Hi all
> On October 10, 2017 at 8:47 PM Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> imho:
> Better to spend more time on a qualitatively good release than to release a
> less good release overhasty.
+1
> Please don't forget: the quality of AOO is the main argument for many users
> to
Am 11.10.2017 um 13:47 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature,
>> and, as such, can be removed. I've gone ahead and done that.
>> So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply
>> to it the 2 patches that have
Patricia Shanahan has asked for 4.1.4_release_blocker:
Issue 127553: update links doesn't work for sections in 4.1.4
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127553
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Lets go ahead and add those. Add the flag and request them and I'll review
and likely approve; at least we will doc them ;)
Thx!
> On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:50 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Am 11.10.2017 um 13:47 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Are these requested as 4.1.4
Jim Jagielski has granted Patricia Shanahan 's
request for 4.1.4_release_blocker:
Issue 127553: update links doesn't work for sections in 4.1.4
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127553
-
To
As noted, the issue is that AOO414 is tagged.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Am 11.10.2017 um 13:47 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Are these requested as 4.1.4 blockers in Bugz?
No.
>> On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:26 AM, Matthias Seidel
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> If time permits, could you have a look at:
>>
>>
Jim Jagielski has granted Matthias Seidel
's request for 4.1.4_release_blocker:
Issue 127141: Incorrectly translated text in Installer
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127141
-
To
Jim,
can you give a short hint when you start building RC5 and the revision#?
Matthias
Am 11.10.2017 um 14:02 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Lets go ahead and add those. Add the flag and request them and I'll review
> and likely approve; at least we will doc them ;)
>
> Thx!
>> On Oct 11, 2017, at
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature,
and, as such, can be removed. I've gone ahead and done that.
So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply
to it the 2 patches that have been applied to branches/AOO415
(after adjusting the version
Are these requested as 4.1.4 blockers in Bugz?
> On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:26 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> If time permits, could you have a look at:
>
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127141
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127538
Matthias Seidel has asked for 4.1.4_release_blocker:
Issue 127141: Incorrectly translated text in Installer
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127141
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Matthias Seidel has asked for 4.1.4_release_blocker:
Issue 127538: SV translation: "Basic" mistranslated as "grundläggande"
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127538
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Jim Jagielski has granted Matthias Seidel
's request for 4.1.4_release_blocker:
Issue 127538: SV translation: "Basic" mistranslated as "grundläggande"
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127538
This is a very good description. Mathias, have you already copied it to
Bugzilla? (I've also tested with business cards, but this one looks more
generic).
Done.
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127553
But 4.1.4 isn't available for version in bugzilla. Neither as »Version«
nor as
Hi Jim,
If time permits, could you have a look at:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127141
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127538
Only small translation fixes, but they didn't make it into 4.1.4.
Regards, Matthias
P.S.: I am also OK, if we go "regression only" for RC5
Am
Jim Jagielski has granted review:
Issue 127553: update links doesn't work for sections in 4.1.4
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127553
Attachment 86222: Labels patch
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=86222=edit
--- Comment #1 from Jim Jagielski
> On October 11, 2017 at 12:20 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
> After a night's sleep I decided that we should release
> the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing
> one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense.
+1
> So the plan is to "re-open"
I am starting on macOS and Linux-64 builds for 4.1.4-RC5 as we speak.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
I've removed the 4.1.4-RC4 files from the SourceForge distribution area
(not public yet: it is "staged" and only project members can see it).
This is the place where our official binaries are served from.
Instead of waiting for a successful vote, I will gradually upload
4.1.4-RC5 there in the
Uploads of AOO 4.1.4-RC5 for Linux 32 bit builds are being
committed as we speak...
> On Oct 11, 2017, at 1:51 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Official SVN rev will be:
>
>1811857.
>
> % svn info
> Path: .
> Working Copy Root Path: /Users/jim/src/asf/code/follow/aoo-414
>
Will do... Give me ~1hr :)
> On Oct 11, 2017, at 5:50 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>
> On 11 Oct, j...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: jim
>> Date: Wed Oct 11 16:07:28 2017
>> New Revision: 22218
>>
>> Log:
>> prep top level dir for 4.1.4-RC5 builds
>>
>> Added:
>>
On 11 Oct, j...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jim
> Date: Wed Oct 11 16:07:28 2017
> New Revision: 22218
>
> Log:
> prep top level dir for 4.1.4-RC5 builds
>
> Added:
> dev/openoffice/4.1.4-RC5/
> dev/openoffice/4.1.4-RC5/binaries/
> dev/openoffice/4.1.4-RC5/sources/
>
If you upload
Am 11.10.2017 um 23:29 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
I've removed the 4.1.4-RC4 files from the SourceForge distribution area
(not public yet: it is "staged" and only project members can see it).
This is the place where our official binaries are served from.
Instead of waiting for a successful
Sounds like a great plan!
> On Oct 11, 2017, at 5:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> I've removed the 4.1.4-RC4 files from the SourceForge distribution area (not
> public yet: it is "staged" and only project members can see it). This is the
> place where our official
On 11 Oct, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> I've removed the 4.1.4-RC4 files from the SourceForge distribution area
> (not public yet: it is "staged" and only project members can see it).
> This is the place where our official binaries are served from.
>
> Instead of waiting for a successful vote, I
After a night's sleep I decided that we should release
the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing
one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense.
So the remaining question was/is: What do we call it?
I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature,
and, as such,
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 07:20:53 -0400
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> After a night's sleep I decided that we should release
> the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing
> one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense.
>
> So the remaining question was/is: What do
Path: .
Working Copy Root Path: /Users/jim/src/asf/code/follow/aoo-414
URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO414
Relative URL: ^/openoffice/branches/AOO414
Repository Root: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
Repository UUID: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Revision:
We can always change that later...
@Marcus:
Can you re-add 4.1.4 (also for Target Milestone)?
Thanks, Matthias
Am 11.10.2017 um 14:24 schrieb Mathias Röllig:
>> This is a very good description. Mathias, have you already copied it
>> to Bugzilla? (I've also tested with business cards, but this
On 10/11/2017 05:46 AM, Pedro Lino wrote:
On October 11, 2017 at 12:20 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
After a night's sleep I decided that we should release
the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing
one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense.
+1
Am 11.10.2017 um 15:19 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
We can always change that later...
@Marcus:
Can you re-add 4.1.4 (also for Target Milestone)?
done for milestone, version and lastest confirmation.
Marcus
Am 11.10.2017 um 14:24 schrieb Mathias Röllig:
This is a very good description.
Am 11.10.2017 um 13:20 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
After a night's sleep I decided that we should release
the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing
one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense.
So the remaining question was/is: What do we call it?
I decided that,
Am 11.10.2017 um 01:30 schrieb Dave Fisher:
Hi
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 10, 2017, at 2:23 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10.10.2017 um 22:56 schrieb Dave Fisher:
Hi -
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 10, 2017, at 1:15 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10.10.2017 um
Official SVN rev will be:
1811857.
% svn info
Path: .
Working Copy Root Path: /Users/jim/src/asf/code/follow/aoo-414
URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO414
Relative URL: ^/openoffice/branches/AOO414
Repository Root: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
Repository UUID:
Jim, you are the Boss! :)
It is good you stay Release Manager! I appreciate that a lot!
Am 11. Oktober 2017 18:27:55 MESZ schrieb Kay Schenk :
>
>On 10/11/2017 05:46 AM, Pedro Lino wrote:
>>
>>> On October 11, 2017 at 12:20 PM Jim Jagielski
>wrote:
>>>
OK, then I will start again with 1811857.
Am 11.10.2017 um 19:51 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Official SVN rev will be:
>
> 1811857.
>
> % svn info
> Path: .
> Working Copy Root Path: /Users/jim/src/asf/code/follow/aoo-414
> URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO414
>
Neither Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2 or 4.2 can run Java (jdk-9.jdk) on macOS 10.12 (Sierra) or
10.13 (High Sierra). Both can run Java (jdk1.8.0_144.jdk).
I also have the legacy Apple Java (1.6.0.jdk) installed.
I have JavaAppletPlugin (Java 9 build 181) in my Internet Plug-ins folder.
Note:
Hallo Mathias,
> Habe jetzt erst entdeckt, dass es auch eine deutschsprachige
> dev-Liste gibt.
da haben wir sehr drum gekämpft, eigentlich wollte man uns keine
deutschsprachige dev zugestehen, weil man wegen des mutmaßlich geringen Traffic
annahm das das nicht lohnt - schadet also nicht
Hallo,
Am 11.10.2017 um 14:25 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
>> P.S.: Am 5.11. bin ich kurz auf der OpenRheinRuhr an unserem
>> OpenOffice-Stand anzutreffen.
>
> Auch das ist prima, noch besser wäre aber eine Info darüber das es diesen
> Stand geben wird, denn bisher ist, zumindest mir, nichts bekannt
Moin Matthias,
> Habe jetzt erst entdeckt, dass es auch eine deutschsprachige
> dev-Liste gibt.
Willkommen.
> Ich selber werde einen Kaffeebecher "spenden"
> (https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-Mug.JPG)
> Bei Bedarf wollte ich davon einige mehr produzieren lassen.
Was kostet denn so ein
Hallo,
> Deutschsprachige Flyer zu AOO mit aktuellem Inhalt wären nützlich (der
> Vorrat ist zwar noch nicht aufgebraucht, geht aber bald zur Neige).
Ich habe gerade an Detlef und Jan geschrieben und gebeten zu überlegen ob wir
bereit wären 1000 Flyer rechtzeitig drucken zu lassen. Ich melde
Am 11.10.2017 um 14:25 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
> Hallo Mathias,
>
>> Habe jetzt erst entdeckt, dass es auch eine deutschsprachige
>> dev-Liste gibt.
> da haben wir sehr drum gekämpft, eigentlich wollte man uns keine
> deutschsprachige dev zugestehen, weil man wegen des mutmaßlich geringen
>
Hallo Mathias,
> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de]
> Das mit den DVDs solltest du nochmal mit Michael Stehmann besprechen.
> Hast du von den Flyern irgendwie Vorlagen?
Ja, es muss eine Vorlage dasein, ich frage gleich mal.
Gruß
Jörg
Hallo Michael,
Wieviele ProOO-Box-DVD willst Du haben? 10?
Meinst Du ProOO-Box-Stcks loszuwerden, dann würden wir noch Einige kaufen?
Flyer sind derzeitig noch ungeklärt, aber wir kümmern uns darum.
Gruß
Jörg
-
To
Hallo Michael ,
ich schau was ich an Flyern und Material habe und gebe es zur Post.
Neueste Flyer haben wir nicht, wurden die letzten beiden Jahre nicht
aktualisiert.
--
Grüßle
Detlef
von der "Box"
Am 11. Oktober 2017 3:37:58 nachm. schrieb "Dr. Michael Stehmann"
46 matches
Mail list logo