Hi all,
Currently there are several threads regarding the overhaul of the
framework, the mini-lang, and other structures. But how will all these
affect the performance?
I haven't seen anything on that subject.
Regards,
Pierre
Op 16 maart 2012 02:15 schreef David E Jones d...@me.com het
The mini-lang overhaul only effects the grammar, not the performance. No
one can comment on the framework performance until a decision is made
about the direction it will take.
-Adrian
On 3/16/2012 8:09 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Hi all,
Currently there are several threads regarding the
Thank you David,
please see inline:
On Mar 15, 2012, at 6:08 AM, David E Jones wrote:
I think the Moqui Framework is already to a point where migration of
OFBiz business-level artifacts could begin immediately.
Of course I would be happy to see (and help with) an effort to create a
On 3/15/2012 7:57 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Not only this; well, yes it is simply this at the technical level but
it is much much more in the end result and approach: in fact in my poc
I have laid out some simple but very effective best practices for
programming services and events: the
On Mar 15, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 3/15/2012 7:57 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Not only this; well, yes it is simply this at the technical level but it is
much much more in the end result and approach: in fact in my poc I have laid
out some simple but very effective best
On Mar 15, 2012, at 9:46 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Adrian, it was a joke not real criticism on you.
And to be very clear: I appreciate all the work you did to add support to
JSR-223
Jacopo
On 3/15/2012 9:20 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Mar 15, 2012, at 9:46 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Adrian, it was a joke not real criticism on you.
And to be very clear: I appreciate all the work you did to add support to
JSR-223
We're cool. ;-)
-Adrian
David,
a side note (but important): is Moqui using (or there are plans to use) jars or
external tools whose license would prevent us from bundling Moqui in an OFBiz
release under the ASL 2.0? This would be a show stopper...
Jacopo
On Mar 15, 2012, at 6:08 AM, David E Jones wrote:
This might
The only library that is not friendly right now is the Redstone XMLRPC
library, which is LGPL licensed. That could be replaced by the Apache
XML-RPC project. The only reasons I used Redstone are that it is much
smaller (library bloat is a real problem), and it is a bit easier to use.
There are a
NOTE: replying to this in multiple messages for better digestibility. :)
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Thank you David,
please see inline:
On Mar 15, 2012, at 6:08 AM, David E Jones wrote:
I think the Moqui Framework is already to a point where migration
of OFBiz business-level artifacts
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Doing a migration like this would bring up other issues...
including whether or not to clean up the data model and services
while at it, especially rewriting messier parts of OFBiz like the
ShoppingCart* objects and order processing stuff in general.
It will be
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
3. running in a single webapp: while this isn't necessary with
Moqui, the Moqui Screens are a combination of the controller.xml
entries for the particular screen and the OFBiz Screen Widget, and
are hierarchical instead of being flat like the request-map URIs in
I think the Moqui Framework is already to a point where migration of
OFBiz business-level artifacts could begin immediately.
Doing a migration like this would bring up other issues... including
whether or not to clean up the data model and services while at it,
especially rewriting messier parts
13 matches
Mail list logo
