Re: 4.1. Regressions

2014-03-30 Thread Tal Daniel
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote (Mar 10): Changing entry of Field Version from an older version to a newer one should not happen. When a user submits a new issue the Field Version should contain the version on which the user observes the issue. Experienced community members, primarily by QA

Re: 4.1. Regressions

2014-03-19 Thread Yuzhen Fan
Here is the analysis of possible cases for bugs in query [1], together with the proposed instructions to review them, any comments and suggestions, please let me know. 1. New issue happens on new feature in 4.1, or migration issue only applies to 4.1(e.g. *Issue

Re: 4.1. Regressions

2014-03-19 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Yuzhen Fan schrieb: Here is the analysis of possible cases Hi, plausible description of the task, I'm more or less proceeding so. I will send you bug list for your review Difficult - I currently prefer to check issues where I have knowledge first, not to proceed a list. Other volunteers

Re: 4.1. Regressions

2014-03-19 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Hi, and we need help of an an experienced MAC user for [1], it seems we have some MAC-Only issues in the list. CU Rainer Hyperlinks: [1]

Re: 4.1. Regressions

2014-03-19 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 3/19/14 9:58 AM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Hi, and we need help of an an experienced MAC user for [1], it seems we have some MAC-Only issues in the list. CU Rainer Hyperlinks: [1]

Re: 4.1. Regressions

2014-03-19 Thread Yuzhen Fan
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Rainer Bielefeld rainerbielefeld_ooo...@bielefeldundbuss.de wrote: Yuzhen Fan schrieb: Here is the analysis of possible cases Hi, plausible description of the task, I'm more or less proceeding so. I will send you bug list for your review Difficult

Re: 4.1. Regressions

2014-03-19 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
how about the defects already have value in QA Contact Hi, https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremlist_id=133813namedcmd=410_RegressionTest_woQAremaction=runsharer_id=8583 Shows the possible regressions without someone in QA, only 5 found. Not many left ... Let's wait

Re: 4.1. Regressions

2014-03-12 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 3/11/14 6:33 PM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Hi, I think Bugzilla Help https://issues.apache.org/ooo/describekeywords.cgi tells it all. There only is no common sense whether key word should be used also for very old regressions (regression in OOo 1.0.1 compared to OOo 1.0.0), from

Re: 4.1. Regressions

2014-03-11 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Hi, I think Bugzilla Help https://issues.apache.org/ooo/describekeywords.cgi tells it all. There only is no common sense whether key word should be used also for very old regressions (regression in OOo 1.0.1 compared to OOo 1.0.0), from developer's point of view only regressions in AOO 3.4-dev

Re: 4.1. Regressions

2014-03-10 Thread Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
Hi, On 08.03.2014 12:59, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Hi all, last weekend I wanted to check whether I can try to use 4.1 for my daily work with acceptable risk. Using such a trunk version for normal work is a much more manifold and reliable test than testing with prepared testcases (what, of

Re: 4.1. Regressions

2014-03-09 Thread Kay Schenk
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 3:59 AM, Rainer Bielefeld rainerbielefeld_ooo...@bielefeldundbuss.de wrote: Hi all, last weekend I wanted to check whether I can try to use 4.1 for my daily work with acceptable risk. Using such a trunk version for normal work is a much more manifold and reliable