I believe I have found what can be considered a bug, or at least not
intended behaviour, in the way the OpenOffice API takes values from Java
when setting certain text properties (in this case "CharBackColor") using
the XPropertySet interface. I have been discussing this on a forum thread (
https:/
Phillip Rhodes wrote:
All of the above said, maybe we should drop this whole discussion
Well, it remains the fact that "OpenOffice moribund" is false.
The primary sources cited in the article (all of which are clearly
misinterpreted) are:
- A message from Juergen saying that he won't be Relea
On 17/09/15 15:30, Phillip Rhodes wrote:
> This is about Wikipedia being accurate, and the simple truth is,
Wikipedia is not about accuracy, nor is it about truth. What it is
about, is whether or not the delusions and hallucinations of the editors
can be supported by an appeal to an external
On 9/12/2015 12:51 AM, Marco A.G.Pinto wrote:
> Hello Keith,
>
> On 12/09/2015 00:53, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> The Release Notes page for version 4.1.2 has been created and the
>> template text added to it. The page is located at
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.2+
All of the above said, maybe we should drop this whole discussion, and let
David have his way, and focus on getting a 4.1.2 release out the door. That
should settle the issue, and shipping code is more important than Wikipedia
anyway, right?
So, what can I do to help with 4.1.2?
Phil
This mess
David, this has nothing to do with marketing, and I honestly feel like you
are the one acting in bad faith here. This is about Wikipedia being
accurate, and the simple truth is, on a question like "what's the status of
AOO" none of your "sources" are more accurate than a primary source like
the in
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:25 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 21:27:53 GMT, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> Last word, in case the inference is unclear. We're dealing with a
>> sophisticated serial infringer on Wikipedia. Correcting erroneous
>> information, which is proper to do, is unlike
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 21:27:53 GMT, Rob Weir wrote:
> Last word, in case the inference is unclear. We're dealing with a
> sophisticated serial infringer on Wikipedia. Correcting erroneous
> information, which is proper to do, is unlikely to be achieved via an
> edit war. Don't bring a knife to
