Should I do macOS and Linux ones as well?
> On Aug 19, 2021, at 7:06 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I just uploaded new AOO4111 Test Builds for Windows:
>
> https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-4111-Test/
>
> Feedback is welcome!
>
> Regards,
>
>Matthias
>
>
Any other opinions or comments?
> On Aug 6, 2021, at 12:52 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> To me, it being within OpenOffice.git makes the most sense... but I'm fine
> either way ;)
>
>> On Aug 6, 2021, at 12:49 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>> Within /Apache/Op
be found at:
o https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/binaries/
Thank you!
--
Jim Jagielski, on behalf of the AOO PMC
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands
the Apache server?
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 06.08.21 um 16:49 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>
>>> On Aug 6, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Matthias Seidel
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> That's c9282f5c5c ?
>> Yep. That's right!
>>> Building for Windows now
The Crash Report indicates that it is the Check For Updates function that
causes the problem. Some weirdness with serf and SSL certs.
libnss3 -> libsmime -> libnssutil3 -> libplds4
> On Aug 6, 2021, at 6:04 PM, Bouschen, Michael
> wrote:
>
>
Can you try this version:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/binaries/de/Apache_OpenOffice_Dev_4.2.0_MacOS_x86-64_install_de.dmg
> On Aug 6, 2021, at 4:37 PM, Michael Bouschen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just updated my system to macOS 11.5.1 and reinstalled OpenOffice
I am uploading both the regular and the ./Dev/ builds... just in case there is
something in the Dev builds themselves which causes issues
> On Aug 6, 2021, at 3:44 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Sorry, these are NOT Dev builds, compare to Dev2:
>
>
ed.
>
> Of course there would be wiki and webpages to update.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Aug 6, 2021, at 9:31 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> Our devtools repo is till under svn; should we switch it to git. It would
>> be nice, I think, to use on version
I'm not getting that crash, even after scrolling thru the doc, resizing the
window, etc...
> On Aug 6, 2021, at 12:38 PM, Michael Bouschen wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> thanks for trying.
>
> I also see this window, but after a few more seconds OpenOffice crashes.
> I figured out OpenOffice up to
Our devtools repo is till under svn; should we switch it to git. It would be
nice, I think, to use on version control implementation for all our code
related repos.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> On Aug 6, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> That's c9282f5c5c ?
Yep. That's right!
>
> Building for Windows now. Might take some time, since I can do only
> single threaded build with Cygwin 3.2.0.
>
Yikes!
I have tagged AOO420-Dev3-m3 and am working on the builds.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
I think I will tag tomorrow morning and start some builds :-)
> On Aug 3, 2021, at 12:48 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Ready, when you are! ;-)
>
> Am 03.08.21 um 18:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> I'd like to spend some time on the ODS bug on macOS:
>>
Never mind that one: This one is the one: THX!
diff --git a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
index dc67c5dc58..fc75fa9cb9 100644
--- a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
+++ b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
@@ -131,9
Can you try this:
diff --git a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
index dc67c5dc58..fc75fa9cb9 100644
--- a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
+++ b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
@@ -131,9 +131,10 @@ inline sal_Bool
diff --git a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
index dc67c5dc58..8ea41ec95f 100644
--- a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
+++ b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
@@ -131,16 +131,22 @@ inline sal_Bool SAL_CALL
> On Aug 4, 2021, at 9:23 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
> Hello Jim,
>
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 08:09:11AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>>> On Aug 4, 2021, at 7:54 AM, Arrigo Marchiori
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Jim,
>>>
&g
> On Aug 4, 2021, at 7:54 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
> Hello Jim,
>
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 07:39:14AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Can you apply the below to your catalina branch build and see how it works?
>>
>> diff --git a/main/comphelper/i
Can you apply the below to your catalina branch build and see how it works?
diff --git a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
b/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
index dc67c5dc58..97c4d080f4 100644
--- a/main/comphelper/inc/comphelper/extract.hxx
+++
It does...
> On Aug 3, 2021, at 1:25 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 03.08.21 um 19:21 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Thanks... but that seems based on some older version of AOO41X... or am I
>> missing something?
>
> Yes, we had this problem
Thanks... but that seems based on some older version of AOO41X... or am I
missing something?
> On Aug 3, 2021, at 1:06 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 03.08.21 um 18:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Wow. This is weird, but also kind of makes sense since it
Hmmm... this seems to indicate that it is something in the UNO code itself
which may be the issue, and specifically about exception handling... possibly
some weirdness in the assembly part.
That narrows things down... great work Arrigo!
Next weekend? Any idea?
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>> Am 29.07.21 um 15:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>>>> Hello All,
>>>&
Wow. This is weird, but also kind of makes sense since it seems so very, very
platform and SDK sensitive.
Someone remind me what the catalina branch is and how it relates to trunk and
AOO42X, please :-)
> On Jul 27, 2021, at 4:21 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> resurrecting
Snapshot works for me
> On Jul 23, 2021, at 10:43 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 16.07.21 um 13:39 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> I'm ready for a dev3...
>
> That's great!
>
> Are there any patches in the pipeline or do we want to do a
> On Jul 19, 2021, at 10:26 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> People need macOS builds more frequently to test.
>
Agreed. But every time I seem to encourage a test macOS build, it seems that
people want to hold off...
I thought that more recent systems were what the 4.2.x... branch was for.
> On Jul 19, 2021, at 10:46 AM, Arrigo Marchiori
> wrote:
>
> Hello Jim,
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 10:14:03AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> What is wrong w/ using the build stuff
What is wrong w/ using the build stuff that we have used for years?
> On Jul 18, 2021, at 9:00 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 03:27:54PM +0200, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I just committed the "catalina" branch:
>>
sis for refreshed code and translations.
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>
>>>> Keith
>>>>
>>>>> Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
> On May 21, 2021, at 5:02 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 14.05.21 um 18:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> On May 14, 2021, at 1:27 AM, Arrigo Marchiori
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I agree, but how many 4.1.X versi
> On May 27, 2021, at 5:11 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Yuri,
>
> Am 27.05.21 um 10:54 schrieb Yuri Dario:
>> Hi Matthias,
>>
Ideas on where to look?
>>> Maybe Jim knows, since we had such an issue in the mac build 4.1.9(?)
>> a rebuild fixed the issue for MacOS (issue 128426),
> On May 14, 2021, at 1:27 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
>
> I agree, but how many 4.1.X versions do we want to publish before 4.2.0?
> Now that we support two digits, please let us not point to 4.1.99 ! ;-)
>
FWIW, I tend to agree. We fixed the bug. Maybe its not the best solution, but I
Done
> On May 11, 2021, at 1:53 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Will do...
>
>> On May 10, 2021, at 2:49 PM, Marcus wrote:
>>
>> Am 06.05.21 um 15:50 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Am 06.05.21 um 15:08 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>> Once we tag
Will do...
> On May 10, 2021, at 2:49 PM, Marcus wrote:
>
> Am 06.05.21 um 15:50 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 06.05.21 um 15:08 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Once we tag HEAD of AOO41X to AOO4110
>> Can't wait! ;-)
>> I have dozens of commits to be backport
Once we tag HEAD of AOO41X to AOO4110
> On May 6, 2021, at 8:28 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Just a pragmatic question:
>
> When do we want to start working on AOO 4.1.11?
>
> The sooner we branch it, the sooner we can do Test builds and let people
> see if their problem is
As noted elsewhere, I use CentOS7 for our 4.2.X/trunk Linux 64 bit builds.
> On May 1, 2021, at 5:35 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127513
>
> Should this Issue not be adjusted?
>
>
> All the best
>
> Peter
>
> --
> This is the Way!
All AOO 4.1.10 artifacts have been uploaded to both the ASF's release repo as
well as SF.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
on-route...
> On Apr 29, 2021, at 2:44 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Am 29.04.21 um 20:38 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Still waiting on 4.1.10 to show up on
>> https://archive.ap
Still waiting on 4.1.10 to show up on
https://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Thx!
> On Apr 29, 2021, at 11:43 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Everything is uploaded now!
>
> FYI: I already created a staged dir at SourceForge.
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 29.04.21 um 17:36 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Thanks! Once done
Am 29.04.21 um 14:47 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> The VOTE on the release of AOO 4.1.10-RC2 as GA has CLOSED.
>>
>> The VOTE has PASSED: AOO 4.1.10-RC2 (git hash b1cdbd2c1b) will be released
>> as AOO 4.1.10 GA
>>
>>> On Apr 25, 2021, at 4:15 PM, Ji
The VOTE on the release of AOO 4.1.10-RC2 as GA has CLOSED.
The VOTE has PASSED: AOO 4.1.10-RC2 (git hash b1cdbd2c1b) will be released as
AOO 4.1.10 GA
> On Apr 25, 2021, at 4:15 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community
Well... it takes *time* to do the release, since there are uploads, and sync,
etc...
> On Apr 28, 2021, at 1:12 PM, Marcus wrote:
>
> Am 28.04.21 um 13:47 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> The VOTE is scheduled to close today... anyone opposed if I keep it open for
>>
The VOTE is scheduled to close today... anyone opposed if I keep it open for
another 24-48 hours?
> On Apr 25, 2021, at 4:15 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community
> builds of
> Apache OpenOffice 4
> On Apr 25, 2021, at 4:15 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community
> builds of
> Apache OpenOffice 4.1.10-RC2 as GA.
>
> These artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dis
I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community builds
of
Apache OpenOffice 4.1.10-RC2 as GA.
These artifacts can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.10-RC2/
Please cast your vote:
The Release Candidate is good for production/GA:
[ ]
Before we call a vote, I'd like to ask as many people as possible to give the
2nd release candidate of AOO 4.1.10 a good, solid test.
The source files and complimentary community builds for this RC can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.10-RC2/
Cheers!
Jim,
>
> Am 20.04.21 um 18:28 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Yeah... I'm fixing as we speak.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Linux (x64) builds are OK.
>
>>
>>> On Apr 20, 2021, at 11:27 AM, Matthias Seidel
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
&g
...
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 20.04.21 um 17:01 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> Windows binaries are also uploaded now, I think we are complete!
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>> Am 19.04.21 um 19:26 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> git hash:
git hash: b1cdbd2c1b0c99b9e8c2ff5f17cc0127551a8f62
> On Apr 19, 2021, at 1:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Since we did kinda do a RC1, at least it was up on the dev dist site, I think
> we should call this RC2. I'll make the updates and then start the macOS and
> Linux build
ow? Time to branch off AOO4110 and make
> a Release Candidate!
>
> Then we can bump up AOO41X, so we can merge Carl's Test fixes.
>
> Regards,
>
>Matthias
>
> Am 14.04.21 um 01:42 schrieb Carl Marcum:
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> This time to the lis
Approved and merged... sorry for the delay
> On Apr 16, 2021, at 1:38 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>
> Hi Arrigo,
>
> On 4/16/21 12:36 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> PR 126 [1] is about the "About" dialog (sorry for the word play :-).
>>
>> It fixes an invalid display of the build
In prep for 4.1.10 (and our 1st release candidate), we're using
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.10
for tracking.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional
I deem it is time for us to push through with a 4.1.10 release of AOO. I am
proposing a AOO 4.1.10-RC1 release sometime over the next week. I am currently
building macOS and Linux 64/32 tests (RC1s) for HEAD of AOO41X
-
To
> On Mar 29, 2021, at 3:53 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Is this the new 4.1.x development branch?
>
> Should I commit to it and we branch off 4.1.10 later?
+1
>
> Matthias
>
> Am 29.03.21 um 17:40 schrieb j...@apache.org:
>> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git
In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on whether or not
we are building the full language set?
> On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have created the directory structure for Dev3:
>
>
ve Fisher <mailto:w...@apache.org>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, 9 March 2021 9:51 AM
>>>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org <mailto:dev@openoffice.apache.org>
>>>> <mailto:dev@openoffice.apache.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Platform hint
I don't understand the question. We just have 1 offering for Mac users... so
what kind of hint text would we need?
> On Mar 8, 2021, at 9:28 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Really no mac user interested?!
>
> Regards,
>
>Matthias
>
> Am 05.03.21 um 20:58 schrieb Marcus:
>> Am 10.01.21
The above issue (https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128426)
is closed for 4.1.x but it seems to crop back up with the various
4.2.x builds on macOS. Of particular interest is that what "fixed"
the bug back when we were handling 4.1.9 RCs was that the bug occurred
when built using a later
Carl, on what platform? TIA.
> On Feb 11, 2021, at 6:26 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>
> On 2/9/21 6:39 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>> On 2/8/21 8:54 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>>> On 2/8/21 7:15 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>
>>>>
For me, the issue seemed to be this code chunk in scripting/java/build.xml
Previously, the java.version was 1.7 which made trying to build break when
using Java8 on the mac. Since the above edit, all proceeds fine. No doubt,
there is a more
Anyone tried building HEAD of AOO42X w/ Java8 (or later) and
Apache Ant 1.10?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Funny that you bring this up... I'm been tracking down some bugs and they
all seem to be XML related... fastsax->libwriterfilter with occasional cores
due to __cxa_call_unexpected.
I feel that making AOO more fragile by trying to work around cases where
invalid and/or non-compliant XML is
It looks like there are more than the required 3 +1 binding votes. This vote
PASSES.
I will start the required uploading
> On Jan 28, 2021, at 2:47 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> I am calling a VOTE on releasing the complimentary community builds of
> macOS Apache OpenOffice 4.1
FTR: +1 from me.
> On Jan 28, 2021, at 2:47 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> I am calling a VOTE on releasing the complimentary community builds of
> macOS Apache OpenOffice 4.1.9-RC1 as GA.
>
> These artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128415 as well, maybe...
> On Jan 28, 2021, at 4:14 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I am calling a VOTE on releasing the complimentary community builds of
>> macOS Apache OpenOffice 4.1.9-RC1 as GA.
>
&
I am calling a VOTE on releasing the complimentary community builds of
macOS Apache OpenOffice 4.1.9-RC1 as GA.
These artifacts can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.9-RC1/binaries/
This vote overrides the previous vote due to some regressions noted
in the
> I'm using Xcode 12.3
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 4:24 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Which version of Xcode?
>>
>>> On Jan 27, 2021, at 5:48 PM, Dylan Pham wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm building trunk/450 on macos
Which version of Xcode?
> On Jan 27, 2021, at 5:48 PM, Dylan Pham wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm building trunk/450 on macos big sur and got an error below:
>
> Makefile:50: /Users/devops1/aoodev/openoffice/ext_libraries/apr-util/
> unxmaccx.pro/misc/build/apr-util-1.6.1/build/rules.mk: No such
The upcoming 4.1.9 release fixes it and we will likely be releasing a
4.2.0-Dev3 in a few weeks.
> On Jan 22, 2021, at 10:28 AM, Scott B wrote:
>
> I would be interested in testing the 4.2 version that fixes the crash in Big
> Sur.
>
> Thanks,
> Scott Bergren
>
After 96hrs, I've closed this vote, which PASSES with plenty of (binding) +1
votes.
Thanks to all!
I will start the actual release process asap.
> On Jan 18, 2021, at 8:47 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community
My guess is that you do not have SDKROOT defined in your environment.
Before running configure make sure you do:
export SDKROOT=$(xcrun --sdk macosx --show-sdk-path)
> On Jan 20, 2021, at 6:09 PM, Dylan Pham wrote:
>
> So I ran below:
>
> ./configure \
>--enable-verbose \
>
My VOTE:
[X] yes / +1
[X] binding (member of PMC)
[X] I have built and tested the RC from source on platform [ macOS 10.15,
CentOS5 ]
[X] I have tested the binary RC on platform [ macOS 10.15, macOS 11.1, CentOS5,
Ubuntu 18.04 ]
> On Jan 18, 2021, at 8:47 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community builds
of
Apache OpenOffice 4.1.9-RC1 as GA.
These artifacts can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.9-RC1/
Please cast your vote:
The Release Candidate is good for production/GA:
[ ]
> On Jan 13, 2021, at 1:05 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
> I like volunteer@ - it is a call to action. It is the proper verb
+1
This is weird. You say you are trying to build 4.1.9 but the solver version is
4.5.0 (trunk).
Are you *SURE* you're on the AOO419 branch?
> On Jan 12, 2021, at 12:12 PM, marcia wilbur wrote:
>
> So,
> Here's the error...
> make: *** No rule to make target
>
The macOS and Linux community builds have been re-verified and uploaded.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
ny problems...
> What problems should have been detected?
>
> Regards,
> Pedro
>
>> On 01/11/2021 1:50 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>
>> I have discovered an issue w/ the Linux and macOS builds. It is NOT
>> a problem w/ the code. As a result, I am removi
I have discovered an issue w/ the Linux and macOS builds. It is NOT
a problem w/ the code. As a result, I am removing these builds and
will rebuild them.
> On Jan 10, 2021, at 9:14 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> The Apache OpenOffice PMC is happy to announce the immediate ava
The Apache OpenOffice PMC is happy to announce the immediate availability
for testing and review of the 1st Release Candidate for Apache OpenOffice
4.1.9.
Pre-built community convenience binaries can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.9-RC1/binaries/
With
Yes, we have been signing releases since we've obtained the ID years ago
> On Jan 9, 2021, at 7:09 AM, Bidouille wrote:
>
>
> Bump this thread
> This was still actuality?
> And could be apply to next 4.1.9
> A real enhancement for end users
>
> - Mail original -
>> De: "Peter Kovacs"
an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> jim pushed a change to annotated tag AOO419-RC1
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git.
>
>
> at a53baa6 (tag)
> tagging 561082130aec836ff9c7626c642cf3c44fbec11f (commit)
> repl
Yes, that is the current hash.
> On Jan 8, 2021, at 10:08 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 08.01.21 um 13:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> By COB today (Friday the 8th) I plan on tagging HEAD of AOO419 as AOO419-RC1
>> so we can start builds
By COB today (Friday the 8th) I plan on tagging HEAD of AOO419 as AOO419-RC1
so we can start builds over the weekend from that tag.
> On Jan 6, 2021, at 3:07 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Matthias and I will be starting our AOO 4.1.9-RC1 builds over
> the weekend for testing by the s
This seems like a safe and non-controversial fix to me...
> On Jan 7, 2021, at 4:31 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 07:03:19AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> On 6 Jan, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>
Matthias and I will be starting our AOO 4.1.9-RC1 builds over
the weekend for testing by the start of next week, hopefully.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
> On Jan 6, 2021, at 9:19 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
>
> - My own build of trunk on Linux can open the file.
>
> Do you think that this is worth more investigation before releasing
> 4.1.9?
>
AFAICT, it is not a regression (trunk and 4.1.x are very different)... So I
https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/Dev/
Note, these are unofficial Dev snapshot builds.
> On Jan 6, 2021, at 2:37 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I had just promised Dave to link the latest test build of AOO 4.1.9 for MacOS
> in the forum.
>
> Can someone please give me the
> On Jan 5, 2021, at 7:51 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 05.01.21 um 13:29 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Should we try for a RC1 early next week?
>
> I didn't hear any response regarding this issue yet:
>
> https://bz.apache.org/
Works for me...
> On Jan 4, 2021, at 3:20 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
> Hello Marcus,
>
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 05:57:56PM +0100, Marcus wrote:
>
>> Am 04.01.21 um 16:27 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>> On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 04:03:35PM +0100, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>>>
first of all,
Just a reminder that as we update files within the AOO
repo, we should also take the opportunity to update the
copyright dates on said files to 2021... There is no need
to wholesale update the copyright on *all* files in
bulk, just as we modify them...
Cheers, and Happy 2021!
Followed up on the bugz ticket...
> On Jan 3, 2021, at 9:16 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> One user has a problem with this commit, see:
>
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128422
>
> Could you have a look?
>
> Regards,
>
>Matthias
>
>
> On Jan 2, 2021, at 9:12 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> the wiki page "Step by step building guides for different platforms"
> [1] mentions:
>
> - CentOS 5 for AOO 4.1.x
> and lists the commands to prepare a x86_64 VM;
>
> - CentOS 7 for AOO 4.2.x
> but it also states
> On Dec 31, 2020, at 5:06 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
>
> Although it was clear to everyone here that the issue needs a quick solution,
> and although there were many discussion posts and a lot of hard work in
> revising the blogpost, nothing relevant has happened yet.
Are you crazy? Did
5674a7e9f73/main/solenv/inc/minor.mk#L23
>
> Regards,
>
>Matthias
>
> Am 30.12.20 um 12:37 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Hmmm. Scanning both trunk and AOO419 for 'GailWindow', I'm not seeing any
>> code level diffs between the 2.
>>
>> I wonder if it's r
Hmmm. Scanning both trunk and AOO419 for 'GailWindow', I'm not seeing any code
level diffs between the 2.
I wonder if it's related to this:
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/commits-list/2011-July/msg00596.html
> On Dec 30, 2020, at 5:43 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>
>
> Starting 4.19 in a
I've uploaded macOS, Linux32 and Linux64 bit Dev test builds to:
http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Works for me...
Any other feedback?
> On Dec 29, 2020, at 6:31 AM, Marcus wrote:
>
> Am 29.12.20 um 11:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> It's been suggested that before we do an actual RC1, it might
>> be a Good Idea to have a Developer's Test Build of all platforms
>>
It's been suggested that before we do an actual RC1, it might
be a Good Idea to have a Developer's Test Build of all platforms
available for a quick pre-test. That makes a LOT of sense. It
doesn't seem like we need the full language set though for these
but instead maybe just 3-5.
How about:
https://www.openoffice.org/download/ also refers to OS X <=10.6 versions, which
we do not provide.
That should be removed as well, IMO.
> On Dec 28, 2020, at 9:48 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> there was currently in the forum the case of a user who believed AOO was also
> available
101 - 200 of 1153 matches
Mail list logo
