This isn't a bug fix - it is an enhancement.
-Adrian
On 9/14/2011 11:38 AM, sascharodek...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sascharodekamp
Date: Wed Sep 14 10:38:50 2011
New Revision: 1170521
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1170521view=rev
Log:
Building a String using concatenation in a loop
Just curious - how is a SalesOpportunity different from a Request (or
CustRequest in OFBiz)? What does SalesOpportunity model?
-Adrian
On 9/15/2011 7:19 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
Not necessarily every communication event, but if it requires action then a
WorkEffort seems like the logic choice to
Ruth,
A simple search and replace will make your modifications compatible with
the newer version.
The change was the result of a months-long discussion on the dev mailing
list (August 2009 to October 2009). If you want more detail, you can
look it up.
-Adrian
On 9/16/2011 10:21 PM, Ruth
...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Adrian Crum
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote:
Thanks Scott - those are my feelings exactly.
I like the way the design worked previously, and changing it because a user
might accidentally leave the comments enabled in production seems silly
I still don't know what that means. Could you be more specific please?
-Adrian
On 9/19/2011 1:59 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
That is fine with me as long as by default there is no active override
in any web.xml
Regards,
Hans
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 01:52 +0100, Adrian Crum wrote:
Let's see if we
Why? As far as I know, that is not a problem - but I don't understand
why it should be prohibited.
-Adrian
On 9/19/2011 2:14 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
that in the trunk there is no override of widget.verbose in any web.xml.
Hans
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 02:01 +0100, Adrian Crum wrote:
I still
, Adrian Crum
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote:
Thanks Scott - those are my feelings exactly.
I like the way the design worked previously, and changing it because a user
might accidentally leave the comments enabled in production seems silly.
That is a user's QC problem, not a widget comment
Hi All.
I apologize for all the noise from Jira - I am finished with the high
level REST servlet design and I wanted to clean up the issue so it would
be easier to read.
I know everyone is busy, but if you could spare a few minutes to take a
look at the proposed REST servlet design I would
at the
moment. Did yo consider my proposition Adrian, Hans? I think it's a
good compromise...
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com
Hi All.
I apologize for all the noise from Jira - I am finished with the high
level REST servlet design and I wanted to clean up the issue so
how it is implemented now is fine. I hope i commented now
enough?
Regards,
Hans
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 10:03 +0100, Adrian Crum wrote:
Hans,
Jacques gave some examples of where an override is currently used and
why it is needed. Could you give us another reason besides i think an
override
what is generating that, then turn them all on.
Like Hans said, I really don't want to have to go through code to find
where it is turned off or on.
Adrian Crum sent the following on 9/19/2011 8:56 AM:
BJ,
The original message of this thread points out why that approach does
not work. If comments
to go through code to find
where it is turned off or on.
Adrian Crum sent the following on 9/19/2011 8:56 AM:
BJ,
The original message of this thread points out why that approach does
not work. If comments are defaulted to on, then there MUST be a way to
turn them off for things like CSV output
thought I'd suggest a possible
solution to that problem. Maybe I'm wrong.
Cheers,
Anne.
On 20 September 2011 10:06, Adrian Crum
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote:
Anne,
Logging the settings is not necessary because the design is not that
complicated. A setting in the widget.properties file
.
4. If there are no further objections, then we can proceed with
implementing the design.
-Adrian
On 9/19/2011 10:23 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Hans,
We can document the behavior in the properties file, and we have this
discussion on record to describe the behavior and the reason why it
was done
wrote?
as long as the properties setting in the trunk will show or hide all
widget comments (so in the trunk NO override) then it is fine.
Regards,
Hans
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 02:10 +0100, Adrian Crum wrote:
Thank you everyone for your patience and comments during this
discussion. I believe we
)
what i wrote?
as long as the properties setting in the trunk will show or hide all
widget comments (so in the trunk NO override) then it is fine.
Regards,
Hans
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 02:10 +0100, Adrian Crum wrote:
Thank you everyone for your patience and comments during this
discussion. I
That was one of the original reasons behind the User Preferences design
- to give users the ability to control screen output.
Maybe have a form widget attribute or element that specifies a
preference group that should be used to control display.
-Adrian
On 9/20/2011 9:37 AM, Hans Bakker
A fixed asset is an instance of a product, much like an inventory item
is an instance of a product. So, no - you do not want to connect a fixed
asset to a product category.
Product: Die Hard DVD
Product Categories: DVD, Action, Drama, Bruce Willis
Fixed Assets: 10010, 10011, 1012
-Adrian
On
, 2011-09-23 at 06:32 +0100, Adrian Crum wrote:
A fixed asset is an instance of a product, much like an inventory item
is an instance of a product. So, no - you do not want to connect a fixed
asset to a product category.
Product: Die Hard DVD
Product Categories: DVD, Action, Drama, Bruce Willis
Fixed
showing in a different category..
Adrian, before you answer can you please think about it a bit?
Regards,
Hans
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 06:42 +0100, Adrian Crum wrote:
Use FixedAssetProduct.
-Adrian
On 9/23/2011 6:37 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
but if you want a particular instance of a product?
I
at 06:47 +0100, Adrian Crum wrote:
Hans,
The data model supports what you are trying to do if YOU think about it.
There is no need to connect a fixed asset to a product category.
-Adrian
On 9/23/2011 6:44 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
sure can do that, but i want a specific instance showing in one
Price: $1.00 per day
Product Category: DVD
Price: $1.50 per day
Product Category: New Releases
Price: $0.50 per day
-Adrian
On 9/23/2011 7:16 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 06:56 +0100, Adrian Crum wrote:
If they are the same product, then they are in the same product categories
to
contribute to this discussion.
Regards
Scott
On 19/09/2011, at 10:24 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Hi All.
I apologize for all the noise from Jira - I am finished with the high level
REST servlet design and I wanted to clean up the issue so it would be easier to
read.
I know everyone is busy
I would prefer #2.
The distinction between users and parties is already blurred enough, and
relating User Preferences to a party will just make that worse.
-Adrian
On 9/29/2011 11:11 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Thanks BJ for the comment.
In order to keep the framework (login preference) and
From my perspective, loyalty points are no different than any other
discount - so we could use the existing discount-related accounting.
-Adrian
On 10/12/2011 1:16 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
We would like to implement loyalty points. There is a box on the party
profile, but no database field,
in the ledger
Regards,
Hans
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 13:39 +0100, Adrian Crum wrote:
From my perspective, loyalty points are no different than any other
discount - so we could use the existing discount-related accounting.
-Adrian
On 10/12/2011 1:16 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
We would like to implement
Could you describe what the bug is and how I can reproduce it?
-Adrian
On 10/23/2011 1:11 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Adrian,
While working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4498 I
found a bug related to r1142458 (only shown in log). If you revert the
commit it dissapears.
, but this was not thrown
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com
Could you describe what the bug is and how I can reproduce it?
-Adrian
On 10/23/2011 1:11 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Adrian,
While working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4498 I
found a bug related
Yes, I get the same error with or without the changes. This commit has
nothing to do with the error.
-Adrian
On 10/23/2011 8:47 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Did you get the error? Did you try to revert to see if you still see it?
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com
I
Please ask this type of question on the user mailing list.
-Adrian
On 11/1/2011 9:49 AM, viswanath wrote:
Dear All,
Can any one help me with integrating jasper with ofbiz by step
by step process, so that i can run the jasper reports in order manager
Regards,
Viswanath
--
The renderDateTimeField macro in htmlFormMacroLibrary.ftl ignores the
framework date-time format settings and formats date-time fields using
jQuery instead. Two problems with that:
1. Even when shortDateInput = true, the date and time are displayed when
the value is a Timestamp.
2. If the
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3830
Maybe it's related to this comment I made a this moment, also a bet...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3830?focusedCommentId=12882890page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-12882890JacquesFrom:
Adrian Crum adrian.c
I located the problem and committed some notes in rev 1197028. I don't
have time right now to fix it.
The problem isn't caused by JavaScript, it's caused by the renderer. We
still need to fix the JavaScript code though.
-Adrian
On 11/1/2011 10:19 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
The way the OFBiz
take
the credit. Try to be in the first group because there is less competition
there.
Never give up on what you really want to do. The person with big dreams
is more powerful than one with all the facts.
From: Adrian Crum (Commented) (JIRA)j...@apache.org
To: ki...@objectedge.com
Date
If the field element is changing the type, then wouldn't it be better
to fix the element?
-Adrian
On 11/7/2011 6:12 AM, hans...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hansbak
Date: Mon Nov 7 06:12:38 2011
New Revision: 1198629
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1198629view=rev
Log:
repeat type of
that the framework specialists, like you would pick this up? We
merely focus on the applications as you may know?
Regards, Hans
On 11/07/2011 03:58 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
If the field element is changing the type, then wouldn't it be
better to fix the element?
-Adrian
On 11/7/2011 6:12 AM, hans
If the same rules apply to all orders, then it seems to me you would
want a separate entity to hold the group order properties:
groupOrderId*
productId
productPriceTypeId
fromDate
thruDate
orderQty
-Adrian
On 11/12/2011 3:16 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Some extra requirements:
1. It seems a start
Actually, there are more errors/warnings in the trunk too - most having
to do with bad entity definitions.
I'm cross posting this to the dev list so we can look into it.
-Adrian
On 11/17/2011 11:53 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Also we have an issue with this, reminder: no time to create a Jira
http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/javadocs/
Please put your comments in the Jira issue instead of replying through
nabble.
-Adrian
On 11/22/2011 5:41 PM, Wai wrote:
I'm not familiar with UEL. I'm going to learn about this feature.
Meanwhile, the purpose of the implementingjava...
Sorry, wrong URL.
http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/javadocs/org/ofbiz/base/util/string/UelFunctions.html
-Adrian
On 11/22/2011 6:04 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/javadocs/
Please put your comments in the Jira issue instead of replying through
nabble
I am running into that familiar problem of handling authorization in
nested services. Example:
Application A
Invoke Service A
Authorized with permissions A
Invokes Service C in Application C
Authorized with permissions C
In order for a user to run Service A, I have to give them
and permissions at run-time, as opposed to
doing it somehow based on inheritance based on location, or even worse
explicit permission checking in services and screens.
BTW, this is already implemented in Moqui.
-David
Adrian Crum wrote:
I am running into that familiar problem of handling
.
On many case, your solution works fine, but for some service, I will
keep the possibility to force permission analyze. Exclude this last
point, I agree with you.
Nicolas
Le 23/11/2011 09:14, Adrian Crum a écrit :
I am running into that familiar problem of handling authorization in
nested
As I mentioned in my original post, this scenario already exists by
passing the system or admin userLogin to the called service. So,
that potential already exists and is being exploited.
-Adrian
On 11/23/2011 9:46 PM, Nicolas Malin wrote:
Le 23/11/2011 22:19, Adrian Crum a écrit :
Why would
I agree that there are many improvements that can be made to the screen
widgets. If you would like to submit patches against the branch, then
you are welcome to do so.
-Adrian
On 11/23/2011 9:39 PM, Nicolas Malin wrote:
Oops scuse me bad english review :/
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for your screen
:
Le 23/11/2011 22:50, Adrian Crum a écrit :
As I mentioned in my original post, this scenario already exists by
passing the system or admin userLogin to the called service. So,
that potential already exists and is being exploited.
completely agree, and it's not always a good thing.
I especially
Hans,
The NPE is by design. Calling code should validate parameters before
calling the utility method.
Providing undocumented default values will also cause strange behavior.
-Adrian
On 11/24/2011 2:54 AM, hans...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hansbak
Date: Thu Nov 24 02:54:14 2011
New
Hans,
I know this suggestion is a little late, but I will make it anyway.
The way I handle this type of scenario is to create Work Efforts. Next
Stepshould be a TASK WorkEffort with a child EVENT WorkEffort (the date
of the next step). That way the task and event can be assigned to users
so
performance improvement.
+ 1
Bilgin
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Adrian Crum
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote:
I am running into that familiar problem of handling authorization in
nested
services. Example:
Application A
Invoke Service A
Authorized with permissions A
Invokes Service C
Some of those are bug fixes that should be applied to the trunk.
I would prefer to limit the branch's scope initially, so we can be
reasonably sure that progress will be made.
-Adrian
On 11/29/2011 8:20 PM, Nicolas Malin wrote:
Hi adrian,
are listed below, jira issue that will be apply on
In the good old days, the Example application was used to demonstrate
OFBiz development best practices. Today, it is an example of all of the
wrong ways to do things.
Go to https://localhost:8443/example/control/main
Click the New Example button. In the popup window, click Create. You are
Please revert this. It does not compile on Sun/Oracle JDK.
-Adrian
On 12/6/2011 7:51 PM, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jaz
Date: Tue Dec 6 19:51:28 2011
New Revision: 1211073
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1211073view=rev
Log:
few minor changes to fix compiling with openjdk icetea6
I agree with Jacopo. If this test did not work for a long time then
buildbot would let us know.
-Adrian
On 12/13/2011 3:52 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hans,
could you please be more specific on the errors/failures you are getting?
It seems I was able to run successfully all the tests.
I agree with Scott. A number of us have tried running the tests with no
problem, so it must be a local issue. Let's get them enabled again.
-Adrian
On 12/15/2011 10:56 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
My vote would be to re-enable them regardless, the whole point of the tests is
to ensure stability and
Jacopo,
Setting the language on the command line should not have any effect
because OFBiz sets the language when it starts up. See the
ofbiz.locale.default setting in start.properties.
I can duplicate the test failures by changing that setting to some other
locale. That is why I thought it
Huh? Start.java is not executed when run-tests is called??!!
-Adrian
On 12/16/2011 11:15 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Adrian,
I doubt that that code is executed when run-tests is called.
Jacopo
On Dec 16, 2011, at 11:14 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Jacopo,
Setting the language on the command
stuff I reported
HTH
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com
Huh? Start.java is not executed when run-tests is called??!!
-Adrian
On 12/16/2011 11:15 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Adrian,
I doubt that that code is executed when run-tests is called.
Jacopo
On Dec 16, 2011
Cappellato wrote:
No, I meant to say that I am pretty sure that the code that sets the locale is
not executed when the tests are run... I am investigating into this now
Jacopo
On Dec 16, 2011, at 12:39 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Huh? Start.java is not executed when run-tests is called??!!
-Adrian
On 12
you suggested.
I doubt it will fix the issue Jacques reported... but that may be unrelated to
locale Jacques, is there any chance that you have some local modifications?
Jacopo
On Dec 16, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
There is no need to investigate - I wrote that code and I can assure
This commit is throwing a lot of exceptions during data loading. See the
buildbot report.
-Adrian
On 12/19/2011 6:40 AM, hans...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hansbak
Date: Mon Dec 19 06:40:18 2011
New Revision: 1220622
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1220622view=rev
Log:
new producttype:
description=Image/
I have fixed it.
Even without reviewing this big commit, this kind of errors (that imply that
very few tests were done) makes me feel nervous about the quality of the code
committed.
Jacopo
On Dec 19, 2011, at 9:24 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
This commit is throwing a lot of exceptions
I don't like this commit - it looks like an ugly hack to me. What is the
end result supposed to be? Or what is this supposed to do?
-Adrian
On 12/22/2011 2:14 PM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Thu Dec 22 14:14:57 2011
New Revision: 141
URL:
address the
problem of null values, then ?
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com
I don't like this commit - it looks like an ugly hack to me. What is
the end result supposed to be? Or what is this supposed to do?
-Adrian
On 12/22/2011 2:14 PM, jler...@apache.org wrote
surprises with this work? How would you address the
problem of null values, then ?
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com
I don't like this commit - it looks like an ugly hack to me. What
is the end result supposed to be? Or what is this supposed to do?
-Adrian
On 12
Is this a bug fix?
-Adrian
On 12/29/2011 8:30 PM, m...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mor
Date: Thu Dec 29 20:30:56 2011
New Revision: 1225641
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1225641view=rev
Log:
Merged from trunk r1225639 r1225640. Log: Added support to associate ship
groups of sales and
The ability to use expressions in seed/demo data would be a nice feature.
-Adrian
On 1/1/2012 7:59 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi Jacques,
the failure could be related to the year switch... this happens every year and
it needs some updates to demo fiscal periods to fix; or you could try
Jacques,
Look at the commit log from a year ago. Jacopo fixed this problem last
year, so the commit log should tell you what needs to be changed.
-Adrian
On 1/1/2012 10:30 PM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Sun Jan 1 22:30:18 2012
New Revision: 1226309
URL:
On 3/20/2011 3:33 AM, David E Jones wrote:
I'm writing this to start a thread to discuss:
If you could change ANYTHING in the OFBiz data model, what would it be?
To kick this off here are some ideas I've compiled that have come up over the
years (many based on feedback from people on this
This question should be asked on the user mailing list.
The best approach is to do a find on the primary key, and if a value is
found, return a user-friendly error message.
-Adrian
On 1/4/2012 11:04 AM, Ritesh K Kaushik wrote:
If we enter a duplicate Primary key in Ofbiz then it gives a
As has been mentioned many times on this list, the EOL concept does not
fit well in an open source community. As long as users are using 4.0 and
are willing to provide patches, etc, then there is no need to remove it.
In other words, older releases are perfectly capable of dying a natural
On 1/6/2012 1:04 PM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
2012/1/6 Adrian Crumadrian.c...@sandglass-software.com:
As has been mentioned many times on this list, the EOL concept does not fit
well in an open source community. As long as users are using 4.0 and are
willing to provide patches, etc, then there
, but are offering help to commit *well done* contributions?
My basic idea (not sure for Erwan) is to prevent users to expect us to
work on their issues if they don't help us...
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com
On 1/6/2012 1:04 PM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
2012/1/6 Adrian
I'm familiar with RAT - I use it for the Commons Convert project.
-Adrian
On 1/12/2012 9:48 PM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
Le 12/01/2012 22:41, Adrian Crum a écrit :
Erwan,
Thank you for taking care of that.
-Adrian
You're welcome ! But I'm not alone, RAT
(http://incubator.apache.org/rat
I tried to find out why a data import for a bespoke (made-to-order)
manufacturer was taking WAY too long. Turns out it was keyword indexing
EECAs.
Each product has dozens of product features, and it also has a
manufacturer ID. The indexProductKeywords is called for the product,
each product
this is something we should fix).
Kind regards,
Jacopo
On Jan 14, 2012, at 1:59 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I tried to find out why a data import for a bespoke (made-to-order)
manufacturer was taking WAY too long. Turns out it was keyword indexing EECAs.
Each product has dozens of product features, and it also
On 1/17/2012 1:12 PM, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk while building
ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2536
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build:
I would like to implement two new screen widgets: column-container and
column. The goal is to simplify multi-column layout. The
column-container widget can have only column child elements and the
column widget can have any screen widget child widgets. A width
attribute can specify the width of
Hans,
Why would you do this? This commit makes the commonext component
dependent on two special purpose components. Please keep
application-specific code inside the application.
-Adrian
On 12/13/2011 4:23 AM, hans...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hansbak
Date: Tue Dec 13 04:23:50 2011
New
are generated by the related
components. So if the scrum coponent is not used, it will not generate
any scrum specifc messages so the link back into the scrum component
will not happen.
The same with the other components
Regards,
Hans
On 01/23/2012 01:50 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Hans,
Why would
On 1/24/2012 2:11 PM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
2012/1/19 Adrian Crumadrian.c...@sandglass-software.com:
I would like to implement two new screen widgets:column-container and
column. The goal is to simplify multi-column layout. The
column-container widget can have onlycolumn child elements
I have been thinking about Properties handling too, not from a
multi-tenant perspective, but from a convenience perspective.
It seems to me the way we handle properties right now could be
simplified. Instead of calling a static utility method to get a property
or using a special mini-language
The use cases I can think of:
1. Implement a sandbox instance for users to learn on (with demo
data), and also have a live instance (with live data). OFBiz users can
learn in the sandbox without affecting live data, and then switch to the
live instance.
2. Offer a customized version of OFBiz
reason for this would be to have a single file you could use for
deployment (dev.xml, staging.xml, production.xml, etc) - drop this in your
hot-deploy component and have it override the values in framework /
applications.
-Joe
On Jan 27, 2012, at 3:49 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I have been
This commit is throwing a lot of exceptions during startup.
-Adrian
On 1/22/2012 6:05 PM, er...@apache.org wrote:
Author: erwan
Date: Sun Jan 22 18:05:28 2012
New Revision: 1234563
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1234563view=rev
Log:
Upgrading tomcat to version 7.0.25 - changelog @
Hans,
This looks pretty good, but I have a few questions.
Do we really need EntityUtilProperties.java? It seems to me you could
just add the three new methods to EntityUtil.java.
In the getSystemPropertyValue method, why are you using findByAnd when
the SystemProperty entity has a primary
Including a systemResource field makes sense.
-Adrian
On 2/1/2012 10:14 AM, Chatree Srichart wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Adrian Crum
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote:
Hans,
This looks pretty good, but I have a few questions.
Do we really need EntityUtilProperties.java
.
-Adrian
On 2/1/2012 12:33 PM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
Le 31/01/2012 15:47, Adrian Crum a écrit :
This commit is throwing a lot of exceptions during startup.
-Adrian
Adrian,
could you point the exceptions ? I tried to find them, but, at my
level, I have no more exceptions than with tomcat 7.0.23
It would be nice if we could come up with a way to use JSR 223 in screen
widgets and mini-language.
-Adrian
On 2/9/2012 6:31 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
After almost 4 years, I can see no problems with that
Jacques
From: Erwan de FERRIERES erwan.deferrie...@gmail.com
Hi all,
in may 2008, we
[0.0.0.0]].addChild(StandardEngine[default-server].StandardHost[0.0.0.0].StandardContext[/images])
2012-02-12 22:00:45,330 (catalina-startup-1) [
GenericDispatcher.java:69 :INFO ] Creating new dispatcher [example]
(catalina-startup-1)
-Adrian
On 2/1/2012 12:47 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
That is odd. I
Based on that bug report, we can fix the errors ourselves by specifying
the correct DTD in the web.xml file.
-Adrian
On 2/13/2012 6:49 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
Le 12/02/2012 23:08, Adrian Crum a écrit :
javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: Resource /WEB-INF/classes not found
Hi Adrian
Why not use the one in Java 6 - Rhino?
-Adrian
On 2/14/2012 5:47 PM, Al Byers wrote:
Anyone working on using OFBiz with SSJS? I would like to compare
notes. I am interested in pursuing the Dojo/Persevere/RingoJS path.
-Al Byers
I am sure most, if not all, contact mech services can be migrated to
entity-auto services or mini-language.
-Adrian
On 2/16/2012 3:36 AM, ki...@objectedge.com wrote:
Hello Friends,
Seems like ContactMechServices.xml and ContactMechServices.java have many
common methods: create/update
Brett,
This opens up the possibility to solve another problem - supporting
alternate authentication systems (like LDAP, etc).
Right now the userLogin entity includes OFBiz credentials (login name,
password), LDAP credentials (DN), and some other credentials that Andrew
added. From my
and feedback early so we
can avoid large changes after the POC is complete.
Let me know the best way to proceed with this effort.
Thanks,
Brett
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Adrian Crum
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote:
Brett,
This opens up the possibility to solve another
on.
Kind regards,
Jacopo
On Feb 20, 2012, at 8:38 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
As far as I know, there are two LDAP authentication implementations - one that
I worked on a while back that can be found in the framework, and a CAS-LDAP one
that can be found in specialpurpose. There is also a SSO
Sounds great! I like the idea of separating release date roadmap from
release feature roadmap.
-Adrian
On 2/21/2012 9:18 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to share some ideas I have to make our release plan more clearer,
public and well defined.
This plan doesn't require
Thank you Hans.
-Adrian
On 2/22/2012 8:37 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
It took some time agrian, we we just implemented your comment in
revision 1292180.
On 01/23/2012 01:50 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Hans,
Why would you do this? This commit makes the commonext component
dependent on two special
We discussed this a while ago and came to an agreement on how to
implement it, but it was never implemented.
-Adrian
On 2/22/2012 10:19 AM, Nicolas Malin wrote:
Hello
on widget form at this time the actions on parents form has been not
execute if child form contains also an actions
Example
Jacopo,
Thank you very much for taking care of this.
-Adrian
On 2/24/2012 3:56 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Today I have created the ticket for Infra to migrate the publishing mechanism
for the OFBiz site and dist/ folder (releases) to svnpubsub:
This is a good summary of the discussions.
I'm not clear on what officialize means. I would prefer to have this
release roadmap considered as a general outline, and not something cast
in stone. My concern is that it will be taken too literally and future
efforts to vary the release schedule
1 - 100 of 5643 matches
Mail list logo
