[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14227484#comment-14227484
]
Divesh Dutta commented on OFBIZ-4540:
-
Verified this issue on latest OFBiz trunk.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14227486#comment-14227486
]
Harsh Vijaywargiya commented on OFBIZ-3497:
---
This issue seems to be resolved now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Harsh Vijaywargiya updated OFBIZ-3497:
--
Attachment: training.png
using date-time type=time shouldn't display a textbox for a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya reassigned OFBIZ-4540:
--
Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya
Item Issuance does not work with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya closed OFBIZ-4540.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
Based on Divesh's recent comment we can close this issue. Thanks
Hi Rishi Solanki
Yes, I'm using OFBIZ trunk. This is my product store xml
However, when I completed order form webpos component (status of order is
completed), the quantity of items which I had bought before is imported
into Ordered, instead of Ship request.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:34 PM,
Hi everybody
I have just a problem about returning product and refunding money to
customer in POS component of OFBiz.
I have created an order which contains the items with negative quantity.
Total due is also negative number. When I pressed pay and finish
buttons, I went into order component and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14227528#comment-14227528
]
Rishi Solanki commented on OFBIZ-5844:
--
[~toashishvijay] / [~arun.patidar]: Getting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rishi Solanki updated OFBIZ-5844:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-5844-bug.patch
PFA.
Convert java files to EntityQuery
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14227543#comment-14227543
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya commented on OFBIZ-5844:
Thanks Rishi, Your changes are
Hi Hoan dang van,
isImmediatelyFulfilled and reserveInvetory flags are mutually exclusive,
i.e if isImmediatelyFulfilled is set to Y then reserveInventory should
always set to N and vice versa. So for web stores/e-commerce stores
settings should be :
isImmediatelyFulfilled = N
reserveInventory
Thanks Divesh Dutta very much
I have just done follow you and system run as I like
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Divesh Dutta divesh.du...@hotwaxmedia.com
wrote:
Hi Hoan dang van,
isImmediatelyFulfilled and reserveInvetory flags are mutually exclusive,
i.e if isImmediatelyFulfilled is
Hi Jacopo,
I looked a bit back. Even if it's not clearly related I trace this back to the
slim-down effort. We can forget it since nobody never complained (pfew...).
Then you proposed to move some component from specialpurpose to extras.
As you said, not every people were happy with it (at
Even though it makes sense, we could maybe add a constraint for that in DB.
Unfortunately I don't think this possibility already exists in OFBiz and it
depends on DBMS
http://www.w3schools.com/sql/sql_check.asp
If you define a CHECK constraint on a table it can limit the values in certain
Le 27/11/2014 15:16, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
For CMSSITE I'm unsure, but it's interesting for the online help (too bad BJ is
no longer with us)
BTWcmssite/cms/APACHE_OFBIZ_HTML https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/cmssite/cms/APACHE_OFBIZ_HTML is no longer working (was still in August in
Is there anything of value here or should we just delete the space and
remove any references to it.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBENDUSER/OFBiz+End+User+Docs+Home
It appears that it has not be touched since 2006 (8 years ago) and it is
of no use at all to new end users in its
On Nov 27, 2014, at 3:16 PM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
I looked a bit back. Even if it's not clearly related I trace this back to
the slim-down effort. We can forget it since nobody never complained
(pfew...).
Then you proposed to move some
I would be willing to spin off Asset Maintenance to a separate project.
I was thinking it could be a good test-run of the concept.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 11/27/2014 2:16 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
I looked a bit back. Even if it's not clearly
Yes, that's another good solution (though less general, I always prefer to cut issues at their roots. But I must admit I have, at the moment, no time
to contribute a change at the Entity Engine level :/ )
I will create a Jira for both solutions (2 Jira issues I mean). Better to keep track of
+1 database technology changes but business level constraints are
permanent (most of the time) and are usually tied to the real world not
technology.
On 27/11/2014 10:10 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
hmmm... in a complex system like OFBiz there are so many configuration
constraints (even
This certainly needs to be revisited but I'd surely not drop it like that!
Jacques
Le 27/11/2014 16:04, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
Is there anything of value here or should we just delete the space and remove
any references to it.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14227760#comment-14227760
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-5840:
Fixed in rev 1642177. Thanks Ejaz!
Create
We could start by removing the links to it from the OFBiz website: if (ever)
the content will be validated we will re-add them.
Jacopo
On Nov 27, 2014, at 4:04 PM, Ron Wheeler rwhee...@artifact-software.com wrote:
Is there anything of value here or should we just delete the space and remove
You mean outside of OFBiz? As a sub-project like suggested Ron? Or in Github or
something like that?
Jacques
Le 27/11/2014 16:31, Adrian Crum a écrit :
I would be willing to spin off Asset Maintenance to a separate project. I was
thinking it could be a good test-run of the concept.
Adrian
Le 27/11/2014 16:30, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Nov 27, 2014, at 3:16 PM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
I looked a bit back. Even if it's not clearly related I trace this back to the
slim-down effort. We can forget it since nobody never complained
That sounds like a smart 1st move to me. People who tend to use search (I do)
would not be dispossessed
Jacques
Le 27/11/2014 16:52, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
We could start by removing the links to it from the OFBiz website: if (ever)
the content will be validated we will re-add them.
I think the term separate project is self-explanatory.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 11/27/2014 5:28 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
You mean outside of OFBiz? As a sub-project like suggested Ron? Or in
Github or something like that?
Jacques
Le 27/11/2014 16:31,
On Nov 27, 2014, at 6:25 PM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
wrote:
Do we want to keep all current components (some disabled) until we decide
those which should go to Attic? For instance we already kind of spoke about
appserver going to Attic.
This could be decided before for
On Nov 27, 2014, at 6:25 PM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
wrote:
Yes, so we need to define which are those components. So 3 points, which
should be discussed separately it seems, not sure of the order yet but
probably this one
1) Components to move to Attic. They will be
Le 27/11/2014 18:41, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Nov 27, 2014, at 6:25 PM, Jacques Le Rouxjacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
wrote:
Yes, so we need to define which are those components. So 3 points, which
should be discussed separately it seems, not sure of the order yet but probably
this
Just one thing is not clear to me: still based on OFBiz I guess?
Jacques
Le 27/11/2014 18:33, Adrian Crum a écrit :
I think the term separate project is self-explanatory.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 11/27/2014 5:28 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
You mean outside
Yes, of course.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 11/27/2014 5:54 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Just one thing is not clear to me: still based on OFBiz I guess?
Jacques
Le 27/11/2014 18:33, Adrian Crum a écrit :
I think the term separate project is self-explanatory.
Be aware that disabling a component does two things:
1. Speeds up unit tests because the disabled component is excluded from
them.
2. Increases the chance of regressions because the disabled component is
not being tested.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On
This is a good point. We could find a way to programmatically enable/disable
the components just for the test run:
./ant -Denable-all=true clean-all load-demo run-tests
but this is just an idea; we could figure out the best way to go.
Jacopo
On Nov 27, 2014, at 7:14 PM, Adrian Crum
Can we clean up that space by:
a) removing the stuff that is no good - does anyone feel comfortable in
making that determination.
b) organize the remaining content so that it is easy to navigate
c) fix the text so that it is clearer about what information can be
counted on by the new user
In an ideal world (according to me),
- we should follow the Apache models or precedents since they seem to
work for a large number of Apache projects.
- the individual projects would have their own committers who may or may
not commit to the core or framework. Perhaps someone can look into how
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gavin Mabie updated OFBIZ-5840:
---
Attachment: bootified_js_screentrans.patch
Hi
I've added/modified the bootified.js to handle screen
That sounds like a good enough solution to me
Jacques
Le 27/11/2014 19:41, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
This is a good point. We could find a way to programmatically enable/disable
the components just for the test run:
./ant -Denable-all=true clean-all load-demo run-tests
but this is just an
Sounds like a good idea.
What do you need from Sharan and I in terms of documentation support and
space in the wiki for project management, functional documentation and
marketing/promotional details.
Any suggestions about wiki structure for this as a separate sub-project?
Ron
On 27/11/2014
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14228088#comment-14228088
]
Swapnil Shah commented on OFBIZ-5706:
-
[~pfm.smits]
We can try leveraging upon
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14228122#comment-14228122
]
Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-5706:
-
I know. I have a solution available, but was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14228125#comment-14228125
]
Ejaz Ahmed commented on OFBIZ-5840:
---
I have tested lookup field and it is working now.
42 matches
Mail list logo