Marco A.G.Pinto wrote:
I believe he asked if we had the English dictionaries auto-updating.
Is there a way of making it automatic?
A fully silent update (i.e. OpenOffice does not even prompt you, it
simply silently downloads the update and replaces the extension, like
some other programs do)
On 06/12/14 00:49, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 12/05/2014 04:26 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 04/12/14 20:10, jan i wrote:
Hi all.
I am currently planning (with infra) to install an apache version of
opengrok.
Is there anybody who can help with the configuration ?
sure, I have it running on
On 8 December 2014 at 11:24, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/12/14 00:49, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 12/05/2014 04:26 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 04/12/14 20:10, jan i wrote:
Hi all.
I am currently planning (with infra) to install an apache version of
opengrok.
On 07/12/2014 jan i wrote:
On Sunday, December 7, 2014, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 9:30 AM, jan i wrote:
Maybe its just me, but it seems all of the above is forgotten, at least I
cannot see any mentions on this ML.
Indeed, and thanks for raising it! The two main discussions we
I bump this thread
I just created a saved search -- registered user -- with 4.1.x regressions:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremlist_id=16namedcmd=4.1.x%20regressionsremaction=runsharer_id=7
Can we add a meta issue to listed most annoying bugs?
On 08/12/14 12:42, jan i wrote:
On 8 December 2014 at 11:24, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/12/14 00:49, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 12/05/2014 04:26 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 04/12/14 20:10, jan i wrote:
Hi all.
I am currently planning (with infra) to install an apache
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 07/12/2014 jan i wrote:
On Sunday, December 7, 2014, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 9:30 AM, jan i wrote:
Maybe its just me, but it seems all of the above is forgotten, at least
I
cannot see any
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:19:17 -0800
Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 07/12/2014 jan i wrote:
On Sunday, December 7, 2014, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 9:30 AM, jan i wrote:
Maybe its
Am 12/08/2014 02:32 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 07/12/2014 jan i wrote:
On Sunday, December 7, 2014, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 9:30 AM, jan i wrote:
Maybe its just me, but it seems all of the above is forgotten, at
least I
cannot see any mentions on this ML.
Indeed, and
Am 12/08/2014 06:31 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:19:17 -0800
Kay Schenkkay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
And, I didn't review the infra ticket on Cent OS carefully. Until we make a
decision that we do not want to provide Linux-32 binaries, we need a 32-bit
Cent OS 5 buildbot.
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 19:37:41 +0100
Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 12/08/2014 06:31 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:19:17 -0800
Kay Schenkkay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
And, I didn't review the infra ticket on Cent OS carefully. Until we make a
decision that we do
2014-12-07 17:05 GMT+01:00 Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org:
On 07/12/2014 Rory O'Farrell wrote:
On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 05:57:23 -0800 mprest7 wrote:
I've tested on multiple browsers and this all goes nowhere (or in
circles). It's a bummer as I'd like to try Apache OpenOffice and I
can't
Am 12/08/2014 07:50 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-12-07 17:05 GMT+01:00 Andrea Pescettipesce...@apache.org:
On 07/12/2014 Rory O'Farrell wrote:
On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 05:57:23 -0800 mprest7 wrote:
I've tested on multiple browsers and this all goes nowhere (or in
circles). It's a bummer
Am 12/08/2014 07:50 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 19:37:41 +0100
Marcusmarcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 12/08/2014 06:31 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:19:17 -0800
Kay Schenkkay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
And, I didn't review the infra ticket on Cent OS
On 8 December 2014 at 19:50, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 19:37:41 +0100
Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 12/08/2014 06:31 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:19:17 -0800
Kay Schenkkay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
And, I didn't review
On 8 December 2014 at 20:15, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 8 December 2014 at 19:50, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 19:37:41 +0100
Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 12/08/2014 06:31 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:19:17 -0800
Kay
Hi Jan,
jan i schrieb:
[..]
Sorry for being very direct (its my danish style), but we need to get
things moving instead of just dreaming...so who will take care of which of
the above points ?
I have been silent, because I'm not able to do any of that points.
Kind regards
Regina
On 07 Dec2014, at 17:42, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Reminder: one week left for submitting talks proposal for FOSDEM. Deadline is
Sunday 14 December. All details below and at
https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/call_for_talks_open_document
Regards,
Andrea.
Thanks,
Marcus wrote:
Am 12/08/2014 02:32 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
We could actually do both, if you believe it makes sense:
- signed 4.1.1 (next Windows binaries only) by end of December
- 4.1.2 in January
IMHO this doesn't make sense and would be just a waste of resources,
when doing 2 releases
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:30 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 8 December 2014 at 20:15, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 8 December 2014 at 19:50, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 19:37:41 +0100
Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 12/08/2014
Am 12/08/2014 08:30 PM, schrieb jan i:
On 8 December 2014 at 20:15, jan ij...@apache.org wrote:
On 8 December 2014 at 19:50, Rory O'Farrellofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 19:37:41 +0100
Marcusmarcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 12/08/2014 06:31 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
On Mon,
Am 12/09/2014 12:07 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Marcus wrote:
Am 12/08/2014 02:32 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
We could actually do both, if you believe it makes sense:
- signed 4.1.1 (next Windows binaries only) by end of December
- 4.1.2 in January
IMHO this doesn't make sense and would be
I don't know if this is helpful or not. I'm not in a position to check.
Thinking out loud:
There are two cases of signatures.
1. Digital signing of installable components, such as DLLs and such. This is
also important but a second-order problem.
2. Digital signing of the installer binary
On 09/12/14 03:29, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I don't know if this is helpful or not. I'm not in a position to check.
Thinking out loud:
There are two cases of signatures.
1. Digital signing of installable components, such as DLLs and such. This
is also important but a second-order
24 matches
Mail list logo
