Re: Help building AOO416 on Ubuntu 16.04

Hi Gavin > What build instructions have you been following so far? > https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Ubuntu_12.04 but checking the 14.04 changes if needed > > > > Is someone going to be online today on IRC or available > for

Re: Help building AOO416 on Ubuntu 16.04

Hi Matthias > On October 14, 2018 at 11:34 AM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote: > > I think I managed it with these instructions. But ignored most of the > warnings, as they are fixed already (either in Ubuntu or in AOO branch). > Ok. So any instructions on

Help building AOO416 on Ubuntu 16.04

Hi all I have come across the first two problems: 1) E: Package 'openjdk-7-jdk' has no installation candidate I installed openjdk-8 instead 2) The following packages have unmet dependencies: libgstreamer-ocaml : Depends: ocaml-base-nox-4.02.3 Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml:i386 but

Re: Update for Step by Step Build Guide for Ubuntu?

Hi Keith > Thanks for taking on this experiment. I have created a 16.04 stub in the > step by step building guide. I am more than willing to help with adding > information to the guide. > Thanks! I'm waiting on Peter Kovac's feedback to move forward. If anyone else has some pointers

Re: svn commit: r1844550 - in /openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.1.6: unxlngi6/build_aoo32bit_on_centos5.sh unxlngix6/build_aoo64bit_on_centos5.sh

Hi all > On October 22, 2018 at 5:38 PM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote: > > > Am 22.10.18 um 18:35 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > > > > The thing is, IMO, that these ARE community builds, and, as such, > should be noted as such on the About Page... But I'm

Re: Test builds of AOO 4.1.6 HEAD

Hi Jim Can you please upload pt (European Portuguese)? Thanks Pedro > On October 19, 2018 at 9:14 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > Builds for macOS and Linux 64bit (CentOS5) can be found at: > > http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ > > 32bit CentOS will either be over the weekend or

Re: Wrong distro detected?

Hi Marcus, all > On October 17, 2018 at 8:13 PM Marcus wrote: > OK, a suggestion: > > Let's do the 4.1.6 release and look closely for such comments. When > there are many comments that DEB would be the better default then we > should change it. Sounds like a good plan! Thanks! Regards

Re: Wrong distro detected?

Hi Marcus, all > On October 16, 2018 at 11:16 PM Marcus wrote: > > 1) For versions until 4.1.5 (our current one) links for MD5 hash values > > are still offered but no longer for newer versions. > > > > 2) When Linux is choosen as platform, a new link "RPM vs. DEB = What to > > choose?" is

Re: Update for Step by Step Build Guide for Ubuntu?

Hi Matthias, all > On October 13, 2018 at 8:06 PM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote: > > > But maybe we should start with 16.04? That is supported until 2021. > I think I managed to build, but ran out of disk space in my VM... > I'm running Ubuntu 16.04.5

Re: Update for Step by Step Build Guide for Ubuntu?

Hi Andrea Thank you for the fast answer! > Sure it is. With 60GB you can build all languages. For a test build > (English only) you won't need more than 10GB. Yes, i would prefer to start with a simple test case. > > How long will it take to build AOO on a Intel® Core™ i5-2520M CPU @

Re: Blocker issue 127789: Server error when looking for updates

Hi Andrea, all This is clearly a server side error (and an intermitent one) I rolled back to 4.1.4 (which was correctly reporting an update available last week) but today all versions I tested (4.1.6, 4.1.5 and 4.1.4) all report "Checking for an update failed." This is not a 4.1.6 problem.

Re: AOO 4.1.6-RC1 vote

Hi Peter, all > The release Manager has to much load at the moment. I have initiated the > vote just now. Just to make sure we are all on the same page: 4.1.6-RC1 refers to Rev. 1844227 available from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.6-RC1/ right? Regards, Pedro

Re: AOO 4.1.6-RC1 vote

> On October 31, 2018 at 10:13 PM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote: > > But it is revision 1844436, isn't it? > Correct! AOO416m1(Build:9790) - Rev. 1844436 2018-10-23 07:03 - Linux x86_64 Regards, Pedro

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Hi all I really would like to build from source (at least under Linux)! But first I found a problem checking the src file integrity. I'm using Double Commander's option Verify Checksum and all sha256 work correctly. However for the sha512, the content of the file is

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Hi Patricia I'm taking this opportunity to write to you directly (I hope this is not a problem) Do you have experience building in Linux? I have found this obstacle but no one on the dev mailing list answered (which worries me since I have been trying to contribute to this project...) Any

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Hi Jim, all > On November 1, 2018 at 1:09 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > ... > > libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0 is already the newest version > > (1.8.3-1ubuntu0.2). > > libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0 set to manually installed. > > libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 is already the newest version > >

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Hi Marcus > Please can you check it with the board-tools of Ubuntu? I think you also > should have sha256sum and sha512sum as commands. It does work for the src file with sha512sum so Double Commander is less versatile. But wouldn't it make sense to keep the two SHA files similar (i.e. *?

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Hi Marcus > it doesn't matter if you have the base, good or bad or ... package. But > the version number must be the same for all. > > Correct: > libgstreamer-plugins-base-0.10-0 > libgstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10-0 > > Problem: > libgstreamer-plugins-base-0.10-0 > libgstreamer-plugins-bad-1.0-0

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Hi Matthias, all > On November 2, 2018 at 12:33 AM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote: > > I have just corrected the script to have identical output for SHA256 and > SHA512. > Thank you! It works correctly with any program! > > > > AFAIK the data is

Re: Test builds of AOO 4.1.6 HEAD

Hi Matthias > On October 20, 2018 at 11:26 AM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote: > > > > > > I can confirm that it is running as expected under Ubuntu 16.04 > x64 (Thanks Jim!) > > > > > > > > The About box does have a quite different text

Re: Test builds of AOO 4.1.6 HEAD

> But even if I wanted, I can not change the copyright year... > That's what I am wondering about. ;-) > Ok. I (wrongly) assumed it was all editable :) > BTW: Can you confirm 2017 as copyright year in Jim's Linux builds? > > Yes, Jim's build is showing 2017. Regards, Pedro

Re: Test builds of AOO 4.1.6 HEAD

Hi Matthias, all > On October 20, 2018 at 10:46 AM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote: > > But has anyone else "Copyright © 2017" in the About Box? > Builds from our buildbots and my own Windows builds have "Copyright © > 2018" and I am wondering about the

Re: Does OpenOffice still use Serf?

> On November 13, 2018 at 10:08 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > 2. All WebDAV operations. You can find somewhere in Bugzilla a patch > that didn't make it to 4.1.2 due to excessive complexity (build > requirements). The Serf upgrade was meant to supplement WebDAV fixes in > 4.1.2. > > So you

Check for Updates broken?

Hi all Any news on fixing the "Checking for an update failed." problem? Regards, Pedro

Re: Check for Updates broken?

Hi Andrea, all > On November 16, 2018 at 12:10 AM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > If someone can provide a predictable way to reproduce the issue > consistently, solving it will likely be trivial. I receive the error message daily on any computer I use,regardless of location, AOO version or OS

Re: Check for Updates broken?

> On November 16, 2018 at 11:54 AM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Can you provide output of the following commands? > > $ host ooo-updates.apache.org ooo-updates.apache.org has address 40.79.78.1 ooo-updates.apache.org has address 95.216.24.32 ooo-updates.apache.org has IPv6 address

Re: Report from OpenRheinRuhr 2018 convention

Hi Peter, all Thank you for sharing this report. I'm happy to read that there is collaboration between the two projects (at least on a local scale) This should be the rule, not the exception... ODF adoption is indeed very important, especially now that Microsoft is making their file format not

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

-- The Release Candidate 1 for 4.1.6 has passed my tests. [x ] yes / +1 I have tested Windows Release [ x] binary Installed the Full Portuguese (pt) installer plus

Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1

Hi Matthias > On November 6, 2018 at 2:35 PM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote: > > > Hi Pedro, > > Am 02.11.18 um 11:35 schrieb Pedro Lino: > > > > Hi Matthias, all > > > > > > >

Re: Wrong distro detected?

Hi Rory, all > On September 2, 2018 at 9:42 PM Rory O'Farrell wrote: > It may be useful to know that the terminal command > inxi -S > > will display the distro name. I am sure there are other commands to do so of > which I am not aware. inxi is not included in Debian or Ubuntu.

Re: ISO image of Microsoft Windows SDK for Windows 7 and .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 ?

Hi Matthias > On September 24, 2018 at 7:53 PM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote: > > > Hi Peter, > > Am 24.09.2018 um 20:49 schrieb Peter kovacs: > > > > Maybe the One with .net 4 dies still Work? > > > > > > > >

Re: [Call for testing] Linux icons 128x128

Hi Matthias, all > > > > > > > Maybe someone can also test it on KDE and on pure Debian? > The new icons are looking perfect under Debian Stretch (9.5) x86 using build AOO420m1(Build:9800) - Rev. 1841506 2018-09-20_22:11:13-Rev.1841519 BTW please someone fix the rev

Re: Check for Updates broken?

> On November 18, 2018 at 2:48 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > For debugging, I suggest using cURL instead of OO, for example: > >     curl -sviI https://www.openoffice.org/ > > Thanks, if the issue is with SSL this indeed helps in finding more > details. Still, curl will always work also on

Re: Check for Updates broken?

Hi Andrea, Branko, all > On November 16, 2018 at 8:25 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Just restart OpenOffice after each edit and check if now the update > server can be found. Then you should go back to the original version of > the file to avoid that further testing is influenced by the change.

Re: Check for Updates broken?

> On November 17, 2018 at 9:56 AM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Another crazy test while at it: you probably know that, if you switch to > the OpenOffice dialog windows in Preferences - OpenOffice - General, you > can open URLs directly from within the application. I use that feature daily to edit

Re: AOO 4.2.0-dev-r1851479 test builds available

> On January 16, 2019 at 8:41 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > Now uploaded are test builds for macOS and Linux 64... Linux x64 installs and runs correctly under Ubuntu 16.04.5 Installation still fails to update the core01 file as described in https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127774

Re: Check for Updates broken?

as currently access. > > On 07.12.18 23:01, Pedro Lino wrote: > >> On December 5, 2018 at 10:01 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: > >> > >> On 05.12.18 08:08, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >>> If yes, we'll have to look into another environment. If no, we can > >&

Re: Check for Updates broken?

Hi Matthias > > > > Version 4.1.6 was released one month ago. > > This problem has not been solved yet (so in theory many users were > > not notified of this update) > > Can this be fixed? > > > > > It has a smaller impact than I would have expected. We

Re: New SDF files for 4.2.0

Hi Mechtilde Thanks! That was easy ;) Regards, Pedro > On December 5, 2018 at 9:11 AM Mechtilde < o...@mechtilde.de > mailto:o...@mechtilde.de > wrote: > > > Hello Pedro > > Am 05.12.18 um 00:42 schrieb Pedro Lino: > > > > > &

Re: Check for Updates broken?

> On December 5, 2018 at 7:08 AM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Are the current VMs unreachable from the affected systems? I mean, does > > $ soffice https://wiki.openoffice.org > $ soffice https://forum.openoffice.org > > give "Server error" from the machine where updates cannot be reached? Both

Re: Check for Updates broken?

> On December 5, 2018 at 10:01 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: > > On 05.12.18 08:08, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > > > If yes, we'll have to look into another environment. If no, we can > > reuse one of these two VMs as the new updates server. > We could try the OpenGrok Server. Has this been tested?

Re: New Chance for Translation Teams

> On December 2, 2018 at 9:33 AM Mechtilde < o...@mechtilde.de > mailto:o...@mechtilde.de > wrote: > > > > Every team who want to improve their translation can > write it here. Then > > I will extract the previous translation from pootle, merge > > them with

Re: [STATISTICS] Some download numbers from 2018-11-12 until 2018-12-01

Excellent news! I expect the number of downloads to increase substantially when the Check for Updates bug is fixed ;) 74% of people notified by SUMo have already updated https://www.kcsoftwares.com/sumo/view.php?ProductName=OpenOffice=OpenOffice.org=2 Regards, Pedro > On December 2, 2018 at

Re: New SDF files for 4.2.0

> On December 4, 2018 at 10:09 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > > On 26/11/2018 Mechtilde wrote: > > I started there: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Translation_from_4.2 > > Thanks for bringing us back on track for localization. Any chance I can download the whole structure from

Re: Check for Updates broken?

Any news on this issue? Can this be solved by Infra or by someone on the PMC? I believe this issue should have some priority especially because it affects the Windows OS users (the vast majority of the users)... Regards, Pedro > On November 20, 2018 at 10:30 PM Pedro Lino wrote: > &

Re: Check for Updates broken?

Hi Dave, Andrea, all > Let’s do our required migrations this week and then we can play with this TLS > issue. This may be more complex. My concern is whether or not older AOO is > even using TLS. Since legacy forums and wiki must be cut over by Nov 30th we > must prioritize. Agreed. Keep in

Re: Check for Updates broken?

Hi Matthias > > > > This means that the program is getting version > information from the server so some communication is passing through... > > > > > You did a reinstall without deleting the profile? Probably you > > updated > some dictionary before and AOO just

Re: Check for Updates broken?

> On November 25, 2018 at 12:13 PM Matthias Seidel < > matthias.sei...@hamburg.de mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote: > > No need to download it again as it is already in your profile. Just add > it by using "Add..." > That doesn't work unless you have the oxt file There

Re: Check for Updates broken?

Hi Andrea, all > On November 19, 2018 at 5:17 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > Can this change be reversed or an exception opened for AOO? > > Sure, we have multiple options available. Including moving this server > to a smaller (or even dedicated) virtual machine. Note that, even if we > miss

Re: Cambio de idioma.

Hola Si, existe una versión en Español. En https://www.openoffice.org/download/index.html deberá detectar automáticamente tu idioma. Si no, lo puedes bajar directamente desde http://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.6/binaries/es/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Win_x86_install_es.exe Saludos

Re: Check for Updates broken?

Hi Brane, all > On November 19, 2018 at 12:52 AM Branko Čibej wrote: > > Does the Apache web server still support TLS version 1.0? The old > > version of OpenSSL that we bundle with the Windows and Linux versions > > doesn't support anything newer than that. > > > It looks like you found the

Re: Check for Updates broken?

Hi Andrea, all I don't know if this is relevant but ping to 40.79.78.1 does not work. I can only send/receive packets to/from 95.216.24.32 Regards, Pedro - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For

Re: Check for Updates broken?

; > > > Hi Pedro, > > > > Am 17.11.18 um 11:26 schrieb Pedro Lino: > >>> On November 17, 2018 at 9:56 AM Andrea Pescetti > >>> wrote: > >>> Another crazy test while at it: you probably know that, if you switch to > >>> the OpenOffice

Re: Check for Updates broken?

> On November 17, 2018 at 5:32 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > A nice additional benefit is that this gives us a simple way to > reproduce the bug, equivalent to the update notification. > > $ soffice https://ooo-updates.apache.org/index.html > (this fails on Ubuntu, succeeds on Fedora) > > Note

Re: Check for Updates broken?

> On November 16, 2018 at 4:02 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > In particular, the last output above shows that you can successfully > download the update feed to your computer. You can replace "416" in the > URL with the OpenOffice version you are actually running if you wish to > be 100% sure.

Re: Check for Updates broken?

> On November 19, 2018 at 5:17 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Does the current explanation actually explain why the first command > succeeds on Fedora? (of course, this also reflects in GUI, where the > check for updates only succeeds on Fedora). Not at all. If the problem was simply on the

Re: Check for Updates broken?

> On November 18, 2018 at 12:00 AM Branko Čibej wrote: > For debugging, I suggest using cURL instead of OO, for example: > >     curl -sviI https://www.openoffice.org/ The output is below * Trying 95.216.24.32... * Connected to www.openoffice.org (95.216.24.32) port 443 (#0) * found 148

Re: [Call for testing] Linux icons 128x128

Hi Hagar > On September 15, 2018 at 11:18 AM Hagar Delest wrote: > There was an error during the installation > (Apache_OpenOffice_4.2.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US_2018-09-12_16_19_52_1840718.tar.gz) > Package in error: openoffice-core01_4.2.0-1_amd64.deb (--install) > belonging to

Re: [Call for testing] Linux icons 128x128

Hi Matthias, all > On September 15, 2018 at 10:21 AM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote: > > Test it on every Linux desktop manager you can get your hands on! ;-) > And *please* give feedback! > Please do include this in version 4.1.6 for Linux! For those who

Re: svn commit: r33277 - /dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev1/binaries/de/

re complicated for all just to benefit the very few advanced users who need several versions simultaneously. In any case currently installing AOO under Linux is only for advanced users so this isn't an essential issue. > Am 29. März 2019 10:55:11 MEZ schrieb Pedro Lino < pedro.l

Re: svn commit: r33277 - /dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev1/binaries/de/

Hi Andrea > On March 31, 2019 at 10:43 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > In the last command the user is actually supposed to install only the > relevant package. Contents of this directory vary, so it might be that > in some circumstances you only find one package there. But the generic > rule is

Re: Optional Typewriter Sounds

Until someone develops that extension, you can always use the fantastic, distraction free FocusWriter https://gottcode.org/focuswriter/ Just enable the typewriter sounds under Settings > Preferences > General > Typewriter sounds For an added nostalgia, under Settings > Themes, switch to Old

Re: Linux desktop integration an Dev builds (Was: Re: 4.2.0-dev-m1)

Hi Jim, all > Linux 64bit builds for en-US and de (both dpkg and rpm) can > be found at: > > http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/Dev-r1856914/ > > These SHOULD fix the desktop integration issues with Linux > builds when building Dev and/or Beta releases. Unfortunately it is not

Re: svn commit: r33277 - /dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev1/binaries/de/

I would like to ask if there is a reason why there is a desktop integration folder? This currently forces the Linux user to run 3 commands sudo dpkg -i *.deb cd desktop-integration sudo dpkg -i *.deb In the downstream project the contents of the desktop-integration folder has been moved to the

Re: svn commit: r33277 - /dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev1/binaries/de/

er? Can this be improved? > Mechtilde > > Am 29. März 2019 10:42:22 MEZ schrieb Pedro Lino < pedro.l...@mailbox.org > mailto:pedro.l...@mailbox.org >: > >I would like to ask if there is a reason why there is a desktop > >integration folder? >

Re: extensions description xml doesn't exist

All extensions are now at https://extensions.openoffice.org/ If your extension is hosted at the new address maybe it needs a little URL editing Hope this helps... > On February 24, 2019 at 1:07 PM John D'Orazio < > john.dora...@cappellaniauniroma3.org >

Re: extensions description xml doesn't exist

ww.w3.org/1999/xlink;> But that address is a 404... Does anyone know what is the point of including this outdated header? Should it be fixed/updated or simply removed? > On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 5:53 PM Pedro Lino < pedro.l...@mailbox.org > mailto:pedro.l...@mailbox.org > wr

Re: extensions description xml doesn't exist

> On February 26, 2019 at 6:25 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > On 26/02/2019 Matthias Seidel wrote: > > For the moment I have created a landing page for this URI: > > http://openoffice.org/extensions/description/2006 > > This will work, but I confirm what you and others had guesses: this is >

Re: Time for our first 4.2.0 beta?

> On February 14, 2019 at 4:45 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > Time for another ping... what does everyone think? Time? How does a Beta version install on Linux?* Is it installed in parallel to the Stable version (like on Windows)? If not then I believe the update problem should be fixed

Re: Time for our first 4.2.0 beta?

Hi Rory, Keith, all > On February 15, 2019 at 11:32 AM "Keith N. McKenna" < > keith.mcke...@comcast.net mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net > wrote: > > > On 2/15/2019 6:03 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > > > On Fri,

Re: Time for our first 4.2.0 beta?

> On January 29, 2019 at 7:21 PM Marcus wrote: > Am 29.01.19 um 13:05 schrieb Pedro Lino: > > Shouldn't AOO be concerned that previous users are not notified of new > > releases > > (or extension updates)? The update notification mechanism has been broken &g

Re: Time for our first 4.2.0 beta?

> On January 29, 2019 at 9:02 PM Matthias Seidel < > matthias.sei...@hamburg.de mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote: > > > > How is this related to 4.2.0 Beta?! > The subject of this email/topic is "Time for our first 4.2.0 beta?" My opinion is that it is better to fix

Re: Time for our first 4.2.0 beta?

Hi Matthias, Andrea, all > On January 31, 2019 at 11:08 PM Matthias Seidel < > matthias.sei...@hamburg.de mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote: > > > Am 31.01.19 um 23:33 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > > > > On 30/01/2019 Peter Kovacs wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: Bootstrap?

rong. > and for installing libcups use apt-get install libcups2-dev. It worked for > me. > > On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 10:01 PM Pedro Lino < pedro.l...@mailbox.org > mailto:pedro.l...@mailbox.org > wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: Bootstrap?

ded that dll in the past and have successfully compiled functional Linux x64 installers and binaries Thanks! > > On 03.02.19 16:45, Pedro Lino wrote: > > Hi Nikhil, all > > > > I forgot to mention that I'm building now (as I did before) under Ubuntu > > 16.04 x64

Re: Bootstrap?

s.h could not be found. libcupsys2-dev or cups???-devel missing? I tried to install libcupsys2 but got "Unable to locate package libcupsys2-dev Thanks! > On 2/3/2019 7:45 AM, Pedro Lino wrote: > > Hi Nikhil, all > > > > I forgot to mention that I'm building now (as I

Re: Bootstrap?

led... Anyway, I got a bootstrap file and it run without errors! Thanks! Cheers, Pedro > On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 10:01 PM Pedro Lino < pedro.l...@mailbox.org > mailto:pedro.l...@mailbox.org > wrote: > > > > > > > >

Bootstrap?

Hi all I have built AOO from source in previous versions using the step-by-step guide https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step Currently (in trunk and all branches from https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/) there is no bootstrap file (only

Re: Bootstrap?

l > --enable-dbus > --without-junit > --with-package-format="installed archive deb" > --enable-bundled-dictionaries > --with-vendor=ASF buildbot - NOT FOR RELEASE > --with-build-version=%(today)s-Rev.%(got_revision)s > > After that has been f

Re: Time for our first 4.2.0 beta?

Hi Jim, all > I think we are at a stage where we should consider doing our > 1st beta release of 4.2.0... we have successful builds for macOS, > Linux 32 and 64, and Windows; we have a stable 4.2.0-dev branch, > and enough changes to warrant a beta release for testing and >

Re: OpenOffice Mystery....

Dear Barbara You have posted in the developer's mailing list. In the future if you need assistance please post your questions at https://forum.openoffice.org/ > I have used OpenOffice for the last 4 years when it was installed for me by > Apple on a new Apple Pro Mac computer. They knew I

Re: AOO Download problems

Hello Jérémy You have posted in the developer's mailing list. In the future if you need assistance please post your questions at https://forum.openoffice.org/ > On May 25, 2019 at 8:18 AM Jérémy NANSÉ < nanje...@gmail.com > mailto:nanje...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > Hello, > >

Re: Downloads

Hi Tom > I'm trying to download your OpenOffice for Windows7 to be able to edit > and use the .doc files that I've made in Microsoft Word 2000 & 2007, but when > I try I keep getting "styles failing to load" and so no download. Also will > your software do what I"m trying to get done? >

Re: Failed downloads of Apache OpenOffice

Dear Malu You have posted in the developer's mailing list. In the future if you need assistance please post your questions at https://forum.openoffice.org/ > I tried to download Apache OpenOffice thrice and all "Failed." Several > retries also failed. > > My device uses Windows

Re: Recent files in Windows

Hi Peter > We have here this old bug on Recent files in Windows Quickstarter. > > Does this still exist is it up to date? - I am a bit confused to be > honest. Maybe this one is obsolete? This was an enhancement request and the feature is still missing. But Quick Starter is now an option not

Re: 124473 - No dictionary included in Language packs - What to do with this Issue?

Hi all > Am 28.08.19 um 08:52 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > > 2. Including dictionaries in language packs would create the issue of > > what to do in some cases. For example, the Italian build contains the > > English dictionary. I may install OpenOffice in Italian and then a few > > months later

Re: Release Candidate for AOO 4.1.7?

Hi Matthias > I think it is time to do our (first) Release Candidate for AOO 4.1.7. > > Unofficial test builds for Windows are already here [1] and those for > macOS and Linux here [2]. > > Please test, so we can decide to build an RC. > Installed Full pt version + en-US

Re: Release Candidate for AOO 4.1.7?

this some sort of server side issue? > > On 04.09.19 00:32, Pedro Lino wrote: > > > > Maybe someone can take another shot at fixing the failed Check for Updates? > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127789 > > I'm available for t

Re: Merchandising for Apache OpenOffice

Thanks! And for those who are not fluent in German (Deutsch), here are the English links https://www.redbubble.com/people/comdev/works/40935635-apache-openoffice and https://www.redbubble.com/people/comdev/works/40952184-apache-openoffice Regards, Pedro > On September 10, 2019 at 9:40

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Maybe I am confused: Where is RC1? I believe we tested some build to check if source was ready to build RC1? A second question: now that source move to git, what is the command to download source for branch 4.1.7 to build from source? Thanks! > On September 11, 2019 at 6:31 AM Peter Kovacs

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Hi Matthias > On September 11, 2019 at 2:41 PM Matthias Seidel < > matthias.sei...@hamburg.de mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote: > > > As always you will find it on the ASF dist server in the dev area: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.7-RC1/ > Ok.

Re: apache open office 4.1.7

Ciao Paolo Assuming you want the Italian version, you can download it directly from Apache http://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.7/binaries/it/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.7_Win_x86_install_it.exe http://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.7/binaries/it/ Hope this helps, Pedro > On

Re: macro start key

Hi Mike Can you please report this at Bugzilla with more details? https://bz.apache.org/ooo/ This is the Dev mailing list, so not the proper place for reporting this. Briefly answering your question: if this is a regression (and seems to be a simple issue) it would probably be fixed for the

Fwd: Re: macro start key

I don't know if you have subscribed the list, so here is a copy. Best regards, Pedro -- Original Message -- From: Pedro Lino To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Date: November 13, 2019 at 12:49 PM Subject: Re: macro start key Hi Mike Can you please report this at Bugzilla with more

Re: [Important] No Availability of Pootle server

Thank you for the warning. It is a shame I lost all the translations I added to Portuguese since Nov 2nd... Regards, Pedro > On November 8, 2019 at 6:11 AM Mechtilde < o...@mechtilde.de > mailto:o...@mechtilde.de > wrote: > > > Hello to all, > > Please don't work at the Pootle

Re: Status of the translation project

Hi Matthias Thank you for the update and thank you Mechtilde for fixing the issue. Regards, Pedro > On December 7, 2019 at 4:33 PM Matthias Seidel < > matthias.sei...@hamburg.de mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote: > > > Hi Pedro, > > Am 06.1

Re: Verified publisher

what we need to do and volunteers > describing and following the procedure. > > Am 25. Oktober 2019 00:11:46 MESZ schrieb Pedro Lino < > pedro.l...@mailbox.org mailto:pedro.l...@mailbox.org >: > >Hi all > > > >I understand that to so

Re: 4.2.0-dev next?

Thank you very much! I'm already running it. This is a good one! All the best, Pedro > On October 24, 2019 at 11:50 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > New builds: http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/AOO420-test/ > > - > To

Re: Mac system Catalina

Hi Jim, all > On October 28, 2019 at 3:34 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > > > On Oct 28, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > > > > Even I saw reports on this very list to the tune that, without proper > > notarization, apps won't work on Catalina. > > Not quite true. You can still

Re: Mac system Catalina

> > > > > > > > > Do you volunteer? Remember, we all are only volunteers... ;-) > > > > I believe these two issues should be enough reason for a > 4.1.8 release. > > > > > Welcome to the team! > I don't understand the cynicism. I believe I have

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >