Re: [Discussion] build tool

2017-09-06 Thread Peter Kovacs
Am Dienstag, den 05.09.2017, 20:18 +0200 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > Am Dienstag, den 05.09.2017, 17:59 +0200 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Peter Kovacs > > wrote: > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > To be honest I am not very happy with gmake and ant.

Re: [Discussion] build tool

2017-09-05 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hello all, > > To be honest I am not very happy with gmake and ant. It is difficult to > add the functionality to Eclipse. Also we stay dependant for Windows on > Cygwin or Windows Subsystem for Linux, which feels to me

Re: [Discussion] build tool

2017-09-05 Thread Peter Kovacs
Am Dienstag, den 05.09.2017, 07:16 -0700 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: > On 9/5/2017 7:11 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > To be honest I am not very happy with gmake and ant. It is > > difficult to > > add the functionality to Eclipse. Also we stay dependant for > > Windows on > >

Re: [Discussion] build tool

2017-09-05 Thread Patricia Shanahan
On 9/5/2017 7:11 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: Hello all, To be honest I am not very happy with gmake and ant. It is difficult to add the functionality to Eclipse. Also we stay dependant for Windows on Cygwin or Windows Subsystem for Linux, which feels to me awkward. Also if we want to have people

[Discussion] build tool

2017-09-05 Thread Peter Kovacs
Hello all, To be honest I am not very happy with gmake and ant. It is difficult to add the functionality to Eclipse. Also we stay dependant for Windows on Cygwin or Windows Subsystem for Linux, which feels to me awkward. Also if we want to have people develop on Windows. A good build environment