On 18.01.2013 22:47, Regina Henschel wrote:
Rob Weir schrieb:
[...]
Also, are we still using/looking at votes on bugs? Was that an
effective way of prioritizing?
It was the only way for users to get a little bit influence on the
decision, which feature will be implemented and what changes
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Fan Zheng zheng.easy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Rob:
I have to say that, the pictures you picked up every time, is pretty
impressive! And everything looks great.
Thanks. There are a lot of
Hi;
I am having fun with other areas of AOO so I don't have time to try this but
here
are some ideas in case someone wants to do further work there:
1) Update libxslt: xslt is really important in OpenOffice and libxslt 1.1.28
works
just fine.
2) Enable building the boost component in python.
Fan Zheng，
I'm so sorry for missing your reply because of my job. I have finished
the building with your help.
Thank you!
Yi
At 2013-01-11 15:07:44,Fan Zheng zheng.easy...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems your cygwin did not to be allow to use system api to create process.
Did you use some kind
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hi;
I am having fun with other areas of AOO so I don't have time to try this but
here
are some ideas in case someone wants to do further work there:
1) Update libxslt: xslt is really important in OpenOffice and libxslt
Hi;
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Rob Weir
4) Replace rtl::math::random with the random nuber generator in APR. We
have a random number generator in SAL that we use for bookmarks in
documents and to seed the PRNG. APR has a crypto grade number generator
that could be used
Hi,
Am 19.01.2013 um 16:07 schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 09:15:24AM +0100, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
So the main files went in fine, with the new directory names under /opt
The desktop integration however gave these error messages:
dpkg:
My impression is that addition of issues@ o.a.o to the CC list is automatic.
But maybe that is only for new issues since the move to Apache bugzilla. In
that case, it makes sense to clean up old ones that way.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
Our latest blog post:
https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/merging_lotus_symphony_allegro_moderato
I've posted on our Facebook and Google+ pages, and once via Twitter:
https://www.facebook.com/ApacheOO/posts/121057218069097
https://plus.google.com/u/0/114598373874764163668/posts/ipZVtpwoRBZ
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
My impression is that addition of issues@ o.a.o to the CC list is automatic.
But maybe that is only for new issues since the move to Apache bugzilla. In
that case, it makes sense to clean up old ones that
Any objections to enabling the useqacontact field in Bugzilla?
Per the BZ doc:
This allows you to define an email address for each component, in
addition to that of the default owner, who will be sent carbon copies
of incoming bugs.
I think this would be useful, so then we can divvy up bug
Thanks to the Apache OpenOffice Wikipedia article, I see there's
OpenOffice Anywhere (http://www.ooanywhere.com/) that claims to
provide browser access to OpenOffice 3. OpenOffice Anywhere charges a
fee for this service.
Given Google Docs is free, and AOO is free, I have doubts about the
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Wikipedia has a lot of policy documents that are typically used to
object to an article or a piece thereof. This comes out largely as
finger-pointing with a laser sight, but it lends legitimacy to an
argument.
I'm wondering if anyone would be offended or object with a blog post
along the lines of How to make money with Apache OpenOffice?
I appreciate that Apache is a non-profit and that we do not pay for
developers, etc. But we are also commercially friendly, and our
permissive license and focus on
Since this has come up recently, I'd like to point you all to a recent
thread on the legal-discuss list:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201301.mbox/browser
If you are not familiar with the SGA form, you can see it here:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:52 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 21 January 2013 19:36, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
I'm wondering if anyone would be offended or object with a blog post
along the lines of How to make money with Apache OpenOffice?
I appreciate that Apache is a non-profit
+1
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 09:17
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; q...@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Enabling QA Contact field in Bugzilla?
Any objections to enabling the useqacontact field in Bugzilla?
Per the BZ doc:
Hello I live in a area where the only internet I can get is dial up and
everytime I try to download Open Office i get kicked offline and have to start
all over again so I was wondering if you have Open Office in CD form. Thank
you for your time.
Joe Dills/HTML
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
+1 although I don't know what MS Office 2003 end-of-life has to do with it,
particularly.
It is something we're seeing. Organizations who purchased licenses
for Office 2003, and see support ending in April
Don
Thanks
Inline...
Donald Whytock wrote:
Wikipedia has a lot of policy documents that are typically used to
object to an article or a piece thereof. This comes out largely as
finger-pointing with a laser sight, but it lends legitimacy to an
argument.
Regarding conflicts of interest:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts lo...@apache.org wrote:
Don
Thanks
Inline...
Donald Whytock wrote:
Wikipedia has a lot of policy documents that are typically used to
object to an article or a piece thereof. This comes out largely as
finger-pointing with a laser sight,
Rob Weir wrote:
Take a look at the lovely new page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice
Some choice bits of distortion:
Thanks for publicising this. I really did mean I wanted more eyes on it.
Useful pages in dealing with contentious topics (which is everything):
someone selling yr software on ebay
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Office-2003-Office-2007-Office-2010-Fully-Microsoft-Compatible-/190785564791?pt=UK_Computing_Other_Computing_Networkinghash=item2c6bb4b077
Hello group,
I found the following page:
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/FirstSteps/First_Steps
According to the Discussion section of this site, it should be possible
to let MediaWiki create a new book by clicking Load this book as your
current book in the toolbar on
On 01/19/2013 06:38 PM, carole...@aol.com wrote:
We have limited internet access and wonder if the programs are still available
on CD.
Thank you.
Carol Conkey
Hi Carol --
Apache OpenOffice 3.4.x is not available directly from the project on
CD. However, if you use your favorite
@Steve, Saransh
Carol's message was moderated, as s/he is not a list member. Please
contact Carol directly if you wish.
On 01/19/2013 10:32 PM, Steve Hawkins Sr wrote:
which programs... i could burn some for you for just my time and
material.. which is legal for open office
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 9:38 PM, carole...@aol.com wrote:
We have limited internet access and wonder if the programs are still
available on CD.
Hi Carol,
What country are you in?
-Rob
Thank you.
Carol Conkey
Hi at all
Is the Extension site down for maintenance or is there an other problem?
Greetings Raphael
On 01/21/2013 10:59 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
Since this has come up recently, I'd like to point you all to a recent
thread on the legal-discuss list:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201301.mbox/browser
If you are not familiar with the SGA form, you can see it here:
my understanding is that it is legal to sell open source software if the
charge is for shipping and handling and a small fee for duplicating
as u can tell the fee is VERY small
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Jem Brand jemo...@hotmail.com wrote:
someone selling yr software on ebay
I'm unfamiliar with UK postage rates, but 99 cents seems within reason
for a CD/DVD. On the other hand, this one seems a bit overpriced
($4.95):
http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEWEST-APACHE-OPEN-OFFICE-3-4-MASTER-INSTALL-DVD-LINUX-MAC-WINDOWS-BONUS-CD-/370639582458
FYI -- At today's exchange rates
Be sure to copy Roberto on things like this.
-Rob
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch wrote:
Hi at all
Is the Extension site down for maintenance or is there an other problem?
Greetings Raphael
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Stan Helton stanhel...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm unfamiliar with UK postage rates, but 99 cents seems within reason for a
CD/DVD. On the other hand, this one seems a bit overpriced ($4.95):
sounds like a deal to me... 5 including shipping is not worth my time
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Stan Helton stanhel...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm unfamiliar with UK postage rates, but 99 cents seems within reason for
a CD/DVD. On the other hand, this one seems a bit overpriced ($4.95):
Welcome!
2013/1/21 2 laoyi...@126.com
Fan Zheng，
I'm so sorry for missing your reply because of my job. I have
finished the building with your help.
Thank you!
Yi
At 2013-01-11 15:07:44,Fan Zheng zheng.easy...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems your cygwin did not to be allow to use system
Just an idea. There are many out there who want AOO on CD, but cannot
download it. And there are some selling AOO or OOo, but not always
the latest versions. And we have no ability as a project to create
and mail CD's.
So one thing that any individual or group of individuals could do,
that
On Jan 21, 2013, at 5:48 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jan 21, 2013, at 10:59 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
Since this has come up recently, I'd like to point you
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jan 21, 2013, at 5:48 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jan 21, 2013, at 10:59 AM,
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jan 21, 2013, at 5:48 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Dave
David Gerard wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
Take a look at the lovely new page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice
Some choice bits of distortion:
Thanks for publicising this. I really did mean I wanted more eyes on it.
Useful pages in dealing with contentious topics (which is
On Jan 21, 2013, at 6:49 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jan 21, 2013, at 5:48 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Rob Weir
On Jan 21, 2013, at 7:02 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
Take a look at the lovely new page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice
Some choice bits of distortion:
Thanks for publicising this. I really did mean I wanted more eyes on it.
Am Dienstag, 22. Januar 2013 um 04:41 schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Jan 21, 2013, at 6:49 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
wrote:
On Jan 21, 2013, at 5:48
Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
Is the Extension site down for maintenance or is there an other problem?
Be sure to copy Roberto on things like this.
As a temporary solution, I see that the site is actually online and
working, but only reachable
Somewhat off-topic, ma non troppo ...
It would be good to tun a RAT scan over the website. We have not done anything
to clean the content licensewise and we probably carry copyleft content,
including code, there!
Pedro.
45 matches
Mail list logo
