Re: Reevaluate the C89 Requirement

2022-08-23 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 8:33 PM Alan Rosenthal wrote: > Hello NuttXers, > > I recently posted an issue to the NuttX Github page: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/issues/6896 > > I'll summarize my thoughts here. > > Currently NuttX has a C89 requirement. However, there is code in the >

Lua on NuttX blog posts

2022-08-23 Thread Mike Mogenson
Hello, I’ve published two articles about using Lua on NuttX with libuv for asynchronous IO and networking: https://medium.com/@michael.mogenson/using-lua-on-nuttx-bcc9a39b2814 https://medium.com/@michael.mogenson/using-lua-and-libuv-for-async-networking-on-nuttx-6e4635eeaedc

Reevaluate the C89 Requirement

2022-08-23 Thread Alan Rosenthal
Hello NuttXers, I recently posted an issue to the NuttX Github page: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/issues/6896 I'll summarize my thoughts here. Currently NuttX has a C89 requirement. However, there is code in the codebase today that is not C89 compliant. Rather than reworking

Re: STM32F103RET6 and HSI

2022-08-23 Thread Alan Carvalho de Assis
I don't know how ST internal oscillator is implemented in silicon, but some MCUs have good internal oscillator. For example the SAMD21 used on Arduino M0 board works fine with NSH running at 115200 and it even supports USB console, but I didn't test your freezing spray, maybe it could fail too.

Re: STM32F103RET6 and HSI

2022-08-23 Thread James Dougherty
Hi David, Wow. That is precisely what is wrong, you can get yourself a little TRIM and make one of the boards work, but then you would have to hand tune them +/- 1% for every baud rate and worse, temperatures. So better to pay the 71 cents and put the 8M crystal on the board. For testing I used

Re: STM32F4 Ethernet Issues

2022-08-23 Thread Fotis Panagiotopoulos
Hello, I was on vacation last week, so I didn't make any progress on this. I want to fix it, but I need guidance. No one has commented on this... Did anyone manage to reproduce the issue using my fork? On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:42 AM Sebastien Lorquet wrote: > Hi, > > is there any follow up

Re: STM32F4 Ethernet Issues

2022-08-23 Thread Sebastien Lorquet
Hi, is there any follow up on this point? Sebastien Le 13/08/2022 à 16:44, Fotis Panagiotopoulos a écrit : Ok, I just managed to reproduce the issue on a NUCLEO-F429ZI, using the NuttX apps. Please check my fork on https://github.com/fjpanag/incubator-nuttx-apps/tree/tcp_issue See the

Re: STM32F103RET6 and HSI

2022-08-23 Thread David Sidrane
HSI is not a good choice if there are external interfaces. It can vary too much part to part and over temperature to meet the 2% across the system boundary. They claim 1% @25c but that is 1/2 the budget to begin with,

STM32F103RET6 and HSI

2022-08-23 Thread James Dougherty
Anyone ever use the HSI on STM32F103, how about RET6? I know the code is set up for HSE. I got it working, at least UART1. But now, the other usart devices ... Wondering if anyone has ever run into UART baud rate mismatches on using HSI? I have a few radios that work great with an existing driver