> On May 21, 2021, at 5:02 AM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 14.05.21 um 18:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> On May 14, 2021, at 1:27 AM, Arrigo Marchiori <ard...@yahoo.it.INVALID>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I agree, but how many 4.1.X versions do we want to publish before 4.2.0?
>>> Now that we support two digits, please let us not point to 4.1.99 ! ;-)
>>>
>> FWIW, I tend to agree. We fixed the bug. Maybe its not the best solution,
>> but I don't see why we should continue to "focus" on 4.1.X at the expense of
>> 4.2.X.
>
> We already made some progress on the Release Blockers for 4.2.0.
> But the remaining ones are untouched for long time.
>
> What about a 4.2.0-Dev3? We already planned it when 4.1.10 got urgent...
>
> Regards,
>
So should the push be 4.1.11 or 4.2.0-Dev3?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
