On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 8:33 PM Alan Rosenthal
wrote:
> Hello NuttXers,
>
> I recently posted an issue to the NuttX Github page:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/issues/6896
>
> I'll summarize my thoughts here.
>
> Currently NuttX has a C89 requirement. However, there is code in the
>
Hello,
I’ve published two articles about using Lua on NuttX with libuv for
asynchronous IO and networking:
https://medium.com/@michael.mogenson/using-lua-on-nuttx-bcc9a39b2814
https://medium.com/@michael.mogenson/using-lua-and-libuv-for-async-networking-on-nuttx-6e4635eeaedc
Hello NuttXers,
I recently posted an issue to the NuttX Github page:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/issues/6896
I'll summarize my thoughts here.
Currently NuttX has a C89 requirement. However, there is code in the
codebase today that is not C89 compliant. Rather than reworking
I don't know how ST internal oscillator is implemented in silicon, but
some MCUs have good internal oscillator.
For example the SAMD21 used on Arduino M0 board works fine with NSH
running at 115200 and it even supports USB console, but I didn't test
your freezing spray, maybe it could fail too.
Hi David,
Wow. That is precisely what is wrong, you can get yourself a little TRIM
and make one of the boards work, but
then you would have to hand tune them +/- 1% for every baud rate and worse,
temperatures. So better to pay the 71
cents and put the 8M crystal on the board. For testing I used
Hello,
I was on vacation last week, so I didn't make any progress on this.
I want to fix it, but I need guidance. No one has commented on this...
Did anyone manage to reproduce the issue using my fork?
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:42 AM Sebastien Lorquet
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there any follow up
Hi,
is there any follow up on this point?
Sebastien
Le 13/08/2022 à 16:44, Fotis Panagiotopoulos a écrit :
Ok, I just managed to reproduce the issue on a NUCLEO-F429ZI, using the
NuttX apps.
Please check my fork on
https://github.com/fjpanag/incubator-nuttx-apps/tree/tcp_issue
See the
HSI is not a good choice if there are external interfaces. It can vary too
much part to part and over temperature to meet the 2% across the system
boundary. They claim 1% @25c but that is 1/2 the budget to begin with,
Anyone ever use the HSI on STM32F103, how about RET6? I know the code is
set up for HSE. I got it working, at least UART1.
But now, the other usart devices ... Wondering if anyone has ever run into
UART baud rate mismatches on using HSI? I have a few
radios that work great with an existing driver