On Jun 12, 2015, at 8:45 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
> I don't agree that moving in this direction will convince our potential
> adopters to chose OFBiz. Having all entities in one component doestn't give
> them more choice. Neither does having all eecas in one component.
>
> Today it is already po
I don't agree that moving in this direction will convince our potential
adopters to chose OFBiz. Having all entities in one component doestn't give
them more choice. Neither does having all eecas in one component.
Today it is already possible to have the entity definitions split up into
multiple f
Le 11/06/2015 21:10, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
I would suggest adding other levels to the structure so that specializations are easy to add without creating conflicts or constant flux as people
alter the accounting-entitymodel.xml to suit their needs and submit it as the "right" version".
applicat
Le 11/06/2015 16:18, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Jun 11, 2015, at 3:51 PM, Taher Alkhateeb wrote:
I would like to help and I think we need to think carefully of the layout /
structure though i.e. how to breakup the entities in files and/or directories.
I would suggest that, at least in th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14583027#comment-14583027
]
Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-6208:
-
Thanks for the reminder, Jacques. Yes, the stat
The grid widget is implemented. Please check the commit logs.
The column widget is not intended to implement a grid. It is intended to
be used for multi-column layout of screens (like newspaper columns).
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 6/11/2015 2:57 PM, Christian
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14583000#comment-14583000
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-6208:
Still a WIP or should we review and hopef
Hi All,
Just to warn you that if you use the OFBiz svn config file and have updated it
after http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1669342
Then you should update it again now, after
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1685036
Jacques
Wei Zhang created OFBIZ-6495:
Summary: The tag in view entity PartyExport
does not work
Key: OFBIZ-6495
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6495
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Adrian,
So grid widget isn't implemented yet?
Is there a JIRA for it?
Would my proposal for conflict with it's
implementation?
If not, would be worthy of a JIRA?
On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 14:18 -0700, Adrian Crum wrote:
> The column widget is intended to be used for multi-column layout. It
The column widget is intended to be used for multi-column layout. It is
not a replacement for a grid widget.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 6/11/2015 1:21 PM, Christian Carlow wrote:
and screen widgets seem to have been
implemented based on the discussion and JI
and screen widgets seem to have been
implemented based on the discussion and JIRAs, but creating a single
table to contain a list doesn't seem supported for screens yet. The
following creates multiple tables for each :
Should something like
I would suggest adding other levels to the structure so that
specializations are easy to add without creating conflicts or constant
flux as people alter the accounting-entitymodel.xml to suit their needs
and submit it as the "right" version".
applications/datamodel/entitidef/accounting-entity
On Jun 11, 2015, at 3:51 PM, Taher Alkhateeb wrote:
> I would like to help and I think we need to think carefully of the layout /
> structure though i.e. how to breakup the entities in files and/or directories.
I would suggest that, at least in the first step, we do it in a simple way like
the
Hi Sharan,
+1
I would like to help and I think we need to think carefully of the layout /
structure though i.e. how to breakup the entities in files and/or directories.
I think too much structure is painful to maintain and too little is
overwhelming to navigate through. Perhaps we can categor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14581900#comment-14581900
]
Christian Carlow commented on OFBIZ-3575:
-
Thanks for the review and fix Neeraj.
+1
Would like to see the definitions organized in a way that makes it easy
to see what entities are mandatory "as is" as opposed to customizable.
Might also want to consider having multiple variations of the entities
to support different industries, different management focuses or languages.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14581669#comment-14581669
]
Neeraj Kumawat commented on OFBIZ-3575:
---
I tried this patch set with ofbiz 12.04 re
Hi All
I'd like to get some feedback on the a proposal Jacopo made a while ago to
find out if we have enough consenus to include it in our upcoming Community
Day.
*/Some time ago I proposed to move all entity definitions from the
applications components into a separate one; this component could a
19 matches
Mail list logo
