Re: mac 64-bit hardware needed - problem with accessing open office

Yes, we do. > On Oct 22, 2019, at 1:24 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Hello all, > > > We do build 64 bit on MacOsx, Right? > > > All the Best > > Peter > > On 20.10.19 22:29, Catherine Victoria wrote: >> Dear Sir/Madam, >> >> I have recently upgraded my MacBook Pro and can no longer use my

Re: [openoffice] 06/08: i127138 Remove the avmedia Quicktime plugin

Could you also commit to the AOO42X branch as well, please? > On Oct 20, 2019, at 9:27 PM, arie...@apache.org wrote: > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > arielch pushed a commit to branch AOO418 > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice

4.2.0-dev next?

Now that we have AOO-4.1.7 out, what do people think about trying for another 4.2.0 "preview" release? Maybe a developers release or even a beta...? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional co

Re: 4.2.0-dev next?

I will kick-off a quick 4.2.0-dev Linux64 build... > On Oct 24, 2019, at 1:19 PM, Pedro Lino wrote: > > >> Now that we have AOO-4.1.7 out, what do people think about trying for >> another 4.2.0 "preview" release? Maybe a developers release or even a >> beta...? > > I believe it is about time

Re: 4.2.0-dev next?

New builds: http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/AOO420-test/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: 4.2.0-dev next?

All works for me... > On Oct 25, 2019, at 2:28 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > I think we should define that when the blockers are fixed we are fine for a > beta. We an still fix issues there. > > I have collected over 20 issues on jira that focusing on crash, memory leaks > and other fatal thin

Branch reminder

Just a reminder that in addition to trunk and AOO418, we also have the AOO42X branch... If you add stuff to trunk, please be sure to see if it is also applicable to 4.2.0-dev, especially if you also back port it to the 4.1.8 branch. Currently, trunk and AOO42X are functionally in-sync (only delt

Re: Mac system Catalina

> On Oct 28, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > > Even I saw reports on this very list to the tune that, without proper > notarization, apps won't work on Catalina. Not quite true. You can still run non-notarized apps on Catalina... it is just harder than before to "bypass" GateKeeper.

Re: Mac system Catalina

> On Oct 28, 2019, at 12:16 PM, Pedro Lino wrote: > > Hi Jim, all > > >> On October 28, 2019 at 3:34 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> >> >> >>> On Oct 28, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: >>> >>&g

Re: Mac system Catalina

It appears that one can notarize an App after bistro (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/notarizing_your_app_before_distribution/customizing_the_notarization_workflow)... I will try w/ the current 4.1.7 dmgs - To uns

Re: Mac system Catalina

I will use Xcode11 to notarize it... It's worth a shot to see if that works :) > On Oct 28, 2019, at 1:07 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 28.10.19 um 18:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> It appears that one can notarize an App after bistro >> (https://developer.

Re: [DISCUSSION] Build environment future

Is the build environment really enough of a failure that we need to spend time on redoing it again? Now if people want to work on that, I'm fine... we are all volunteers and work on stuff that interests us, but certainly, if people are *looking* for things to do, improving the actual code itsel

macOS Notarization test builds

Located at https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/AOO418-macOS-test/ Are some test macOS dmgs that should be correctly signed and notarized such that they do not trigger Gatekeeper; that is, they should result in AOO opening on macOS without any warning about unknown developer. Please che

Re: macOS Notarization test builds

> On Oct 31, 2019, at 5:20 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > > On 31.10.2019 19:49, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Located at >> >>https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/AOO418-macOS-test/ >> >> Are some test macOS dmgs that should be correctly signed and nota

Re: macOS Notarization test builds

Dave Fisher wrote: > > Jim, > > It worked for Catalina and that is the goal. I don’t think a difference > should be expected for macOS prior to 10.15. > > Please check with Apple Developer documentation before letting FUD get you! > > Regards, > D

Re: macOS Notarization test builds

> On Nov 1, 2019, at 7:39 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > >> On Nov 1, 2019, at 7:35 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Hi Jim, >> >>> On Nov 1, 2019, at 7:18 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> >>> I don't mind spending some cycles

Re: macOS Notarization test builds

FWIW, this link seems to imply that simply signing and notarizing the DMG should be enough: https://forums.developer.apple.com/thread/121813 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional comma

Re: C++ standard when building OpenOffice

FWIW, macOS is clang, llvm, etc... it only pretends to be gcc :) > On Nov 5, 2019, at 1:44 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > what if we require LLVM as build requirement and build OpenOffice only > with LLVM instead of preinstalled gcc? > > the project provides packages for Windows, Linux (And here R

Re: C++ standard when building OpenOffice

> On Nov 5, 2019, at 1:56 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > > On 5 Nov, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> >>> 4.1.x. >> >> To my knowledge we build 4.2.x on CentOS 7. Yep. > > It builds and works fine on CentOS 6 as well. The issue is gstreamer1, as well as other dependencies... as noted at https://wiki.

Re: C++ standard when building OpenOffice

I am curious what system you build and test these patches on before you commit... Thx! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSSION] Build environment future

Before we start reworking the build environment to pieces, could we look at possibly doing a 4.2.0 release 1st? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.a

Re: PMC Chair

... what have I done?... :-) > On Nov 21, 2019, at 4:47 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > One of the resolutions passed at the last board meeting was: > > "Change the Apache OpenOffice Project Chair (Jim Jagielski, VP)" > > Jim, > > I don't know

Re: volunteer activity tracking (was: Ariel is back in our PMC and developer circle)

> On Nov 21, 2019, at 1:41 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > I am proud of the community’s progress since then. > FWIW, so am I. I think it was Good that we (the entire AOO community) took time to really decide what we wanted, and expected, from the project and out of the project and made sure tha

Re: PMC Chair

I will assume that the question was asked in Good Faith and not a troll-attempt: At the ASF, some PMCs do the voting for PMC chair on the public list and some do it on the private list. Only votes from the PMC members are considered "binding" but, if there are multiple candidates for the positio

Re: Status of the translation project

w00t! > On Nov 27, 2019, at 3:00 AM, Mechtilde wrote: > > Hello, > > first I want to say a big thank you to Ariel. He prepared the new pootle > server. > > Now we can continue working on the translation for Apache OpenOffice 4.2. > > At this time The server is accessible under > > https://tr

Re: AOO 4.1.8 and MacOS Catalina

Hmmm... will look into that. thx > On Dec 4, 2019, at 8:41 AM, Bidouille wrote: > > Hello list, > > A french user reports this bug. > Once 4.1.8 installed on MacOS 10.15, icons for ODF documents are wrong. > See screenshot: > https://forum.openoffice.org/fr/forum/download/file.php?id=136692 >

Re: My talk has been accepted on Fosdem

w00t! > On Dec 6, 2019, at 1:49 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Hello all, > > I will have a talk on Fosdem. I will talk about building openoffice. I hope > that talk can be used afterwards to help people with building openoffice. > > Side note : will add the talk to Comdev wiki as soon as I have

Re: AOO 4.1.8 and MacOS Catalina

Sometimes you need to rebuild the Desktop to get macOS to correct icon problems... Have you tried that? > On Dec 4, 2019, at 10:33 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Hmmm... will look into that. thx > >> On Dec 4, 2019, at 8:41 AM, Bidouille wrote: >> >> Hello list

Re: AOO 4.1.8 and MacOS Catalina

nal - >> De: "Jim Jagielski" >> À: "dev" >> Cc: ooofo...@free.fr >> Envoyé: Lundi 9 Décembre 2019 15:28:35 >> Objet: Re: AOO 4.1.8 and MacOS Catalina >> >> Sometimes you need to rebuild the Desktop to get macOS to correct >>

Time for some test tarballs/developer releases for 4.1.8-dev and 4.2.0-devm2

Sub sez it all. Yeah, I know we have some bugz to squash, but maybe getingt some feedback on the current state is helpful too. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h.

Re: Time for some test tarballs/developer releases for 4.1.8-dev and 4.2.0-devm2

like CentOS 8, Fedora 31 or Ubuntu 19.10. > > We should investigate that before we think of new DevBuild. > > Regards, > > Matthias > > Am 03.01.20 um 18:22 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Sub sez it all. Yeah, I know we have some bugz to squash, but maybe geti

Re: Time for some test tarballs/developer releases for 4.1.8-dev and 4.2.0-devm2

solved by installing openjdk-8-jdk. (I >> also installed mesa-utils but I don't think it is needed) >> >> Normally I would think that AOO can operate without Java, but that is >> definitely something for the Release Notes. >> >> Regards, >> >>

Re: OpenOffice trunc Assertion Error

+1 > On Jan 8, 2020, at 9:02 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > On 1/8/2020 5:55 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> Hi - >> See inline >> Sent from my iPhone >>> On Jan 8, 2020, at 3:44 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: >>> >>> Hello again, >>> >>> hope I do not annoy anyone, with my questions. >>> I have looked

Re: External dependencies

+1 > On Jan 27, 2020, at 6:57 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 1/27/20 2:28 PM, Marcus wrote: >> Am 27.01.20 um 19:50 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >>> Kay Schenk wrote: > https://sourceforge.net/mirror/oooextras/_members/ Just a quick FYI. My id, "kschenk", is listed as "developer" but I no

Re: Apache OpenOffice 4.1.7 for OS/2 (and OS/2 based systems like ArcaOS)

cool > On Jan 31, 2020, at 10:28 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > FYI, AOO 4.1.7 for OS/2 has been released: > > https://www.bitwiseworks.com/news/#012020 > > I am happy to see my first bug fixes for OS/2 in "real life"! ;-) > > Regards, > >Matthias > >

Audience for AOO (Was: Re: Apache OpenOffice 4.1.7 for OS/2 (and OS/2 based systems like ArcaOS))

This news about AOO for OS/2 got me thinking... one of the things that I think is special about AOO, and something that we should pride ourselves on, and classify as an advantage, is that we try to make AOO usable for an extremely wide range of users. Now sure, if you are running the latest ver

Re: Updated 4.2.0 build?

FTR, let me know when/if "official" dev builds for Linux and/or macOS are needed. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: about build environment development (was: declaring gbuild target dependencies)

> On Apr 15, 2020, at 3:01 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > We are also thin on new contributors, and I recall you saying they're > largely scared off by the current build system. > Two points: 1. I doubt that by the time we finish porting to a whole new build system, we will even have

Re: Update to python-2.17

I agree. We should ensure that all works w/ 2.7.18 since it is the last of the Python 2.7s... even if it means we "fix" AOO to work with it, we should simply baseline that version. > On Apr 21, 2020, at 7:56 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > The final Python 2.7.18 is out: > > ht

Re: Update to python-2.17

> On Apr 23, 2020, at 8:50 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 23.04.20 um 13:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I agree. We should ensure that all works w/ 2.7.18 since it is the last of >> the Python 2.7s... even if it means we "fix" A

Re: about build environment development

On 4/15/2020 10:08 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 3:15 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Apr 15, 2020, at 3:01 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>

macOS and AOO42X

Just a FYI that I'm doing a quick test-build of HEAD AOO42X for macOS - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: macOS and AOO42X

;d like to have 5 new languages added. > > Regards, > > Matthias > > Am 28.04.20 um 16:09 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Just a FYI that I'm doing a quick test-build of HEAD AOO42X for macOS >> >>

Re: macOS and AOO42X

macOS builds for a handful of langs available at: o http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ > On Apr 28, 2020, at 10:09 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Just a FYI that I'm doing a quick test-build of HEAD AO

Re: macOS and AOO42X

OK, so I have available a handful of Lang builds for Linux 64bit and macOS available at o http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ These are of HEAD of AOO42X and were built as developer releases... these are not the "official" Dev2m2 releases however, although they are in a directory that i

Re: macOS and AOO42X

> On May 3, 2020, at 1:58 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 29.04.20 um 20:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> OK, so I have available a handful of Lang builds for Linux 64bit and macOS >> available at >> >> o http://home.apache.org/~j

Re: macOS and AOO42X

> On May 10, 2020, at 5:13 AM, Pedro Lino wrote: > > Hi Matthias, Jim > >> To be honest, there are still enough issues to fix... But I thought it >> would be time for a little bit of fun! ;-) >> >> https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/about.png > > I agree. Personally I think that aside from ta

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

With the somewhat successful tests, I will tag HEAD/trunk of the 42X branch as 420-Dev2-m2 (420m2) sometime today or tomorrow and start on the Linux 32&64 and macOS builds. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apa

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

Tag is done: 420-Dev2-m2 Kicking off builds > On May 11, 2020, at 10:26 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > 420-Dev2-m2

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

99 make: *** Deleting file '/Users/jim/src/asf/aoo-git/main/solver/420/unxmaccx.pro/workdir/UnoApiTarget/offapi.rdb' dmake: Error code 2, while making 'all' > On May 11, 2020, at 2:46 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Tag is done: > >420-Dev2-m2 > > K

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

It is, yes. > On May 11, 2020, at 3:55 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Let me guess... > > make is updated to 4.3? > > Am 11.05.20 um 21:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Ok, something happened between now and like 1 week ago, because I get (on >> macOS): >

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

Thanks I see https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128373 <https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128373> now. this needs to be fixed before our next release :/ > On May 11, 2020, at 4:04 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 11.05.20 um 22:01 schrieb Jim Jagiel

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

According to the gmake 4.3 release docs: * WARNING: Backward-incompatibility! Number signs (#) appearing inside a macro reference or function invocation no longer introduce comments and should not be escaped with backslashes: thus a call such as: foo := $(shell echo '#') is legal. Pre

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

In the meantime, I've changed configure.ac to balk if gmake is 4.3 (or later) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

Gotcha... before I do it I'll try w/ 4.3.0 and see if there are any diffs between the makefiles > On May 11, 2020, at 5:58 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 11.05.20 um 23:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> In the meantime, I've changed configure.ac to balk if gmake i

Re: AOO 4.2.0-Dev2 (was: macOS and AOO42X)

From what I can see, builds are starting to to fill in... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Test of AOO-DEV-m2

That's weird... something must be hard-coding that path in there. > On May 20, 2020, at 2:01 AM, Mechtilde wrote: > > Hello Jim, > > I did a first test of the last beta version of AOO. > > I did a fresh install of the Extension Writer2epub and get the message > attached. > > I am wondering ab

Re: Test of AOO-DEV-m2

Isn't that auto-generated? > On May 20, 2020, at 2:18 PM, Mechtilde wrote: > > Hello Jim, > > I found this entry in: > > program/python-core-2.7.17/lib/_sysconfigdata.py > > Can you correct it? > > Kind regards > > Am 20.05.20 um 15:12 schrieb Mechtilde: >> hello, >> >> i sent a screenshot

Re: Dev-m2 on macOS

I can't recreate that on any of the Macs I have access to. > On Jun 2, 2020, at 9:23 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi, > > Any confirmations? I don't have a mac to test anymore... > > [2] is a mega release blocker. > > Regards, > >Matthias > > Am 29.05.20 um 16:51 schrieb Matthias S

Re: configure on Mac OS X

What version of macOS and Xcode? > On Jun 20, 2020, at 7:56 AM, Peter wrote: > > Hi, > > > When Running configure ion Mac OS X I get the error Message: > > checking whether we are cross compiling... configure: error: in > `workspace/AOO/gitbox/main': > configure: error: cannot run C compiled

Re: configure on Mac OS X

You can force install them using /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/Packages/macOS_SDK_headers_for_macOS_10.14.pkg > On Jun 20, 2020, at 9:54 AM, Peter wrote: > > Jims Script does not work for me. And it sets a lot of stuff, which I am > unsure if they are the same on my System. > > Apple is

Re: Build Issue with Hunspell on MacOSx

> On Jun 28, 2020, at 3:31 AM, Peter wrote: > > Hello all, > > does anyone have an Idea how this error can happen? > > hunspell.cxx:119:14: fatal error: '../../intl/libintl.h' file not found > #include <../../intl/libintl.h> > ^~ > 1 error generated. > >

Re: Dev-m2 on macOS

age? > > If so, I would work on graphics for the Language Pack and SDK, too. > > Regards, > > Matthias > > Am 11.06.20 um 15:52 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I can't recreate that on any of the Macs I have access to. >> >>> On Jun 2, 2020, at 9:

Re: configure on Mac OS X

Jun 23, 2020, at 3:55 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Hey Jim. > > My Mac Mini has MacOSX Catalina 10.15.5 and XCode 11.5 > > All the Best > > Peter > > Am 22.06.20 um 14:10 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> What version of macOS and Xcode? >>

Re: Dev-m2 on macOS

Building as we speak... > On Jul 1, 2020, at 12:36 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi JIm, > > Am 01.07.20 um 15:59 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I'll kick off a developer's build. Which specific language should I do? > > I have no personal preference. T

Re: Dev-m2 on macOS

Some builds are available at: https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/AOO-dev-50c544e5/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Dev-m2 on macOS

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/40d4a01ecacb607efe5dc313561c55b38d338734 > > Regards, > >Matthias > > Am 02.07.20 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Some builds are available at:

Re: Dev-m2 on macOS

I put a handful up on https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ > On Jul 6, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 06.07.20 um 14:51 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I'm kicking off a new build... > Thanks! >> >>> On Jul 3,

Re: 4.1.8 on the 20th Anniversary? (was Re: 4.2.0 on the 20th Anniversary?)

I'm up for it > On Jul 13, 2020, at 12:46 PM, Pedro Lino wrote: > > Hi Matthias > >> Personally I don't think a decent 4.2.0 release in 3 month is realistic. >> However we have a branch 4.1.8 at hand that is in good shape. > > So the plan is to release 4.1.8 for the Anniversary? > > Cheers, >

Re: sdk configuration on macos

The behavior is intended for ASF community builds. You are certainly able to adjust the scripts to allow for a more personalized build > On Jul 16, 2020, at 10:15 AM, Hyeon Lee wrote: > > > > > Hi, I'm building the office on macos 10.15. > I found out that the configure only supports unti

macOS test builds of 4.1.8

... are underway - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

devtools repo - move to git

Considering that AOO is now, itself, under gitbox, should we also move devtools as well over there as well? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apach

Re: devtools repo - move to git

> On Aug 4, 2020, at 6:09 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > On 8/4/20 4:12 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Considering that AOO is now, itself, under gitbox, should we also move >> devtools

Re: 4.1.8 on the 20th Anniversary? (was Re: 4.2.0 on the 20th Anniversary?)

I have a handful of builds for macOS and Linux 32+64bit available for review/comment at http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.1.8-dev/ > On Aug 3, 2020, at 1:19 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > >> On Aug 3, 2020, at 10:09 AM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Hi Pedro, >> >> Am 03.08.

Re: devtools repo - move to git

; : >> Good.send on. >> >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020, 5:09 PM Carl Marcum wrote: >> >>> Hi Jim, >>> >>> On 8/4/20 4:12 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>>> Consideri

Re: 4.1.8 on the 20th Anniversary? (was Re: 4.2.0 on the 20th Anniversary?)

; > Am 06.08.20 um 19:12 schrieb Pedro Lino: >> Thanks Jim >> >> Have been using the DEB x64 build under Ubuntu 18.04.4 x64 for real work >> since lunch time and it is rock solid ;) >> Updated 4.1.7 without any issues. >> >> Cheers, >> Pedro >

Re: 4.1.8 on the 20th Anniversary? (was Re: 4.2.0 on the 20th Anniversary?)

> On Aug 18, 2020, at 3:51 PM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 18.08.20 um 13:09 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Should we think of doing a 4.1.8 beta? > > do you have target group in mind? I mean, one that is really active and would > give us feedback? Considering that the only re

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

Let's commit and work after pushed. > On Aug 27, 2020, at 2:02 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > > On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Am 27.08.20 um 19:32 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>> >>> Hi Don, >>> >>> Am 24.08.20 um 04:04 schrieb Don Lewis: I've got a bunch of cherry picks that I'm planning to

Re: installing git on centos 5.5

All my Linux builds in http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.1.8-dev/ where done on CentOS5 > On Aug 30, 2020, at 2:36 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > > On 30 Aug, Carl Marcum wrote: >> Hi Don, >> >> On 8/29/20 8:02 PM, Don Lewis wrote: >>> O

Re: installing git on centos 5.5

Just a FYI that I have no problem compiling and building AOO418 HEAD on CentOS5 (64bit) > On Aug 31, 2020, at 9:49 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > All my Linux builds in > >http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.1.8-dev/ > <http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4

Re: problem building AOO418 on centOS 6.10

It looks to me that it's just that you are missing the Time/HiRes.pm CPAN module. > On Aug 31, 2020, at 3:03 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: > > Hi All, > > I'm trying to build AOO418 branch on a VirtualBox CentOS 6.10 VM. > I've mostly followed the centos 5 build instructions for 4.1.x with the > not

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

> Am 28.08.20 um 15:17 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Let's commit and work after pushed. > > We should try > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887 > > again for 4.1.8. > > Regards, > >Matthias > >> >>> On Aug 27,

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

Are these in trunk, or 4.2.x? > On Sep 7, 2020, at 10:31 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 07.09.20 um 15:14 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> For 4.1.x we have always supported 10.7 as the min macOS version. Changing >> supported versions via a patch re

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

Hmmm... we still support 10.7 as the lowest macOS version on both truck and AOO420 so somewhere, somehow, that got reverted. So let's go ahead and pull those Issues into AOO418. > On Sep 8, 2020, at 2:30 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 08.09.20 um 19:5

AOO 4.1.8 release

Are we ready for us to start coordinating an AOO418 release in earnest? Do we need a RM? If so, I can volunteer... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffi

Re: Minimum MacOS Version for trunk and 4.2.0 builds

Here is my thought. AOO exists to serve a large segment of the "I need office software" community which is, IMO at least, dis-served. Not everyone can afford the latest and greatest PC, with the latest version of the OS, and lots of RAM and disk. This is especially true in developing countries.

Re: Minimum MacOS Version for trunk and 4.2.0 builds

Yep... We needed to update our community build server from CentOS5 to CentOS7 due to gstreamer. There was talk about working around that, but it never came to fruition. One option is that we provide 2 sets of community builds for Linux: one on CentOS5 w/o gstreamer and one built on CentOS7 w/ gs

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

Just a FYI that HEAD of AOO418 builds on macOS with no issues so far... > On Sep 19, 2020, at 5:43 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 15.09.20 um 13:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Hmmm... we still support 10.7 as the lowest macOS version on both truck and

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

I have some ideas... with some changes to the proposed patch I have macOS building further along than before... fingers crossed. > On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:35 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Don, Jim, > > Am 22.09.20 um 22:54 schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 22 Sep, Jim Jag

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

found: libserf-1.0.0.0.dylib ... cleaning the output tree ... ... removing directory /var/folders/_p/nx0kp5h157197n6ssf35ft7hgn/T/ooopackaging/i_446601600974718 ... > On Sep 24, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I have some ideas... with some changes to the proposed pat

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

Thinking it's due to some changes not cherry picked from scp2 in AOO42X... rebuilding > On Sep 24, 2020, at 3:13 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Well, gotten further but now there are packaging issues. Something with the > new apr/apr-util/serf stuff is getting hosed..

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

> And update LICENSE: > > https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/1dedf1ecff4aeffe2f7c7612cbf893530465764e > > Regards, > > Matthias > > > Am 24.09.20 um 21:31 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Thinking it's due to some changes not cherry picked from

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

+1 > On Sep 26, 2020, at 2:53 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > Am 25.09.20 um 18:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-) >> Let's wait for Don&#

Re: java detection

Even more importantly: is it a *safe* fix? :-) > On Sep 26, 2020, at 8:34 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Don, > > Is this an easy fix? > > Regards, > >Matthias > > Am 25.09.20 um 22:54 schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 25 Sep, Don Lewis wrote: >>> On 24 Sep, Don Lewis wrote: I've been

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Am 25.09.20 um 18:05 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>>>> Am 25.09.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>>>>> That looks quite a bit more straightforward :-) >>>>> Let'

Re: [libexpat/libexpat] Release R_2_2_10 - 2.2.10

Let's cherry pick the change > On Oct 5, 2020, at 11:26 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Don, > > Am 05.10.20 um 17:09 schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 3 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Libexpat has been updated! >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>>Matthias >>> >>> >>> >>> W

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

I am booting up the macOS VM for the 4.1.8-dev builds as we speak. Will update to head and pull in nss > On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:00 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > > Any progress on nss? > > On 30 Sep, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> I'll see how the build on macOS goes, but likely

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

macOS build to include '-std=c++11' > On Oct 6, 2020, at 8:30 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I am booting up the macOS VM for the 4.1.8-dev builds as we speak. Will > update to head and pull in nss > >> On Oct 5, 2020, at 4:00 PM, Don Lewis > <mailto:tru

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

Thanks! Since these are relatively new, I think that this can hold for 4.1.9 > On Oct 6, 2020, at 12:19 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > > On 6 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> OK... as expected, it fails on macOS. >> >> 2 things I see: in the nss.patch file there is a line: &

Re: AOO418 cherry picks

++1 > On Oct 6, 2020, at 12:33 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > > On 6 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Thanks! Since these are relatively new, I think that this can hold for 4.1.9 > > I'd at least like to get the nss update into trunk/AOO42X where it can > soak for a while. &g

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >