Re: should we conduct a 20 year anniversary online conference / meetup?

Hi Matthias, On 7/4/20 5:52 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Carl, Am 04.07.20 um 18:16 schrieb Carl Marcum: Hi Matthias, On 7/4/20 11:32 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi all, Bumping up this one again... Additionally, we have a virtual ApacheCon this year: https://apachecon.com/acna2020/ What

Re: Trying to re-generate the Documentation effort

Hi Keith, On 7/2/20 11:18 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: On 5/30/2020 8:41 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: I should probably have my head examined but I am thinking of one more time trying to revive the documentation effort for AOO. One of the drawbacks is that most people that have started to help ha

Re: should we conduct a 20 year anniversary online conference / meetup?

Hi Matthias, On 7/4/20 11:32 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi all, Bumping up this one again... Additionally, we have a virtual ApacheCon this year: https://apachecon.com/acna2020/ What about some talks about our project? Regards,    Matthias I would definitely attend an online meetup unle

Re: New Committer: Czesław Wolański

Welcome to being a committer Czesław! On 6/30/20 6:10 PM, Marcus wrote: The Apache OpenOffice project is happy to have a new committer on board: Czesław Wolański Please give him a warm welcome. Marcus (on behalf of the Apache OpenOffice PMC) Your great work is very appreciated. Best regar

Re: New Committer: Detlef Nannen

Welcome as committer Detlef!! Best regards, Carl On 6/30/20 6:10 PM, Marcus wrote: The Apache OpenOffice project is happy to have a new committer on board: Detlef Nannen Please give him a warm welcome. Marcus (on behalf of the Apache OpenOffice PMC)

Re: New Committer: Pedro Lino

Hi Pedro, Welcome on board as a committer. Thanks for your contributions to the project. Best regards, Carl On 6/18/20 11:11 PM, Peter wrote: Hi Pedro, Thanks for joining the commiter ranks. It shows your support in the past, and i hope you will stay for a longer while. We need the partici

Re: extract GSI Check into an own repository

Hi Peter, On 5/29/20 7:41 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: In general: I am not a big fan of the monolith structure AOO uses with storing everything in one Repository. I prefer to have small Repositories, with nice individual Release cycles and modular main repo. They are easier to document, and ma

Re: Trying to re-generate the Documentation effort

Hi Keith, On 5/30/20 8:41 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: I should probably have my head examined but I am thinking of one more time trying to revive the documentation effort for AOO. One of the drawbacks is that most people that have started to help have left as there has been very limited availabi

Re: [GitHub] [openoffice] Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #83: Python2718

On 5/21/20 4:44 AM, GitBox wrote: Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #83: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/83#issuecomment-631965250 Anyone else wanting to review this? This is an automated message from th

Re: [PROPOSAL] fix broken dev guide pages

On 5/17/20 4:41 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: On 5/17/2020 10:27 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 5/17/20 9:59 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: On 5/17/2020 8:15 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 5/17/20 6:18 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 13.05.20 um 16:07 schrieb Carl Marcum: Hi All, There are quite a few pages in

Re: [PROPOSAL] fix broken dev guide pages

On 5/17/20 10:27 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 5/17/20 9:59 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: On 5/17/2020 8:15 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 5/17/20 6:18 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 13.05.20 um 16:07 schrieb Carl Marcum: Hi All, There are quite a few pages in the developer guide that display as blank. I

Re: [PROPOSAL] fix broken dev guide pages

On 5/17/20 9:59 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: On 5/17/2020 8:15 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 5/17/20 6:18 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 13.05.20 um 16:07 schrieb Carl Marcum: Hi All, There are quite a few pages in the developer guide that display as blank. I believe this problem goes back to an

Re: [PROPOSAL] fix broken dev guide pages

On 5/17/20 8:15 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 5/17/20 6:18 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 13.05.20 um 16:07 schrieb Carl Marcum: Hi All, There are quite a few pages in the developer guide that display as blank. I believe this problem goes back to an upgrade that was done to the wiki. After some

Re: [PROPOSAL] fix broken dev guide pages

On 5/17/20 6:18 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 13.05.20 um 16:07 schrieb Carl Marcum: Hi All, There are quite a few pages in the developer guide that display as blank. I believe this problem goes back to an upgrade that was done to the wiki. After some recent testing I believe the issue is with a

Re: Wiki Account

Hi Matthias, That's perfect :) Best regards, Carl On 5/16/20 9:40 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Carl, Am 16.05.20 um 15:31 schrieb Carl Marcum: That's a good idea. Also a list of who currently has what karma would be helpful if it doesn't exist already or another m

Re: Wiki Account

That's a good idea. Also a list of who currently has what karma would be helpful if it doesn't exist already or another means to find it. I think Keith mentioned in another thread that he was an admin in the mwiki. Thanks, Carl On 5/16/20 7:59 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: I think we need to

Re: "New" Todo List

On 5/14/20 2:48 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: Hello I discuss off list with a Jyotirmoy Singh, who is interested to help on OpenOffice. I do it off list because I do not have much hope if on list will do any difference on the outcome. since we go back and force what he could do I created a new

Re: [PROPOSAL] fix broken dev guide pages

On 5/13/20 12:17 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: I think it makes more sense to fix our extension. It should be something not that difficult. The main issue is someone must get access to the machine and look into the issue, and figure out whats wrong. Hi Peter, I agree that's the best solutio

Re: [PROPOSAL] fix broken dev guide pages

On 5/13/20 12:10 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: On 5/13/2020 10:07 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: Hi All, There are quite a few pages in the developer guide that display as blank. I believe this problem goes back to an upgrade that was done to the wiki. After some recent testing I believe the issue

[PROPOSAL] fix broken dev guide pages

Hi All, There are quite a few pages in the developer guide that display as blank. I believe this problem goes back to an upgrade that was done to the wiki. After some recent testing I believe the issue is with a custom plugin of ours referred to as IDLTags. This plugin uses tags in the wiki lik

Re: IDL plugin for wiki

ilde wrote: Hello Carl, as I scroled back in the Mailinglist I found a thread with you and Andrea at end of 2018 about an incompatible Plugin to show subpages in the mediawiki, Maybe this helps a little Kind regards Am 10.05.20 um 16:51 schrieb Carl Marcum: Hi All, Does anyone know how to deb

IDL plugin for wiki

Hi All, Does anyone know how to debug and fix the mediawiki plugin for generating the links to the IDL documentation? It seems all the Dev Guide pages that show blank have these or tags in them and I suspect it may me the problem. Example: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/De

Re: testers and reviewers for Github

Hi Jörg On 4/26/20 12:45 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: Hello, -Original Message- From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2020 5:11 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: testers and reviewers for Github We have no process what soever. The created pull re

Re: testers and reviewers for Github

On 4/26/20 7:05 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: Hallo all, We have some pull request (patches) signed in on Github. We need people to test them and sign them off. Matthias should not sign everything on his own. I am volunteering here, but the question is: Who else can I count into? All the Be

Re: New extension to publish

Hi Matthias, I believe I have admin rights on sf openoffice but not sf aoo-extensions or extensions.o.o. I'd be willing to learn if I can get karma. Thanks, Carl On 4/21/20 5:28 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Anyone?!? Am 18.04.20 um 11:29 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Yes, please! Can someone pub

Re: MWiki empty pages

On 2/4/20 6:16 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Peter Kovacs wrote: What rights does the volunteer need in order to fix it? I posted more useful information than the forum thread and its links, on this same list: https://s.apache.org/zbrde Can this be fixed with a Mwiki user or do we need Ph

including additional files in packaging

Hi All, How to get files included during build packaging? For instance if I've built some additional jars during the build process. How can I get them included when the other jars are packaged into openoffice4/program/classes ? Thanks, Carl --

Re: declaring gbuild target dependencies

On 4/15/20 6:31 PM, Don Lewis wrote: On 14 Apr, Carl Marcum wrote: Hi all, I'm very new to the build system and I've run into an issue with a target and needing to declare a dependency between targets. This example is Module_javaunohelper.mk in the javaunohelper module where I&#x

Re: declaring gbuild target dependencies

On 4/14/20 5:53 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: On 4/14/20 1:46 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 4/14/20 3:57 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: You could try to build only the module, by going into the folder and execute make directly. Hi Peter, Yes but that doesn't solve my problem with targets not runni

Re: declaring gbuild target dependencies

On 4/14/20 3:57 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: You could try to build only the module, by going into the folder and execute make directly. Hi Peter, Yes but that doesn't solve my problem with targets not running in order or how I can enforce it if possible. I don't want to break the build if my

declaring gbuild target dependencies

Hi all, I'm very new to the build system and I've run into an issue with a target and needing to declare a dependency between targets. This example is Module_javaunohelper.mk in the javaunohelper module where I've added the last target Ant_juh shown below. This new target needs the Jar_juh ta

Re: Spam-Attack on Bugzilla

I would +1 to accounts upon request. Best regards, Carl On 4/12/20 6:05 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: since we use it as developer tool only, I agree. Am 12.04.20 um 12:02 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi Marcus, Am 10.04.20 um 22:38 schrieb Marcus: Am 10.04.20 um 19:27 schrieb Matthias Seidel: https

Re: AOO Draw - User Profile Corrupted, follow-up

Hi Czesław, Yes, thank you for your hard work on this and your contributions to improve the UI! I had seen your issues come though on the mailing list and had looked a few but had no time for testing. Your filed issues and steps to reproduce are thorough. Apologies for not taking time to re

Re: Patricia elected for ASF Board

On 4/5/20 3:40 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: On 4/5/2020 1:15 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: Thanks. I had hoped to get more active in AOO, but will be giving priority to board activities for my Apache time. Congratulations Patricia. Though your greater activity in AOO will be missed it is good

Re: How to join Docs team

Hi Pulkit, Are you subscribed to the dev@ mailing list? In case you didn't see it, I'll copy the previous reply from Keith below. And thanks for volunteering! Best regards, Carl On 3/31/20 8:55 AM, Pulkit Krishna wrote: Is there no one left in the documentation team. I can convince a few of m

Re: [NEW CHAIR] Carl Marcum is the new chair for Apache OpenOffice

at do you think? I am currently do not have so much time. Still would be cool if I can post this this week. Can I name you Carl on Facebook? (Some people do not want to see themselfs there. ;) ) Thanks for any help. All the Best Peter Am 24.03.20 um 00:43 schrieb Carl Marcum: Thanks Kay!

Re: [NEW CHAIR] Carl Marcum is the new chair for Apache OpenOffice

Thanks Kay! On 3/23/20 6:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: Congratulations Carl, and thank you for volunteering to be the new chair of AOO. We all really appreciate your work here at AOO! Best, Kay On 3/21/20 6:45 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: Thanks Marcus, I appreciate the support of the PMC and the

Re: Introducing Andi

On 3/21/20 9:07 AM, Hspue Vsvd wrote: Hi guys, I'm Andi, 30 yrs from Germany. I've chatted on IRC with @mseidel. Well, I'm a freelancer. I'm doing tutor jobs and some IT stuff. In my free time I do some coding. Python is my favourite coding language. Anyhow, I can also C/C++ etc. It would be

Re: [NEW CHAIR] Carl Marcum is the new chair for Apache OpenOffice

signed his position as VP, Apache OpenOffice last week for personal reasons. The Apache OpenOffice PMC thanks Jim for his efforts and engagement as VP, and we respect his decision. Jim will continue as PMC member and Release Manager. Carl Marcum volunteered, and so the PMC recommended him to the

Re: Version Numbers in source code

Hi Marcus, please have a look into the devtools in the source code repo. There is a script collection that actually bumps up to a new version number [1]. [1] .../devtools/updateVersion/... I hope this is helpful for you. Marcus That helps a lot. It gives me a few files I can look into and

Re: Version Numbers in source code

Hi Damjan, On 3/15/20 1:50 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: Hi I don't think we ever convert 450 to 4.5.0. Where do you see that? Damjan I don't see it. That was just an assumption on my part since I can't find a variable set to 4.5.0 and that string turns up all through build text and in the

Version Numbers in source code

Hi All, I'm working on using Ant to build javadocs and package Java sources of some of the UNO libs. I need to include a version number in the name of the jar file like "jurt-4.5.0-javadoc.jar" so I'd like to set a version property in main/ant.properties to use. I haven't been able to find wh

Re: Maven Release Bundles of Java UNO jars

On 3/3/20 2:25 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: AFAIK you have to check. If there is an Mk-file Damjan has migrated the module to gbuild which calls ant. You see the call in the mk file. In case it is managed by dmake I am not sure how it is called. In future, if successful, we will call ant from SCO

Re: Maven Release Bundles of Java UNO jars

On 3/2/20 9:43 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Carl, Am 01.03.20 um 18:54 schrieb Carl Marcum: Hi All, Just an FYI that I'm finally circling back to this and would like to work to include in the build process of the UNO jars, the building of the additional javadoc and source jars an

Maven Release Bundles of Java UNO jars

Hi All, Just an FYI that I'm finally circling back to this and would like to work to include in the build process of the UNO jars, the building of the additional javadoc and source jars and gpg signing required in the release of the UNO jar libraries on the Apache Nexus repository for use in

Re: Unsuccessful test of AOO 4.5 from buildbot output

to older Linuxes. You could install a newer Gcc on Centos 7. Or you could build AOO in the Centos7 machine to get a valid build. It has nothing to do with our build requirements. Just with the build setup on the buildbots. Am 27.02.20 um 01:36 schrieb Carl Marcum: On 2/26/20 6:49 PM

Re: dev email not appearing in archives

On 2/22/20 5:02 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 2/22/20 4:46 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Andrea, Am 22.02.20 um 22:42 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Carl Marcum wrote: On 2/22/20 12:13 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: I use lists.apache.org, and it seems to be fine. I don't see that one listed o

Re: Unsuccessful test of AOO 4.5 from buildbot output

f AOO are built on CentOS systems. Not sure what version is being used currently, maybe 6. On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 5:22 PM Carl Marcum wrote: On 2/25/20 6:55 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: Hello all -- I just installed the AOO 4.5.0 for Linux-64 from the buildbots https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoff

Re: Restructuring AOO Build Guide

On 2/25/20 10:25 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: Hi Carl, --enable-dbgutil Will activate assertion errors. We have a lot of them. The one you have found i started to analyses at https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128272 I know now there is some IDL to look at, but did not pick up the inve

Re: Restructuring AOO Build Guide

On 2/26/20 1:26 AM, Mechtilde wrote: Hello, Am 25.02.20 um 18:10 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Carl Marcum wrote: Here are my notes on building AOO 4.2 on Ubuntu 18 LTS 64-bit VM In this case you won't need EPM probably. Or do you still need it? We need epm to build deb und rpm. $

Re: Unsuccessful test of AOO 4.5 from buildbot output

On 2/25/20 6:55 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: Hello all -- I just installed the AOO 4.5.0 for Linux-64 from the buildbots https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/linux64/ I'm getting errors (multiple occurrence of each) as follows: l/ib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `CXXABI_1.3.8' not found /l

Re: Restructuring AOO Build Guide

On 2/25/20 12:10 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Carl Marcum wrote: Here are my notes on building AOO 4.2 on Ubuntu 18 LTS 64-bit VM Thanks for the efforts (both for CentOS 7 and Ubuntu LTS). Some of the notes below apply to both. Started with a minimal desktop install. Especially as we

Re: Restructuring AOO Build Guide

Hi Keith, On 2/17/20 5:01 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: In a previous thread (https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4bf950b61077b8fb320de7c257d6ffacbcbf42cd2bdf643c3be7b617%40%3Cdev.openoffice.apache.org%3E) it was mentioned that a restructuring of the AOO build Guides would be a good idea. I am

Re: dev email not appearing in archives

On 2/22/20 4:46 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Andrea, Am 22.02.20 um 22:42 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Carl Marcum wrote: On 2/22/20 12:13 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: I use lists.apache.org, and it seems to be fine. I don't see that one listed on our project mailing list page. [1].

Re: dev email not appearing in archives

On 2/22/20 12:13 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 2/22/2020 9:10 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 2/22/20 12:05 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Am 22.02.20 um 18:00 schrieb Pedro Lino: Seems to be a bug in the web page (when sorted by thread). There is no way to scroll further down (only tested

Re: dev email not appearing in archives

On 2/22/20 12:05 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Am 22.02.20 um 18:00 schrieb Pedro Lino: Seems to be a bug in the web page (when sorted by thread). There is no way to scroll further down (only tested Firefox but maybe it works on Chrome/Chromium based browsers) Workaround: Click on Date (top r

dev email not appearing in archives

Hi all, When I view the dev mailing list archives [1]. I don't see anything newer than 1 week ago. They show up on mail-archive.com right away. [2]. Is there a problem or is that expected? [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-dev/202002.mbox/browser [2] https://www.mail-arc

Re: Restructuring AOO Build Guide

On 2/17/20 5:01 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: In a previous thread (https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4bf950b61077b8fb320de7c257d6ffacbcbf42cd2bdf643c3be7b617%40%3Cdev.openoffice.apache.org%3E) it was mentioned that a restructuring of the AOO build Guides would be a good idea. I am starting

Re: Building On CentOS 8 Dependency Help

On 2/17/20 9:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: On Mon, Feb 17, 2020, 16:44 Carl Marcum wrote: On 2/17/20 6:31 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: OK. Here's the section of configure.ac that applies to your issue... *** begin code *** dnl ==

Re: Building On CentOS 8 Dependency Help

On 2/17/20 7:35 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 4:14 PM Carl Marcum wrote: Hi All, Not sure if anyone has went down this road yet but I've installed CentOS 8 with a Gnome desktop env, on a server of mine and would like to build AOO 4.2 on it or even 4.1.x if n

Re: Building On CentOS 8 Dependency Help

On 2/17/20 6:31 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: OK. Here's the section of configure.ac that applies to your issue... *** begin code *** dnl === dnl Check whether the gtk 2.0 libraries are available. dnl ===

Re: Restructuring AOO Build Guide

On 2/17/20 5:01 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: In a previous thread (https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4bf950b61077b8fb320de7c257d6ffacbcbf42cd2bdf643c3be7b617%40%3Cdev.openoffice.apache.org%3E) it was mentioned that a restructuring of the AOO build Guides would be a good idea. I am starting

Re: Building On CentOS 8 Dependency Help

On 2/17/20 5:35 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: On 2/15/2020 9:14 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: Hi All, Not sure if anyone has went down this road yet but I've installed CentOS 8 with a Gnome desktop env, on a server of mine and would like to build AOO 4.2 on it  or even 4.1.x if needed. My sta

Re: Building On CentOS 8 Dependency Help

   GTK+ - GTK+ Graphical UI Library (x11 target) gtk+-x11-3.0   GTK+ - GTK+ Graphical UI Library ... Thanks, Carl On 2/16/20 6:17 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: Hi All, Now I'm stuck GTK. I'm not sure if it may be related to the gnome-vfs package being changed to gvfs or not.

Re: Building On CentOS 8 Dependency Help

Hi All, Now I'm stuck GTK. I'm not sure if it may be related to the gnome-vfs package being changed to gvfs or not. Here is my configure ./configure \ --enable-category-b \ --enable-bundled-dictionaries \ --enable-dbgutil \ --with-package-format="installed" \ --with-rat-scan last bit of lates

Re: Building On CentOS 8 Dependency Help

On 2/15/20 9:44 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: We have updated to Gstreamer some time now. 0.1 is not supported anymore. Minimum Java is 1.7 But I think it builds with latest 1.8 Thanks Peter ! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsub

Re: Building On CentOS 8 Dependency Help

Gstreamer some time now. 0.1 is not supported anymore. Minimum Java is 1.7 But I think it builds with latest 1.8 Am 15.02.20 um 15:14 schrieb Carl Marcum: Hi All, Not sure if anyone has went down this road yet but I've installed CentOS 8 with a Gnome desktop env, on a server of mine and wou

Building On CentOS 8 Dependency Help

Hi All, Not sure if anyone has went down this road yet but I've installed CentOS 8 with a Gnome desktop env, on a server of mine and would like to build AOO 4.2 on it  or even 4.1.x if needed. My starting point was the Building Guide section for Centos 7 for AOO 4.2.  [1] I have the followin

Re: MWiki empty pages

On 2/4/20 1:54 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: Hi all, I can not find the mail. But we had some blank sites as a regression from the Version update from MWiki. I think we analysed what caused it, but I can not remeber Fixes. Do you remeber what was the Issue or where in Bugzilla I find the case?

Re: Content for YouTube channel

On 1/26/20 8:05 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi all, > > AOO has its own  YouTube channel: > https://www.youtube.com/openoffice > > Although we have no real content there, just now the 405th user has > subscribed. > > Wouldn't that be the perfect place to post tutorials? > For example, we could te

Re: Preparing OpenOffice 20 years anniversay

On 1/18/20 7:22 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi all, > > The long awaited Apache OpenOffice 4.2.0 release for the 20th > anniversary... That would be great! > > But that needs a lot of work to be done by everyone involved. > > I am willing to do what I can. How about the others? > > Regards, > >

Source Code Repos - some catching up

Greetings and happy new year ! It's been some time since I've been able to devote any time. I'm trying to catch up on the addition of gitbox & github and am working on tying together my apache and githup accounts, two-factor auth, etc. for github. My question for trunk & branches (not devtools

Re: Broken tools from GIT migration

Hi Andrea, On 8/15/19 2:34 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > ... > > 5) Devtools > > Our devtools are code and should have been included in the migration > to Git. I didn't notice they were left out. > > Proposal: talk to Infra to see if we can easily add them retaining > history, or just copy them

Re: : 500 Internal Server Error

On 1/3/19 1:09 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 03.01.19 um 10:44 schrieb Stephan Bergmann: Fetching (as linked from e.g., ) results

Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice Wiki

On 12/30/18 10:33 PM, 张黎 wrote: We can not open these page: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Drawings/Shape_Types and https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Drawings/General_Drawing_Properties These page are so crucial to our project, we want use Open

Re: [WIKI] Blank pages in wiki DevGuide

On 12/16/18 9:59 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: probably an artifact from the migration. On 16.12.18 15:20, Carl Marcum wrote: I was back in the dev guide after quite a while and I'm encountering blank pages for certain links. some I found so far: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Document

[WIKI] Blank pages in wiki DevGuide

I was back in the dev guide after quite a while and I'm encountering blank pages for certain links. some I found so far: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Spreadsheets/Spreadsheet_Documents https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/FirstSteps/First_Contact

Re: current OpenOffice Flyers

I have an edited English version here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1WtZVmknkM-hE5OwVdCgHSHJ3gnic9Piz Please review and update as needed. Thanks, Carl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For ad

Re: current OpenOffice Flyers

On 10/09/2018 05:41 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: Hi all, the german community has updated our flyers. Current Version can be found at [1] If you are french or english native speaker, please have a look. And give some feedback, thanks. All the best Peter [1] https://drive.google.com/drive/f

Re: IBM Plex font

Hi Matthias, On 08/09/2018 11:55 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi all, IBM Plex font [1] is a real nice looking font type. Apart from that, it is now dual-licensed under OFL and Apache license. [2] I am wondering if we could include it in OpenOffice? Regards,    Matthias [1] https://www.ibm

Re: A 4.1.6 Release

Hi Peter, On 07/01/2018 11:27 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: Hi everbody. I would like to bring a 4.1.6 Release on the way in July. Even if we manage to get 4.2.0 ready it will only be a beta. And we have some stuff to get out to the people. Matthias has created a suggestion for a 4.1.6 release

Re: Testing: Is there any interest in the old TestLink system and/or test cases?

On 01/30/2018 05:47 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: As I previously posted, the old TestLink instance is still alive but NOT well on: http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/login.php?note=expired referenced from the Apache OpenOffice QA information at: https://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/intro-qa.h

Re: Request re-instatement as an APache OpenOffice committer

On 01/21/2018 07:15 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: Hello Kay, I am sorry for the delay. The PMC has accepted your request to re-instatement as a commiter. We are glad that you took the step and we looking forward to your contribution. Please people give her a nice welcome back! :-D All the best P

Re: [RESULT] Was: Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.5-RC1 as GA

On 12/23/2017 05:10 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 23.12.2017 um 17:59 schrieb Carl Marcum: On 12/23/2017 11:48 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Carl Marcum wrote: "Set the attribute "Latest Version" to all full installation files for every platform." I believe this should be done

Re: [RESULT] Was: Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.5-RC1 as GA

On 12/23/2017 11:48 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Carl Marcum wrote: "Set the attribute "Latest Version" to all full installation files for every platform." I believe this should be done once files have been "unstaged", which in turn should be done just a few hours

Re: [RESULT] Was: Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.5-RC1 as GA

On 12/22/2017 06:54 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Carl Marcum wrote: My upload to SF has been going all day. Looks to be about 1/2 way done. Strange, normally I do it from a good connection but I think the entire 4.1.4 upload took about 3 hours. On the other hand, uploading to the ASF servers

Re: [RESULT] Was: Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.5-RC1 as GA

On 12/22/2017 02:04 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: All done!! :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org My upload to SF has been going all da

Re: [Request] SourceForge permissions for uploading release

On 12/22/2017 07:10 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Carl Marcum wrote: Can someone with admin rights to the SourceForge account grant me permissions so I can upload the release? Done. Thank you and enjoy! We now have 6 PMC members as administrators of that area, so we should be well covered

[Request] SourceForge permissions for uploading release

Can someone with admin rights to the SourceForge account grant me permissions so I can upload the release? My SF username is cmarcum. Thanks, Carl - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional

Re: [RESULT] Was: Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.5-RC1 as GA

On 12/21/2017 05:16 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 12/21/2017 04:32 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Once I get the A-OK from Infra, I'll do the svn mv from dev to release. Hi Jim, Sorry If I jumped the gun.. I'm currently exporting from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.

Re: [RESULT] Was: Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.5-RC1 as GA

On 12/21/2017 04:32 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Once I get the A-OK from Infra, I'll do the svn mv from dev to release. Hi Jim, Sorry If I jumped the gun.. I'm currently exporting from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.5-RC1 to prepare for SF upload. I can cancel it and

Re: [RESULT] Was: Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.5-RC1 as GA

On 12/21/2017 03:09 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Carl Marcum wrote: On 12/21/2017 11:36 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Who wants to do the Upload to SF? That's usually me but if the Release Express has to leave then... I'm willing if I'm able. ...then go ahead, please. Are the

Re: [RESULT] Was: Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.5-RC1 as GA

On 12/21/2017 11:36 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: The Final Tally: +1 (binding): Jim Jagielski Keith N. McKenna Matthias Seidel Patricia Shanahan Carl Marcum Marcus Lange Roberto Galoppini +1 (non-binding) Kay Schenk Kazunari Hirano So with

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.5-RC1 as GA

On 12/18/2017 08:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: I am calling a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenOffice 4.1.5-RC1 as GA!! You can find these gems at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.5-RC1/ The vote will last at least the normal 72 hours. Cheers! -- Jim Jagielski On behalf o

Re: [NEW CHAIR] Peter Kovacs is the new chair for Apache OpenOffice

On 12/20/2017 05:57 PM, Marcus wrote: The last board meeting for this year is done and the resolution for the formal change of the project's chair was resolved successfully. Peter was already elected as new chair on Dec 16th and is therefore now our new chair. Congratulations! :-) Please sup

Re: New PMC Member Keith N. McNamara

On 12/19/2017 04:06 PM, Marcus wrote: The Apache OpenOffice Project is pleased to announce that Keith N. McNamera is back and joined the PMC again today. Please give a warm welcome to Keith. Marcus (on behalf of the Apache OpenOffice PMC) -

Re: New Committer: Günter Feierabend

On 12/19/2017 03:32 PM, Marcus wrote: The Apache OpenOffice project is happy to have a new committer on board: Günter Feierabend Please give him a warm welcome. :-) Marcus (on behalf of the Apache OpenOffice PMC) - To unsubs

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] New Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair

On 12/13/2017 07:08 PM, Peter kovacs wrote: I am confused. There was no proper " I do not want to candidate anymore mail." But maybe my English is not good enough. A one candidate vote is something completely different as between 2+ candidates. Such a step should be well thought of if this is r

Re: [VOTE] New Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair

When I first got in I thought Peter preferred to wait until next year. However since he is up for it, and my workload is very heavy at the moment I will bow out and maybe try next year. Thanks for all who voted for me. [ ] Carl Marcum (cmarcum) [X] Peter Kovacs (petko) [ ] Abstain (I cannot

Re: A more sane way to build - SCons, deCygwination and other hopes

On 12/02/2017 03:05 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: Hi After days of failing to add a few new simple features to gbuild, I've now reached my limits, and have begun experimenting with the SCons build system instead. It's starting to work. Having ported some of gbuild.mk, LinkTarget.mk and platform/f

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >