On 15.02.2015 23:14, Guy Waterval wrote:
>
> You could reduce the number of options here. For instance OOoLight is not
> necessary. The differences with OOo4Kids are too small.
> Novice, Intermediate and Advanced (AOO without modifications) should be
> enough (personal opinion).
>
IMO the brand
On Monday, February 16, 2015, RA Stehmann
wrote:
> On 15.02.2015 23:14, Guy Waterval wrote:
>
>
> >
> > You could reduce the number of options here. For instance OOoLight is not
> > necessary. The differences with OOo4Kids are too small.
> > Novice, Intermediate and Advanced (AOO without modifica
Hello list,
Since Bugzilla maintenance, I see notifications in issues@ mailing list.
But I don't receive any e-mails.
Did you have same problem?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional comma
Hello!
Yesterday (2015-02-15) Kevin Atkinson released an update for US and CA.
I have been working on en_GB but so far I have only added around 300 new
words this month, because I have been terribly busy.
I will try to add as many as possible before the official .OXT release
on 2015-03-01.
Am 02/16/2015 11:02 AM, schrieb FR web forum:
Since Bugzilla maintenance, I see notifications in issues@ mailing list.
But I don't receive any e-mails.
Did you have same problem?
at least no longer, I get the issues mails as always and cannot see a
delay or other problem.
Marcus
--
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:53 AM, jan i wrote:
> On 13 February 2015 at 18:13, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:43 AM, jan i wrote:
> >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > We have now for a while had a readonly Git copy of our svn repo.
> > >
> > > Should we move to a full git repo, making it
Am 02/15/2015 02:19 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
So, from what I can understand, the GIT repository would only replace
these three directories:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/
(which would become the master branch)
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/
http://svn.apach
I recommend something more neutral such as Starter, Intermediate, and Full or
some equivalent, so it is about the interface, not the user of it. The default
on an install could be Starter in the absence of an existing user configuration.
Should we consider having the skins simply be options on
Please provide me with some assistance. I have had and used Open Office
for a number of years. Yesterday on version 4.0.1 and the spell check
all of a sudden stopped working!! I tried and tried to correct it. I
went your very confusing support website to see if it could be
corrected. After wast
Do you mean that you do not receive a direct copy of the Bugzilla notice where
you are the creator or on the CC list for an issue?
I just submitted a Bugzilla comment. I received two copies: the list copy and
a direct copy on [Issue 126098].
Perhaps there was a change that interferes with mail
HI.
Remark those that follow bugzilla-admin, will have noticed that Infra has
identified a problem with BZ sending mail.
I assume it will be solved quickly.
rgds
jan I.
On 16 February 2015 at 20:56, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> Do you mean that you do not receive a direct copy of the Bugzilla
-- replying in-line to --
From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 10:01
To: OOo Apache
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] move repo to Git.
[ ... ]
I'm just curious about these statements. Have potential new developers
remarked on this to you?
Since most IDEs suppo
We Burgart wrote:
> Please provide me with some assistance. I have had and used Open Office
> for a number of years. Yesterday on version 4.0.1 and the spell check
> all of a sudden stopped working!! I tried and tried to correct it. I
> went your very confusing support website to see if it could be
On 16/02/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
again, I have never used git and it might be the coolest thing ever
It does have a reputation for being cool. This is justified in many
cases, less justified in others. I know some developers who refuse to
work with SVN in principle; true, maybe they would be p
If there are no objections, I would like to remove the AOO 5.0 cwiki
page entirely in the next day or so --
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+5.0
And, we seem to have an older AOO4 Brainstorming page --
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO4+Brainstorming
Am 02/17/2015 12:28 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
If there are no objections, I would like to remove the AOO 5.0 cwiki
page entirely in the next day or so --
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+5.0
+1, no concrete content since October.
And, we seem to have an older AOO4 Brain
Kay Schenk wrote:
> If there are no objections, I would like to remove the AOO 5.0 cwiki
> page entirely in the next day or so --
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+5.0
>
> And, we seem to have an older AOO4 Brainstorming page --
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/dis
On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Kay Schenk wrote:
> If there are no objections, I would like to remove the AOO 5.0 cwiki
> page entirely in the next day or so --
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+5.0
>
> And, we seem to have an older AOO4 Brainstorming page --
> https://
18 matches
Mail list logo
