I am currently working on some bug in the sc module and find that it is
really hard to even find compiler errors among the many warning
messages. Some of these warnings are caused directly by code in sc but
the majority of the warnings originate in header files. Platform is
Windows. The
On 3/3/14 3:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
of course this is a showstopper, means we will definitely make a new build.
to keep you all informed the upload of the rebuild Beta RC is ongoing
and we expect to have all the bits in place later tonight. We will
inform you...
I plan to start the vote
On 05.03.2014 09:30, Andre Fischer wrote:
I am currently working on some bug in the sc module and find that it is
really hard to even find compiler errors among the many warning
messages. Some of these warnings are caused directly by code in sc but
the majority of the warnings originate in
On 05.03.2014 10:01, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 05.03.2014 09:30, Andre Fischer wrote:
I am currently working on some bug in the sc module and find that it is
really hard to even find compiler errors among the many warning
messages. Some of these warnings are caused directly by code in sc but
the
On 05.03.2014 10:28, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 05.03.2014 10:01, Herbert Duerr wrote:
The warning expression has no effect itself is interesting enough,
just not in in list header. Fortunately terms like list(1137) can be
filtered out easily.
Please explain how that can be filtered out easily.
On 05.03.2014 11:28, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 05.03.2014 10:28, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 05.03.2014 10:01, Herbert Duerr wrote:
The warning expression has no effect itself is interesting enough,
just not in in list header. Fortunately terms like list(1137) can be
filtered out easily.
Please
On 05.03.2014 11:45, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 05.03.2014 11:28, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 05.03.2014 10:28, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 05.03.2014 10:01, Herbert Duerr wrote:
The warning expression has no effect itself is interesting enough,
just not in in list header. Fortunately terms like
Use MSVC's WD flag to disable the warning. You'll probably need to hack
wntmsci11.mk...
On 5 Mar 2014 08:31, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote:
I am currently working on some bug in the sc module and find that it is
really hard to even find compiler errors among the many warning messages.
On 05.03.2014 12:38, John O'Sullivan wrote:
Use MSVC's WD flag to disable the warning. You'll probably need to hack
wntmsci11.mk...
I wouldn't like to turn off this warning globally. I only don't want to
see it for system headers that I can't change anyway.
-Andre
On 5 March 2014 12:46, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote:
On 05.03.2014 12:38, John O'Sullivan wrote:
Use MSVC's WD flag to disable the warning. You'll probably need to hack
wntmsci11.mk...
I wouldn't like to turn off this warning globally. I only don't want to
see it for system
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:32 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 5 March 2014 12:46, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote:
On 05.03.2014 12:38, John O'Sullivan wrote:
Use MSVC's WD flag to disable the warning. You'll probably need to hack
wntmsci11.mk...
I wouldn't like to turn off this
On 5 March 2014 14:18, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:32 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 5 March 2014 12:46, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote:
On 05.03.2014 12:38, John O'Sullivan wrote:
Use MSVC's WD flag to disable the warning. You'll probably
Hi,
as we have created branch AOO410 for our coming AOO 4.1.0 release I
would like to propose a new entry for Bugzilla field 'Target Milestone'.
Something like 'AOO.next'. It shall be used for the solved issues which
won't be part of the AOO 4.1.0 release, but be part of the next
following
On 05.03.2014 10:01, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 05.03.2014 09:30, Andre Fischer wrote:
re C4530: One option would be to compile all sc code with exceptions
enabled.
That sounds reasonable.
Does anyone know of a reason not to do that?
Not that I'm aware of.
I am neither, that's why I
On 05.03.2014 11:53, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 05.03.2014 11:45, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 05.03.2014 11:28, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 05.03.2014 10:28, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 05.03.2014 10:01, Herbert Duerr wrote:
The warning expression has no effect itself is interesting enough,
just not in in
On 5 March 2014 14:42, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote:
On 05.03.2014 10:01, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 05.03.2014 09:30, Andre Fischer wrote:
re C4530: One option would be to compile all sc code with exceptions
enabled.
That sounds reasonable.
Does anyone know of a reason not
On 05.03.2014 14:49, jan i wrote:
On 5 March 2014 14:42, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote:
On 05.03.2014 10:01, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 05.03.2014 09:30, Andre Fischer wrote:
re C4530: One option would be to compile all sc code with exceptions
enabled.
That sounds reasonable.
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
propose a new entry for Bugzilla field 'Target Milestone'.
Something like 'AOO.next'. It shall be used for the solved issues which
won't be part of the AOO 4.1.0 release
Good idea. I would actually use it also for issues that are not solved
yet but that we agree
On 05.03.2014 14:18, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:32 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 5 March 2014 12:46, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote:
On 05.03.2014 12:38, John O'Sullivan wrote:
Use MSVC's WD flag to disable the warning. You'll probably need to hack
wntmsci11.mk...
Hello list,
I would to update some outdated pages from french website:
http://www.openoffice.org/fr/Mac/
I don't find it on SVN:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/fr
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
as we have created branch AOO410 for our coming AOO 4.1.0 release I would
like to propose a new entry for Bugzilla field 'Target Milestone'. Something
like 'AOO.next'. It shall be used for the solved
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:23 AM, FR web forum ooofo...@free.fr wrote:
Hello list,
I would to update some outdated pages from french website:
http://www.openoffice.org/fr/Mac/
I don't find it on SVN:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/fr
Is this it here:
Hi,
On 05.03.2014 14:59, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
propose a new entry for Bugzilla field 'Target Milestone'.
Something like 'AOO.next'. It shall be used for the solved issues which
won't be part of the AOO 4.1.0 release
Good idea. I would actually use it also for
Hi,
On 05.03.2014 15:35, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
as we have created branch AOO410 for our coming AOO 4.1.0 release I would
like to propose a new entry for Bugzilla field 'Target Milestone'. Something
like
my spell check doesn't work, am I supposed to download a dictionary?
Sent from Windows Mail
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 05.03.2014 14:59, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
propose a new entry for Bugzilla field 'Target Milestone'.
Something like 'AOO.next'. It shall be used for the solved
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 05.03.2014 15:35, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
as we have created branch AOO410 for our coming AOO 4.1.0 release
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 05.03.2014 15:35, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
as we have created branch AOO410 for our coming AOO 4.1.0
If you look at the SourceForge page you'll see that shows 99.7 million
downloads:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stats/timeline?dates=2011-11-29+to+2014-03-18
But that number includes the downloads of Language Packs. The more
conservative number that we report on the
On 5 March 2014 20:47, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
If you look at the SourceForge page you'll see that shows 99.7 million
downloads:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stats/timeline?dates=2011-11-29+to+2014-03-18
But that number includes the downloads of
Am 03/04/2014 07:31 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
On 3/3/14 9:24 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 02/14/2014 09:53 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
As this is our first beta release at Apache, I would like to clarify
some things before it's maybe too late to change the facts and to
prepare webpages:
3. File
Am 03/05/2014 05:23 PM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
Hi,
On 05.03.2014 15:35, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
as we have created branch AOO410 for our coming AOO 4.1.0 release I
would
like to propose a new entry
On 04/03/2014 Daniel Roberts wrote:
To complete this upgrade process we need to understand the
compatibility of the software supplied by yourselves. To assist with
this, we have detailed the tables below
Dear Daniel,
OpenOffice is developed by volunteers, so we are not a traditional
software
On 02/03/2014 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
The ApacheCon Denver Schedule has been published. Some of the talks
relevant to OpenOffice are at
http://apacheconnorthamerica2014.sched.org/overview/type/openoffice
and there are more in the community tracks.
Quick update:
- If you are considering to
On 6 March 2014 00:03, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 02/03/2014 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
The ApacheCon Denver Schedule has been published. Some of the talks
relevant to OpenOffice are at
http://apacheconnorthamerica2014.sched.org/overview/type/openoffice
and there are more in
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:17 AM, brwbuildersand...@gmail.com wrote:
my spell check doesn't work, am I supposed to download a dictionary?
Sent from Windows Mail
Please try the steps in the spell check troubleshooting tutorial on the
user forum
36 matches
Mail list logo
