks out and built beautifully On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 9:27 PM Koji Kawamura wrote: > +1 binding > > Went through release helper guide. > Thanks Joe for managing this release! > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 9:34 AM Aldrin Piri

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.9.0 (rc2)

+1 (binding) - Went through helper on ubuntu 16.04 (x86) without issue - ran through some very simple flows On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 5:07 PM Andrew Lim wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > -Ran full clean install on OS X (10.14.2) > -Ran a flow moving data from MySQL into Kudu (QueryDatabaseTable &

[ANNOUNCE] New Apache NiFi Committer Ed Berezitsky

On behalf of the Apache NiFI PMC, I am very pleased to announce that Ed has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer on the Apache NiFi project. We greatly appreciate all of Ed's hard work and generous contributions to the project. We look forward to his continued involvement in the

[ANNOUNCE] New Apache NiFi Committer Nathan Gough

On behalf of the Apache NiFI PMC, I am very pleased to announce that Nathan has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer on the Apache NiFi project. We greatly appreciate all of Nathan's hard work and generous contributions to the project. We look forward to his continued involvement in

Re: [DISCUSS] Early, voluntary relocation to GitBox

+1, sounds like a great idea On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:44 AM Mike Thomsen wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:08 PM Sivaprasanna > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > I’m in. Thanks for doing it, Aldrin. > > > > > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 7:32 AM, James Wing wrote: > > > > > +1, thanks

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.8.0 (RC3)

+1 (binding) ran through helper. ran some fairly simple tests. On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 3:16 PM Kevin Doran wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Ran through the steps in the helper guide. > Ran a test by Running NiFi, connecting with registry, and > versioning/importing/running flows. > > Thanks for

Re: [CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.8.0

While likely not an issue with the release - I have a fresh install of Ubuntu 18.04 I was verifying on and hit a heisenbug condition. TestPutUDP was failing in weird fashion because as best as I can tell the default send buffer size in the operating system was smaller than the default send buffer

[ANNOUNCE] New NiFi PMC member Jeremy Dyer

All, On behalf of the Apache NiFi PMC, I am pleased to announce that Jeremy Dyer has accepted the PMC's invitation to join the Apache NiFi PMC. Jeremy has been a long-time contributor to the project - across many different parts of the project to include NiFi and and MiNiFi, contributing code,

[ANNOUNCE] New NiFi PMC member Kevin Doran

NiFi Community, On behalf of the Apache NiFi PMC, I am pleased to announce that Kevin Doran has accepted the PMC's invitation to join the Apache NiFi PMC. In addition to being a regular code contributor to the project for quite some time, Kevin has been hard to miss on the mailing lists,

Re: Apache NiFi contributor access

I'll take care of that. On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 4:32 AM, Kumara M S, Hemantha (Nokia - IN/Bangalore) wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to get contributor access to Apache Nifi on JIRA. Can you > please add me to contributor list? My username is 'hemantha.kumara' . > > Thanks, > Hemantha > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi 0.5.0 RC2

+1 (binding) License + notice look good built without issue hashes and signature look good Tested using a really simple flow On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Jeff wrote: > +1, binding > > Ran through the release helper guide > Created a simple flow for MiNiFi in NiFi, used the transform of the

Re: [DISCUSS] Tar + Gzip vs. Zip

My preference is zip. On Tue, Jun 26, 2018, 9:21 AM Josh Elser wrote: > > > On 6/25/18 11:34 PM, Andy LoPresto wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > I do not want to start a long-running argument or entrenched battle. > > However, having just performed the RM duties for the latest release, I > > believe

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.7.0

+1 Verified hashes and signature. Notice and license look good Built okay on my Ubuntu 16.04 box. Had a few problems on my windows 10 box, but believe them to be environment rather than a problem with the build Ran a few test flows On Fri, Jun 22, 2018, 3:48 PM Scott Aslan wrote: > +1 binding

Re: Unable to install Apachi nifi on my unix box

Srinivasarao, I think you attempted to attach an image with the error which did not make it through to the email list. Tony On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Sivaprasanna wrote: > What error do you get when you run it? Please share it over here. BTW, > which version of Apache NiFi are you

[ANNOUNCE] New NiFi PMC member Mike Thomsen

NiFi community, On behalf of the Apache NiFi PMC, I am pleased to announce that Mike Thomsen has accepted the PMC's invitation to join the Apache NiFi PMC. We greatly appreciate all of Mike's hard work and generous contributions to the project. We look forward to continued involvement in the

[ANNOUNCE] New Apache NiFi Committer Sivaprasanna Sethuraman

On behalf of the Apache NiFI PMC, I am very pleased to announce that Sivaprasanna has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer on the Apache NiFi project. We greatly appreciate all of Sivaprasanna's hard work and generous contributions to the project. We look forward to continued

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ 0.5.0

's always great to have more feedback in case we missed something. > Sorry about the equipment failures and let me know if there is anything I > can o to help > > Thanks - Jeremy Dyer > ____ > From: Tony Kurc > Sent: Sunday, June 3, 2018 6:02:2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ 0.5.0

All, I haven't been able to verify this release due to some equipment failure.. it looks like there is enough votes to pass, but I'm going to keep trying. On Sun, Jun 3, 2018, 5:58 PM Joe Witt wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Confirmed sigs, hashes, commit. > Built on Fedora 28 > Checked L Wow that

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC3)

+1 (binding) comments: verified signature and hashes Built on ubuntu 14.04 x86_64 Reviewed NOTICE and LICENSE files, did not find issues Ran a few simple flows without issues. On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:54 AM, Aldrin Piri wrote: > +1, binding > > > comments: > > * signature

[ANNOUNCE] New Apache NiFi Committer Mike Thomsen

On behalf of the Apache NiFI PMC, I am very pleased to announce that Mike has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer on the Apache NiFi project. We greatly appreciate all of Mike's hard work and generous contributions to the project. We look forward to his continued involvement in the

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for an Apache NiFi sub-project - NiFi Fluid Design System

Is some of the thinking that projects other than nifi projects would use this? On Feb 22, 2018 10:00 PM, "Scott Aslan" wrote: > Sivaprasanna, > > I am not sure I follow exactly what you are saying... > > NiFi Registry would no longer continue to host a copy of the FDS

Re: Will you accept contributions in Scala?

It is like Matt read my mind. On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 6:26 PM, Matt Burgess wrote: > I'm fine with a vote, but I'll be voting to keep Java as the single > language for the (non-test) code. I share the same concerns as many of > the other folks as far as accepting other

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ 0.4.0 RC1

+1 (binding) Verified signatures and hashes. Built using helper guide on in an Ubuntu 16.04 (x86_64) docker container. Did not try the bootstrap script (it failed when my container didn't have a working sudo, figured this was a non-issue for most use cases and moved on) . Ran a couple very simple

Re: Apache MiNiFi C++ 0.4.0 Release Helper Guide

I believe cmake DPORTABLE=ON -DFAIL_ON_WARNINGS= .. may be missing a "-" before the DPORTABLE On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 1:36 AM, Aldrin Piri wrote: > Hello Apache NiFi community, > > Please find the associated guidance to help those interested in > validating/verifying the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi 0.4.0 RC2

+1 (binding) Build great on ubuntu 14.04. Verified signatures and hashes and clean build. Ran some very simple flows. Did not find any issues with NOTICE or LICENSE. Minor point for next release is to update copyright date everywhere (it is 2017 in the NOTICE and a few files) On Mon, Jan 22,

Re: [DISCUSS] MiNiFi Releases

I like what you have to say On Jan 16, 2018 9:17 AM, "Aldrin Piri" wrote: > Hey folks, > > With the release of NiFi 1.5 we have a current gap in the typical flow > performed in taking a template with an RPG to connect from a MiNiFi > instance to NiFi as discovered in

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NiFi distribution has grown too large

> > this decision could also depend on how the option #3 is going to be > > > implemented I guess. > > > > > > 2018-01-13 6:36 GMT-07:00 Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > thanks tony! > > > > > > > > On Ja

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NiFi distribution has grown too large

100% sure on your vision for > the nars > > - Jeremy Dyer > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Jan 12, 2018, at 10:18 PM, Tony Kurc <tk...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > I was looking at nar sizes, and thought some data may be helpful. I used > my recent RC1 v

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NiFi distribution has grown too large

I was looking at nar sizes, and thought some data may be helpful. I used my recent RC1 verification as a basis for getting file sizes, and just got the file size for each file in the assembly named "*.nar". I don't know whether the images I pasted in will go through, but I made some graphs.b The

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.5.0 (RC1)

+1 (binding) verified signature and hashes. built clean with contrib-check. ran some simple flows without issue. reviewed the NOTICE and LICENSE, saw no issues. On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Koji Kawamura wrote: > +1 (binding) Release this package as nifi-1.5.0 > >

Re: [DRAFT][REPORT] Apache NiFi Board Report Jan 2018

Looks great! Thanks for pulling this together, Joe! On Jan 9, 2018 12:40 PM, "Joe Witt" wrote: > Thanks for the prompt replies all. Board Report for Jan submitted. > > ## Description: > - Apache NiFi is an easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to >process and

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache NiFi Committer Kevin Doran

Congratulations Kevin! On Jan 3, 2018 9:17 AM, "Bryan Bende" wrote: > On behalf of the Apache NiFi PMC, I am very pleased to announce that > Kevin Doran has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer on > the Apache NiFi project. We greatly appreciate all of Kevin's

[ANNOUNCE] New NiFi PMC member Jeff Storck

NiFi community, On behalf of the Apache NiFi PMC, I am pleased to announce that Jeff Storck has accepted the PMC's invitation to join the Apache NiFi PMC. We greatly appreciate all of Jeff's hard work and generous contributions to the project. We look forward to continued involvement in the

[ANNOUNCE] New NiFi PMC member Scott Aslan

NiFi community, On behalf of the Apache NiFi PMC, I am pleased to announce that Scott Aslan has accepted the PMC's invitation to join the Apache NiFi PMC. We greatly appreciate all of Scotts's hard work and generous contributions to the project. We look forward to continued involvement in the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ 0.3.0 release.

Marc et al., Exciting news! Great job pulling together the release! Tony On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Marc wrote: > Hello! > > The Apache NiFi team would like to announce the release of Apache NiFi - > MiNiFi C++ 0.3.0. > > MiNiFi is a subproject of Apache NiFi. Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFI C++ 0.3.0 (RC2)

+1 Built fine, ran a few simple flows. Reviewed license and notice and didn't see any issues. On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:36 PM, Joe Witt wrote: > +1 binding > > L looks good on both source and binary artifacts. Ran a fairly high > speed and stable flow of data into Kafka.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFI C++ 0.3.0 (RC1)

Question about the LICENSE. When swapping in rocksdb for leveldb [1], the leveldb LICENSE section was removed. I looked at the ticket chatter [2] and saw "Not including RocksDB because it is dual licensed under Apache License, Version2.0". In reviewing the rocksdb thirdparty, it has a

Re: Apache MiNiFi C++ 0.3.0 Release Helper Guide

ion. > > Thanks, >Marc > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Marc P. <marc.par...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Tony, > > Try adding libbz2-dev liblzma-dev to your distro if you haven't > already. > > I don't think I correctly copied the command for apt-get

Re: Apache MiNiFi C++ 0.3.0 Release Helper Guide

I'm having a bit of trouble with running make test - still diagnosing, but it is a segfault. (building on an ubuntu 16.04 docker image). --- CompressFileBZip

[ANNOUNCE] New NiFi PMC member Mike Moser

NiFi community, On behalf of the Apache NiFi PMC, I am pleased to announce that Mike Moser has accepted the PMC's invitation to join the Apache NiFi PMC. We greatly appreciate all of Mike's hard work and generous contributions to the project. We look forward to continued involvement in the

[ANNOUNCE] New Apache NiFi Committer Andy Christianson

On behalf of the Apache NiFI PMC, I am very pleased to announce that Andy has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer on the Apache NiFi project. We greatly appreciate all of Andy's hard work and generous contributions to the project. We look forward to his continued involvement in the

[ANNOUNCE] New Apache NiFi Committer Mike Hogue

On behalf of the Apache NiFI PMC, I am very pleased to announce that Mike Hogue has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer on the Apache NiFi project. We greatly appreciate all of Mike's hard work and generous contributions to the project. We look forward to his continued involvement

[ANNOUNCE] New Apache NiFi Committer Peter Wicks

On behalf of the Apache NiFI PMC, I am very pleased to announce that Peter Wicks has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer on the Apache NiFi project. We greatly appreciate all of Peter's hard work and generous contributions to the project. We look forward to his continued

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.4.0 (RC2)

+1 (binding) Built on Ubuntu 14.04 with Java 1.8.0 and Maven 3.5.0. Verified hashes and signature. Tested some simple flows. Tested some tls toolkit operations. Did not see any issues with LICENSE or NOTICE files. On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 4:17 AM, Koji Kawamura wrote: >

Re: Separate MiNiFi projects in JIRA

If there is a ticket that applies to multiple implementations, separate jira projects makes that a bit more complicated. How often is that likely to happen? On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Joe Witt wrote: > Since changing the permissions on requirement for a given field

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Gitbox

of providing contributions may be off-putting to some. On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm a strong +0. I don't think think it is a huge step forward, but it > isn't a step back either. > > On Jul 28, 2017 5:42 PM, "Andy LoPresto"

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Gitbox

I'm a strong +0. I don't think think it is a huge step forward, but it isn't a step back either. On Jul 28, 2017 5:42 PM, "Andy LoPresto" wrote: > +1 to enable gitbox. > > Andy LoPresto > alopre...@apache.org > *alopresto.apa...@gmail.com * >

Re: Binaries in embedded redis jar files

Mike - Is there something about these binaries versus all of the other myriad binaries (jars, .class files, dlls and .so files) included in the convenience jar? I wouldn't think so, these are just more binary artifacts. I honestly can't think of another apache project that provides similar

RTC clarification

All, I was having a discussion with Mike Hogue - a recent contributor - off list, and he had some questions about the review process. And largely the root of the question was, if a non-committer reviews a patch or PR (which Mike has spent some time doing), is that considered a "review"? I didn't

Re: [DRAFT][REPORT] Apache NiFi - July 2017

I don't have any concerns, looks good! On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:01 AM, Aldrin Piri wrote: > Looks good. Thanks for compiling this, Joe. > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Joe Witt wrote: > > > Team, > > > > It's that time again to submit our board

Re: NiFi Assembly NOTICE/LICENSE Maintenance

should and shouldn't do w.r.t LICENSEs and NOTICEs. I'll > capture this in the contributor guide as well. > > Thanks again, > Mike > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 1:44 PM Mike Hogue <hogu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Not a problem, assuming i'm able to edit the contributor's gui

Re: NiFi Assembly NOTICE/LICENSE Maintenance

9f36ae38470017ea61b104d > 01310b8f16/nifi-assembly/LICENSE#L1086 > [2] https://github.com/apache/nifi/blob/master/nifi-assembly/NOTICE#L939 > [3] https://github.com/netty/netty/blob/4.1/NOTICE.txt > [4] https://nifi.apache.org/licensing-guide.html > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:26 PM, Tony K

Re: NiFi Assembly NOTICE/LICENSE Maintenance

For reference: Netty 4.1 NOTICE https://github.com/netty/netty/blob/4.1/NOTICE.txt Netty 3.7 NOTICE https://github.com/netty/netty/blob/3.7/NOTICE.txt On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:21 PM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Background, I asked Mike how he put together the LICENSE, a

Re: NiFi Assembly NOTICE/LICENSE Maintenance

Background, I asked Mike how he put together the LICENSE, and why he added a separate section in the LICENSE for Google Protocol Buffers 3.3.1, and his answer that made sense was "well, what existed there was there had a version (2.5.0)". Interesting note, the Google Protocol Buffers LICENSE

Re: NIFI-3641

cing, rather than implementing that > ourselves. > >> > gRPC has pluggable load balancing, authentication, and transport > >> protocols, > >> > so you're still free to provide your own implementation. > >> > > >> > I think the latter optio

Re: NIFI-3641

roto being able to talk to > another service to share data. Is that planned as part of this effort > or is that just what the referenced JIRA was about? > > In either case this seems like one heck of an initial area to > contribute to and a good discussion point! Thanks > > Joe > >

Re: NIFI-3641

Mike, I think what you're saying is you are debating two options: A) gRPC as a transport mechanism and support the deployment use cases from the HTTP s2s document [1] to include using nifi-specific peer selection in the client if the destination is a cluster. B) Building a different

[ANNOUNCE] New Apache NiFi Committer Marc Parisi

On behalf of the Apache NiFI PMC, I am very pleased to announce that Marc Parisi has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer on the Apache NiFi project. We greatly appreciate all of Marc's hard work and generous contributions to the project. We look forward to his continued involvement

[ANNOUNCE] New Apache NiFi Committer Drew Lim

On behalf of the Apache NiFI PMC, I am very pleased to announce that Drew Lim has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer on the Apache NiFi project. We greatly appreciate all of Drew's hard work and generous contributions to the project. We look forward to his continued involvement in

[ANNOUNCE] New Apache NiFi PMC Member - Koji Kawamura

On behalf of the Apache NiFi PMC, I am pleased to announce that Koji Kawamura has accepted the PMC's invitation to join the Apache NiFi PMC. We greatly appreciate all of Koji's hard work and generous contributions to the project. We look forward to continued involvement in the project. Koji has

[ANNOUNCE] New Apache NiFi PMC Member - Pierre Villard

On behalf of the Apache NiFi PMC, I am pleased to announce that Pierre Villard has accepted the PMC's invitation to join the Apache NiFi PMC. We greatly appreciate all of Pierre's hard work and generous contributions to the project. We look forward to continued involvement in the project. Pierre

[ANNOUNCE] New Apache NiFi PMC Member - Yolanda Davis

On behalf of the Apache NiFi PMC, I am pleased to announce that Yolanda Davis has accepted the PMC's invitation to join the Apache NiFi PMC. We greatly appreciate all of Yolanda's hard work and generous contributions to the project. We look forward to continued involvement in the project. I know

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi MiNiFi 0.2.0

+1 (binding) - verified signatures - verified hashes - build cleanly - verified a simple flow - I think c2 worked as expected - ran toolkit's config.sh and did some converting without issue On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Aldrin Piri wrote: > Hello, > > I am pleased to be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 0.7.3

+1 (binding) - checked hashes - verified signature - built cleanly (java 1.8.0_102, Amazon Linux 2017.03) - checked over license, notice and readme - launched and ran some simple flows On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 8:33 PM, Michael Moser wrote: > Hello Apache NiFi community, >

  1   2   3   4   >