Microsoft warning that potentially affect us ?

2013-11-05 Thread janI
Hi. I just read this warning from microsoft (after a hint on infra): http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/531046/microsoft_warns_office_zero-day_active_hacker_exploits/?utm_medium=rss&utm_source=sectionfeed aoo imports office 2007 documents, so could it be a problem for us too ? rgds jan I.

Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website

2013-11-05 Thread Larry Gusaas
On 2013-10-31, 4:52 PM Robert Center wrote: I have OpenOffice version 3 installed on my Mac and it does everything I need with Lion OS. Will it also work if I upgrade and install Mavericks OS 9? I was considering updating OpenOffice 3 to Apache OpenOffice 4 but I noticed in the readme file wit

Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website

2013-11-05 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 31/10/2013 Robert Center wrote: I was considering updating OpenOffice 3 to Apache OpenOffice 4 but I noticed in the readme file with ApacheOO download that version 4 requires the use of Java for some operations. However, Java has been disconnected in Macs for security purposes. So what limitat

Re: Call for Automation BVT volunteer for AOO4.1

2013-11-05 Thread Kay Schenk
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Andrew Rist wrote: > > On 11/5/2013 10:32 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Alexandro Colorado >> wrote: >> >> I reported this a while back: >>> http://markmail.org/message/x2plcngb6xczxbch >>> >>> yes...we have NIGHTLY 32 bit RPMS buil

Re: Call for Automation BVT volunteer for AOO4.1

2013-11-05 Thread Alexandro Colorado
Also some RPM don't install correctly, there are some issues with them, i think some testing is needed. On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Andrew Rist wrote: > > On 11/5/2013 10:32 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Alexandro Colorado >> wrote: >> >> I reported this a wh

Re: Call for Automation BVT volunteer for AOO4.1

2013-11-05 Thread Andrew Rist
On 11/5/2013 10:32 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: I reported this a while back: http://markmail.org/message/x2plcngb6xczxbch yes...we have NIGHTLY 32 bit RPMS buildt from "trunk" but not "snapshot" builds -- those built from the snapshot tr

Re: [ANNOUNCE] forum.openoffice.org

2013-11-05 Thread janI
On Nov 5, 2013 9:38 PM, "FR web forum" wrote: > > > >But still, we need the real IP. It's useful in case of spam. > +1 > Sometime, we have a spambot with multiple accounts. > Disable by IP is the only one thing to stop it. > > The solution is to configure server as transparent proxy. proxy is con

Re: PDF Extension 2.1.0

2013-11-05 Thread Roberto Galoppini
2013/11/5 Rory O'Farrell : > There is a report on the Forum (and I confirm) that PDF import extension > 2.1.0 is not working on OO 4.0.1. The earlier version 0.1.0 is working. The > extension site entry for 2.1.0 says this is identical to 0.1.0 apart from > changed ID and version number. > > I'v

Re: [ANNOUNCE] forum.openoffice.org

2013-11-05 Thread FR web forum
>But still, we need the real IP. It's useful in case of spam. +1 Sometime, we have a spambot with multiple accounts. Disable by IP is the only one thing to stop it. The solution is to configure server as transparent proxy. - To

Re: [ANNOUNCE] forum.openoffice.org

2013-11-05 Thread Hagar Delest
Le 05/11/2013 09:55, Ricardo Berlasso a écrit : Ban spammers by IP is a bad idea. Most Internet users, and that's include most human spammers, use dynamic IP connections so you are only banning an IP that will be used by others, maybe valid users. It happened to me once on an online service I use

PDF Extension 2.1.0

2013-11-05 Thread Rory O'Farrell
There is a report on the Forum (and I confirm) that PDF import extension 2.1.0 is not working on OO 4.0.1. The earlier version 0.1.0 is working. The extension site entry for 2.1.0 says this is identical to 0.1.0 apart from changed ID and version number. I've had a quick look inside the two pac

Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website

2013-11-05 Thread Kay Schenk
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 10:19 PM, sari seg wrote: > Dear Sirs, > > The file of new Office 4.01 is not installable. > There are some bugs in the file, please recheck. > > Thanks and Best Regards, > Anton Iswara > HI -- Can you provide what package was selected for you from: http://www.openoffice

Re: Call for Automation BVT volunteer for AOO4.1

2013-11-05 Thread Kay Schenk
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > I reported this a while back: > http://markmail.org/message/x2plcngb6xczxbch > yes...we have NIGHTLY 32 bit RPMS buildt from "trunk" but not "snapshot" builds -- those built from the snapshot trunk -- at the moment. > > > On Mon,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] forum.openoffice.org

2013-11-05 Thread Ricardo Berlasso
2013/11/4 FR web forum > > >you should use the ip in the header and not tcpip level. traffic goes > This is a function of PhpBB > We use to ban spammer by ip > Ban spammers by IP is a bad idea. Most Internet users, and that's include most human spammers, use dynamic IP connections so you are onl