Done, thanks Vikas
Jacques
From: Vikas Mayur vikas.ma...@hotwaxmedia.com
Please update http - https under Developer Access for release09.04.
Vikas
On Apr 18, 2009, at 2:54 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I have updated http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Source+Repository+and+Access
Thanks Jacques!
Vikas
On Apr 20, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Done, thanks Vikas
Jacques
From: Vikas Mayur vikas.ma...@hotwaxmedia.com
Please update http - https under Developer Access for release09.04.
Vikas
On Apr 18, 2009, at 2:54 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I have updated
Hello David,
Below is your comments from rev no. 757316.
Changed back to throw an exception when a non-body parameter is passed to
a secure request that calls a service as an event; now that we have the
Form Widget and form defs fixed up to handle these better it should be fine
for most things,
I have cleaned up things a bit :
Commented out
ameniti
partnerhomes = php ?
peacockalley = asp ?
ulta still alive but now at http://www.ulta.com/ulta/ (still OFBiz ?) seems
more jsp now. Should we comment out too ?
I have added Entente Oya as Products based on Apache OFBiz: and C-libre as
Thanks Jacques :-)
--
Ashish
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Jacques Le Roux
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote:
I have cleaned up things a bit :
Commented out
ameniti
partnerhomes = php ?
peacockalley = asp ?
ulta still alive but now at http://www.ulta.com/ulta/ (still OFBiz ?)
seems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-281.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Assignee: David E. Jones
As
Hi,
There is an error from the service createContact in SFA :
The Following Errors Occurred:
The following required parameter is missing: [OUT]
[createContact.contactMechId]
Could it be the same probleme that occured on the CreateLead service
(corrected in r766236)? Then there is only to
Thanks for reporting Gil. It should be fixed by r766637.
Vikas
On Apr 20, 2009, at 2:47 PM, gil portenseigne wrote:
Hi,
There is an error from the service createContact in SFA :
The Following Errors Occurred:
The following required parameter is missing: [OUT]
[createContact.contactMechId]
Hi David,
I have fixed the sfa profile issue in r766636 and reverted part of
your commit (since createLead was working with the existing
implementation and this was kind of not used and unreachable code) in
r766642.
Btw, I am not able to commit these changes to release09.04 branch,
Thanks a lot Jacques!
I'm sorry but I'm busy with other things and I have not the time to do it.
Marco
I commited a workaround at r766516. I think it's enough
Jacques
From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
No worries take your time, thanks Marco.
Actually I began but got an
hi,
I have found a more complicated problem, after creating a purchase order using
the demo catalog, i wanted to receive this order :
So in facility, Receive inventory :
- I gave my PO number, and chose to receive the entire PO.
- Then viewing my PO, i selected all the product I ordered, and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya reassigned OFBIZ-2100:
--
Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya
Survey Implementation for testing scenarios of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya updated OFBIZ-2100:
---
Description:
This has been a collaborative effort : Idea is given by Anil Patel and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12700773#action_12700773
]
Pranay Pandey commented on OFBIZ-2100:
--
Thanks Ashish for providing detailed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya reassigned OFBIZ-2100:
--
Assignee: (was: Ashish Vijaywargiya)
Keeping it unassigned.. so that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya updated OFBIZ-2100:
---
Attachment: WorkEffortSurvey.patch
In this patch we have covered points #1 #2.
There is another downside with this approach.
If you want to change the logo you have to make it exatly the same size as the original logo.
This should not be an issue in most case, but it's not very handy
Jacques
From: Tim Ruppert tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com
Thanks David.
Cheers,
Tim
--
I have opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2323
Jacques
From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
There is another downside with this approach.
If you want to change the logo you have to make it exatly the same size as the original logo.
This should not be an issue in
Allow to smoothly change the logo
-
Key: OFBIZ-2323
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2323
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Sub-task
Components: ALL COMPONENTS
Affects Versions: Release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12700786#action_12700786
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-2323:
--
I understand it would be nice to have
UEL exception while performing Quick Ship Entire Order
Key: OFBIZ-2324
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2324
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: order
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-2323.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
Yes, I agree an issue is really something too big for that. My intention
Hi Adrian,
could you please review the following change I did? Is it the correct
way to fix this issue? Do you think we should search for similar
patterns in the system and fix them?
Thanks,
Jacopo
Begin forwarded message:
From: jaco...@apache.org
Date: April 20, 2009 4:19:28 PM
Count me in please.
Mike
On Apr 18, 2009, at 8:43 AM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
Interested and have a couple of different directions. Will write
some things up.
- David E Jones wrote:
The ApacheCon USA 2009 conference committee has contacted the OFBiz
PMC (and other pmcs) about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato reassigned OFBIZ-2324:
Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato
UEL exception while performing Quick Ship Entire
Jacopo,
totalsMap.${receipt.orderItemSeqId}
should work on revision 764992 or later. If not, try
totalsMap[receipt.orderItemSeqId]
A good explanation can be found in section 1.5 and 1.6 of the UEL syntax
documentation.
-Adrian
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi Adrian,
could you please review
Hi Adrian,
On Apr 20, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Jacopo,
totalsMap.${receipt.orderItemSeqId}
should work on revision 764992 or later. If not, try
It is not working on trunk.
totalsMap[receipt.orderItemSeqId]
I will try the above solution and commit the change if it works.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12700815#action_12700815
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-2324:
Jacopo,
I'll look into this. I'd rather fix the
Thanks for the reminder Vikas. I have added permissions for those who
have access to the apps only for branches/release09.04.
-David
On Apr 20, 2009, at 4:48 AM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
Hi David,
I have fixed the sfa profile issue in r766636 and reverted part of
your commit (since
The safest syntax to use (but a bit cumbersome) is:
field=totalsMap[quot;receipt.orderItemSeqIdquot;]
If it works without the quot; then all the better though!
-David
On Apr 20, 2009, at 8:52 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Jacopo,
totalsMap.${receipt.orderItemSeqId}
should work on revision
Just a quick note on syntax: there is a difference between these two.
The first one totalsMap.${receipt.orderItemSeqId} is saying find an
entry in the totalsMap Map with the key consisting of the value of the
receipt.orderItemSeqId field.
The second one totalsMap.receipt.orderItemSeqId is
ok, thanks I will test both.
BTW it also worked in the way I have changed it in the commit (i.e. I
was able to receive items in inventory with no errors)... but I didn't
test it heavily, so I can't guarantee. :-)
Jacopo
On Apr 20, 2009, at 5:04 PM, David E Jones wrote:
The safest syntax
Jacopo,
You're right. It looks like I'll need to hack the JUEL parser to get
this to work. I was trying to avoid that, but I can't come up with any
other solution.
-Adrian
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi Adrian,
On Apr 20, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Jacopo,
ok, thanks for the extra explanation, now I see (please ignore my last
post) and I will fix it today.
Jacopo
On Apr 20, 2009, at 5:07 PM, David E Jones wrote:
Just a quick note on syntax: there is a difference between these two.
The first one totalsMap.${receipt.orderItemSeqId} is saying
I just sent an email that commented more, but in short it may have run
without errors, but I don't think it worked. :)
-David
On Apr 20, 2009, at 9:09 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
ok, thanks I will test both.
BTW it also worked in the way I have changed it in the commit (i.e.
I was
Thanks David,
I remember you already wrote that. Last time I searched I did not find the right
syntax (because of the quot; I guess)
Jacques
From: David E Jones david.jo...@hotwaxmedia.com
The safest syntax to use (but a bit cumbersome) is:
field=totalsMap[quot;receipt.orderItemSeqIdquot;]
Thanks David!
Vikas
On Apr 20, 2009, at 8:32 PM, David E Jones wrote:
Thanks for the reminder Vikas. I have added permissions for those
who have access to the apps only for branches/release09.04.
-David
On Apr 20, 2009, at 4:48 AM, Vikas Mayur wrote:
Hi David,
I have fixed the sfa
I'd rather get the UEL code to work with the existing syntax. If
everyone could be patient, I should have this fixed soon.
-Adrian
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Thanks David,
I remember you already wrote that. Last time I searched I did not find
the right syntax (because of the quot; I guess)
Fix them all in 1 shoot : +1
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com
I'd rather get the UEL code to work with the existing syntax. If everyone could
be patient, I should have this fixed soon.
-Adrian
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Thanks David,
I remember you already wrote that. Last time I
Done at 766736, I'll also backport such changes in future
Jacques
From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
Should we not allow to backport a change in a labels file since it can't hurt (except if the change is wrong but we can ignore
this case) but may be of a great value for users
I tried to removed the ${component-dir}/script directory from the classpath but
it does not work.
I tried with
event type=simple path=component://org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/PaymentMethodEvents.xml
invoke=updateCreditCard/
instead of
event type=simple
Thanks Tim,
For those interested http://log.ofbiz.org/ have a look a trunk error.log
For everybody, don't you think this log should be empty or near empty ? In 2
days we have already 2MB of log...
Jacques
From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
Thanks Tim,
Another request, could
Mmm, I had a closer look. Most of the errors so far seems to xome from bots, or unlikely mad users, trying creasy things. So It's no
as bad as I thought at 1st glance :D
Jacques
From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
Thanks Tim,
For those interested http://log.ofbiz.org/ have a
Hi,
I work to create a simple system in ofbiz to return on the previous
screen after creating or updating a record by a specific screen. all the
solutions I have tested are too complex and too difficulte to create. I
found the new request type save-* and this solution is really nice.
After
So Will this be actively maintained and become a release with version numbers?
From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 10:11:37 AM
Subject: Re: any plans for release soon?
From: Tim Ruppert
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12700894#action_12700894
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-2260:
I found this one in error.log on demo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12700897#action_12700897
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-2260:
Another one in error.log
2009-04-19
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Crum closed OFBIZ-2324.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in trunk, rev 766827.
UEL exception while performing Quick Ship Entire Order
Hi Nicolas,
The attributes are save-last-view, view-last and view-home. They are documented in site-conf.xsd. Did you try to use save-last-view
?
HTH (I did not look into all code details)
Jacques
From: Malin Nicolas malin.nico...@librenberry.net
Hi,
I work to create a simple system in
This should be fixed in the trunk, rev 766827.
-Adrian
Adrian Crum wrote:
I'd rather get the UEL code to work with the existing syntax. If
everyone could be patient, I should have this fixed soon.
-Adrian
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Thanks David,
I remember you already wrote that. Last time I
Just a final note on this...
The expression
totalsMap[receipt.orderItemSeqId]
is the preferred syntax because it is UEL compliant. The expression
totalsMap.${receipt.orderItemSeqId}
works the same, but it is technically a nested expression (which is not
UEL compliant) and it results in two
Done, I have added a link to the news found at
http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=104STORY=/www/story/04-20-2009/0005008924EDATE=
in the summary at https://www.ohloh.net/p/162/
I don't think we need to create a RSS feed for our news, and there are no other
means to add a
I suggest that where all we use a service oriented architecture we replace by a
service oriented and events driven architecture.
Also , but it's another topic, we may speak more about the RESTful possibilities of OFBiz (using using HTTP for sync services and
JMS for async services). It seems
Should we not rewrite it correctly and backport to 9.04 ?
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com
Just a final note on this...
The expression
totalsMap[receipt.orderItemSeqId]
is the preferred syntax because it is UEL compliant. The expression
totalsMap.${receipt.orderItemSeqId}
I'm thinking of it more as a Best Practice - try to use the preferred
syntax from now on. There's no need to make global changes to the
release unless something is broken.
-Adrian
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Should we not rewrite it correctly and backport to 9.04 ?
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum
Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Nicolas,
The attributes are save-last-view, view-last and view-home. They are
documented in site-conf.xsd. Did you try to use save-last-view ?
HTH (I did not look into all code details)
Jacques
Hi jacques,
My problem, I read only the source code and not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan Foster updated OFBIZ-2288:
---
Attachment: images.zip
index.patch
Here is the patch for the homepage of
Are you trying to use the classpath reference instead of the component
reference? If so, why?
To use a classpath reference make there is no component:// on the
front, ie:
path=org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/PaymentMethodEvents.xml
Still, using the component reference is generally better,
I think the answer Jacques is looking for is: Yes, you did something wrong.
The correct component:// URL is:
event type=simple
path=component://accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/PaymentMethodEvents.xml
invoke=updateCreditCard/
The correct classpath is:
event type=simple
+1
--
Ashish
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com wrote:
I think the answer Jacques is looking for is: Yes, you did something wrong.
The correct component:// URL is:
event type=simple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12701047#action_12701047
]
Ryan Foster commented on OFBIZ-2287:
This has now been fixed in rev7969 and rev7970 for
I'm not sure I followed all of that... are you worried about having a
form nested within another form?
Yes, the forms will have to be outside the main form, but the links to
those forms can be inside the main form.
-David
On Apr 20, 2009, at 2:25 AM, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
Hello
Thanks David for your reply.
I am not worried about the nesting of one form with another.
I am thinking about the case when a form created in FTL has Update
Delete link (As I have both the option in my custom form).
In your comment what do you mean by but chances are there are some
links in
63 matches
Mail list logo
