Reinstall 4.1.3 Forbidden.
It is no longer possible to reinstall/repair a 4.1.3 installation under Window without uninstalling first. Not a release blocker for 4.1.4 but definitely a fix worth considering. -- Please address any reply to the mailing list only. Any messages sent to this noreply@ address are automatically deleted from the server and will never be read. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Signature verification for 4.1.3-RC1
On 08/10/2016 Andrea Pescetti wrote: (secondary resource) at https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ ... doesn't contain mine since I never bothered uploading it again My key is now listed on the secondary resource too, just for extra visibility. If others want to do the same, they must simply login at id.apache.org and specify the full fingerprint there. The web page is updated once a day. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Code signing available for OpenOffice
On 9 October 2016 20:21:32 BST, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >On 10/09/2016 Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 9 September 2016 23:29:49 BST, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> Mark Thomas wrote: The infrastructure team has regained access to the OpenOffice code signing account. If you would like to use it to sign releases >please open an infra ticket and provide the Apache IDs >>> May I ask if this is the same Symantec system ... >> It is. > >Coming back to this discussion based on recent conversations on the >OpenOffice dev list: does the Symantec code signing apply to Windows >only, or is it relevant to Mac OS X (and Gatekeeper) too? The Symantec service covers Windows binaries and Java JARs. We have separate a service for the Apple app store (and another for the Google app store). Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Post vote release actions
On 10/9/2016 8:56 PM, Don Lewis wrote: On 9 Oct, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 10/9/2016 10:52 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Marcus wrote: - Change the RC1 into the real release This one takes a few seconds and is best done close to the release. - Uploading to the Sourceforge mirrors This one takes a few hours. I've already prepared a full svn export of https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/ and I'll be using it for uploading to SourceForge shortly - I've just verified all hashes. So the rename above can happen at any time: I'll be using my local copy and not SVN for the rsync to SourceForge. Rename done. I see the binaries under http://www.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.3/ but not the source tarballs. From my phone, I saw the source tarballs, but only some of the language subdirectories. From the computer I used to do the move, I see both. I think we may be seeing a propagation issue, and should let things settle for a few hours. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Post vote release actions
On 9 Oct, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > > On 10/9/2016 10:52 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> Marcus wrote: >>> - Change the RC1 into the real release >> >> This one takes a few seconds and is best done close to the release. >> >>> - Uploading to the Sourceforge mirrors >> >> This one takes a few hours. I've already prepared a full svn export of >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/ and I'll be >> using it for uploading to SourceForge shortly - I've just verified all >> hashes. So the rename above can happen at any time: I'll be using my >> local copy and not SVN for the rsync to SourceForge. > > Rename done. I see the binaries under http://www.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.3/ but not the source tarballs. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Post vote release actions
On 10/9/2016 10:52 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Marcus wrote: - Change the RC1 into the real release This one takes a few seconds and is best done close to the release. - Uploading to the Sourceforge mirrors This one takes a few hours. I've already prepared a full svn export of https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/ and I'll be using it for uploading to SourceForge shortly - I've just verified all hashes. So the rename above can happen at any time: I'll be using my local copy and not SVN for the rsync to SourceForge. Rename done. Just for information, the svn export from dist took hours. I expected it to be much faster again, but we have to consider that it's still a huge amount of data (dozens of GBytes). Do we want the SourceForge files to be "staged"? This can be done after the upload and will make Sourceforge files temporarily invisible to visitors, even though most visitors will simply download from the official site. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Post vote release actions
Am 10/09/2016 11:00 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Andrea Pescetti wrote: So upload is in progress and at a very good speed Upload is complete. So all binaries are now available from SourceForge, even though I assume that for best download speed one should still wait for some hours while all mirrors are populated. ACK I confirm that uploading to SourceForge is an order of magnitude faster than uploading to SVN: the full 4.1.3 tree took less than 3 hours (while uploading to SVN took more than 3 days). Wow! Maybe we should change the upload order for the next release: First SourceForge into a "staged" and "not-mirrored" dir and then - when the RC is approved - upload also to ASF. This would increase the release process enormously. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Post vote release actions
Andrea Pescetti wrote: So upload is in progress and at a very good speed Upload is complete. So all binaries are now available from SourceForge, even though I assume that for best download speed one should still wait for some hours while all mirrors are populated. I confirm that uploading to SourceForge is an order of magnitude faster than uploading to SVN: the full 4.1.3 tree took less than 3 hours (while uploading to SVN took more than 3 days). Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Proposal] Publish Apache Open Office on the apple store.
On 09.10.2016 20:54, Jan Høydahl wrote: Peter, don’t get yourself lost in historic discussions and perhaps unwillingness to tackle this. Some developers have been satisfied with the status quo since we have a workaround (an awful one). No not want to get lost. But it is good to know what was already on the table. Then I know what to ask in order to avoid missasumptions. On 09.10.2016 21:16, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Peter Kovacs wrote: I would like to see the old communication. Was the dev mailinglist involved? Oh, sure! You can search for digital signatures on the dev list https://lists.apache.org/list.html?dev@openoffice.apache.org (I recall I sent a message on 1st January 2015, and nothing significant happened after it except discussions). Thanks! Absolutely. Actually less than that is enough. I mean, if Infra is going to be involved then we mustn't repeat once again -and I am responsible for at least one occurrence- the mistake of asking to prepare stuff and not using it. Then Consider me in. It is something that I can fairly easy do. If you help me a bit. Let's start from the basics. I'll now reopen a conversation here asking if the Symantec signing infrastructure applies to Gatekeeper or not. If it is Windows-only, then the entire previous discussions are not relevant and we (you) must find a way forward for Mac OS X. If, on the contrary, it applies, then I'll give you explanations and liaise with Infra since you might not have the needed level of access. Hmm, I have nothing. Well except Bugzilla of course. And Jörg said there needs to be of an introduction of sort? This beaucracy is not high n my priority list. :) However I will need some help here and there. But I am confident I get the support from someone. All the best Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Post vote release actions
Am 10/09/2016 09:42 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Marcus wrote: Can you upload in a staged dir? Have you tried this already in the past? No, I haven't, and I probably made the wrong choice. I created the "4.1.3" directory through the web interface and I was asked whether to consider it staged or not, I went for "not staged" but I don't see an option to turn it on now. ah, too bad. So upload is in progress and at a very good speed, but files won't be protected so they will be visible already tonight if one looks for them via explicit URL. Not a big issue anyway, since both the files (even if they are in the dev area on dist) and the fact that they are the "official" 4.1.3 binaries are already public... But for the next release it would be better to experiment with: - create the dir from the web interface and mark it as "staged" - populate the dir through rsync as usual Yes, nexct time. Good that it's not too long in the future. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Post vote release actions
Marcus wrote: Can you upload in a staged dir? Have you tried this already in the past? No, I haven't, and I probably made the wrong choice. I created the "4.1.3" directory through the web interface and I was asked whether to consider it staged or not, I went for "not staged" but I don't see an option to turn it on now. So upload is in progress and at a very good speed, but files won't be protected so they will be visible already tonight if one looks for them via explicit URL. Not a big issue anyway, since both the files (even if they are in the dev area on dist) and the fact that they are the "official" 4.1.3 binaries are already public... But for the next release it would be better to experiment with: - create the dir from the web interface and mark it as "staged" - populate the dir through rsync as usual Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Code signing available for OpenOffice
On 10/09/2016 Mark Thomas wrote: On 9 September 2016 23:29:49 BST, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: The infrastructure team has regained access to the OpenOffice code signing account. If you would like to use it to sign releases please open an infra ticket and provide the Apache IDs May I ask if this is the same Symantec system ... It is. Coming back to this discussion based on recent conversations on the OpenOffice dev list: does the Symantec code signing apply to Windows only, or is it relevant to Mac OS X (and Gatekeeper) too? Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Proposal] Publish Apache Open Office on the apple store.
Peter Kovacs wrote: I would like to see the old communication. Was the dev mailinglist involved? Oh, sure! You can search for digital signatures on the dev list https://lists.apache.org/list.html?dev@openoffice.apache.org (I recall I sent a message on 1st January 2015, and nothing significant happened after it except discussions). What kind of seriousness do you need? Like I volunteering to drive this in a civilised provesional mannor would be sufficient for you? Absolutely. Actually less than that is enough. I mean, if Infra is going to be involved then we mustn't repeat once again -and I am responsible for at least one occurrence- the mistake of asking to prepare stuff and not using it. Let's start from the basics. I'll now reopen a conversation here asking if the Symantec signing infrastructure applies to Gatekeeper or not. If it is Windows-only, then the entire previous discussions are not relevant and we (you) must find a way forward for Mac OS X. If, on the contrary, it applies, then I'll give you explanations and liaise with Infra since you might not have the needed level of access. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Proposal] Publish Apache Open Office on the apple store.
+1 to proceed with NEXT STEP™ towards getting AOO signed for Gatekeeper. Peter, don’t get yourself lost in historic discussions and perhaps unwillingness to tackle this. Some developers have been satisfied with the status quo since we have a workaround (an awful one). So please, if you can bring some facts to the table, and consult a bit with INFRA then I think what we need more than anything else is someone just driving it through! -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > 9. okt. 2016 kl. 19.31 skrev Peter Kovacs : > > Thanks for the insight. > > > On 09.10.2016 17:54, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> So this is not impossible, but probably a prerequisite will be to sign MacOS >> X packages with a signature that Apple (to be precise, Gatekeeper) >> recognizes as valid. I have no idea on what this entails. The ASF has a >> signing solution (from Symantec) available, but if I recall correctly it >> does not apply to Mac, only Windows. I can double-check but, due to a long >> history of misunderstandings and unfulfilled promises between OpenOffice and >> ASF Infra on this, I'd like to be sure that we are serious about getting >> this done before proceeding. > > I agree. This is a complex topic with a lots of possible missunderstandings > if not spoken clearly. > I would like to see the old communication. Was the dev mailinglist involved? > > What kind of seriousness do you need? > Like I volunteering to drive this in a civilised provesional mannor would be > sufficient for you? > Or should we do a vote? > > In case of a vote, I would prepare all the facts I can find. So everyone can > have at least a summary what we are heading towards before proceeding. > Of course this will take a bit. Since I am not Quick :-D. > > All the best > Peter > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
Re: Post vote release actions
Am 10/09/2016 07:52 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Marcus wrote: - Change the RC1 into the real release This one takes a few seconds and is best done close to the release. - Uploading to the Sourceforge mirrors This one takes a few hours. I've already prepared a full svn export of https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/ and I'll be using it for uploading to SourceForge shortly - I've just verified all hashes. So the rename above can happen at any time: I'll be using my local copy and not SVN for the rsync to SourceForge. ah, great. Just for information, the svn export from dist took hours. I expected it to be much faster again, but we have to consider that it's still a huge amount of data (dozens of GBytes). Do we want the SourceForge files to be "staged"? This can be done after the upload and will make Sourceforge files temporarily invisible to visitors, even though most visitors will simply download from the official site. IMHO yes. Can you upload in a staged dir? Have you tried this already in the past? Better to do it this way than to finish the big upload and then stage the dir. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Post vote release actions
Marcus wrote: - Change the RC1 into the real release This one takes a few seconds and is best done close to the release. - Uploading to the Sourceforge mirrors This one takes a few hours. I've already prepared a full svn export of https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/ and I'll be using it for uploading to SourceForge shortly - I've just verified all hashes. So the rename above can happen at any time: I'll be using my local copy and not SVN for the rsync to SourceForge. Just for information, the svn export from dist took hours. I expected it to be much faster again, but we have to consider that it's still a huge amount of data (dozens of GBytes). Do we want the SourceForge files to be "staged"? This can be done after the upload and will make Sourceforge files temporarily invisible to visitors, even though most visitors will simply download from the official site. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
More Code Documentation available?
Hello all, I have some Problems in understanding the Concept of the code. Especially the not obvious parts are difficult. So What I have read are some architectur overview Documentation on OpenOffice wiki. Also on the same ressource some uno Documentation. I am currently focusing into understanding how the Writer manages a document. Is there a unified concept for Multithreading? Does someone still understand the part or knows if we can reach out to the developers who resigned from it in order to ask them Questions? Do we have more documentation in general somewhere? Thanks! All the best Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Proposal] Publish Apache Open Office on the apple store.
Thanks for the insight. On 09.10.2016 17:54, Andrea Pescetti wrote: So this is not impossible, but probably a prerequisite will be to sign MacOS X packages with a signature that Apple (to be precise, Gatekeeper) recognizes as valid. I have no idea on what this entails. The ASF has a signing solution (from Symantec) available, but if I recall correctly it does not apply to Mac, only Windows. I can double-check but, due to a long history of misunderstandings and unfulfilled promises between OpenOffice and ASF Infra on this, I'd like to be sure that we are serious about getting this done before proceeding. I agree. This is a complex topic with a lots of possible missunderstandings if not spoken clearly. I would like to see the old communication. Was the dev mailinglist involved? What kind of seriousness do you need? Like I volunteering to drive this in a civilised provesional mannor would be sufficient for you? Or should we do a vote? In case of a vote, I would prepare all the facts I can find. So everyone can have at least a summary what we are heading towards before proceeding. Of course this will take a bit. Since I am not Quick :-D. All the best Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Signature verification for 4.1.3-RC1
We should ensure that AOO people join the keysignings @ ApacheCon > On Oct 8, 2016, at 9:08 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > This is not a blocker for the release (and moreover signature files are > explicitly allowed to be updated during the release vote if needed), but I > couldn't verify signatures in a straightforward way for source packages. > > One of the signatures is mine; no problem with that, and that itself is > enough to prove integrity for release approval purposes. > > Patricia's one, according to my GPG, is done with a key having a short ID of > 02703386; I couldn't find the public key in the usual places, so I couldn't > verify this one. > > Again, this is not a blocker issue since one key is enough, but public keys > used for signing releases are expected to be found at: > http://www.apache.org/dist/openoffice/KEYS > or (secondary resource) at > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ > > The former contains my key and another key by Patricia (short ID A57935C5); > the latter contains the same key by Patricia - it doesn't contain mine since > I never bothered uploading it again to enforce the long IDs and I now see > that someone decided to remove the keys that only had a short ID, I'll fix it > later today. > > Where can I find the matching public key by Patricia? It should be added in > SVN to > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/openoffice/KEYS > which (I believe) maps to the first URL I listed. There is surely a way to do > it without a full checkout, but I didn't check details. > > Regards, > Andrea. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: 4.1.4_release_blocker requested: [Issue 125147] CRASH applying styles to text
I will happiliy test the 414 branch when it is available. Will there be build bots? Matthias Am 07.10.2016 um 01:15 schrieb Marcus: > Am 10/06/2016 11:55 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Yes, there were at least 5 (overlapping) issues solved by these 2 fixes. >> >> Should they all be requested as release blocker? > > when all are similar but have the same root cause, then it doesn't > make sense. > > Let's see: > When this one got fixed in the (coming soon) AOO414 branch in SVN, all > related issues can be tested. If all are no longer occurring, then > goal reached. Otherwise we have to look at the remaining issues > separately. > > Marcus > > > >> Am 06.10.2016 um 23:19 schrieb Marcus: >>> +1 >>> I remember, too, that there were more than 1 report. >>> >>> Marcus >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 10/06/2016 10:13 PM, schrieb bugzi...@apache.org: Matthias Seidel has askedfor 4.1.4_release_blocker: Issue 125147: CRASH applying styles to text https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125147 > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [Proposal] Publish Apache Open Office on the apple store.
Peter Kovacs wrote: Yes I agree signing the package for our users would be a good step, while the app store is the next step in this topic. For some literature on the ASF and the App Store you can read this long discussion from a few months ago: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11183 So this is not impossible, but probably a prerequisite will be to sign MacOS X packages with a signature that Apple (to be precise, Gatekeeper) recognizes as valid. I have no idea on what this entails. The ASF has a signing solution (from Symantec) available, but if I recall correctly it does not apply to Mac, only Windows. I can double-check but, due to a long history of misunderstandings and unfulfilled promises between OpenOffice and ASF Infra on this, I'd like to be sure that we are serious about getting this done before proceeding. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Post vote release actions
Am 10/09/2016 03:28 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 10/5/2016 8:26 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: I plan to start the 4.1.3 vote today. This is a draft of the action list assuming the vote passes. Please help by correcting, expanding, and adding anything missing. Just in case anyone missed it, the vote passed so it is time to execute the post vote actions. I can think of the following to start with: - Change the RC1 into the real release - Uploading to the Sourceforge mirrors Anything else for the moment? Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: New AOO414 branch?
Am 10/09/2016 02:31 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 10/9/2016 5:13 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 11:37:38PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Can we open the AOO414 branch? Everything seems to show that 4.1.3 will be coming in a week or so and for sure there is no further code work to do on it. So I'd like to have an AOO414 branch where (once they are approved) we can start merging changes. OpenOffice 4.1.4 is not going to take another year, so better start early. If the "4.1.4 Release Manager?" thread ended with me as RM for 4.1.4, I'll be branching aoo-4.1.4 on Tuesday (right now I'm on travel). At some point we should formalize the process for selecting an RM. Currently, it seems to be someone volunteers, some more people express support, nobody opposes, and you are it. By that process, you are the 4.1.4 RM. sure, when there are more than 1 candidate then we need to discuss the options. But when it's just one then we don't need to vote or anything else. Lazy consensus should be enough. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Post vote release actions
On 10/5/2016 8:26 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: I plan to start the 4.1.3 vote today. This is a draft of the action list assuming the vote passes. Please help by correcting, expanding, and adding anything missing. Just in case anyone missed it, the vote passed so it is time to execute the post vote actions. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: New AOO414 branch?
On 10/9/2016 5:13 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 11:37:38PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Can we open the AOO414 branch? Everything seems to show that 4.1.3 will be coming in a week or so and for sure there is no further code work to do on it. So I'd like to have an AOO414 branch where (once they are approved) we can start merging changes. OpenOffice 4.1.4 is not going to take another year, so better start early. If the "4.1.4 Release Manager?" thread ended with me as RM for 4.1.4, I'll be branching aoo-4.1.4 on Tuesday (right now I'm on travel). At some point we should formalize the process for selecting an RM. Currently, it seems to be someone volunteers, some more people express support, nobody opposes, and you are it. By that process, you are the 4.1.4 RM. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Proposal] Publish Apache Open Office on the apple store.
Yes I agree signing the package for our users would be a good step, while the app store is the next step in this topic. Matthias Seidel schrieb am So., 9. Okt. 2016, 00:41: > +1 > > Maybe this would be something for long-term? > > But what about getting a Developer ID from Apple to get rid of the > gatekeeper-messages? > A lot of traffic on the user-mailinglist is from people who think they > can not install AOO on MacOS because of that... > > https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202491 > > regards > > Matthias > > > Am 09.10.2016 um 00:14 schrieb Jan Høydahl: > > Hi, > > > > I’m afraid we need a lot of changes to the software to comply with the > sandboxing policy of the Appstore, see > > > https://developer.apple.com/library/content/documentation/Security/Conceptual/AppSandboxDesignGuide/MigratingALegacyApp/MigratingAnAppToASandbox.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40011183-CH6-SW1 > < > https://developer.apple.com/library/content/documentation/Security/Conceptual/AppSandboxDesignGuide/MigratingALegacyApp/MigratingAnAppToASandbox.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40011183-CH6-SW1 > > > > But Collabora has done it for LibreOffice “in a few months", so it > should be possible… Now you find LibreOffice Vanilla and NeoOffice on the > AppStore. It would be great to find Apache OpenOffice as well! > > > > -- > > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > > > >> 4. okt. 2016 kl. 07.32 skrev Peter Kovacs : > >> > >> Hello all, > >> > >> I would like to propose to publish _Open Office_ as _Apache Foundation_ > on the Apple store. > >> > >> I am always dissapointed when I see some unknown developer publishes > Open Source, and the Project itself is not present. > >> Afaik this costs money (99$/year). > >> Here is a blog post that explains the details what is involved as > effort: > >> https://www.raywenderlich.com/127936/submit-an-app-part-1 > >> > >> Does the Apache Foundation allow this? > >> What does such a move involve on our side? > >> Where can we get the money from? > >> Do we want to do this on a general thought? > >> > >> I would volunteer as a Apple Store publisher, if it comes down for > volunteers who do it. > >> But I think this is only the last piece to think about. > >> > >> all the best > >> Peter > >> > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >> > > > > > -- Disclaimer: Diese Nachricht stammt aus einem Google Account. Ihre Antwort wird in der Google Cloud Gespeichert und durch Google Algorythmen zwecks werbeanaöysen gescannt. Es ist derzeit nicht auszuschließen das ihre Nachricht auch durch einen NSA Mitarbeiter geprüft wird. Durch kommunikation mit diesen Account stimmen Sie zu das ihre Mail, ihre Kontaktdaten und die Termine die Sie mit mir vereinbaren online zu Google konditionen in der Googlecloud gespeichert wird. Sollten sie dies nicht wünschen kontaktieren sie mich bitte Umgehend um z.B. alternativen zu verhandeln.
Re: New AOO414 branch?
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 11:37:38PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Can we open the AOO414 branch? Everything seems to show that 4.1.3 will be > coming in a week or so and for sure there is no further code work to do on > it. So I'd like to have an AOO414 branch where (once they are approved) we > can start merging changes. OpenOffice 4.1.4 is not going to take another > year, so better start early. If the "4.1.4 Release Manager?" thread ended with me as RM for 4.1.4, I'll be branching aoo-4.1.4 on Tuesday (right now I'm on travel). Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: I think we need a press release for AOO 4.1.3
+1 for press release +1 for translation. Jörg Schmidt schrieb am So., 9. Okt. 2016, 10:48: > > From: Jörg Schmidt [mailto:joe...@j-m-schmidt.de] > > > You (Marcis) ... > > Sorry, I meant: > > You (Marcus) ... > > > Jörg > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > -- Disclaimer: Diese Nachricht stammt aus einem Google Account. Ihre Antwort wird in der Google Cloud Gespeichert und durch Google Algorythmen zwecks werbeanaöysen gescannt. Es ist derzeit nicht auszuschließen das ihre Nachricht auch durch einen NSA Mitarbeiter geprüft wird. Durch kommunikation mit diesen Account stimmen Sie zu das ihre Mail, ihre Kontaktdaten und die Termine die Sie mit mir vereinbaren online zu Google konditionen in der Googlecloud gespeichert wird. Sollten sie dies nicht wünschen kontaktieren sie mich bitte Umgehend um z.B. alternativen zu verhandeln.
Re: I think we need a press release for AOO 4.1.3
Hi, Don't know if you had some help usually for the French translation but if needed, I can help. However, I've no access to the French area of the website, it would have to be posted online by someone who has the karma. Hagar Le 09/10/2016 à 10:44, Jörg Schmidt a écrit : From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] I working already with Apache for a press release. Thank you, these are good news. Please let me know if I can help with a German translation of the press release, because public relations is, in this times, important for Germany. You (Marcis) know the following, but let me all remember it: Germany is a particularly important country for OpenOffice, because the cradle of StarOffice and also of OpenOffice stood in Hamburg(*). (*) or a little bit in Lüneburg, because the company "StarDivision" was formally founded in Lüneburg. Greetings, Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: I think we need a press release for AOO 4.1.3
> From: Jörg Schmidt [mailto:joe...@j-m-schmidt.de] > You (Marcis) ... Sorry, I meant: You (Marcus) ... Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: I think we need a press release for AOO 4.1.3
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > I working already with Apache for a press release. Thank you, these are good news. Please let me know if I can help with a German translation of the press release, because public relations is, in this times, important for Germany. You (Marcis) know the following, but let me all remember it: Germany is a particularly important country for OpenOffice, because the cradle of StarOffice and also of OpenOffice stood in Hamburg(*). (*) or a little bit in Lüneburg, because the company "StarDivision" was formally founded in Lüneburg. Greetings, Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: I think we need a press release for AOO 4.1.3
Am 10/09/2016 09:32 AM, schrieb Jörg Schmidt: I have translated the release notes in German and I get the following idea: We need an press release on AOO 4.1.3, because: - to counter the existing rumors to AOO - To say something to 4.1.3 (this version was also meant to rearrange internal processes in the project, which should be explained to the public) I think that is important in the current situation. I working already with Apache for a press release. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
I think we need a press release for AOO 4.1.3
Hello, I have translated the release notes in German and I get the following idea: We need an press release on AOO 4.1.3, because: - to counter the existing rumors to AOO - To say something to 4.1.3 (this version was also meant to rearrange internal processes in the project, which should be explained to the public) I think that is important in the current situation. What do you all mean? Greeetings, Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
