Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
I see there was a historical attempt to upgrade the build environment
to gbuild which migrated some modules
(https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Build_Environment_Effort), and a
more recent attempt, Capstone 2013, to get AOO to build in Visual
Studio.
Yes and we have
Hello Kay;
The story behind the patch is that I was going to bring libressl but I
noticed just updating OpenSSL was much simpler.
I started a build with the patch but then I realized the patch is of no
use in FreeBSD: FreeBSD (and likely all unixes) carries a newer
version of openssl in the base
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 2:09 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Hi
>
> I see there was a historical attempt to upgrade the build environment
> to gbuild which migrated some modules
> (https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Build_Environment_Effort), and a
> more recent attempt, Capstone
Hi Damjan and list;
Working on gbuild would certainly be welcome, however please do so on the
gbuild branch.
The branch is really old, I recall it was broken for FreeBSD, so it needs
updating. I realize the request may seem inconvenient but the gbuild branch
contains the last OpenOffice.org
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 2:09 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I see there was a historical attempt to upgrade the build environment
>> to gbuild which migrated some modules
>>
Am 09/23/2015 11:23 AM, schrieb jan i:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Hi
I see there was a historical attempt to upgrade the build environment
to gbuild which migrated some modules
(https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Build_Environment_Effort), and a
Am 09/23/2015 11:09 AM, schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
[...]we chosen a final build system yet?
The reason I ask is that I became quite familiar with gbuild in the
course of migrating our unit tests to Google Test, and have already
successfully migrated one dmake module (formula) to gbuild, so if
Am 09/23/2015 05:26 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 2:09 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Hi
I see there was a historical attempt to upgrade the build environment
to gbuild which migrated some modules
(https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Build_Environment_Effort),
Why are the Windows nightly builds so far out of date when other platforms
seem to be building fine ?
Apache_OpenOffice_4.2.0_Win_x86_install_en-US_1692551.exe was built at
the beginning of August.
Regards,
David Bell
Senior Solution Architect & IBM Certified Specialist
IBM Enterprise Social
Hi
I see there was a historical attempt to upgrade the build environment
to gbuild which migrated some modules
(https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Build_Environment_Effort), and a
more recent attempt, Capstone 2013, to get AOO to build in Visual
Studio.
Have we chosen a final build system yet?
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 12:12 PM, David Bell wrote:
> Why are the Windows nightly builds so far out of date when other platforms
> seem to be building fine ?
>
> Apache_OpenOffice_4.2.0_Win_x86_install_en-US_1692551.exe was built at
> the beginning of August.
>
> Regards,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Hi Damjan and list;
>
> Working on gbuild would certainly be welcome, however please do so on the
> gbuild branch.
>
> The branch is really old, I recall it was broken for FreeBSD, so it needs
> updating. I realize the
Andrea Pescetti has granted Yuri Dario
's request for 4.1.2_release_blocker:
Issue 125592: 4.1.1 RC3 (os/2) can't open encrypted file, NSS modules are
missing
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125592
--- Comment #10 from Andrea Pescetti
Andrea Pescetti has granted Yuri Dario
's request for 4.1.2_release_blocker:
Issue 118923: Build of OS/2 tree
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118923
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Kay Schenk wrote:
Anyway, I will do this update on my system and we'll see what happens after
that.
This can also be considered for 4.1.2, but in that case it would be
easier for everybody if after testing you open an issue and attach the
patch so that we can go through the usual process.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Hello Kay;
>
> The story behind the patch is that I was going to bring libressl but I
> noticed just updating OpenSSL was much simpler.
>
> I started a build with the patch but then I realized the patch is of no
> use in
Exactly, that's what I had in mind, a kind of helper function for a more
permanent solution. In the meantime I'm beginning to look over the source
code to familiarize myself, to see if I can contribute such a solution.
We'll see how far I get...
Il 23/set/2015 03:32, "Carl Marcum"
Hi again Damjan;
I was assuming that we are sort of preparing for a release and we don’t want
ugly surprises with the build system. On second thoughts we do have a bunch
of buildbots so we will detect any wrong-going within the build system.
Well, no one is currently using the build branch so I
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Hi
>
> I see there was a historical attempt to upgrade the build environment
> to gbuild which migrated some modules
> (https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Build_Environment_Effort), and a
> more recent attempt, Capstone
Here is a rough, top-level view of Apache OpenOffice by the operating systems
it is downloaded for. This should be no surprise. To have some grounding on
the immediate situation, here are the downloading statistics of Apache
OpenOffice 4.1.1 so far.
>From Sourceforge,
20 matches
Mail list logo