On 4/7/13 9:58 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 2:48 PM, janI wrote:
>
>> On 7 April 2013 21:24, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 2:12 PM, janI wrote:
>>>
On 7 April 2013 20:58, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> I wonder if the nightly build
Hi Kay,
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 04:33:05PM -0700, Kay Schenk wrote:
> Well, Ok. I think we need to maintain a secure environment with
> anything used for our builds -- libraries, etc. That would be my only
> concern with "older" items.
CentOS 5 is currently being maintained; in fact, the "latest
Thanks for the patch. I've checked it in.
-Rob
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Yan Ji wrote:
> Clone URL (Committers only):
>
> https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://ooo-site.apache.org/stats%2Fdefects.txt
>
> Yan Ji
>
> Index: trunk/content/stats/defects.txt
> =
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts
wrote:
> "Seriously out of date" is an understatement. We're almost talking
> archeology here. I haven't maintained that page in years, and the one that
> is most relevant is probably here, https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/, but it's
> not a planet.
>
2013/4/8 David Gerard
> http://www.openoffice.org/editorial/blogs.html
>
> This page is seriously out of date. In particular, there's four blog
> planets listed there, none of which are operational. Is there a new
> blog planet? Should there be?
>
Exactly one year ago there was a thread about a
"Seriously out of date" is an understatement. We're almost talking
archeology here. I haven't maintained that page in years, and the one that
is most relevant is probably here, https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/, but it's
not a planet.
louis
On 7 April 2013 18:42, David Gerard wrote:
> http://www.op
http://www.openoffice.org/editorial/blogs.html
This page is seriously out of date. In particular, there's four blog
planets listed there, none of which are operational. Is there a new
blog planet? Should there be?
- d.
-
To uns
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 2:48 PM, janI wrote:
> On 7 April 2013 21:24, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 2:12 PM, janI wrote:
> >
> > > On 7 April 2013 20:58, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> > >
> > > > I wonder if the nightly builds support customized builds, if for
> > example
On 7 April 2013 21:24, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 2:12 PM, janI wrote:
>
> > On 7 April 2013 20:58, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> >
> > > I wonder if the nightly builds support customized builds, if for
> example
> > if
> > > a user wants a build that has some special conf
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 2:12 PM, janI wrote:
> On 7 April 2013 20:58, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>
> > I wonder if the nightly builds support customized builds, if for example
> if
> > a user wants a build that has some special configuration like, anti-alias
> > by default or a customized default
On 7 April 2013 20:58, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> I wonder if the nightly builds support customized builds, if for example if
> a user wants a build that has some special configuration like, anti-alias
> by default or a customized default templates or menu layout.
>
> Can the nightly build infra
I wonder if the nightly builds support customized builds, if for example if
a user wants a build that has some special configuration like, anti-alias
by default or a customized default templates or menu layout.
Can the nightly build infrastructure be used to generate that?
If not, why not, what w
2013/4/7 Ariel Constenla-Haile
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 03:18:11PM +0200, RGB ES wrote:
> > 2013/4/7 Andrea Pescetti
> >
> > > RGB ES wrote:
> > >
> > >> I just noticed that the LanguageTool extension(1) have some problems
> on
> > >> both, the latest builds from the build bot a
Hi Ricardo,
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 03:18:11PM +0200, RGB ES wrote:
> 2013/4/7 Andrea Pescetti
>
> > RGB ES wrote:
> >
> >> I just noticed that the LanguageTool extension(1) have some problems on
> >> both, the latest builds from the build bot and the one layer build from
> >> Jürgen, but it wor
2013/4/7 Andrea Pescetti
> RGB ES wrote:
>
>> I just noticed that the LanguageTool extension(1) have some problems on
>> both, the latest builds from the build bot and the one layer build from
>> Jürgen, but it works without issues on 3.4.1 so it's not a problem with
>> the
>> extension but with
2013/4/7 Andrea Pescetti
> RGB ES wrote:
>
>> I just noticed that the LanguageTool extension(1) have some problems on
>> both, the latest builds from the build bot and the one layer build from
>> Jürgen, but it works without issues on 3.4.1 so it's not a problem with
>> the
>> extension but with
2013/4/7 Yi Xuan Liu :
> Defects status weekly report as of 20130408:
> http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Report/DefectStatus#Weekly_report_as_of_2013.2F04.2F08
I thought nice disseminate on social networking:
http://identi.ca/notice/100521297
Albino
---
RGB ES wrote:
I just noticed that the LanguageTool extension(1) have some problems on
both, the latest builds from the build bot and the one layer build from
Jürgen, but it works without issues on 3.4.1 so it's not a problem with the
extension but with AOO.
It's not necessarily a problem in Ope
Clone URL (Committers only):
https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://ooo-site.apache.org/stats%2Fdefects.txt
Yan Ji
Index: trunk/content/stats/defects.txt
===
--- trunk/content/stats/defects.txt (revi
19 matches
Mail list logo
