Mmm, I had a closer look. Most of the errors so far seems to xome from bots, or unlikely mad users, trying creasy things. So It's no
as bad as I thought at 1st glance :D
Jacques
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[email protected]>
Thanks Tim,
For those interested http://log.ofbiz.org/ have a look a trunk error.log
For everybody, don't you think this log should be empty or near empty ? In 2
days we have already 2MB of log...
Jacques
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[email protected]>
Thanks Tim,
Another request, could we have also the error.log file in the archive ? It's
much more easier to use before diving in details...
TIA
Jacques
From: "Tim Ruppert" <[email protected]>
http://log.ofbiz.org should have the previous days demo logs all zipped up in case there are multiple files. Please keep
checking it out as it's still in BETA :)
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
----- "Tim Ruppert" <[email protected]> wrote:
I've got everything in place to have log files available to the
community. Will be trying to release it officially tomorrow.
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Ashish,
>
> I'm more looking for errors generated after build, by users online.
> But yes, these ones colud be interesting too...
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <[email protected]>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Please take a look on the following link.
> > http://ant.apache.org/faq.html#mail-logger
> >
> > To me details can be of some help for us.
> >
> > --
> > Ashish Vijaywargiya
> >
> >
> > Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> >> I agree with Tim the full log seems more usefull.
> >> Tim suggested to use a log analysis tool. From Contegix
experience
>
> >> Apache Chainsaw does not seem to be a good candidate.
> >> There are also MindTree Insight
> >> http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=805978
> >> and Vigilog http://vigilog.sourceforge.net/ but I'm not sure we
> need a
> >> such tools for now...
> >>
> >> Jacques
> >>
> >> From: "Tim Ruppert" <[email protected]>
> >>> I actually like the idea of having the entire logs for the day
> >>> available the day after. We could easily do it just like we do
> >>> build.ofbiz.org for the daily builds - having something like
> >>> logs.ofbiz.org with a similar style and having them available
for
> >>> viewing. We could even have individual errors available via the
> >>> route that you were talking about David - by having OFBiz send
> >>> them to a place where we can pluck them off.
> >>>
> >>> Something like this could be really helpful. Anyways, let's
keep
>
> >>> chatting on it - but the full days logs being available the
next
> >>> day makes good sense to me.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Tim
> >>> --
> >>> Tim Ruppert
> >>> HotWax Media
> >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
> >>>
> >>> o:801.649.6594
> >>> f:801.649.6595
> >>>
> >>> ----- "Tim Ruppert" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Could we create another mailing list for these types of things
> that
> >>>> people - and hopefully all committers :) - would subscribe to?
> >>>> Something like [email protected]? I imagine that the
> errors
> >>>> will be less than helpful without the steps that caused it -
but
> it
> >>>> could be a start? I'm not opposed to just making the previous
> days
> >>>> log file available to people who want to scan it as well.
> >>>>
> >>>> I've also got a thread going with Contegix about this very
thing
> at
> >>>> the moment talking about other helpful ways of looking at logs
-
> will
> >>>> loop you in David.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Tim
> >>>> --
> >>>> Tim Ruppert
> >>>> HotWax Media
> >>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
> >>>>
> >>>> o:801.649.6594
> >>>> f:801.649.6595
> >>>>
> >>>> ----- "David E Jones" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> > The easiest thing to do is have Log4J send the emails with a
> little
> >>>>
> >>>> > setting in the log4j.xml file. We could do this for all
ERROR
> and
> >>>> > FATAL level messages.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Where to send them is another issue. I suppose if we really
> wanted
> >>>>
> >>>> > people to get on these then having them go to the dev list
> would do
> >>>>
> >>>> > the trick... but we may get a lot of email from this... even
> >>>> hundreds
> >>>> >
> >>>> > a day.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > -David
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Apr 5, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > This is a good idea. I don't know the technologies all
that
> well
> >>>>
> >>>> > > for scanning logs, but we can have this put in place and
> have
> >>>> > > automated messages sent each day. Does anyone know how
we'd
> go
> >>>> > > about doing this? If no one else has any great ideas on
the
> way,
> >>>>
> >>>> > > I'm sure that Jacques and I, along with Contegix, can try
and
> put
> >>>>
> >>>> > > something rudimentary in place.
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > Cheers,
> >>>> > > Tim
> >>>> > > --
> >>>> > > Tim Ruppert
> >>>> > > HotWax Media
> >>>> > > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > o:801.649.6594
> >>>> > > f:801.649.6595
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > ----- "Jacques Le Roux" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > >> It's not a deterministic way, but I think we should
exploit
> >>>> > error.log
> >>>> > >> on demo server to fix error instead waiting people to
> report
> >>>> them.
> >>>> > >>
> >>>> > >> Jacques
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
