On 02/13/2013 09:34 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
wrote:
If you have a good setup for testing such things, try loading, saving, and
closing AndrewMacro.odt
That's a big one: Release the Kraken!
The time to close the document (not saving) could
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:38:57AM +0100, janI wrote:
> > I don't understand what you are talking about, it looks like you are
> > mixing what happens during building the product, with the final product.
> >
> > The final product, as can be downloaded from the final, in his language,
> > contain on
On 13 February 2013 22:06, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 09:42:42AM +0100, janI wrote:
> > If performance and memory footprint is a concern, we loose a lot in our
> > international version,
> >
> > An average set of language text takes up 1.3Mb in the code segment.
> >
>
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 09:42:42AM +0100, janI wrote:
> If performance and memory footprint is a concern, we loose a lot in our
> international version,
>
> An average set of language text takes up 1.3Mb in the code segment.
>
> Since we release 8 languages, it would be expected to use about 10Mb
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:42 AM, janI wrote:
> On 13 February 2013 00:47, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
>
>>
>> If you have a good setup for testing such things, try loading, saving, and
>> closing AndrewMacro.odt
>>
>> LO claims that much of their improvements are related to large Calc
>> docume
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
wrote:
>
> If you have a good setup for testing such things, try loading, saving, and
> closing AndrewMacro.odt
>
That's a big one: Release the Kraken!
The time to close the document (not saving) could be low-hanging
fruit. Presumably th
On 13 February 2013 12:22, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 2/13/13 12:12 PM, janI wrote:
> > On 13 February 2013 10:33, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >
> >> On 2/13/13 9:42 AM, janI wrote:
> >>> On 13 February 2013 00:47, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak <
> and...@pitonyak.org
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>
> If y
On 2/13/13 12:12 PM, janI wrote:
> On 13 February 2013 10:33, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On 2/13/13 9:42 AM, janI wrote:
>>> On 13 February 2013 00:47, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak >> wrote:
>>>
If you have a good setup for testing such things, try loading, saving,
>> and
closing Andrew
On 13 February 2013 10:33, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 2/13/13 9:42 AM, janI wrote:
> > On 13 February 2013 00:47, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> If you have a good setup for testing such things, try loading, saving,
> and
> >> closing AndrewMacro.odt
> >>
> >> LO claims that much
On 2/13/13 9:42 AM, janI wrote:
> On 13 February 2013 00:47, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
>
>>
>> If you have a good setup for testing such things, try loading, saving, and
>> closing AndrewMacro.odt
>>
>> LO claims that much of their improvements are related to large Calc
>> documents. Might be
On 13 February 2013 00:47, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
>
> If you have a good setup for testing such things, try loading, saving, and
> closing AndrewMacro.odt
>
> LO claims that much of their improvements are related to large Calc
> documents. Might be nice to find and test their large test Ca
If you have a good setup for testing such things, try loading, saving,
and closing AndrewMacro.odt
LO claims that much of their improvements are related to large Calc
documents. Might be nice to find and test their large test Calc
document... Not sure what they used, however.
On 02/12/2013
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 07:42:49 Rob Weir wrote:
> I did some tests to see how we were doing, comparing AOO 3.4.1 on
> Windows against OOo 3.3.0. And since LibreOffice claims that their
> 4.0 release is much faster and leaner, I tested them as well, to see
> if we could learn anything.
>
>
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:53 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 12 February 2013 12:42, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> I just did a basic test, seeing how long it took to load a large text
>> document, in this case the ODF 1.2 specification. I looked at memory
>> consumed and the number of seconds to load. I l
On 12 February 2013 12:42, Rob Weir wrote:
> I just did a basic test, seeing how long it took to load a large text
> document, in this case the ODF 1.2 specification. I looked at memory
> consumed and the number of seconds to load. I loaded the document
> once to reduce the impact of disk cachi
I did some tests to see how we were doing, comparing AOO 3.4.1 on
Windows against OOo 3.3.0. And since LibreOffice claims that their
4.0 release is much faster and leaner, I tested them as well, to see
if we could learn anything.
I just did a basic test, seeing how long it took to load a large te
16 matches
Mail list logo
