> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2020 6:06 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving
> pages? (was: Old build Documentation)
> I am aware. It i
On 21.12.20 15:11, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
I suggest we create a archive site (suggestion:
archive.openoffice.org)
site, and move pages there, that have only historic value.
Can you also tell which ones they are? On what factual basis?
I, personally, had noted e.g. in the confluence-Wiki pages w
> -Original Message-
> From: Jörg Schmidt [mailto:joe...@j-m-schmidt.de]
> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2020 3:12 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving
> pages? (was: Old build Documentation)
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2020 12:32 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving
> pages? (was: Old build Documentation)
>
> I change subject
On 20.12.20 18:58, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Greetings Peter, comments are inline.
On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 00:32:15 +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote:
I change subject since I venture to more generic topic.
On 19.12.20 22:15, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
The Policy for the mwiki is and has been since the
On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 11:03:17 -0800, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Dec 20, 2020, at 9:58 AM, Keith N. McKenna
>> wrote:
>>
>> Greetings Peter, comments are inline.
>>> On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 00:32:15 +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>>
>>> I change subject since I venture to more ge
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 20, 2020, at 9:58 AM, Keith N. McKenna
> wrote:
>
> Greetings Peter, comments are inline.
>> On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 00:32:15 +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>
>> I change subject since I venture to more generic topic.
>>
>>
>>> On 19.12.20 22:15, Keith N. McKenna wr
Greetings Peter, comments are inline.
On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 00:32:15 +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> I change subject since I venture to more generic topic.
>
>
> On 19.12.20 22:15, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> The Policy for the mwiki is and has been since the days of
>> OpenOffice.org
>> (OOo) to
I change subject since I venture to more generic topic.
On 19.12.20 22:15, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
The Policy for the mwiki is and has been since the days of OpenOffice.org
(OOo) to NOT delete pages from the wiki but mark them as outdated and be
sure there is a link to any replacement documen
On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 13:11:10 -0500, Carl Marcum wrote:
Comments inline
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 12/19/20 12:09 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>
>> On 19.12.20 14:38, Carl Marcum wrote:
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> On 12/19/20 8:13 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Hello Peter,
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 01:30:
Hi Peter,
On 12/19/20 12:09 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
On 19.12.20 14:38, Carl Marcum wrote:
Hi Peter,
On 12/19/20 8:13 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Hello Peter,
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 01:30:21AM +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote:
Hello all,
do we still need the documentation description for:
http
On 19.12.20 14:38, Carl Marcum wrote:
Hi Peter,
On 12/19/20 8:13 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Hello Peter,
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 01:30:21AM +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote:
Hello all,
do we still need the documentation description for:
https://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/build_windows_
Hi Peter,
On 12/19/20 8:13 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Hello Peter,
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 01:30:21AM +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote:
Hello all,
do we still need the documentation description for:
https://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/build_windows_pre638.html
http://www.openoffice.org/to
Hello All,
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 02:13:46PM +0100, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
[...]
> This is quite infortunate, and (still IMHO) one more reason to get rid
> of those pages as quickly as possible.
I apologize, I meant "unfortunate".
--
rigo
http://rigo.altervista.org
-
Hello Peter,
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 01:30:21AM +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> do we still need the documentation description for:
>
> https://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/build_windows_pre638.html
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/tools/dev_docs/build_windows.html
>
> https://
Hello all,
do we still need the documentation description for:
https://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/build_windows_pre638.html
http://www.openoffice.org/tools/dev_docs/build_windows.html
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide
I mean, the first link is the first re
16 matches
Mail list logo