As you can see in
http://sourceforge.net/projects/libwpd/files/libwpd/libwpd-0.9.7/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/libwps/files/libwps/libwps-0.2.8/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/libwpg/files/libwpg/libwpg-0.2.2/
the three libraries that OpenOffice was using to import WordPerfect, MS
Works
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.orgwrote:
As you can see in
http://sourceforge.net/**projects/libwpd/files/libwpd/**libwpd-0.9.7/http://sourceforge.net/projects/libwpd/files/libwpd/libwpd-0.9.7/
Rob Weir wrote:
In any case, will you next deal with our OpenGrok and Test link instances,
which are at Adfinis domains
Why not? It would make sense to recognize them as important community
services and point opengrok.openoffice.org and testlink.openoffice.org
to them.
and of course our
On Apr 21, 2013 2:15 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
wrote:
As you can see in
http://sourceforge.net/**projects/libwpd/files/libwpd/**libwpd-0.9.7/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/libwpd/files/libwpd/libwpd-0.9.7/
Hello
I just reported this bug. Who will be assigned to this? I won't be able
to solve this by myself, but I want to help. And since we need this as
patch for 3.4.1 it's probably a good idea to discuss how the issue can
be solved. OR there might be a workaround, which would be sufficent.
On Apr 21, 2013 3:26 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
In any case, will you next deal with our OpenGrok and Test link
instances,
which are at Adfinis domains
Why not? It would make sense to recognize them as important community
services and point
Licensing issues have not been entirely removed,
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b.
Code with Category B MPL license is accepted in ASF projects under very
specific restrictions. Having to build the code from source, especially with
modifications, is problematic.
- Dennis
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.orgwrote:
Licensing issues have not been entirely removed,
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b.
Code with Category B MPL license is accepted in ASF projects under very
specific restrictions. Having to build
On 16/04/2013 Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshotfullsets
Linux builds are there too. The ARC column contains archived
installations, no need to install RPMs/DEBs, simply untar the
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 05:20:38PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 16/04/2013 Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshotfullsets
Linux builds are there too. The ARC column contains archived
@Rob,
Thanks.
That is a great summary of what is involved.
I am curious, in the case of libwpd, how binaries would be obtained and what
the inclusion mechanism would be. E.g., would there be shared libraries/DLLs
built from unmodified external sources as part of the AOO build?
I assume
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.orgwrote:
@Rob,
Thanks.
That is a great summary of what is involved.
I am curious, in the case of libwpd, how binaries would be obtained and
what the inclusion mechanism would be. E.g., would there be shared
@Rob,
I'm sorry. I understood about there not being any presence in our source
releases in any form whatever.
I was looking only at stage (4, your number) and how inclusion in binary
distributions occurs as a consequence of the build process. I am clear about
the ASF Legal FAQ. I was
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Can I assume that essentially the same procedure applies to both hunspell and
libwpd?
This is not the case currently (we don't carry libwpd in binary releases
since it was LGPL-only when OpenOffice 3.4.0 was released), but I expect
this to be the case if libwpd is
On 21 April 2013 22:49, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Can I assume that essentially the same procedure applies to both hunspell
and libwpd?
This is not the case currently (we don't carry libwpd in binary releases
since it was LGPL-only when
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:49:49PM +0200, janI wrote:
I am trying to understand the discussion here, and I miss something.
If we do not have libwpd in our 3.4.0 release I assume we have
something else to replace it (or have we removed the feature that uses
libwpd?).
answer in
On 21 April 2013 23:55, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:49:49PM +0200, janI wrote:
I am trying to understand the discussion here, and I miss something.
If we do not have libwpd in our 3.4.0 release I assume we have
something else to replace it
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.orgwrote:
@Rob,
I'm sorry. I understood about there not being any presence in our source
releases in any form whatever.
I was looking only at stage (4, your number) and how inclusion in binary
distributions occurs as a
Hi Jani,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:06:18AM +0200, janI wrote:
I am trying to understand the discussion here, and I miss
something.
If we do not have libwpd in our 3.4.0 release I assume we have
something else to replace it (or have we removed the feature that
uses libwpd?).
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 07:12:18PM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi Jani,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:06:18AM +0200, janI wrote:
I am trying to understand the discussion here, and I miss
something.
If we do not have libwpd in our 3.4.0 release I assume we have
Currently, there is an accessibility issue for table header. If end users
create Writer table and check the table header in the table dialog, the
table header will have Table Header style and can be exported to pdf/doc
completely,and Adobe Professional can recognize the table header
Hi, all
By now, we have completed 71.65% sidebar test. 12 volunteers took part in
sidebar test.
31 sidebar defects are opened to track sidebar issue. We're expected to
complete sidebar test this Wednesday.
More information of sidebar test is
Hi,
I thought I tested very careful but it seems that I did not :-(
I tested mainly the archives on windows because it's easier and faster
and they worked well. I had tested the setup before and at this time it
worked. Currently some former URE directories are not correct and the
setup won't
On 4/22/13 12:24 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 07:12:18PM -0300, Ariel Constenla-Haile
wrote:
Hi Jani,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:06:18AM +0200, janI wrote:
I am trying to understand the discussion here, and I miss
something.
If we do not have libwpd in our
24 matches
Mail list logo
