Re: [OS/2 and macOS] saving ODS with chart

2021-07-28 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:21 PM Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > But that property _was_ set as a bool by method > XMLFilter::impl_Export(), in file > main/chart2/source/model/filter/XMLFilter.cxx, at the beginning of > this explanation: > > 691: xInfoSet->setPropertyValue( sUsePrettyPrinting,

epm 5 not compiling on FreeBSD 13

2021-07-07 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi On FreeBSD 13.0 the epm module doesn't compile: = Building module epm = Entering /store0/Projects/Apache/Public/openoffice/openoffice-git/main/epm mkdir ./unxfbsdx/misc/build/epm-5.0.0/ mkdir: ./unxfbsdx/misc/build/epm-5.0.0/: File exists cd

Re: svn commit: r1890844 - /openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.1.10/wntmsci/build_aoo32bit_on_mingw. sh

2021-06-16 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 1:34 AM Don Lewis wrote: > On 16 Jun, ard...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: ardovm > > Date: Wed Jun 16 19:07:44 2021 > > New Revision: 1890844 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1890844=rev > > Log: > > Build script for AOO 4.1.10 under Mingw > > > > Better

Re: OpenOffice for Amazon Linux in aarch64 architecture

2021-02-17 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 4:49 PM Jesús Alberto Cantú Peña < jca...@ecaresoft.com> wrote: > Hello: > I started using AWS g4 generation machines and i need an open office > software for that kind of architecture: (Linux machine aarch64) > Do you know if exist an Open Office versión to be installed

Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO

2020-12-07 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 8:38 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to know how you guys feel we should move on with our base > Database. Our current strategy is a small sized embedded DB using HSQLDB > (BSD). There are 2 other options in the same weight class, that is H2 > (EPL1 or

Re: Help w/ bt

2020-12-03 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Well done! On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 7:09 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > fixed: it was a strcpy overflow. > > > On Dec 2, 2020, at 9:02 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > > That's in main/soltools. > > > > Try isolate the exact command used, and try run tha

Re: Help w/ bt

2020-12-02 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
sure if this is macOS specific or whether or not doing so breaks > on other platforms as well... anyone know before I spin up another VM and > test? > > > On Dec 2, 2020, at 10:25 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 3:35 PM Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.co

Re: Help w/ bt

2020-12-02 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 3:35 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > So I've been working on some of the macOS bugz and am looking at the UNO > bridge as a likely subject, hence the various changes to the macOS code > there. I'm hoping someone can help me with this crash. > > I open up Extension Manager, hit

Re: [OPINION VOTE] CentOS7 or Ubuntu 14.04

2020-11-10 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 7:58 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > History: For previous AOO releases (up to 4.1.8), we have used > CentOS5 as our build environ for our community builds. > As of 4.2.x, this is no longer an option. Instead, we > baselined CentOS7 (mainly due to

Re: QA Automated Test coverage

2020-10-27 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 8:14 PM Carl Marcum wrote: > Hi All, > > I've been testing builds with the automated BVT and FVT tests lately. > I have a few questions: > > 1. Is there anything documented about how much coverage these tests > provide vs.functionality? > > 2. Is there yet a place to list

Re: Apache Python Project

2020-10-27 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi Kent Welcome to Apache OpenOffice. One of the major tasks we need Python development for at the moment is to upgrade OpenOffice from Python 2 to 3. This is unfortunately quite difficult, as we not only have to port Python code, but possibly C code too, deal with patching, testing and

Re: Writer and .docx

2020-10-17 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 4:13 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > Hi - > > Top posting as well. I think we should consider our goals as a project. If > one of those goals is support for ODF as a theory of everything office that > you can trust and know will remain parsable a century from now then what > does

Re: Writer and .docx

2020-10-17 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 11:50 AM Bidouille wrote: > > OpenOffice users can open documents in .docx format, but they cannot > > save in that format. > Well, remember that last version of Microsoft Office (since 2016) can open > ODT format. > > Unfortunately not all MS Office editions have ODT

poi-filter branch with initial OOXML/.xlsx export filter

2020-10-17 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi I've put together my previous work on an OOXML export filter for spreadsheets, and pushed it into a branch called poi-filter. So far it builds successfully, gets packaged, appears in the "Save" dialog, loads, has all the right methods called, and gets to traversing and saving the document,

Re: Writer and .docx

2020-10-16 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 4:24 PM Carl Marcum wrote: > Hi Damjan, > > On 10/16/20 9:23 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 2:05 PM Dave Fisher > wrote: > > > >> Hi - > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > >> > >&g

Re: Writer and .docx

2020-10-16 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 2:05 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > Hi - > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Oct 16, 2020, at 4:04 AM, Mechtilde wrote: > > > > Hello Joost, > > > > I'm very happy to read from you. > > > >> Am 16.10.20 um 12:50 schrieb Joost Andrae: > >> Hi Simon, > >> > >> it's an honor to me

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: It seems we need YYDEBUG to compile main/connectivity now.

2020-10-05 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 8:08 AM Don Lewis wrote: > On 5 Oct, dam...@apache.org wrote: > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > > > damjan pushed a commit to branch trunk > > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git > > > > > > The

Re: UNO knowledge

2020-09-12 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi Patricia Please elaborate? Which bug? On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 6:49 PM Patricia Shanahan wrote: > I have been working on a bug, and have reached the conclusion that a fix > will require changes to the parsing of XML and recording of event > actions. I am seriously handicapped in making

Re: file serialization entry point

2020-07-29 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 2:30 AM Kira Tsu wrote: > Hi, > > I'm completely new to OpenOffice and was grok'ing around to find the code > that serializes spreadsheet files. Can someone point me in the right > direction, please? Where in the codebase does it parse into memory and > save out XLSX

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated (053307f -> 15daf39)

2020-07-26 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi Thank you. I've been testing them, they work. Regards Damjan On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 5:54 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Damjan, > > The Windows buildbot for trunk did succeed and I don't see any problems. > But is there any way to test your changes? > > I would like to cherry-pick these

Re: Our OpenGrok server

2020-07-18 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Can you please also see if we can set tab size to 4 spaces? On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 10:08 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > I have admin access. I will look into it asap. > > > Am 16.07.20 um 11:42 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > > Hi all, > > > > Our OpenGrok server needs some attention: > >

Re: Automated gbuild -> SCons convertibility now at 88.57%

2020-07-05 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
d outside Cygwin), though I do want to check that the paths passed to rsc.exe are correct. My MSVC is broken, so I can't test the binary targets. > > I have to look at the SCons. I plan to build GSICheck also with SCons, > even if it is a total simple tool. > > Ok great. > > All

Re: Automated gbuild -> SCons convertibility now at 88.57%

2020-07-04 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
at 9:35 PM Patricia Shanahan wrote: > On 7/4/2020 12:24 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > Given how I've only developed on FreeBSD so far, anything Windows is > > probably at negative infinity :) > > > Do you have some example modules with that symbols problem, or a

Re: Automated gbuild -> SCons convertibility now at 88.57%

2020-07-04 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
; > On 7/4/2020 11:44 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > Hi > > > > In the scons-build branch, I've just pushed a set of 11 commits that > > theoretically get 93 out of 105 gbuild modules (88.57%) automatically > > converting to gbuild. > > > > The "

Automated gbuild -> SCons convertibility now at 88.57%

2020-07-04 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi In the scons-build branch, I've just pushed a set of 11 commits that theoretically get 93 out of 105 gbuild modules (88.57%) automatically converting to gbuild. The "gotoSCons" converter and the SCons infrastructure in that branch have now been developed to such a level that a module can be

Re: Small regression in trunk

2020-05-18 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 9:41 AM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Damjan, all, > > Am 11.05.20 um 17:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > > Hi Damjan, > > > > Am 11.05.20 um 17:48 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > >> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 5:25 PM Matthias Seidel < &

Re: Small regression in trunk

2020-05-11 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 5:25 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Damjan, > > Is there a specific reason why you moved "sd/res/imagelst" to > "sd/imagelst" in this commit: > > > https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/b63233d868a9af170b0457a7aa0c5809011cc2c1 > > The reason why I ask is that it

Re: Remove of STAX and SAXON

2020-04-26 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 7:30 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Pedro hinted STAX can be dropped, and STAX reference is only in the > dependency of SAXON. > > I would like to add SAXON to the removal list. Since to my research no > other module references SAXON as a dependency, and we

Re: harmful code??

2020-04-25 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 2:11 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hello all, > > I hunt some Warnings and Errors that get logged during build. > > I stumbled over this code here in file_misc.cxx [1]: > > 684 > < >

Re: drop ressources (stlport, maybe beanshell)

2020-04-25 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 3:50 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Another potential candidate to get Rid of is beanshell. I am looking > into it, the project moved to Apache Commons. I hope that it is still > there under a different name (beanUtil?) > > See https://github.com/beanshell/beanshell#history

Re: Issue in vbahelper

2020-04-23 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 5:18 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hello all, > > Build broke again, this time with Following Output: > > = > Building module vbahelper > = > > Entering /home/legine/workspace/AOO/gitbox/main/vbahelper/prj > > cd .. && make -s -r -j1

Re: about build environment development (was: declaring gbuild target dependencies)

2020-04-15 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 3:15 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > On Apr 15, 2020, at 3:01 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > > > > We are also thin on new contributors, and I recall you saying they're > > largely scared off by the current build system.

Re: about build environment development (was: declaring gbuild target dependencies)

2020-04-15 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 6:46 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > If one wants to tap in our build system he needs to understand Perl, > shell, make, ant, XML, configure, ... > > This is just way to complicated, especially if you want to bring in an > IDE to ease code development. > > > Damjan is not very

Re: Version Numbers in source code

2020-03-15 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi I don't think we ever convert 450 to 4.5.0. Where do you see that? Damjan On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 3:40 PM Carl Marcum wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm working on using Ant to build javadocs and package Java sources of > some of the UNO libs. > I need to include a version number in the name of the

Re: setting scons up for linux

2020-02-29 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
con the fileaccess > build for Linux. > > I can push on Sunday the OS setup to gitbox. > > What are the next steps from here? > > I try to deliver a Mac and OS/2 profile. > > And I will have a look at the converter, too. > > > All the Best > > Peter > > Am 27.02

Re: setting scons up for linux

2020-02-27 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
You need a recent Python 3: ImportError: cannot import name ABC: On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 7:14 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hello Damjan, > > > I did try to setup scons for Linux. > > I copied the > > 1) FreeBSD file to Linux File. > > 2) replaced FreeBSD to Linux > > 3) added a entry to

Re: Building On CentOS 8 Dependency Help

2020-02-17 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
vel gstreamer-devel > gstreamer-plugins-base-devel ORBit2-devel > > I found that gstreamer 0.1 is no longer maintained and they suggest 1.0 > series. [2] > Do we still need 0.1 for building. > We moved to 1.0 a year ago: commit b6e71573e19c0b24193aa83c913ad163e3fbb449 Author:

Re: Updated 4.2.0 build?

2020-02-16 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 1:59 AM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > I think I saw, ages ago, a graphical installer for Linux, written in > Java; none of our current builds uses that approach (and honestly this > seems a bit out of place in the Linux world) but the code might still be > there. We are

Re: gotoSCons: automated gbuild to SCons conversion

2020-02-09 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 11:47 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Sounds nice. > > Thank you. It would be great to have a debug output that can be checked to check which > dependencies have been pulled. For me a declarative output would be cool to > understand some code. > > You can see within-module

Re: gotoSCons: automated gbuild to SCons conversion

2020-02-09 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
targets need, plus of course delivery rules. Fortunately, as it's Python, we have some flexibility as to how to implement it. On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 2:31 AM Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Hi > > I've just pushed a "scons-build" branch. > > The build infrastructure is

Re: gotoSCons: automated gbuild to SCons conversion

2020-02-01 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
s done quickly. And it is great if others can have a look, too. > > All the best > Peter > > > Am 1. Februar 2020 13:36:42 MEZ schrieb Damjan Jovanovic < > dam...@apache.org>: > >Hi > > > >gbuild has become an unmaintainable nightmare. While there are only 37

gotoSCons: automated gbuild to SCons conversion

2020-02-01 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi gbuild has become an unmaintainable nightmare. While there are only 37 internal dmake modules left (+ another 37 external modules), I cannot motivate myself to convert even 1 more. At my development speed of about 2 lines of code every 8 hours, gbuild is a disaster that wastes unbelievable

Re: Audience for AOO (Was: Re: Apache OpenOffice 4.1.7 for OS/2 (and OS/2 based systems like ArcaOS))

2020-01-31 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 6:00 PM Pedro Lino wrote: > Hi Jim > > > Now sure, if you are running the latest version of Linux, on a high-end > machine, and needs lots of bells and > > whistles, then other Office suites are likely more tailored for your > setup. > > Actually I'm running a high-end

Re: System-provided Python 3 support now committed

2020-01-25 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
ocation=application") and I am not sure what's making it unhappy there. > Regards, > >Matthias > > [1] > > https://github.com/apache/openoffice/blob/trunk/main/scripting/source/pyprov/pythonscript.py > > Am 25.01.20 um 10:56 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > Hi > > >

System-provided Python 3 support now committed

2020-01-25 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi With Python 2 EOL as of 1 January 2020, we have little choice but to move to Python 3. After a lot of hard work by me and Pedro, both of us relatively unfamiliar with Python, I am happy to report that using a system-provided Python 3 in Apache OpenOffice now works. The UNO/Python bridge and

Re: code comments and doxygen

2019-11-18 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:58 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: > anyone minds if i add or modify existing code comments to fit to a > doxygen generated output? > > I am using it at the moment to build a better understanding. > > Don't we have an internal documentation system used in place of doxygen, and

Re: C++ standard when building OpenOffice

2019-11-05 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 10:05 PM Don Lewis wrote: > > I thought that Damjan implemenented that. > > I have a patch that does gstreamer-1.0 access through run-time dynamic linking, so we should in theory just need the gstreamer source for its header files at compile time. It hasn't been tested or

Re: [DISCUSSION] Build environment future

2019-11-04 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi Ant already works for some Java modules, though at a module-only level. I did get gbuild to extract dependency information from Ant, and build Ant modules in the right order. For C++ though, I don't see how Ant is possible. Even if we do get it to call the C++ compiler, it doesn't support

Re: C++ standard when building OpenOffice

2019-11-03 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 3:49 AM Branko Čibej wrote: > On 04.11.2019 02:14, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > Thank you for the info. I haven't had good experiences with Boost in my > > Win64 attempts either... > > > > Don, how feasible do you think Go or Rust are, to st

Re: C++ standard when building OpenOffice

2019-11-03 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Thank you for the info. I haven't had good experiences with Boost in my Win64 attempts either... Don, how feasible do you think Go or Rust are, to start using in place of C++? On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 1:08 AM Don Lewis wrote: > On 3 Nov, Don Lewis wrote: > > For much of our history, until

Re: New computer

2019-10-30 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 6:16 PM Patricia Shanahan wrote: > On 10/30/2019 8:13 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > What do you already know? SVN? > > RCS, SCCS, and SVN. > > > > > I personally did: > > git clone https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git &g

Re: New computer

2019-10-30 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
What do you already know? SVN? I personally did: git clone https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git (ie. not GitHub) which I think used my Apache credentials. If you prefer to clone from GitHub, and want to link your Apache and GitHub credentials, you can apparently do it on:

Re: 4.2.0-dev next?

2019-10-24 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 1:00 AM Marcus wrote: > Am 24.10.19 um 14:04 schrieb Mechtilde: > > First we should try to fix the release blocker > > > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125129 > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127731 > >

Re: OpenGrok

2019-10-18 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Thank you so much! It works well. On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 1:26 AM Ariel Constenla-Haile < ariel.constenla.ha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi *, > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 3:15 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Server is openoffice-vm1-he-de.Apache. Org > > A first attempt is now live at

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Fix incorrect gbuild usage that can cause intermittent parallel build failures.

2019-10-04 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 6:47 PM Don Lewis wrote: > On 4 Oct, truck...@apache.org wrote: > > > diff --git a/main/codemaker/Executable_cppumaker.mk > b/main/codemaker/Executable_cppumaker.mk > > index b876b68..63c9bc2 100644 > > --- a/main/codemaker/Executable_cppumaker.mk > > +++

Re: leftover debug?

2019-10-01 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Please delete it. Thank you Damjan On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 2:33 AM Don Lewis wrote: > It looks like there is some leftover debug code in trunk commit > 5168e59c15cb9af435bdca9b78b99d1abe16c58e. > > main/scripting/source/protocolhandler/scripthandler.cxx: > cdf0e10c (rcweir 2011-08-16

Re: OpenJDK (8u222) not listed in AOO 4.1.6?

2019-08-24 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
? > > This would be a workaround for 4.1.7 and we could further improve it for > the next release. > > Regards, > > Matthias > > > Am 20.08.19 um 03:58 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 9:30 PM Matthias Seidel < > matthias.sei...@hamburg.de&

Re: OpenJDK (8u222) not listed in AOO 4.1.6?

2019-08-19 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 9:30 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Thanks! > > Am 18.08.19 um 20:26 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > That's great news. Thank you for testing. > > > > I am busy so it will take me a few days to finalize the patch and commit > it. > &g

Re: OpenJDK (8u222) not listed in AOO 4.1.6?

2019-08-18 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
er Debian 11. > > The detection of Java 8u222, Java 11.0.4 and Java 12.0.2 works. Java > means OpnJDK which is shipped with Debian. > > The German builds I published under > > /home/mechtilde/public_html/NewBuild > > Thanks to Damjan. > > Mechtilde > > Am 18.08.19 um 12:

Re: OpenJDK (8u222) not listed in AOO 4.1.6?

2019-08-18 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
is used in Debian 10 > (buster, stable) > > Am 18.08.19 um 10:45 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > > Hi Damjan, > > > > Thank you for looking into it! > > > > Indeed it was Ubuntu 16.04 where I could replicate the problem with > > OpenJDK8u222. > > >

Re: OpenJDK (8u222) not listed in AOO 4.1.6?

2019-08-17 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
, as we'll soon be flooded by different java.vendor properties on different platforms, as different package repositories begin setting their own... On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 2:39 AM Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Found 8u222 on Ubuntu 16.04, testing... > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 2:32

Re: OpenJDK (8u222) not listed in AOO 4.1.6?

2019-08-17 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Found 8u222 on Ubuntu 16.04, testing... On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 2:32 AM Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > 8.202.8 and 8.212.4.1 work for me on FreeBSD. > > Let me see if I can find 8u222 somewhere. > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 6:23 PM Matthias Seidel < > matthias.sei...@hamburg.d

Re: OpenJDK (8u222) not listed in AOO 4.1.6?

2019-08-17 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
a release blocker for 4.1.7! > > Regards, > >Matthias > > > Am 14.08.19 um 16:37 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > > Hi Damjan, > > > > Am 14.08.19 um 07:02 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > >> Hi > >> > >> What does "java --version" give

Re: OpenJDK (8u222) not listed in AOO 4.1.6?

2019-08-13 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi What does "java --version" give? You might need to backport the following commit to 4.1.x: commit 3bd2d6aed629c4323ea9e8426acfb793eb9046fd Author: Damjan Jovanovic Date: Sun Apr 15 15:00:46 2018 + Allow the Java version suffix (eg. the 162 in 1.8.0_162) to be 3 d

Re: build issue with Rhino

2019-08-11 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Our minimum Java version has been 1.7 for a while now. Rhino's version is set in: main/rhino//misc/build/rhino1_7R3/build.properties Damjan On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:03 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: > I have following Issue. Does anyone know what to do? > > Latest Version of Rhino is 1.7.9 we use

Re: [resolution] svn migration plan

2019-08-03 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 7:47 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hello all, > > I have pushed Infra a bit. We are now migrating. > > So migration will be finished soon. > > Excellent :). > > I suggest we use the short hash. > > For what? Why can't we "git tag" relevant commits and use the tag instead?

Re: Java 12 not recognized by AOO

2019-07-28 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Thank you. That's good news. Sure, feel free to merge it to other branches. I've also added it to https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Building_old_versions Regards Damjan On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 12:12 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Damjan, > > Am 28.07.19 um 07:32 schrieb Damjan

Re: Building AOO

2019-07-27 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
ifneq ($(BUILD_VER_STRING),) $(eval $(call gb_Library_add_defs,cui,-DBUILD_VER_STRING="$(BUILD_VER_STRING)")) endif Please try fiddle with that middle line. Maybe you need $$ instead of $ and/or {} instead of (), for the BUILD_VER_STRING variable. Regards Damjan On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 6:24 AM

Re: Java 12 not recognized by AOO

2019-07-27 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
, Jul 28, 2019 at 5:31 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Should we not move this stuff in some sort of config file?Is the > information in the config file you edited? > > On 27.07.19 21:52, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > Thank you. > > > > I've added the new paths in commit 18638

Re: Java 12 not recognized by AOO

2019-07-27 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
b/server/libjvm.so > /usr/lib/jvm/java-12-openjdk-amd64/lib/server/libjvm.so > /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so > > Kind regards > > > Am 27.07.19 um 20:18 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > The problem with AdoptOpenJDK 11 is that it has a: > &g

Re: Java 12 not recognized by AOO

2019-07-27 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Damjan On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 7:48 PM Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > AdoptOpenJDK 11 isn't detected. > > I am investigating. > > > > On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 7:41 PM Damjan Jovanovic > wrote: > >> Hi Mechtilde >> >> No idea. I'll try AdoptOpenJDK 11 now. &g

Re: Java 12 not recognized by AOO

2019-07-27 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
AdoptOpenJDK 11 isn't detected. I am investigating. On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 7:41 PM Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Hi Mechtilde > > No idea. I'll try AdoptOpenJDK 11 now. > > Regards > Damjan > > > On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 7:22 PM Mechtilde wrote: > >> Hello,

Re: Java 12 not recognized by AOO

2019-07-27 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
KD because this is standard in the > Linux distributions > > Kind regards > > Mechtide > > Am 10.05.19 um 08:42 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 8:35 AM FR web forum wrote: > > > >> @Larry, > >> Strange, the xml has kept many path loca

Re: SHA1/MD5 in sal/rtl/source/digest.c patch license able for OO

2019-07-27 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
If you read through the LO bug report, you'll see that there are many patches for this bug, affecting multiple modules. Why? The historical files that are valid but have the wrong checksum due to having been written by the broken [OO.org-derivative] implementations when they were created, will

Re: Top 3 of urgent issues

2019-07-23 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 9:20 PM Bidouille wrote: > Maybe for AOO v5.0... > > 1) AOO do not recognize JRE beyond v.8 and alternative > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128074 > > The bug for AdoptOpenJDK is https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128157 and I think it should be << v5.0

Re: [discussion] svn migration plan

2019-07-20 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
That's a great idea, thank you! 1.1 - 1.5: test/ requires main/ to build, for Ant scripts. main/ requires ext_libraries/ if not more. Why can't we use one repository for everything, like the Github mirror already does? Regards Damjan On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 2:16 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hello

Re: ./configuration acrobatics.

2019-07-07 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
As stated on the bug report: Possibly a regression from:https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk@1852965 Please keep the discussion there. Damjan On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 2:43 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Thanks Andrea for the pointer. > > It does not give any reasons for the option

Re: abp.component

2019-06-03 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
ns I did not compile it correctly? Or I need to turn > off these assertions? Any hint? Thanks a lot in advance. > > -Paul > > -----Original Message- > From: Damjan Jovanovic [mailto:dam...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2019 10:13 PM > To: Apache OO > S

Re: abp.component

2019-06-02 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi It should be under main/extensions/source/abpilot/abp.component but I am not sure why it wasn't built and delivered. Try: build --from extensions Regards Damjan On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 6:08 AM Ynjiun Paul Wang wrote: > Dear, > > > > I am new in development. Today I tried to compile the

Re: Build on Windows

2019-05-15 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 4:45 AM Patricia Shanahan wrote: > "Install Microsoft Windows SDK for Windows 7 and .NET Framework 3.5. SP1 > (recommended by Microsoft. Note: later versions of the Windows SDK will > not work. AOO can not be built with MSVC 2010 or 2012 - MSVC 2008 is > needed and is

Build broken by 1858940?

2019-05-10 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Entering /path/to/openoffice/main/extras/source/misc_config dmake: Error: -- `wizard/web/styles/pc_old.css' not found, and can't be made 1 module(s): extras need(s) to be rebuilt Reason(s): ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /path/to/openoffice/main/extras/source/misc_config When

Re: Java 12 not recognized by AOO

2019-05-10 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 8:35 AM FR web forum wrote: > @Larry, > Strange, the xml has kept many path locations. > Could you rename this file (quit AOO before)? > Run AOO that re-create a new javasettings file. > Go back in Tools > Options > AOO > Java to see if jre 12 is here. > > > > > >

Re: svn commit: r1856677 - in /openoffice/trunk/main/tools: GoogleTest_tools_pathutils.mk Module_tools.mk qa/test_pathutils.cxx

2019-04-02 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:24 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Damjan, > > Just for clarification, these tests are done automatically while > building unless I disable them explicitly with --disable-unit-tests? > > Regards, > >Matthias > > That's right. Regards Damjan

Re: 4.2.0-dev-m1

2019-03-30 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
ple files get generated and passed around. It shouldn't be too hard to get working though. Nothing done regarding testing yet. Damjan On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 11:32 AM Stehmann wrote: > Hello > > Am 29. März 2019 19:40:47 MEZ schrieb Damjan Jovanovic >: > >I have a lot of ex

Re: 4.2.0-dev-m1

2019-03-29 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
I have a lot of experience with desktop integration but am too busy to have a look. Also I posted a checklist of things we should do for the release. None of them are done yet. On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 1:23 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > Does the lack of desktop integration in m1 mean that this

Re: OS/2 error running unopkg.bin while packaging

2019-02-22 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi There were a lot of changes to UNO-related modules in the past few months, due to both the Win64 port and the gbuild port. It's possible something broke for OS/2 in the process. I suggest a bisection test. Sorry Damjan On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 12:52 PM Yuri Dario wrote: > Hi, > > I have

Re: svn commit: r1853643 - in /openoffice/trunk/main: ./ apple_remote/ apple_remote/prj/ apple_remote/source/

2019-02-21 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
That's great :) Well done! On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 6:35 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > Resolved in r 1854065

Re: svn commit: r1853643 - in /openoffice/trunk/main: ./ apple_remote/ apple_remote/prj/ apple_remote/source/

2019-02-20 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Looks like a lot of symbols may need exporting. For starters, try the following: In apple_remote/inc/AppleRemote.h, change: @interface AppleRemote : HIDRemoteControlDevice { to: @interface SAL_DLLPUBLIC_EXPORT AppleRemote : HIDRemoteControlDevice { You may also need: #include See if you get

Re: svn commit: r1853643 - in /openoffice/trunk/main: ./ apple_remote/ apple_remote/prj/ apple_remote/source/

2019-02-20 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
t; unxmaccx.pro/workdir/LinkTarget/Library/libvcl.dylib] Error 1 > make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs > dmake: Error code 2, while making 'all' > > > > > On Feb 19, 2019, at 8:59 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > > Yes, changes to gbuild itself are large

Re: svn commit: r1853643 - in /openoffice/trunk/main: ./ apple_remote/ apple_remote/prj/ apple_remote/source/

2019-02-19 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Yes, changes to gbuild itself are largely made by experimentation. It's beyond anyone's complete understanding. Please try this patch, with the file extensions back on *.m. On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:39 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > On Feb 19, 2019, at 12:05 PM, Damjan Jovano

Re: svn commit: r1853643 - in /openoffice/trunk/main: ./ apple_remote/ apple_remote/prj/ apple_remote/source/

2019-02-19 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
I think .m files are Objective C, and gb_Library_add_objcxxobjects wants Objective C++'s .mm. I am completely unfamiliar with both languages. Please try renaming apple_remote/source/*.m to *.mm and see if it works? If not, I'll have to make a gb_Library_add_objcobjects API instead. On Tue, Feb

Re: Time for our first 4.2.0 beta?

2019-02-15 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Bug 125129 looks like a wild goose chase and requires considerable understanding of the framework layer, but I'll try continue when I have time. My own release checklist would include: 1. Library audit. 1.1 Did we lose or gain any public symbols in our libraries since the 4.1.0? Gbuild requires

Re: macOS on trunk broken again

2019-02-13 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Fixed in 1853558: Fix a regression in 1853299 caused by a path and pattern match rule in main/packages that were wrong. Patch by: me On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 9:04 PM Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Hi > > I can reproduce it now. In debug mode (Ctrl+Alt+Shift+D), it gives > warnings,

Re: macOS on trunk broken again

2019-02-13 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
y see empty boxes... ;-) > > But a fresh Windows build from buildbot, revision 1853466 still shows no > icons in toolbars: > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/33hqi8dbvxz8mt0/VirtualBox_Windows%207%20AOO-Build_13_02_2019_16_49_43.png?dl=0 > > I will force a new build for Linux64 now and se

Re: macOS on trunk broken again

2019-02-12 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
der.uno.dylib > lrwxr-xr-x > <http://unxmaccx.pro/workdir/LinkTarget/Library/pythonloader.uno.dyliblrwxr-xr-x> > 1 jim staff 89 Feb 12 14:35 solver/450/ > unxmaccx.pro/workdir/LinkTarget/Library/pyuno.so@ -> > /Users/jim/src/asf/trunk/main/solver/450/ > unxmaccx.pr

Re: macOS on trunk broken again

2019-02-12 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
1853456 introduced a bracketing bug in main/pyuno/Library_pyuno_loader.mk. 1853457 Linux64 buildbot. 1853465 Linux32 buildbot. 1853466 fixed that bug. Maybe we just need a rebuild? On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 3:02 AM Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Where? I see them: > [image: image.png] &g

Re: macOS on trunk broken again

2019-02-12 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Where? I see them: [image: image.png] [image: image.png] On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 12:47 AM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Damjan, > > Am 12.02.19 um 18:01 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > Linux should be fixed in commit 1853456. > > It builds now, but the icons in the too

Re: macOS on trunk broken again

2019-02-12 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
/logs/prj.txt > <> > > > https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/linux32/main/pyuno/unxlngi6.pro/misc/logs/prj.txt > <> > > Maybe it is related? > > <> > > Regards, <> > >Matthias > > <> > > Am 11.02.

Re: macOS on trunk broken again

2019-02-12 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
logs/prj.txt > > > https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/linux32/main/pyuno/unxlngi6.pro/misc/logs/prj.txt > > Maybe it is related? > > Regards, > >Matthias > Am 11.02.19 um 20:56 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 8:03 PM Jim Jag

Re: macOS on trunk broken again

2019-02-11 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
svn-bisect to track down the issue... > > > On Feb 11, 2019, at 2:56 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 8:03 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > >> Uggg > >> > >> looks like breakage from the solenv port to gbuild???

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >