> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org] 
> Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2020 12:32 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving 
> pages? (was: Old build Documentation)
> 
> I change subject since I venture to more generic topic.
> 
> 
> On 19.12.20 22:15, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> >   The Policy for the mwiki is and has been since the days 
> of OpenOffice.org
> > (OOo) to NOT delete pages from the wiki but mark them as 
> outdated and be
> > sure there is a link to any replacement document.
> 
> For me this rule does not add up. Marking pages out dated is not the 
> solution. We are not a museum.
> 
> These pages are so dire old, no body knows if that what the pages are 
> saying are any accurate, or what.
> 
> We should create an Archive section, and then create there a 
> static html 
> site that preserves the state in order to honor history.
> 
> We can add some information maybe like contributors and 
> stuff. If this 
> sentiment is important. But we should move pages that are 
> confusing and 
> irrelevant to our work somewhere they are not in the way.
> 
> I suggest we create a archive site (suggestion: 
> archive.openoffice.org) 
> site, and move pages there, that have only historic value.

Can you also tell which ones they are? On what factual basis?

I, personally, had noted e.g. in the confluence-Wiki pages which are important 
for our daily work AND remain. Have you read that?

> I suggest that we create an archive page (suggestion: archive.openoffice.org) 
> Site, and move pages there that have only historical value.

I had already suggested, and continue to suggest, we move all old pages to an 
archive.
If only certain pages should be moved there, then this must be voted, because 
it can't be that someone decides randomly.

> There is no rush, 

yes, that is how it is. Care is far more important than speed

> But to forget stuff is important or we run all the time with loads of 
> old baggage around. 

-1

It is not your past, but that of other people who have long worked here with 
diligence where others OO not yet even knew!

my opinion is quite clear:
the memory of the performance of former project members must not be erased, 
even if they are not PMC members.
The former work at OOo was worth at least as much as the current work at AOO.



greetings,
Jörg


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to