Re: Monteray MacOS build and Python

2022-09-05 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 10:36 AM Bidouille wrote: > Hello, > > Since MacOS 12.3, Apple don't provide Python 2.7 > > https://developer.apple.com/documentation/macos-release-notes/macos-12_3-release-notes#Python > > So, you can not run any Python scripts anyway. > > Annoying... > > We have had

Re: The issue of bad allocation in Calc

2022-09-05 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 3:34 PM Aivaras Stepukonis wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone have the time and expertise to solve the issue of bad > allocation afflicting Calc as per Issue > 125006 - Calc > Consistently crashing, usually with "Fatal Error -

Re: Any news from x64 port?

2022-08-31 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 3:50 PM Bidouille wrote: > Seems to be paused since 2018: > https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Win64_port > > So I've been playing around lately, and thinking how to do the Win64 port, a newer MSVC compiler, and to finish the port to gbuild or a better build system, all at

Re: --with-system-boost breaks build in vcl, --without in configmgr

2022-08-23 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi Linux and FreeBSD have always used the "gnu++98" standard: openoffice-git/main]$ grep '\-std' solenv -R solenv/inc/unxfbsd.mk:CFLAGSCXX= -pipe $(ARCH_FLAGS) -std=gnu++98 solenv/inc/unxlng.mk:CFLAGSCXX= -pipe $(ARCH_FLAGS) -std=gnu++98 solenv/gbuild/platform/freebsd.mk: -std=gnu++98 \

Re: WebDAV module ported from serf to curl; curl using openssl and zlib (was: Re: Openssl, serf and curl)

2022-08-22 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 6:54 PM Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > Hello Damjan, All, > > On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 03:22:53PM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 11:48 AM Arrigo Marchiori > > > wrote: > > > > > Hello Damjan, > >

--with-system-boost breaks build in vcl, --without in configmgr

2022-08-22 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
teger); ^ fatal error: too many errors emitted, stopping now [-ferror-limit=] commit 7ea3dd96c0cddf821d2f83199ef817a4fa174040 Author: Damjan Jovanovic Date: Tue Aug 23 02:46:53 2022 +0200 --without-system-boost apparently needs BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_TUPLE defined to compile with C

glib >= 2.71.0 breaks the build in the avmedia module (FreeBSD / Linux)

2022-08-22 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi Apparently in some recent glib commit, probably f304df34c7335526ef08701dc0b4a35f03299249 first released in 2.71.0, they changed a macro in a way that fixes warnings with C, but fails to compile with stricter C++ compilers (Clang 8, 9, 10, 12 and 13 on FreeBSD, but probably GCC+Linux too).

Re: [DISCUSS] Fixes for Basic lang in 4.1 line

2022-06-09 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 5:46 PM Carl Marcum wrote: > For discussion: > Should we included these fixes in 4.1.x? > The only reason I didn't include them myself, is that back then I expected 4.2.0 to be out soon, and didn't want to waste time backporting to 4.1.x which was about to be EOL.

Re: WebDAV module ported from serf to curl; curl using openssl and zlib (was: Re: Openssl, serf and curl)

2022-05-28 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 11:48 AM Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > Hello Damjan, > > On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 11:12:45AM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 9:20 AM Arrigo Marchiori > > > wrote: > > > > > Hello Damjan, all, > >

Re: WebDAV module ported from serf to curl; curl using openssl and zlib (was: Re: Openssl, serf and curl)

2022-05-28 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
amjan, > > > > > > On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 06:10:46PM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 2:43 PM Arrigo Marchiori > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello Damjan, all, > > >

Re: WebDAV module ported from serf to curl; curl using openssl and zlib (was: Re: Openssl, serf and curl)

2022-05-28 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 9:47 PM Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > Hello Damjan, > > On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 06:10:46PM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 2:43 PM Arrigo Marchiori > > > wrote: > > > > > Hello Damjan, all, > >

Re: WebDAV module ported from serf to curl; curl using openssl and zlib (was: Re: Openssl, serf and curl)

2022-05-22 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 2:43 PM Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > Hello Damjan, all, > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 07:56:22PM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 9:57 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > > I'm gonna look into the serf->(lib)cur

Re: WebDAV module ported from serf to curl; curl using openssl and zlib (was: Re: Openssl, serf and curl)

2022-05-15 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 3:57 PM Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > Dear All, > > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 07:36:49PM +0200, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > if nobody objects, I will merge this PR during the week-end. > > > > Reference: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/146 > >

Re: WebDAV module ported from serf to curl; curl using openssl and zlib (was: Re: Openssl, serf and curl)

2022-04-28 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 8:46 PM Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > Hello Damjan, > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 06:53:43PM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 6:12 PM Arrigo Marchiori > > > wrote: > > > > > Dear Damjan, All, > >

Re: WebDAV module ported from serf to curl; curl using openssl and zlib (was: Re: Openssl, serf and curl)

2022-04-28 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 6:12 PM Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > Dear Damjan, All, > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 07:56:22PM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 9:57 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > > I'm gonna look into the serf->(lib)cur

Re: WebDAV module ported from serf to curl; curl using openssl and zlib (was: Re: Openssl, serf and curl)

2022-04-27 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 9:22 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi, > > Am 27.04.22 um 21:09 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 8:07 PM Matthias Seidel < > matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Damjan, > >> > >

Re: WebDAV module ported from serf to curl; curl using openssl and zlib (was: Re: Openssl, serf and curl)

2022-04-27 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 8:07 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Damjan, > > Am 27.04.22 um 19:11 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > Thank you Matthias. > > > > Not too happy to use Github, but here is the pull request: > > https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/1

Re: WebDAV module ported from serf to curl; curl using openssl and zlib (was: Re: Openssl, serf and curl)

2022-04-27 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
> >Matthias > Am 26.04.22 um 19:56 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 9:57 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> I'm gonna look into the serf->(lib)curl option... Since we don't use any >> of the fancy features of serf, I'm thinking that the easy option

New UNO service for logging to syslog

2022-04-27 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi I've committed a new UNO service, com.sun.star.logging.SyslogHandler, which logs to a syslog server. Updated documentation on how you use it is at: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Category:Logging This only applies to code using the com.sun.star.logging framework, which is currently only

Re: WebDAV module ported from serf to curl; curl using openssl and zlib (was: Re: Openssl, serf and curl)

2022-04-26 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Pedro Lino wrote: > > Hi Damian > > > > I use Webdav almost on a daily basis. > Looking forward to testing a new build under Linux as soon as you push it > to 42X > > Can you share your working binaries for Windows? > > > > Thanks! > > Pedro &

Re: [DISCUSS] [QA AUTOMATION] merging standalone-test branch into trunk

2022-04-03 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 9:44 PM Carl Marcum wrote: > Hi All, > Hi I want to get some opinions on whether to merge my work on standalone > test automation into trunk and possibly AOO42X and AOO41X or leave it in > a branch and use it from there. > Six months ago I posted this [1] on qa@ and

Re: Help building in Ubuntu 20.04.4?

2022-03-20 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
se commits from trunk: commit ca91c47212927702e72149e398fae850402fa54c Author: Damjan Jovanovic Date: Thu Oct 19 16:35:49 2017 + GnomeVFS was deprecated 9 years ago. Make GIO, its replacement, the default searched by configure.ac instead. commit 6b1c0a07ced87c91d0adf8f59096a87e364647c0 Author: Damjan Jovanovic Da

Re: Branch scons-build and PR #82

2021-09-08 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi Arrigo You can. Peter's patches didn't fully convert the logic from main/solenv/gbuild/platform/linux.mk into SCons, they only did the minimum to catch up with FreeBSD. I haven't developed on that branch in some time, and can't help right now. There's a lot we could do in a SCons build

Re: [OS/2 and macOS] saving ODS with chart

2021-07-28 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:21 PM Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > But that property _was_ set as a bool by method > XMLFilter::impl_Export(), in file > main/chart2/source/model/filter/XMLFilter.cxx, at the beginning of > this explanation: > > 691: xInfoSet->setPropertyValue( sUsePrettyPrinting,

epm 5 not compiling on FreeBSD 13

2021-07-07 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi On FreeBSD 13.0 the epm module doesn't compile: = Building module epm = Entering /store0/Projects/Apache/Public/openoffice/openoffice-git/main/epm mkdir ./unxfbsdx/misc/build/epm-5.0.0/ mkdir: ./unxfbsdx/misc/build/epm-5.0.0/: File exists cd

Re: svn commit: r1890844 - /openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.1.10/wntmsci/build_aoo32bit_on_mingw. sh

2021-06-16 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 1:34 AM Don Lewis wrote: > On 16 Jun, ard...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: ardovm > > Date: Wed Jun 16 19:07:44 2021 > > New Revision: 1890844 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1890844=rev > > Log: > > Build script for AOO 4.1.10 under Mingw > > > > Better

Re: OpenOffice for Amazon Linux in aarch64 architecture

2021-02-17 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 4:49 PM Jesús Alberto Cantú Peña < jca...@ecaresoft.com> wrote: > Hello: > I started using AWS g4 generation machines and i need an open office > software for that kind of architecture: (Linux machine aarch64) > Do you know if exist an Open Office versión to be installed

Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO

2020-12-07 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 8:38 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to know how you guys feel we should move on with our base > Database. Our current strategy is a small sized embedded DB using HSQLDB > (BSD). There are 2 other options in the same weight class, that is H2 > (EPL1 or

Re: Help w/ bt

2020-12-03 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Well done! On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 7:09 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > fixed: it was a strcpy overflow. > > > On Dec 2, 2020, at 9:02 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > > That's in main/soltools. > > > > Try isolate the exact command used, and try run tha

Re: Help w/ bt

2020-12-02 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
sure if this is macOS specific or whether or not doing so breaks > on other platforms as well... anyone know before I spin up another VM and > test? > > > On Dec 2, 2020, at 10:25 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 3:35 PM Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.co

Re: Help w/ bt

2020-12-02 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 3:35 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > So I've been working on some of the macOS bugz and am looking at the UNO > bridge as a likely subject, hence the various changes to the macOS code > there. I'm hoping someone can help me with this crash. > > I open up Extension Manager, hit

Re: [OPINION VOTE] CentOS7 or Ubuntu 14.04

2020-11-10 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 7:58 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > History: For previous AOO releases (up to 4.1.8), we have used > CentOS5 as our build environ for our community builds. > As of 4.2.x, this is no longer an option. Instead, we > baselined CentOS7 (mainly due to

Re: QA Automated Test coverage

2020-10-27 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 8:14 PM Carl Marcum wrote: > Hi All, > > I've been testing builds with the automated BVT and FVT tests lately. > I have a few questions: > > 1. Is there anything documented about how much coverage these tests > provide vs.functionality? > > 2. Is there yet a place to list

Re: Apache Python Project

2020-10-27 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi Kent Welcome to Apache OpenOffice. One of the major tasks we need Python development for at the moment is to upgrade OpenOffice from Python 2 to 3. This is unfortunately quite difficult, as we not only have to port Python code, but possibly C code too, deal with patching, testing and

Re: Writer and .docx

2020-10-17 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 4:13 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > Hi - > > Top posting as well. I think we should consider our goals as a project. If > one of those goals is support for ODF as a theory of everything office that > you can trust and know will remain parsable a century from now then what > does

Re: Writer and .docx

2020-10-17 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 11:50 AM Bidouille wrote: > > OpenOffice users can open documents in .docx format, but they cannot > > save in that format. > Well, remember that last version of Microsoft Office (since 2016) can open > ODT format. > > Unfortunately not all MS Office editions have ODT

poi-filter branch with initial OOXML/.xlsx export filter

2020-10-17 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi I've put together my previous work on an OOXML export filter for spreadsheets, and pushed it into a branch called poi-filter. So far it builds successfully, gets packaged, appears in the "Save" dialog, loads, has all the right methods called, and gets to traversing and saving the document,

Re: Writer and .docx

2020-10-16 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 4:24 PM Carl Marcum wrote: > Hi Damjan, > > On 10/16/20 9:23 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 2:05 PM Dave Fisher > wrote: > > > >> Hi - > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > >> > >&g

Re: Writer and .docx

2020-10-16 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 2:05 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > Hi - > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Oct 16, 2020, at 4:04 AM, Mechtilde wrote: > > > > Hello Joost, > > > > I'm very happy to read from you. > > > >> Am 16.10.20 um 12:50 schrieb Joost Andrae: > >> Hi Simon, > >> > >> it's an honor to me

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: It seems we need YYDEBUG to compile main/connectivity now.

2020-10-05 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 8:08 AM Don Lewis wrote: > On 5 Oct, dam...@apache.org wrote: > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > > > damjan pushed a commit to branch trunk > > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git > > > > > > The

Re: UNO knowledge

2020-09-12 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi Patricia Please elaborate? Which bug? On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 6:49 PM Patricia Shanahan wrote: > I have been working on a bug, and have reached the conclusion that a fix > will require changes to the parsing of XML and recording of event > actions. I am seriously handicapped in making

Re: file serialization entry point

2020-07-29 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 2:30 AM Kira Tsu wrote: > Hi, > > I'm completely new to OpenOffice and was grok'ing around to find the code > that serializes spreadsheet files. Can someone point me in the right > direction, please? Where in the codebase does it parse into memory and > save out XLSX

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated (053307f -> 15daf39)

2020-07-26 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi Thank you. I've been testing them, they work. Regards Damjan On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 5:54 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Damjan, > > The Windows buildbot for trunk did succeed and I don't see any problems. > But is there any way to test your changes? > > I would like to cherry-pick these

Re: Our OpenGrok server

2020-07-18 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Can you please also see if we can set tab size to 4 spaces? On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 10:08 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > I have admin access. I will look into it asap. > > > Am 16.07.20 um 11:42 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > > Hi all, > > > > Our OpenGrok server needs some attention: > >

Re: Automated gbuild -> SCons convertibility now at 88.57%

2020-07-05 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
d outside Cygwin), though I do want to check that the paths passed to rsc.exe are correct. My MSVC is broken, so I can't test the binary targets. > > I have to look at the SCons. I plan to build GSICheck also with SCons, > even if it is a total simple tool. > > Ok great. > > All

Re: Automated gbuild -> SCons convertibility now at 88.57%

2020-07-04 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
at 9:35 PM Patricia Shanahan wrote: > On 7/4/2020 12:24 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > Given how I've only developed on FreeBSD so far, anything Windows is > > probably at negative infinity :) > > > Do you have some example modules with that symbols problem, or a

Re: Automated gbuild -> SCons convertibility now at 88.57%

2020-07-04 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
; > On 7/4/2020 11:44 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > Hi > > > > In the scons-build branch, I've just pushed a set of 11 commits that > > theoretically get 93 out of 105 gbuild modules (88.57%) automatically > > converting to gbuild. > > > > The "

Automated gbuild -> SCons convertibility now at 88.57%

2020-07-04 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi In the scons-build branch, I've just pushed a set of 11 commits that theoretically get 93 out of 105 gbuild modules (88.57%) automatically converting to gbuild. The "gotoSCons" converter and the SCons infrastructure in that branch have now been developed to such a level that a module can be

Re: Small regression in trunk

2020-05-18 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 9:41 AM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Damjan, all, > > Am 11.05.20 um 17:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > > Hi Damjan, > > > > Am 11.05.20 um 17:48 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > >> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 5:25 PM Matthias Seidel < &

Re: Small regression in trunk

2020-05-11 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 5:25 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Damjan, > > Is there a specific reason why you moved "sd/res/imagelst" to > "sd/imagelst" in this commit: > > > https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/b63233d868a9af170b0457a7aa0c5809011cc2c1 > > The reason why I ask is that it

Re: Remove of STAX and SAXON

2020-04-26 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 7:30 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Pedro hinted STAX can be dropped, and STAX reference is only in the > dependency of SAXON. > > I would like to add SAXON to the removal list. Since to my research no > other module references SAXON as a dependency, and we

Re: harmful code??

2020-04-25 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 2:11 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hello all, > > I hunt some Warnings and Errors that get logged during build. > > I stumbled over this code here in file_misc.cxx [1]: > > 684 > < >

Re: drop ressources (stlport, maybe beanshell)

2020-04-25 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 3:50 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Another potential candidate to get Rid of is beanshell. I am looking > into it, the project moved to Apache Commons. I hope that it is still > there under a different name (beanUtil?) > > See https://github.com/beanshell/beanshell#history

Re: Issue in vbahelper

2020-04-23 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 5:18 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hello all, > > Build broke again, this time with Following Output: > > = > Building module vbahelper > = > > Entering /home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/vbahelper/prj > > cd .. && make -s -r -j1

Re: about build environment development (was: declaring gbuild target dependencies)

2020-04-15 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 3:15 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > On Apr 15, 2020, at 3:01 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > > > > We are also thin on new contributors, and I recall you saying they're > > largely scared off by the current build system.

Re: about build environment development (was: declaring gbuild target dependencies)

2020-04-15 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 6:46 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > If one wants to tap in our build system he needs to understand Perl, > shell, make, ant, XML, configure, ... > > This is just way to complicated, especially if you want to bring in an > IDE to ease code development. > > > Damjan is not very

Re: Version Numbers in source code

2020-03-15 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi I don't think we ever convert 450 to 4.5.0. Where do you see that? Damjan On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 3:40 PM Carl Marcum wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm working on using Ant to build javadocs and package Java sources of > some of the UNO libs. > I need to include a version number in the name of the

Re: setting scons up for linux

2020-02-29 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
con the fileaccess > build for Linux. > > I can push on Sunday the OS setup to gitbox. > > What are the next steps from here? > > I try to deliver a Mac and OS/2 profile. > > And I will have a look at the converter, too. > > > All the Best > > Peter > > Am 27.02

Re: setting scons up for linux

2020-02-27 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
You need a recent Python 3: ImportError: cannot import name ABC: On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 7:14 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hello Damjan, > > > I did try to setup scons for Linux. > > I copied the > > 1) FreeBSD file to Linux File. > > 2) replaced FreeBSD to Linux > > 3) added a entry to

Re: Building On CentOS 8 Dependency Help

2020-02-17 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
vel gstreamer-devel > gstreamer-plugins-base-devel ORBit2-devel > > I found that gstreamer 0.1 is no longer maintained and they suggest 1.0 > series. [2] > Do we still need 0.1 for building. > We moved to 1.0 a year ago: commit b6e71573e19c0b24193aa83c913ad163e3fbb449 Author:

Re: Updated 4.2.0 build?

2020-02-16 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 1:59 AM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > I think I saw, ages ago, a graphical installer for Linux, written in > Java; none of our current builds uses that approach (and honestly this > seems a bit out of place in the Linux world) but the code might still be > there. We are

Re: gotoSCons: automated gbuild to SCons conversion

2020-02-09 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 11:47 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Sounds nice. > > Thank you. It would be great to have a debug output that can be checked to check which > dependencies have been pulled. For me a declarative output would be cool to > understand some code. > > You can see within-module

Re: gotoSCons: automated gbuild to SCons conversion

2020-02-09 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
targets need, plus of course delivery rules. Fortunately, as it's Python, we have some flexibility as to how to implement it. On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 2:31 AM Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Hi > > I've just pushed a "scons-build" branch. > > The build infrastructure is

Re: gotoSCons: automated gbuild to SCons conversion

2020-02-01 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
s done quickly. And it is great if others can have a look, too. > > All the best > Peter > > > Am 1. Februar 2020 13:36:42 MEZ schrieb Damjan Jovanovic < > dam...@apache.org>: > >Hi > > > >gbuild has become an unmaintainable nightmare. While there are only 37

gotoSCons: automated gbuild to SCons conversion

2020-02-01 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi gbuild has become an unmaintainable nightmare. While there are only 37 internal dmake modules left (+ another 37 external modules), I cannot motivate myself to convert even 1 more. At my development speed of about 2 lines of code every 8 hours, gbuild is a disaster that wastes unbelievable

Re: Audience for AOO (Was: Re: Apache OpenOffice 4.1.7 for OS/2 (and OS/2 based systems like ArcaOS))

2020-01-31 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 6:00 PM Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi Jim > > > Now sure, if you are running the latest version of Linux, on a high-end > machine, and needs lots of bells and > > whistles, then other Office suites are likely more tailored for your > setup. > > Actually I'm running a high-end

Re: System-provided Python 3 support now committed

2020-01-25 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
ocation=application") and I am not sure what's making it unhappy there. > Regards, > >Matthias > > [1] > > https://github.com/apache/openoffice/blob/trunk/main/scripting/source/pyprov/pythonscript.py > > Am 25.01.20 um 10:56 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > Hi > > >

Re: code comments and doxygen

2019-11-18 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:58 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: > anyone minds if i add or modify existing code comments to fit to a > doxygen generated output? > > I am using it at the moment to build a better understanding. > > Don't we have an internal documentation system used in place of doxygen, and

Re: C++ standard when building OpenOffice

2019-11-05 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 10:05 PM Don Lewis wrote: > > I thought that Damjan implemenented that. > > I have a patch that does gstreamer-1.0 access through run-time dynamic linking, so we should in theory just need the gstreamer source for its header files at compile time. It hasn't been tested or

Re: [DISCUSSION] Build environment future

2019-11-04 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi Ant already works for some Java modules, though at a module-only level. I did get gbuild to extract dependency information from Ant, and build Ant modules in the right order. For C++ though, I don't see how Ant is possible. Even if we do get it to call the C++ compiler, it doesn't support

Re: C++ standard when building OpenOffice

2019-11-03 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 3:49 AM Branko Čibej wrote: > On 04.11.2019 02:14, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > Thank you for the info. I haven't had good experiences with Boost in my > > Win64 attempts either... > > > > Don, how feasible do you think Go or Rust are, to st

Re: C++ standard when building OpenOffice

2019-11-03 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Thank you for the info. I haven't had good experiences with Boost in my Win64 attempts either... Don, how feasible do you think Go or Rust are, to start using in place of C++? On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 1:08 AM Don Lewis wrote: > On 3 Nov, Don Lewis wrote: > > For much of our history, until

Re: New computer

2019-10-30 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 6:16 PM Patricia Shanahan wrote: > On 10/30/2019 8:13 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > What do you already know? SVN? > > RCS, SCCS, and SVN. > > > > > I personally did: > > git clone https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git &g

Re: New computer

2019-10-30 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
What do you already know? SVN? I personally did: git clone https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git (ie. not GitHub) which I think used my Apache credentials. If you prefer to clone from GitHub, and want to link your Apache and GitHub credentials, you can apparently do it on:

Re: 4.2.0-dev next?

2019-10-24 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 1:00 AM Marcus wrote: > Am 24.10.19 um 14:04 schrieb Mechtilde: > > First we should try to fix the release blocker > > > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125129 > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127731 > >

Re: OpenGrok

2019-10-18 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Thank you so much! It works well. On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 1:26 AM Ariel Constenla-Haile < ariel.constenla.ha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi *, > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 3:15 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Server is openoffice-vm1-he-de.Apache. Org > > A first attempt is now live at

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Fix incorrect gbuild usage that can cause intermittent parallel build failures.

2019-10-04 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 6:47 PM Don Lewis wrote: > On 4 Oct, truck...@apache.org wrote: > > > diff --git a/main/codemaker/Executable_cppumaker.mk > b/main/codemaker/Executable_cppumaker.mk > > index b876b68..63c9bc2 100644 > > --- a/main/codemaker/Executable_cppumaker.mk > > +++

Re: leftover debug?

2019-10-01 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Please delete it. Thank you Damjan On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 2:33 AM Don Lewis wrote: > It looks like there is some leftover debug code in trunk commit > 5168e59c15cb9af435bdca9b78b99d1abe16c58e. > > main/scripting/source/protocolhandler/scripthandler.cxx: > cdf0e10c (rcweir 2011-08-16

Re: OpenJDK (8u222) not listed in AOO 4.1.6?

2019-08-24 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
? > > This would be a workaround for 4.1.7 and we could further improve it for > the next release. > > Regards, > > Matthias > > > Am 20.08.19 um 03:58 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 9:30 PM Matthias Seidel < > matthias.sei...@hamburg.de&

Re: OpenJDK (8u222) not listed in AOO 4.1.6?

2019-08-19 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 9:30 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Thanks! > > Am 18.08.19 um 20:26 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > That's great news. Thank you for testing. > > > > I am busy so it will take me a few days to finalize the patch and commit > it. > &g

Re: OpenJDK (8u222) not listed in AOO 4.1.6?

2019-08-18 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
er Debian 11. > > The detection of Java 8u222, Java 11.0.4 and Java 12.0.2 works. Java > means OpnJDK which is shipped with Debian. > > The German builds I published under > > /home/mechtilde/public_html/NewBuild > > Thanks to Damjan. > > Mechtilde > > Am 18.08.19 um 12:

Re: OpenJDK (8u222) not listed in AOO 4.1.6?

2019-08-18 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
is used in Debian 10 > (buster, stable) > > Am 18.08.19 um 10:45 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > > Hi Damjan, > > > > Thank you for looking into it! > > > > Indeed it was Ubuntu 16.04 where I could replicate the problem with > > OpenJDK8u222. > > >

Re: OpenJDK (8u222) not listed in AOO 4.1.6?

2019-08-17 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
, as we'll soon be flooded by different java.vendor properties on different platforms, as different package repositories begin setting their own... On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 2:39 AM Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Found 8u222 on Ubuntu 16.04, testing... > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 2:32

Re: OpenJDK (8u222) not listed in AOO 4.1.6?

2019-08-17 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Found 8u222 on Ubuntu 16.04, testing... On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 2:32 AM Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > 8.202.8 and 8.212.4.1 work for me on FreeBSD. > > Let me see if I can find 8u222 somewhere. > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 6:23 PM Matthias Seidel < > matthias.sei...@hamburg.d

Re: OpenJDK (8u222) not listed in AOO 4.1.6?

2019-08-17 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
a release blocker for 4.1.7! > > Regards, > >Matthias > > > Am 14.08.19 um 16:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > > Hi Damjan, > > > > Am 14.08.19 um 07:02 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > >> Hi > >> > >> What does "java --version" give

Re: OpenJDK (8u222) not listed in AOO 4.1.6?

2019-08-13 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi What does "java --version" give? You might need to backport the following commit to 4.1.x: commit 3bd2d6aed629c4323ea9e8426acfb793eb9046fd Author: Damjan Jovanovic Date: Sun Apr 15 15:00:46 2018 + Allow the Java version suffix (eg. the 162 in 1.8.0_162) to be 3 d

Re: build issue with Rhino

2019-08-11 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Our minimum Java version has been 1.7 for a while now. Rhino's version is set in: main/rhino//misc/build/rhino1_7R3/build.properties Damjan On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:03 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: > I have following Issue. Does anyone know what to do? > > Latest Version of Rhino is 1.7.9 we use

Re: [resolution] svn migration plan

2019-08-03 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 7:47 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hello all, > > I have pushed Infra a bit. We are now migrating. > > So migration will be finished soon. > > Excellent :). > > I suggest we use the short hash. > > For what? Why can't we "git tag" relevant commits and use the tag instead?

Re: Java 12 not recognized by AOO

2019-07-28 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Thank you. That's good news. Sure, feel free to merge it to other branches. I've also added it to https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Building_old_versions Regards Damjan On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 12:12 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Damjan, > > Am 28.07.19 um 07:32 schrieb Damjan

Re: Building AOO

2019-07-27 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
ifneq ($(BUILD_VER_STRING),) $(eval $(call gb_Library_add_defs,cui,-DBUILD_VER_STRING="$(BUILD_VER_STRING)")) endif Please try fiddle with that middle line. Maybe you need $$ instead of $ and/or {} instead of (), for the BUILD_VER_STRING variable. Regards Damjan On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 6:24 AM

Re: Java 12 not recognized by AOO

2019-07-27 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
, Jul 28, 2019 at 5:31 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Should we not move this stuff in some sort of config file?Is the > information in the config file you edited? > > On 27.07.19 21:52, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > Thank you. > > > > I've added the new paths in commit 18638

Re: Java 12 not recognized by AOO

2019-07-27 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
b/server/libjvm.so > /usr/lib/jvm/java-12-openjdk-amd64/lib/server/libjvm.so > /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so > > Kind regards > > > Am 27.07.19 um 20:18 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > The problem with AdoptOpenJDK 11 is that it has a: > &g

Re: Java 12 not recognized by AOO

2019-07-27 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Damjan On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 7:48 PM Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > AdoptOpenJDK 11 isn't detected. > > I am investigating. > > > > On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 7:41 PM Damjan Jovanovic > wrote: > >> Hi Mechtilde >> >> No idea. I'll try AdoptOpenJDK 11 now. &g

Re: Java 12 not recognized by AOO

2019-07-27 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
AdoptOpenJDK 11 isn't detected. I am investigating. On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 7:41 PM Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Hi Mechtilde > > No idea. I'll try AdoptOpenJDK 11 now. > > Regards > Damjan > > > On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 7:22 PM Mechtilde wrote: > >> Hello,

Re: Java 12 not recognized by AOO

2019-07-27 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
KD because this is standard in the > Linux distributions > > Kind regards > > Mechtide > > Am 10.05.19 um 08:42 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 8:35 AM FR web forum wrote: > > > >> @Larry, > >> Strange, the xml has kept many path loca

Re: SHA1/MD5 in sal/rtl/source/digest.c patch license able for OO

2019-07-27 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
If you read through the LO bug report, you'll see that there are many patches for this bug, affecting multiple modules. Why? The historical files that are valid but have the wrong checksum due to having been written by the broken [OO.org-derivative] implementations when they were created, will

Re: Top 3 of urgent issues

2019-07-23 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 9:20 PM Bidouille wrote: > Maybe for AOO v5.0... > > 1) AOO do not recognize JRE beyond v.8 and alternative > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128074 > > The bug for AdoptOpenJDK is https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128157 and I think it should be << v5.0

Re: [discussion] svn migration plan

2019-07-20 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
That's a great idea, thank you! 1.1 - 1.5: test/ requires main/ to build, for Ant scripts. main/ requires ext_libraries/ if not more. Why can't we use one repository for everything, like the Github mirror already does? Regards Damjan On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 2:16 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hello

Re: ./configuration acrobatics.

2019-07-07 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
As stated on the bug report: Possibly a regression from:https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk@1852965 Please keep the discussion there. Damjan On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 2:43 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Thanks Andrea for the pointer. > > It does not give any reasons for the option

Re: abp.component

2019-06-03 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
ns I did not compile it correctly? Or I need to turn > off these assertions? Any hint? Thanks a lot in advance. > > -Paul > > -----Original Message- > From: Damjan Jovanovic [mailto:dam...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2019 10:13 PM > To: Apache OO > S

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >