On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 1:45 AM M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <
zn...@algocompsynth.com> wrote:
> I've just run across NuttX, and I think it's a good fit for my project.
> What I'm trying to do is develop some computer music applications on
> microcontrollers. I'm mostly interested in the Raspberry Pi
I've just run across NuttX, and I think it's a good fit for my project. What
I'm trying to do is develop some computer music applications on
microcontrollers. I'm mostly interested in the Raspberry Pi Pico, but I also
have some ESP32 S3, ESP 32 C3/C6, and Teensy 4.1 boards aand would like the
dencies. I even can
> mount master's file system and run programs from it on the remote
> node, as the remote node's capability is superset of that of the master
> node.
>
>
>
>
>
> Here I have some questions regarding RPTUN:
>
>
>
>
>
> How to judge if RP
> Using the latest version I got some problems:
> > https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/8767
> >
> > I think it should be fine using the stable release since I have no idea
> > what is going wrong using master.
> >
> > As for my questions:
> > I
atest version I got some problems:
> https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/8767
>
> I think it should be fine using the stable release since I have no idea
> what is going wrong using master.
>
> As for my questions:
> I could not find a lot of information about the statu
got some problems:
https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/8767
I think it should be fine using the stable release since I have no idea
what is going wrong using master.
As for my questions:
I could not find a lot of information about the status of the bluetooth for
NuttX, only articles on running
While looking into the mcp2515 driver I noticed something unexpected.
In mcp2515_instantiate() it does the follofing:
SPI_SETFREQUENCY(config->spi, CONFIG_MCP2515_SPI_SCK_FREQUENCY);
SPI_SETMODE(config->spi, MCP2515_SPI_MODE);
SPI_SETBITS(config->spi, 8);
SPI_HWFEATURES(config->spi, 0);
Hi Briann,
The main idea of NuttX RTOS is to have a POSIX and in some way a Linux-like
RTOS that runs on low/mid-end microcontrollers, like STM32, ESP32, etc.
You also can run NuttX on high-end processors like Freescale/NXP iMX6 and
others. Then in theory you can port Java Virtual Machine and
Can Apache NuttX run Apache Programs within NuttX? Apps such as Flink or
Storm?
ne larger MTD device that span all the
small ones.
This is a kind of raid0 for MTD devices.
I have questions about the API. Basically there are two choices:
-have an empty initialiser (mtd_agg_init()) that return the larger
device, and a function mtd_agg_adddev(child) to grow the device
-ha
e checked) and the result is one larger MTD device that span all the
small ones.
This is a kind of raid0 for MTD devices.
I have questions about the API. Basically there are two choices:
-have an empty initialiser (mtd_agg_init()) that return the larger
device, and a function mtd_agg_addde
that span all the small
ones.
This is a kind of raid0 for MTD devices.
I have questions about the API. Basically there are two choices:
-have an empty initialiser (mtd_agg_init()) that return the larger
device, and a function mtd_agg_adddev(child) to grow the device
-have an initializer that takes
Before we change the coding standard, I suggest that we get more
feedback from the dev community.
My opinion: If a loop does not require a body, I suggest to use
braces, rather than a semicolon, because it is less prone to
programmer error. ...
I should not be so opposed to coding standard
As a conclusion for me:
If you don't want to force braces, the macos/sim build test needs to be fixed.
Importantly: It's not a style test that is failing, it's a build test.
Nevertheless I will change the code in my PR to use braces, because it seems to
be the preferred way (at least by Greg and
My opinion: If a loop does not require a body, I suggest to use
braces, rather than a semicolon, because it is less prone to
programmer error. I would be okay with either:
while (condition)
{
}
or
while (condition) {}
And of the two, I think the second one expresses the intent best.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:55 AM Gregory Nutt wrote:
> > Hmmm... I don't agree.
> >
> > The Coding Standard encourages empty "while loops":
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Coding+Standard#while
> > Why should this not applicable for "for loops"? I think there are many
> >
Hmmm... I don't agree.
The Coding Standard encourages empty "while loops":
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Coding+Standard#while
Why should this not applicable for "for loops"? I think there are many already
in the tree.
Actually, I think that is an error in the coding
macOS (sim)" complaining?
Johannes
> -Original Message-
> From: Nathan Hartman [mailto:hartman.nat...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2020 4:15 PM
> To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
> Subject: [!!Mass Mail]Re: Some questions related PR#1478
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 9:4
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 9:46 AM Schock, Johannes - NIVUS GmbH <
johannes.sch...@nivus.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> I have two questions related PR#1478 (
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/1478):
>
> 1. I think there's a configuration error with "Build / macOS
> From: Gregory Nutt [mailto:spudan...@gmail.com]
> fsync on any open file descriptor will flush the file system since data
> is only buffered for for metadata and one file at a time.
This explains why my problem seems gone after I introduced a fsync on the file
in my test case.
I will have
Hello,
I have two questions related PR#1478
(https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/1478):
1. I think there's a configuration error with "Build / macOS (sim)" since it is
using -Wempty-body, or is this intentional?
It gives errors for
for (namelen = 0; dirinfo->fd_l
Yes! Should I do the same workaround as Greg mentions there, namely to
add an additional "Included Files" section for the conditional
includes?
We have just been ignoring this style error in previous PRs.
If you want someone to ignore and nxstyle complaint, I think the the
etiquette is to
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 1:29 PM Abdelatif Guettouche
wrote:
> Here are the supported sections:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/blob/master/tools/nxstyle.c#L131
> (There is an "s" too many in what I wrote above, it's "Public Function
> Prototypes")
Thanks. More below:
> On Mon, Apr
Here are the supported sections:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/blob/master/tools/nxstyle.c#L131
(There is an "s" too many in what I wrote above, it's "Public Function
Prototypes")
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 7:20 PM Abdelatif Guettouche
wrote:
>
> > (1)
> (1) arch/arm/include/stm32/stm32f40xxx_irq.h:361:3: error: Invalid
> section for this file type
For a header file the section "Public Functions" should not exist,
it's actually "Public Functions Prototypes"
> (2) arch/arm/include/stm32/irq.h:81:3: warning: #include outside of
> 'Included
I am not sure what to do about the following nxstyle complaints:
(1) arch/arm/include/stm32/stm32f40xxx_irq.h:361:3: error: Invalid
section for this file type
Should I just remove the section? What to do with the unused
__ASSEMBLY__, __cplusplus, and extern "C" stuff?
(2)
Hi,
I'm trying to port the imxrt SD Card driver (imxrt_usdhc.c) to the
sama5d27. Both chips appear to use similar Cadence IP blocks... the
registers appear to be almost identical. I know the SDMMC peripheral and
the SD Card both work since I can boot from it using U-Boot on the
SAMA5D2-XULT
what's the status of CONFIG_BUILD_KERNEL?
it seems only sama5 has the necessary up_ functions. is this right?
is there a way to run on emulators like qemu?
I have not used the kernel build in some time. It has been used in
products in the past so it is complete and usable but has some
hi,
what's the status of CONFIG_BUILD_KERNEL?
it seems only sama5 has the necessary up_ functions. is this right?
is there a way to run on emulators like qemu?
thank you
29 matches
Mail list logo
