[NOTICE] - Moving and Upgrading of Buildbot Jobs

2021-08-15 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi All.

This NOTICE goes out via BCC to all affected projects and to the
main bui...@apache.org mailing list.
Please have replies CC the builds list.

https://ci.apache.org is currently on version 0.8 and is to be turned off
soon.
https://ci2.apache.org is version 3.2 and is the direct replacement.

If you project has Buildbot jobs they are listed here:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Buildbot+0.8+-%3E+3.2+Migration

Infra will perform the migration for you over the next 2 weeks. Starting
Monday.

Your $project.conf code will be updated to be compatible with Buildbot 3.2
(from 0.8)

Unless you state otherwise - your config will be moved to a new SVN [1] or
GIT [2] area
depending on whether you primarily use SVN or GIT.

[1] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/buildbot2
[2] - https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-bb2

An INFRA ticket will be created for each project migration and your dev
list will be kept in the loop.

For those of you with nightly builds that use ci.apache.org/projects/* -
please note that this service is deprecated and will NOT be available going
forward. Instead, your jobs should be changed to upload to
https://nightlies.apache.org/$project/* instead. Please request if you want
your existing content migrated over otherwise we will not do so.

After migration: Once everybody is off of the old Buildbot 0.8 - we will
change ci.apache.org to point to the new 3.2 instance. We will also put in
a redirect for ci.apache.org/projects/$project/* to point to your new
location at nightlies.apache.org/$project/*

Please let us know if you have any questions. Either Drew Foulks or myself
will perform your migration.

Kind Regards.

-- 

*Gavin McDonald*
Systems Administrator
ASF Infrastructure Team


Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Move to new Website Git Repositories

2020-11-15 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi,

On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 6:59 PM Matthias Seidel 
wrote:

> Hi Dave,
>
> Am 15.11.20 um 18:54 schrieb Dave Fisher:
> >
> >> On Nov 15, 2020, at 9:40 AM, Matthias Seidel <
> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Dave,
> >>
> >> Am 15.11.20 um 18:37 schrieb Dave Fisher:
> >>> Hi -
> >>>
> >>> Unless there are objections I think we should move to the new CMS for
> openoffice-project and openoffice-org this week in about 72 hours.
> >> Yes for openoffice-project.
> >>
> >> openoffice-org has some optical glitches that should be ironed out
> before.
> > Please provide a link that shows the issue.
>
> https://www.openoffice.org vs. https://openoffice-org.staged.apache.org/
> ;-)
>
> As already written, the vertical space between the topics on the main
> page is slightly higher. This is on Ubuntu with Firefox and Chrome.
>
> The same for the colored boxes on the download page.
>
> None of this is a blocker to moving the website, they are minor
differences in layout that can be
resolved later. In fact, I prefer the newer version, the spacing looks
better, but again, this does
not need to hold up the migration.

Gav...


> Regards,
>
>Matthias
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dave
> >
> >> Matthias
> >>
> >>> Proposed schedule is Wednesday for both.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Dave
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>>
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
>
>

-- 

*Gavin McDonald*
Systems Administrator
ASF Infrastructure Team


Re: test2 is ready to run

2020-10-24 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi,

On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 6:50 PM Dave Fisher  wrote:

> Hi Gavin,
>
> These tests are not RCs. We had a bug in the RCs and now Jim is trying to
> find the commit that introduced it.
>

Ok yeah I've been following. So the only thing Jim is interested in during
these tests is open a file and save it?

Gav...


>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> > On Oct 24, 2020, at 9:43 AM, Gavin McDonald 
> wrote:
> >
> > What is the full suite of tests that needs to be done for a release
> > candidate?
> >
> > Open, and Save a file seems a bit limited
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 6:39 PM Matthias Seidel <
> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Pedro,
> >>
> >> Am 24.10.20 um 18:36 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> >>> No problems on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64
> >>>
> >>> Would it be useful to test on an older (or newer) distro like Ubuntu
> >> 14.04 or 20.10?
> >>>
> >>> I have an old laptop (Intel Classmate aka Magalhães) running Ubuntu
> >> 12.04 x86 which I can give a spin if/when a 32bit build is available.
> >>
> >> We would definitely need someone to test the RC on 32bit Linux.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >>   Matthias
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Pedro
> >>>
> >>>> On 10/24/2020 4:56 PM Matthias Seidel 
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> No problems on Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit.
> >>>>
> >>>> Am 24.10.20 um 17:53 schrieb André Pereira:
> >>>>> test8 opens and saves files with no error messages here.
> >>>>> Debian 10
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:25 PM Jim Jagielski 
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> And test8 is now available...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ <
> >>>>>> http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/>
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> >
> > *Gavin McDonald*
> > Systems Administrator
> > ASF Infrastructure Team
>
>

-- 

*Gavin McDonald*
Systems Administrator
ASF Infrastructure Team


Re: test2 is ready to run

2020-10-24 Thread Gavin McDonald
What is the full suite of tests that needs to be done for a release
candidate?

Open, and Save a file seems a bit limited


On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 6:39 PM Matthias Seidel 
wrote:

> Hi Pedro,
>
> Am 24.10.20 um 18:36 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> > No problems on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64
> >
> > Would it be useful to test on an older (or newer) distro like Ubuntu
> 14.04 or 20.10?
> >
> > I have an old laptop (Intel Classmate aka Magalhães) running Ubuntu
> 12.04 x86 which I can give a spin if/when a 32bit build is available.
>
> We would definitely need someone to test the RC on 32bit Linux.
>
> Regards,
>
>Matthias
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> >
> >> On 10/24/2020 4:56 PM Matthias Seidel 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> No problems on Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit.
> >>
> >> Am 24.10.20 um 17:53 schrieb André Pereira:
> >>> test8 opens and saves files with no error messages here.
> >>> Debian 10
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:25 PM Jim Jagielski 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> And test8 is now available...
> >>>>
> >>>> http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ <
> >>>> http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/>
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
>
>

-- 

*Gavin McDonald*
Systems Administrator
ASF Infrastructure Team


Re: Fwd: New Mirror OpenOffice

2020-10-08 Thread Gavin McDonald
Apache Mirrors are all mentioned here:-

http://apache.org/mirrors/


On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 7:53 PM Jörg Schmidt  wrote:

>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2020 7:28 PM
> > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Fwd: New Mirror OpenOffice
> >
> > Am 07.10.20 um 10:25 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
> > >> -Original Message-
> > >> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2020 12:31 AM
> > >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Moderator
> > >> Cc: Desmond van der Winden - Serverion
> > >> Subject: Re: Fwd: New Mirror OpenOffice
> > >>
> > >> Hi Desmond,
> > >> [...]
> > >
> > > do you think that we can somehow actively help Desmond to
> > get his server registered with Apache?
> >
> > managing the Apache mirror network is in the hands of Apache. I think
> > it's up to the Infra team.
> >
> > We as project cannot help here. That's the reason why I
> > directed Desmond
> > to the linked webpage.
>
> It was important to me to at least offer my personal help with something
> that I think is important.
> It may be that I find the technical things more difficult than they are,
> just some personal support never seems wrong to me.
>
> By the way, I would like to make one more remark:
> why am I apparently the only one who thinks that such technical
> contributions in kind should be appreciated similarly to donations? Would
> it not be the task of our PMC to discuss this question with the ASF?
> What I mean is that it would be motivating for serverion.com, and
> possible future providers, if their support would be publicly acknowledged.
>
> We know exactly that we are almost completely dependent on Sourceforge,
> because beyond Sourceforge we have only one mirror (link I don't know at
> the moment) whose address is only given in case of emergency and with the
> hint not to spread the address too far so that the traffic doesn't get too
> high.
> At OOo we had dozens of Mirrors in the past and why we do not care if one
> is offered to us I do not understand.
>
>
> greetings,
> Jörg
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

-- 

*Gavin McDonald*
Systems Administrator
ASF Infrastructure Team


Re: 4.2.0 on the 20th Anniversary? (was Re: Website Migrations)

2020-07-13 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi,

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 5:45 AM Keith N. McKenna 
wrote:

>
> Not only that, but running a search on Bugzilla looking at Issues marked
> as Milestone 4.2.0 there are 267 items. That is a lot of items, some may
> have been already done, others may be hanging out there unfinished for
> whatever reason. With that number it should be looked at closely and
> well could complicate getting a 4.2.0 Release done and we need to get a
> release fairly soon to keep on track for a once a year release. The
> search I use is 4.2.0Milestone and is set as shared so anyone can run it.
>
> Regards
> Keith
>

I think it would be unrealistic to expect all those to be fixed in time to
get a release
out soon. Someone should go through those and bump out some to the next
release.



-- 

*Gavin McDonald*
Systems Administrator
ASF Infrastructure Team


Re: my wiki account no longer works.?

2020-05-15 Thread Gavin McDonald
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:39 AM Jörg Schmidt  wrote:

> > -Original Message-
> > From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 9:40 AM
> > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: my wiki account no longer works.?
> >
> > If you have a Apache.org Account use the password for the Apache
> > Account. Conflkuence does not use a seperate Credentials any longer.
>
> Where exactly do I set this up?
>
> I've had three accounts for different purposes for years. One for CMS, one
> for Bugzilla and one for WIKI.
>
> If I can (or must) create a central account somewhere, I don't know and I
> don't know how to do it. ***Do you have a tip for this?***
>

Hi ,

For over a year our Confluence Wiki has been LDAP enabled, meaning your
login is now your ASF username and your ASF password,
your ASF username is joesch and your ASF password is what you use to commit
code in svn and.or git. Should you not remember
your ASF (LDAP) password, then you can reset it at
https://id.apache.org/reset/enter

(There is nothing for you to 'set up' , your account is already there, you
just need to login with the correct credentials)

HTH

Gav...

>
>
>
> greetings,
> Jörg
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


Re: Status of the translation project

2019-11-30 Thread Gavin McDonald
What about the other projects that use this shared service? JMeter ,
Subversion etc - are all their translations in place also?

Gav...


On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 10:09 AM Matthias Seidel 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I think we could switch off the old VM now and make the new one available
> at
>
> https://translate.apache.org/
>
> Regards,
>
>Matthias
>
> Am 27.11.19 um 09:00 schrieb Mechtilde:
> > Hello,
> >
> > first I want to say a big thank you to Ariel. He prepared the new pootle
> > server.
> >
> > Now we can continue working on the translation for Apache OpenOffice 4.2.
> >
> > At this time The server is accessible under
> >
> > https://translate-upgrade.apache.org
> >
> > At the server I can write the data from the database into the *.po
> > files. The conversion of *.po files into *.sdf files can' t be done on
> > the server even after the update.
> >
> > This is because the version of translate-toolkit under Ubuntu 18.04 LTS
> > is too old. Only in the Ubuntu version 20.04 lTS there is a newer
> > version of translate-toolkit.
> >
> > I can prepare new *.sdf files at my local maschine. I will do it for all
> > languages before the beta release and so on.
> >
> > If someone need a developer build to test the recent translation, please
> > ask me, then i will prepare the *.sdf file and commt it into the source
> > code.
> >
> > For those who are interested: In the Wiki at
> > https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Translation_from_4.2 I have filed a
> > description of the process. Suggestions for improvements are very
> welcome.
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
>
>

-- 
Gav...


Re: PMC Chair

2019-11-22 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi,

Nothing is decided until the PMC votes, then that gets passed to the board for
approval in the form of a
resolution. That resolution was passed by the board less than 2 days ago, so
I think we are good here.

Gav...


On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 9:48 AM Simon Phipps  wrote:

> On Thu, 21 Nov 2019, 21:48 Patricia Shanahan,  wrote:
>
> > One of the resolutions passed at the last board meeting was:
> >
> > "Change the Apache OpenOffice Project Chair (Jim Jagielski, VP)"
> >
> > Jim,
> >
> > I don't know whether congratulation or commiseration is more
> > appropriate, so you get whichever you prefer from me.
> >
>
> Likewise!
>
> I'm slightly surprised this was decided in September but only just became
> public. Can the PMC comment please?
>
> S.
>
> >
>


Re: macOS Notarization test builds

2019-10-31 Thread Gavin McDonald
Confirmed it still complains - 10.14.3

Gav...

On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 9:21 PM Branko Čibej  wrote:

> On 31.10.2019 19:49, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Located at
> >
> > https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/AOO418-macOS-test/
> >
> > Are some test macOS dmgs that should be correctly signed and notarized
> such that they do not trigger Gatekeeper; that is, they should result in
> AOO opening on macOS without any warning about unknown developer.
> >
> > Please check that this does, in fact, happen ;) If not, then instead of
> signing, notarizing and stapling the DMG we will need to do the actual app
> itself, which means some changes to the actual AOO build and packaging
> process... which I hope we don't need :)
>
>
> Nope, sorry (macOS 10.14.6). Still complains. Signing the DMG is not
> enough.
>
> -- Brane
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


Re: [discussion] CMS migration (was: svn migration plan)

2019-07-29 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi all,

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 9:18 AM George Karalis  wrote:
>
> Hello Peter,
>
> I have proposed some time ago the move to a static site generator — like
Jekyll, Hugo etc. —
> as I was redesigning OpenOffice’s front-page. That would greatly help
reduce tech diversity
> and maintenance as only static html files will be served.
>
> Most static site generators work with markdown and I believe that content
writers won't have
> a problem working with markdown. We could also setup an automated build
pipeline that
> serves the generated site with every commit, i.e. every markdown or
template change.


Hi George, you have just described almost perfectly Infras replacement for
the CMS!
Using Pelican and GHFM and Buildbot, you only need to 'edit' a page in
Github and that
commit will trigger a site rebuild and automatic publish of the site. It is
still in testing but
almost ready for use. I'll post more details and a docs link when its ready
for wider testing.

Gav...


>
>
> By the way there's a fully functional redesigned front-page for anyone
interested, that time
> there was a server migration and it hadn't got much attention. The CMS
migration provides an
> opportunity to move to a whole website redesign.
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>


--
Gav...


Re: 32-bit buildbots

2019-06-25 Thread Gavin McDonald
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 4:00 PM Matthias Seidel 
wrote:

> Hi Gavin,
>
> P.S.: What is bb_slave8_ubuntu running? 18.04?
>

Is is yep!

Gav...


>
> >
> > Gav...
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 3:31 PM Matthias Seidel <
> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Infra does not provide 32-bit slaves anymore, so we will not have new
> >> builds for Linux32 here:
> >>
> >> https://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds.html
> >>
> >> I will update the page but leave the links to the most recent builds for
> >> a while.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >>Matthias
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>

-- 
Gav...


Re: 32-bit buildbots

2019-06-25 Thread Gavin McDonald
Thanks Matthias, you beat me to it!

If openoffice were to have someone with a 32 bit VM running a
buildbot-worker, we would of course connect it
to our master, and your builds would continue to be provided.

Have you any idea how many 32 bit openoffice users are left?

Gav...


On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 3:31 PM Matthias Seidel 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Infra does not provide 32-bit slaves anymore, so we will not have new
> builds for Linux32 here:
>
> https://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds.html
>
> I will update the page but leave the links to the most recent builds for
> a while.
>
> Regards,
>
>Matthias
>
>
>

-- 
Gav...


Re: [NOTICE] Mandatory relocation of Apache git repositories on git-wip-us.apache.org

2018-12-08 Thread Gavin McDonald
You can use Github directly or Gitbox directly, git.a.o would no longer be
involved. (And does not need to be)

On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 8:33 PM Mechtilde  wrote:

> Hello
>
> Am 07.12.18 um 20:59 schrieb Dave Fisher:
> > Hi -
>
> >
> > SVN -> git.apache.org -> GitBox -> GitHub.
> >
> > When we switch to GitHub development then it will be:
> >
> > GitHub -> GitBox -> git.apache.org
> >
>
> Is it possible to use git.apache.org directly?
>
> Kind regards
>
> --
> Mechtilde Stehmann
> ## Apache OpenOffice
> ## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows
> ## Debian Developer
> ## Loook, tbsync, libreoffice-canzeley-client
> ## PGP encryption welcome
> ## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899  39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F
>
>

-- 
Gav...


Re: Chat Channel (was [Discussion] Program for Sandro)

2018-10-21 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi Sandro,

I sent an invite email so that you can join the #openoffice channel, let me
know how it goes.

Gav...


On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 3:42 PM sandro  wrote:

> Dear Gavin,
>
> I have followed your instruction. The Slack Site (https://asf.slack.com/)
> says that I need an account to access it. I would like to request one.
>
>
> My greatest motivation for the chat channel is that it will be a facility
> for working everyday. Online with you in real time I plan to work about 2
> hours per day from Monday to Friday and 10 hours in the weekends, it would
> become far easier to my personal management, besides that the possibility
> of collaboration would enhance my productivity and turn me happier and more
> joyful.
>
> Glad,
> Sandro Suzart
>
>
> 
> De: Peter kovacs 
> Enviado: domingo, 14 de outubro de 2018 13:09
> Para: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Assunto: Re: Chat Channel (was [Discussion] Program for Sandro)
>
> I am online now too.  Thanks Gavin.
>
> Am 14. Oktober 2018 13:21:04 MESZ schrieb Matthias Seidel <
> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>:
> >Hi Gavin,
> >
> >Am 14.10.2018 um 11:46 schrieb Gavin McDonald:
> >> Install the Slack app, or via the web goto the-asf.slack.com you will
> >find
> >> an #openoffice slack channel ready and waiting, been there quite some
> >time
> >> unused.
> >
> >Thank you for the pointer, I didn't know of it.
> >
> >>
> >> With HipChat going away, Slack is the option to use now.
> >>
> >> I am there, lets see you all there too!
> >
> >I'm in! ;-)
> >
> >Matthias
> >
> >>
> >> HTH
> >>
> >> Gav...
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 2:12 AM Howard Cary Morris <
> >> howard_cary_mor...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I can create a chat room to share or you can use another service to
> >do the
> >>> same thing
> >>> Howard
> >>>
> >>> From: sandro<mailto:sandro_suz...@hotmail.com>
> >>> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2018 6:59 PM
> >>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org<mailto:dev@openoffice.apache.org>
> >>> Subject: Re: Chat Channel (was [Discussion] Program for Sandro)
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I feel that the chat channel (real time chat) can really improve our
> >>> experience to more creativity, we could be able to communicate and
> >interact
> >>> in real time, certainly our productivity would soar, it would lead
> >us to
> >>> greater satisfaction.
> >>>
> >>> Has anyone felt the same way about that idea? What is your opinion?
> >>>
> >>> When I first gave the idea I was thinking about a communication
> >between me
> >>> and Peter, but as other guys liked that idea then I feel it could be
> >an
> >>> amazing experience to all of us.
> >>>
> >>> Glad,
> >>> Sandro Suzart
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>> De: Peter Kovacs 
> >>> Enviado: segunda-feira, 8 de outubro de 2018 04:11
> >>> Para: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> Assunto: Chat Channel (was [Discussion] Program for Sandro)
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I am traveling a lot. The classic irc channel never worked for me,
> >>> because I get disconnects all the time.
> >>>
> >>> So currently from my perspective we could set something up in
> >threema,
> >>> slack or discord for real time chat.
> >>>
> >>> I am also open for other mobile capable options. Just keep in mind
> >it
> >>> has to work with a shitty german mobile connection.
> >>>
> >>> If anyone knows a solution for IRC I would gladly participate in a
> >>> channel there.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> All the best
> >>>
> >>> Peter
> >>>
> >>> On 9/26/18 3:13 AM, sandro wrote:
> >>>> Dear Peter
> >>>>
> >>>> It is an amazing idea, very nice. Maybe one of those kind services
> >(
> >>> Dropbox or Google) have a nice and amazing chat service so we could
> >>> communicate in real time while working. It is nice to interact and
> >it is
> >>> glad, certainly it will drive us to joy.
> >>>> I would like to try Dropbox and I would like to know

Re: MSVC Update

2018-10-14 Thread Gavin McDonald
Please consider filing an INFRA ticket with any new software versions that
might be needed on the Buildbots.
Also eqnuire about an extra 16.04 buildbot if needed.

Gav...


On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 9:31 PM Matthias Seidel 
wrote:

> Hello George,
>
> Am 10.10.2018 um 13:23 schrieb George Karalis:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This is an update of the current MSVC task. So far I had success in
> integrating MSVC 2015
> > to the project but it requires Windows SDK 8.1 or higher in order to
> work correctly. I ‘ve
> > found that Microsoft has reworked the folder structure of this SDK so it
> requires additional
> > work to be done in the configure.ac, in order to find the correct
> compilers and tools. Same
> > thing at the Windows 10 SDK, which has a more different structure.
>
> Thank you for your work!
> Windows is the main platform for our users with about 85% of downloads.
> Still is has been a bit neglected...
> A newer SDK/compiler will certainly help us on our way to a 64-bit version.
>
> >
> > Another thing that requires additional work is the integration of MSVC
> 2017. I was able to
> > find the installation from the registry, using oowintool, copy the
> required dll etc., but in Visual
> > Studio 2017 the folder structure is completely different, so changes are
> also needed at
> > configure.ac, for —with-cl-home to work correctly.
> >
> > So that leaves me with the following notes:
> >
> > (1) Integrate MSVC 2010 with Windows 7.1 SDK, both are available from
> Microsoft, no
> >  additional work is needed at the configure level, and update the
> project to MSBuild
> >  (Easy)
>
> This is the SDK we are talking about?
> https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=8279
>
> As a non developer I would say this should be our first step.
>
> >
> > (2) Integrate MSVC 2017 with Windows 10 SDK, requires more work, but it
> ’s the main
> >  goal.
> >
> > I ‘m thinking of doing an incremental integration. Work on option (1)
> and after a successful build
> > continue to option (2). Option (1) also provides support for Windows XP,
> so we could stick at
> > that for a while. After (1) is complete I presume that building to a new
> compiler and SDK, will
> > be easier, since the project will have already changed to MSBuild.
>
> Sounds like a plan to me.
> And I also think it would be good if we can support XP for some
> additional time.
>
> Regards,
>Matthias
>
> >
> > What are your thoughts and suggestions about this matter?
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > George
>
>
>

-- 
Gav...


Re: Help building AOO416 on Ubuntu 16.04

2018-10-14 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi Pedro,


On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 8:25 PM Pedro Lino  wrote:

> Hi all
>
>
> I have come across the first two problems:
>
>
> 1) E: Package 'openjdk-7-jdk' has no installation candidate
>
> I installed openjdk-8 instead
>
>
> 2) The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libgstreamer-ocaml : Depends: ocaml-base-nox-4.02.3
> Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml:i386 but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
> libgstreamer-ocaml:i386 : Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml but 0.2.0-2build2
> is to be installed
> libgstreamer-ocaml-dev : Depends: ocaml-nox-4.02.3
> Depends: ocaml-findlib but it is not going to be installed
> Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml-dev:i386 but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
> libgstreamer-ocaml-dev:i386 : Depends: ocaml-nox-4.02.3:i386
> Depends: libgstreamer1.0-dev:i386 but it is not going to be installed
> Depends: libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev:i386 but it is not going to be
> installed
> Conflicts: libgstreamer-ocaml-dev but 0.2.0-2build2 is to be installed
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
>
>
> Help?
>

What build instructions have you been following so far?


> Is someone going to be online today on IRC or available for direct email?
> I think these newbie problems don't belong in the dev mailing list.
>

16.04 isnt in our build systems yet for openoffice, and so only a handful
of developers have been trying it so far.
With that said, I believe this list is the right place for such questions
so that those that follow can see the discussions in the
archives.

Gav...


>
> Regards,
>
> Pedro
>


Re: Chat Channel (was [Discussion] Program for Sandro)

2018-10-14 Thread Gavin McDonald
Install the Slack app, or via the web goto the-asf.slack.com you will find
an #openoffice slack channel ready and waiting, been there quite some time
unused.

With HipChat going away, Slack is the option to use now.

I am there, lets see you all there too!

HTH

Gav...


On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 2:12 AM Howard Cary Morris <
howard_cary_mor...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> I can create a chat room to share or you can use another service to do the
> same thing
> Howard
>
> From: sandro
> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2018 6:59 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Chat Channel (was [Discussion] Program for Sandro)
>
> Hi,
>
> I feel that the chat channel (real time chat) can really improve our
> experience to more creativity, we could be able to communicate and interact
> in real time, certainly our productivity would soar, it would lead us to
> greater satisfaction.
>
> Has anyone felt the same way about that idea? What is your opinion?
>
> When I first gave the idea I was thinking about a communication between me
> and Peter, but as other guys liked that idea then I feel it could be an
> amazing experience to all of us.
>
> Glad,
> Sandro Suzart
>
> 
> De: Peter Kovacs 
> Enviado: segunda-feira, 8 de outubro de 2018 04:11
> Para: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Assunto: Chat Channel (was [Discussion] Program for Sandro)
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am traveling a lot. The classic irc channel never worked for me,
> because I get disconnects all the time.
>
> So currently from my perspective we could set something up in threema,
> slack or discord for real time chat.
>
> I am also open for other mobile capable options. Just keep in mind it
> has to work with a shitty german mobile connection.
>
> If anyone knows a solution for IRC I would gladly participate in a
> channel there.
>
>
> All the best
>
> Peter
>
> On 9/26/18 3:13 AM, sandro wrote:
> > Dear Peter
> >
> > It is an amazing idea, very nice. Maybe one of those kind services (
> Dropbox or Google) have a nice and amazing chat service so we could
> communicate in real time while working. It is nice to interact and it is
> glad, certainly it will drive us to joy.
> >
> > I would like to try Dropbox and I would like to know if this service has
> means of communication in real time, like a chat?
> >
> > Glad,
> > Sandro Suzart
> >
> >
> > 
> > De: Peter Kovacs 
> > Enviado: domingo, 23 de setembro de 2018 12:29
> > Para: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> > Assunto: Re: [Discussion] Program for Sandro
> >
> > Dear Sandro,
> >
> > Glad to read about your determination. :) Lets get you doing something.
> >
> > You can send it directly to my address if you like. I personally would
> > appreciate if we could store it somewhere more cloudy.
> >
> > How about google drive or Dropbox. They offer free cloud space. And you
> > can setup the space easy.
> >
> >
> > Yea it is really cool that we are a cloud Project. I think it is great
> > that you are with us. Maybe we can make OpenOffice a bit more Cloudy. ;)
> >
> > All the best
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > On 9/22/18 7:32 PM, sandro wrote:
> >> Dear Peter,
> >>
> >> It is always amazing to show my commitment and passion for this
> project, I feel that it is so good to build together that it certainly
> drives all of us to happiness.
> >>
> >> I just have been looking for sending a work plan to you, as I told in
> my last message. I will ask an user for the wiki project.
> >>
> >> Well, I have the wish and I feel that I am plenty able to go on with
> long term perspective with this volunteering. Because since the time
> schedule is flexible and since I can work from anywhere (school, park, home
> ...) there is probably no interference in the activity and I think that
> nothing will prevent me from collaborate. If a have to move to another
> city, or if I work more in another project, I can always collaborate; the
> only thing that would stop would be internet connection ( if I do not have
> it at home) but it is easy to find free wifi anywhere, there are libraries
> and other buildings that offer internet access for free and also a computer
> to access.
> >>
> >> So I will always be here, I just was doing the work plan while handling
> other tasks (such as a university test to September, 24. It is a calculus
> test, macroeconomics test and a management test in the same week... rs). I
> plan to always collaborate with you, always hold hands.
> >>
> >> Glad,
> >> Sandro Suzart
> >>
> >>
> >> 
> >> De: Peter Kovacs 
> >> Enviado: sábado, 22 de setembro de 2018 01:04
> >> Para: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> >> Assunto: Re: [Discussion] Program for Sandro
> >>
> >> Dear,
> >>
> >> Have you asked a user Request? - Use a new thread for that please. -
> >> Hope you are still with us, it would be sad if you already stop.
> >>
> >> All the best
> >>
> >> Peter
> >>
> >> On 9/11/18 5:15 PM, 

Re: Mac buildbot available?

2018-08-30 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi,

Apologies for giving false hope here, but that page is years out of date, I
will update it shortly, but to
confirm, we do not have any macs at the ASF.

Gav...


On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 4:39 PM Peter kovacs  wrote:

> I do not know. Looping in the builds mailing List to the OpenOffice dev
> mailing list discussion.
>
> If the server do not have the graphical libraries, is it possible to
> install a VM on Top of the Apple server?
> App allows that MacOS runs in a VM a long as Apple Hardware is used.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Am 30. August 2018 03:40:30 MESZ schrieb Damjan Jovanovic <
> dam...@apache.org>:
> >Hopefully. Does Xserve provide the graphical libraries (Aqua, Quartz,
> >etc.)? Weren't XServes discontinued years ago?
> >
> >
> >On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:47 PM Peter kovacs  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I just read following on https://ci.apache.org/buildbot.html
> >>
> >> *NEW* - OSX Apple XServe Slave
> >>
> >> This sounds cool!
> >> Would this help us?
> >>
> >> All the best
> >> Peter
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>


-- 
Gav...


Re: svn commit: r1025487 - /infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/projects/openofficeorg.conf

2018-02-18 Thread Gavin McDonald


> On 18 Feb 2018, at 2:46 am, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Gavin,
> 
> Am 17.02.2018 um 01:40 schrieb Gavin McDonald:
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> Just wanted to make you aware of the change to 3 of your buildbot builds so 
>> have
>> forwarded you the commit diff below.
>> 
>> Basically, 3 of your long running builds tat are taking 9 or 10 hours to 
>> complete, are spending 
>> 6 or 7 hours of that time uploading tar.gz files and zips as snapshot 
>> builds. However , they are 
>> then all being deleted the very next day and built and uploaded all over 
>> again.
>> 
>> This is not great use of our hardware and bandwidth. Therefore I have 
>> inserted 'onlyIfChanged=True’
>> into those 3 builds so they will only build (and upload and delete) when 
>> there has been a change in the 
>> code since the last build. This makes much more sense.
> 
> Indeed!
> 
> I was not aware of such helpful switches. There may be many more, can
> you recommend a documentation for the buildbots?

Best page I can recommend for our installation versions is :-

http://docs.buildbot.net/0.8.9/full.html 
<http://docs.buildbot.net/0.8.9/full.html> 


> 
> What I would like to do in the near future is to unify the names of our
> buildbots and make the names more generic, e.g.:
> 
> aoo-windows32-branch
> aoo-windows32-trunk
> aoo-linux32-branch
> aoo-linux32-trunk
> …

Makes sense, but please note that changing builder names loses all history for 
a build as it 
starts again from build number 0. So if doing it, make sure its one to stick 
around for a while.


Gav…

> 
> Until now I only managed to change the branch from 414 to 415.
> 
> Regards,
>Matthias
> 
>> 
>> Any questions, fire away, I am subscribed to this list.
>> 
>> Gav…
>> 
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>> 
>>> From: gmcdon...@apache.org
>>> Subject: svn commit: r1025487 - 
>>> /infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/projects/openofficeorg.conf
>>> Date: 17 February 2018 at 11:35:12 am AEDT
>>> To: comm...@infra.apache.org
>>> Reply-To: priv...@infra.apache.org
>>> 
>>> Author: gmcdonald
>>> Date: Sat Feb 17 00:35:11 2018
>>> New Revision: 1025487
>>> 
>>> Log:
>>> Changed 3 schedulers to only build when scheduled 
>>> and only if the code has changed since the last build.
>>> 
>>> Some of these builds are taking 3 hours to perform, then
>>> they are taking 7+ hours to upload 2.5GB worth of various 
>>> tar.gz files -- only to delete all of it the next day and 
>>> do it all over again! 
>>> 
>>> This is not good use of CI hardware or our bandwidth. So
>>> it makes sense to only build these at the scheduled time
>>> only if some part of the code has changed.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Modified:
>>>   
>>> infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/projects/openofficeorg.conf
>>> 
>>> Modified: 
>>> infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/projects/openofficeorg.conf
>>> ==
>>> --- 
>>> infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/projects/openofficeorg.conf
>>>  (original)
>>> +++ 
>>> infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/projects/openofficeorg.conf
>>>  Sat Feb 17 00:35:11 2018
>>> @@ -9,14 +9,16 @@ c['schedulers'].append(Nightly(name='ope
>>>  builderNames=['openoffice-linux64-nightly'],
>>>  branch='openoffice/trunk',
>>>  hour=4,
>>> -  minute=10))
>>> +  minute=10,
>>> +  onlyIfChanged=True))
>>> 
>>> c['schedulers'].append(Nightly(name='openoffice-linux64-41x',
>>>  builderNames=['openoffice-linux64-41x'],
>>>  branch='openoffice/branches/AOO415',
>>>  dayOfWeek=[6],
>>>  hour=12,
>>> -  minute=40))
>>> +  minute=40,
>>> +  onlyIfChanged=True))
>>> 
>>> c['schedulers'].append(Nightly(name='openoffice-nightly-rat',
>>>  builderNames=['openoffice-nightly-rat'],
>>> @@ -34,14 +36,16 @@ c['schedulers'].append(Nightly(name='ope
>>>  builderNames=['openoffice-linux32-nightly'],
>>>  branch='openoffice/trunk',
>>>  hour=2,
>>> -  minute=5))
>>> +  minute=5,
>>> +  onlyIfChanged=True))
>>> 
>>> c['schedulers'].append(Nightly(name='openoffice-linux32-41x',
>>>  builderNames=['openoffice-linux32-41x'],
>>>  branch='openoffice/branches/AOO415',
>>>  dayOfWeek=[5],
>>>  hour=7,
>>> -  minute=9))
>>> +  minute=9,
>>> +  onlyIfChanged=True))
>>> 
>>> c['schedulers'].append(Nightly(name='aoo-win7-nightly',
>>>  builderNames=['aoo-win7'],
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 



Fwd: svn commit: r1025487 - /infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/projects/openofficeorg.conf

2018-02-16 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi All,

Just wanted to make you aware of the change to 3 of your buildbot builds so have
forwarded you the commit diff below.

Basically, 3 of your long running builds tat are taking 9 or 10 hours to 
complete, are spending 
6 or 7 hours of that time uploading tar.gz files and zips as snapshot builds. 
However , they are 
then all being deleted the very next day and built and uploaded all over again.

This is not great use of our hardware and bandwidth. Therefore I have inserted 
'onlyIfChanged=True’
into those 3 builds so they will only build (and upload and delete) when there 
has been a change in the 
code since the last build. This makes much more sense.

Any questions, fire away, I am subscribed to this list.

Gav…

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: gmcdon...@apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1025487 - 
> /infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/projects/openofficeorg.conf
> Date: 17 February 2018 at 11:35:12 am AEDT
> To: comm...@infra.apache.org
> Reply-To: priv...@infra.apache.org
> 
> Author: gmcdonald
> Date: Sat Feb 17 00:35:11 2018
> New Revision: 1025487
> 
> Log:
> Changed 3 schedulers to only build when scheduled 
> and only if the code has changed since the last build.
> 
> Some of these builds are taking 3 hours to perform, then
> they are taking 7+ hours to upload 2.5GB worth of various 
> tar.gz files -- only to delete all of it the next day and 
> do it all over again! 
> 
> This is not good use of CI hardware or our bandwidth. So
> it makes sense to only build these at the scheduled time
> only if some part of the code has changed.
> 
> 
> Modified:
>
> infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/projects/openofficeorg.conf
> 
> Modified: 
> infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/projects/openofficeorg.conf
> ==
> --- 
> infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/projects/openofficeorg.conf 
> (original)
> +++ 
> infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/projects/openofficeorg.conf 
> Sat Feb 17 00:35:11 2018
> @@ -9,14 +9,16 @@ c['schedulers'].append(Nightly(name='ope
>   builderNames=['openoffice-linux64-nightly'],
>   branch='openoffice/trunk',
>   hour=4,
> -  minute=10))
> +  minute=10,
> +  onlyIfChanged=True))
> 
> c['schedulers'].append(Nightly(name='openoffice-linux64-41x',
>   builderNames=['openoffice-linux64-41x'],
>   branch='openoffice/branches/AOO415',
>   dayOfWeek=[6],
>   hour=12,
> -  minute=40))
> +  minute=40,
> +  onlyIfChanged=True))
> 
> c['schedulers'].append(Nightly(name='openoffice-nightly-rat',
>   builderNames=['openoffice-nightly-rat'],
> @@ -34,14 +36,16 @@ c['schedulers'].append(Nightly(name='ope
>   builderNames=['openoffice-linux32-nightly'],
>   branch='openoffice/trunk',
>   hour=2,
> -  minute=5))
> +  minute=5,
> +  onlyIfChanged=True))
> 
> c['schedulers'].append(Nightly(name='openoffice-linux32-41x',
>   builderNames=['openoffice-linux32-41x'],
>   branch='openoffice/branches/AOO415',
>   dayOfWeek=[5],
>   hour=7,
> -  minute=9))
> +  minute=9,
> +  onlyIfChanged=True))
> 
> c['schedulers'].append(Nightly(name='aoo-win7-nightly',
>   builderNames=['aoo-win7'],
> 



Re: FOSDEM dinner invitation

2018-02-03 Thread Gavin McDonald
This is today/tonight?

Is anybody from  OpenOffice going ? It sure would be nice.

https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Events/2018/FOSDEM#Social_Dinner 
 

Gav…


> On 23 Jan 2018, at 4:07 am, Simon Phipps  wrote:
> 
> Just a reminder that everyone on this list is invited for dinner at FOSDEM
> as below.  Cheers!
> 
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Simon Phipps  wrote:
> 
>> Dear AOO developers,
>> 
>> The board of directors of The Document Foundation have asked me to extend
>> their invitation to join the LibreOffice developers for an informal dinner
>> on the Saturday evening at FOSDEM (February 3rd, 8pm) in Brussels. If you
>> would like to attend, please add your name and contact details to the wiki
>> at https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Events/2018/FOSDEM#Social_Dinner
>> or contact me privately if you have any problems.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Simon
>> 



Re: [VOTE] New Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair

2017-12-10 Thread Gavin McDonald
[X] Peter Kovacs (petko)

Gav…


> On 9 Dec 2017, at 6:53 am, Marcus  wrote:
> 
> End of October I wrote that I would like to resign from the Apache OpenOffice 
> PMC Chair position. I'm the chair a bit more than 1 year and until now we 
> have rotated the role every year.
> 
> Luckily we have 2 volunteers: Carl and Peter. Therefore please vote by 
> replying to this thread.
> 
> [ ] Carl Marcum (cmarcum)
> [ ] Peter Kovacs (petko)
> [ ] Abstain (I cannot/won't choose between them)
> 
> The [VOTE] will close in about 7 days (Fri 15 Dec 2017, 21:00 UTC), to give 
> all PMC members the opportunity to participate. For a converted time fitting 
> to your location see here:
> 
> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20171215T2100
> 
> After the vote:
> I will submit a resolution to the Board asking to be replaced by the most 
> voted of the 2 candidates. The plan is to submit the resolution for the Board 
> meeting on 20th December 2017, so that it can be effective right after that.
> 
> PS:
> The next board report is due for mid January and of course I will help the 
> new chair with this but also other chair tasks.
> 
> Marcus
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Building Guides

2017-10-19 Thread Gavin McDonald

> On 20 Oct 2017, at 9:40 am, Andrea Pescetti  wrote:
> 
> 


> There are no build instructions on the CWiki and there shouldn't be a copy 
> there.

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
 


Gav…
> 



Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC5 as GA

2017-10-18 Thread Gavin McDonald

> On 19 Oct 2017, at 9:39 am, Carl Marcum  wrote:
> 
> 

> Question..
> If a PMC member cast a vote should it always be counted as binding whether 
> stated explicitly or not?

Yes,

Gav…

> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Opengrok

2017-09-05 Thread Gavin McDonald
Sorry to hijack the thread here sort of but … 

https://fisheye.apache.org/changelog/openoffice 
 

With all the talk of OpenGrok, did anybody actually look closer to home?

Gav…

> On 6 Sep 2017, at 11:09 am, Patricia Shanahan  wrote:
> 
> Would Opengrok be out of service during the "remove all branches" phase? If 
> so, for how long?
> 
> 
> On 9/5/2017 3:04 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>> Hi,
>> maybe it would be nice to have a small script that runs once a day that
>> just removes all branches and set them up which it finds.
>> It would remove the necessatity of manual maintenance.
>> And I think it is fine for us if we see the new branch one day later.
>> Not sure if your interface supports scripting, but would be neat.
>> All the best
>> Peter
>> Am Donnerstag, den 17.08.2017, 08:51 +0200 schrieb Nicolas Christener:
>>> Hi Marcus
>>> 
>>> See my answer inline, below:
>>> 
>>> On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 21:00 +0200, Marcus wrote:
>>> [...]
 However, the selection of branches is a bit
 old. Is there a chance to get newer branches into Opengrok?
>>> 
>>> Sure! :)
>>> 
 In SVN we have some more [1] and it would be great to get all
 4.1.x
 release branches as selection here [2].
>>> 
>>> I'll take a look at this - shouldn't be a big issue.
>>> 
 Or maybe is there a way that we can add this on our own? ;-)
>>> 
>>> I'll check what the options are - I'd of course be happy to give you
>>> (or
>>> someone else) the needed permissions so you can do this on your own.
>>> I'll have
>>> a look and report back.
>>> 
 Thanks for your help.
>>> 
>>> You're very welcome!
>>> 
>>> All the best,
>>> Nicolas
>>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 



Re: svn commit: r1804009 - /openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.1.4/unxlngix6/config.log

2017-08-04 Thread Gavin McDonald
..

> +PATH: .
> +PATH: .
> +PATH: .
> +PATH: .
> +PATH: .
> +PATH: .
> +PATH: /home/jim/src/asf/code/aoo-414/main/solenv/unxlngx6.pro/bin
> +PATH: /home/jim/src/asf/code/aoo-414/main/solenv/bin
> +PATH: /home/jim/src/asf/code/aoo-414/main/solenv/unxlngx6.pro/bin
> +PATH: /home/jim/src/asf/code/aoo-414/main/solenv/bin
> +PATH: /home/jim/src/asf/code/aoo-414/main/solenv/unxlngx6.pro/bin
> +PATH: /home/jim/src/asf/code/aoo-414/main/solenv/bin
> +PATH: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.41.x86_64/bin
> +PATH: /home/jim/src/asf/code/aoo-414/main/solenv/unxlngx6.pro/bin
> +PATH: /home/jim/src/asf/code/aoo-414/main/solenv/bin
> +PATH: /usr/java/jdk1.8.0_101/bin
> +PATH: /usr
> +PATH: /home/jim/bin
> +PATH: /usr/local/bin
> +PATH: /usr/bin
> +PATH: /bin
> +PATH: /usr/X11R6/bin
> +

Should developer specific path environments be in version control or do 
we all have to change our name to jim ;)

Gav…



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Buildbot upgrades broken ? (was: Re: Forums and Wiki VM Migrations)

2017-06-27 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi

> On 28 Jun 2017, at 2:18 am, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Gavin McDonald wrote:
>> https://forum.openoffice.org ...
>> https://wiki.openoffice.org ...
>> We need to migrate these services over to new fully puppetized VMs.
> 
> One thing to remember: while we can live without buildbots (that were left 
> crippled by a similar infrastructure upgrade) we can't have a long downtime 
> for the Forum or Wiki; so if Infra is embarking on this, then this time the 
> job must be completed successfully. I see the JIRA issues already take care 
> of stating this, but it's better to point it out again

The Operating Systems were upgraded on some Buildbot VMS whilst others were 
replaced altogether. Mostly, I see this as the OpenOffice project need to keep 
up to speed with Operating Systems, associated software packages for those 
systems and ensure that the OpenOffice software can run on ever evolving 
systems. Windows 7 as an example was EOL years ago and security updates no 
longer available. Ubuntu 12.04 the same thing. You are complaining we replaced 
5 year old and 10 year old Operating systems and that this broke your builds. 

Builds break, upgrades of Operating Systems and their underlying software 
packages happen. Our build systems will always be evolving so projects must 
learn to cope with this and ensure their builds change with it.

I would like to have all the OpenOffice builds fixed. So, please open INFRA 
tickets for all broken builds where you see that INFRA needs to do something - 
install software etc. But sitting around doing nothing is not going
to get them fixed. 

Gav…





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Forums and Wiki VM Migrations

2017-06-27 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi,

> On 28 Jun 2017, at 2:18 am, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Gavin McDonald wrote:
>> https://forum.openoffice.org ...
>> https://wiki.openoffice.org ...
>> We need to migrate these services over to new fully puppetized VMs.
> 
> One thing to remember: while we can live without buildbots (that were left 
> crippled by a similar infrastructure upgrade) we can't have a long downtime 
> for the Forum or Wiki; so if Infra is embarking on this, then this time the 
> job must be completed successfully. I see the JIRA issues already take care 
> of stating this, but it's better to point it out again.

This deserves another thread so I’ll do that shortly.

> 
>> I imagine that identifying all the nuts and bolts of these services will 
>> take a
>> bit of time to go through, and to puppetize everything that we can.
> 
> Speaking as probably the only active person in maintaining the services, I 
> can say that the text files available to Infra (not publicly accessible, but 
> ask me the URL if needed) describe reasonably well the setup. The wiki is 
> mostly normal, but the forum is crazy (for historical reasons).

Right. I have been involved in the initial setup and upgrades of both services 
so we should be good.

> 
>> I will be here on list and also liaising through the INFRA Jira tickets 
>> [1][2].
> 
> Thank you. I don't see it necessary to create a wiki page for the migration 
> but if it helps, no problem.

The wiki page was not to help me, but rather the project as a whole as future 
documentation to refer to.

> 
>> A volunteer or two to assist with communication between Infra and the
>> Openoffice communities (such as those using and managing the Forums -
>> particularly since some of those dont follow the mailing lists or Jira.) 
>> would
>> be nice.
>> A volunteer or two who wants to be involved in the actual migration process
>> would also be nice so that we have folks here with some working knowledge
>> by the end of the process.
> 
> I volunteer for the second part: I don't have a lot of spare time, but at the 
> moment I'm the only person with recent experience of managing the services. 
> I've subscribed to both JIRA issues.

Great, thanks.

Gav…

> 
> Regards,
>  Andrea.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Forums and Wiki VM Migrations

2017-06-27 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi All,

The OpenOffice forums - https://forum.openoffice.org 
 

and 

The OpenOffice wiki - https://wiki.openoffice.org 
 

are both housed on old VMware VMS which are in turn hosted on 
old hardware. 

We need to migrate these services over to new fully puppetized VMs.

I imagine that identifying all the nuts and bolts of these services will take a 
bit of time to go through, and to puppetize everything that we can.

I propose that someone here might like to create a Confluence wiki page for 
each service where everyone can follow along. (Not strictly necessary as this 
is mostly a one time operation) 
I will be here on list and also liaising through the INFRA Jira tickets [1][2].

A volunteer or two to assist with communication between Infra and the 
Openoffice communities (such as those using and managing the Forums - 
particularly since some of those dont follow the mailing lists or Jira.) would 
be nice.

A volunteer or two who wants to be involved in the actual migration process 
would also be nice so that we have folks here with some working knowledge 
by the end of the process.

I aim to start the process of both migrations simultaneously but I do expect 
differing finishing lines. My current expectations are that we could be done 
between 1 and 2 months.

Any queries please reply to the dev list or the relevant INFRA jira tickets.

Fact finding on the hardware requirements and disk configurations are the 
first step in the process and I am ready to begin that step now - who wants 
to join in ?

Myself and Daniel ‘pono’ will be the main Infra peeps taking this on.

Thanks for getting this far.

Gav… 

[1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13281 
 
[2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13275 
 




Re: Mac OSX/macOS builds of AOO 4.1.4

2017-05-03 Thread Gavin McDonald

> On 2 May 2017, at 4:38 am, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> The new, Sierra-buildbot build of AOO 4.1.4 is now available for
> test at:
> 
>   http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/r1781484-Test/
> 
> Just one lang and package is available at present.
> 
> TIA for your testing!

Thanks Jim thats much better, open, new,close, database all work fine now.

Cant find anything else wrong at the moment with the suite from initial looking 
around. I’d need specific bugs to check for anything else.

Gav…


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Mac OSX/macOS builds of AOO 4.1.4

2017-05-01 Thread Gavin McDonald
I am using OS Siera 10.12.4

I installed Jims version en-US

Creating new database instance fine.
Saving it fine
Closing down the database or closing down the database window or closing down 
Openoffice does not work.
Literally nothing happens.

I ended up force quitting the program.

No other tests done at this point, anything else needing to be tested?

Gav…


> On 1 May 2017, at 8:43 pm, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> For the record, the build system IS running 10.11/El Capitan, but I
> cannot recreate the bug here. However, I strongly urge people to test as
> Andrea sez. Worse case scenario is that I need to update the build
> system to Sierra, and if that is the case, I'd prefer to do it asap.
> 
> So please test soon!
> 
> PS: Will likely tweet this request to gain a wider audience!
> 
>> On May 1, 2017, at 5:08 AM, Andrea Pescetti  wrote:
>> 
>> On 27/04/2017 Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> A sampling has been uploaded to:
>>>http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/
>> 
>> Thanks! For Mac users testing those builds: please make sure there is no 
>> regression with respect to https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126622 
>> (an issue with 4.1.2 that was determined to be related to build details, see 
>> Ariel's last comment there for more).
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Andrea.
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Buildbots page

2017-04-01 Thread Gavin McDonald
I have no idea why you have been doing all this work, the old scripts have been 
working fine 
and can be updated in svn for the template parts and git for the sh script.

Gav…

> On 2 Apr 2017, at 6:52 am, Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
> If no one has objections I would make :
> 
> https://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds-test.html
> 
> live tomorrow and ask Infra to remove the script, page and artefacts of:
> 
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/index.html
> 
> Regards, Matthias
> 
> FYI: I changed the schedule of the snapshot builds (414 branch) to a
> weekly base.
> 
> 
> Am 28.03.2017 um 21:15 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 28.03.2017 um 01:55 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
>>> It might have changed...
>> Indeed (from:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos//infra/infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/public_html/README_SCRIPTS.txt):
>> 
>> Index generation scripts
>> 
>> 
>> Note:
>> The shell scripts which generate the nightly and snapshot indexes have been 
>> moved to puppet.
>> 
>> See the directory:
>> 
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=infrastructure-puppet.git;a=tree;f=modules/buildbot_asf/files/projects;hb=HEAD
>> 
>> The cron jobs are defined in
>> 
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=infrastructure-puppet.git;a=blob_plain;f=modules/buildbot_asf/manifests/init.pp;hb=HEAD
>> 
>> 
>> Unfortunately only the script has been moved, but not the header, footer
>> and css. Therefore the page can not be updated properly.
>> The script itself generates links to AOO 4.1.2 snapshots and needs also
>> to be changed.
>> 
>> Instead of trying to fix the generated page I would suggest to link
>> directly to nightlys/snapshots from our devbuilds homepage:
>> https://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds.html
>> 
>> I created a test page as example:
>> https://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds-test.html
>> 
>> Opinions?
>> 
>> Kind regards, Matthias
>> 
>>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Matthias Seidel <
>>> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>> 
 Hi Damjan,
 
 Thanks you for the link, but in:
 
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/buildbot/
 aegis/buildmaster/master1/public_html/projects/openoffice/
 
 I can only find header, footer and CSS but no script?
 
 Regards, Matthias
 
 
 Am 27.03.2017 um 18:25 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> It's generated from:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/buildbot/
 aegis/buildmaster/master1/public_html/projects/openoffice/create-ooo-
 snapshots-index.sh
> Regards
> Damjan
> 
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Matthias Seidel <
 matthias.sei...@hamburg.de
>> wrote:
>> Hello all!
>> 
>> Is there a way to maintain our Buildbots page?
>> 
>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/index.html
>> 
>> Regards, Matthias
>> 
>> 
>> 
 
>> 
> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Windows 7 Buildbot migrations to Windows 10

2017-03-05 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi All,

Apologies for the short notice.

Buildbot machine known as ‘win7; will be turned off today and all builds will 
be migrated to a new 
‘win10’ box instead. We will make the appropriate config changes to your 
project.conf files in svn 
and perform an initial post move build. They are likely to fail. Please do 
create tickets for any 
dependencies that will need to be installed. We will work with you all to 
return you builds to passing 
again.

Thanks

Gavin


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Templates Site "Access Denied"

2017-02-23 Thread Gavin McDonald

> On 23 Feb 2017, at 10:05 am, Marcus  wrote:
> 
> Am 22.02.2017 um 23:47 schrieb Simon Phipps:
>> There have been a large number of reports on the Users mailing list of
>> people getting Access Denied messages when they attempt to access any of
>> the templates at http://templates.openoffice.org/ or
>> http://templates.services.openoffice.org/. This situation has been
>> previously reported here several times so I'm surfacing it as a clear
>> top-level thread.
>> 
>> I have been able to reproduce the error simply by visiting the site and
>> clicking on the name of any template, using an incognito Chrome window on
>> ChromeOS to ensure there are no statefulness issues.
>> 
>> I've no access to the site so can't investigate further. Can someone with
>> admin rights investigate please?
> 
> as you know for sure we also have no access to any webpages that are hosted 
> by Sourceforge. So, we cannot do anything here.
> 
> I don't know if somebody ping'ed already Sourceforge about this problem. But 
> I'll do it here again.
> 
> @Dave:
> Please can you take over this topic? I was able to see the same "access 
> denied" error message by simply clicking the first link to a template [1] 
> after opening the template webpage [2].
> 
> Thanks in advance for your help.
> 
> [1] http://templates.openoffice.org
> [2] http://templates.openoffice.org/en/node/8382 
> 

Other templates seem accessible so it isn’t all of them:-

http://templates.openoffice.org/en/template/web-based-medical-course-training 
 

Gav…

> 
> Marcus
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 



RE: Post vote release actions

2016-10-05 Thread Gavin McDonald


> -Original Message-
> From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
> Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 2:26 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Post vote release actions
> 
> I plan to start the 4.1.3 vote today. This is a draft of the action list 
> assuming
> the vote passes. Please help by correcting, expanding, and adding anything
> missing.
> 
> RM: Update
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3 to
> show vote result etc.
> 
> RM: Edit
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3+Releas
> e+Notes
> release notes to delete "DRAFT" note. - RM
> 
> RM: Use svn to move
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/ to
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/openoffice/4.1.3/. See
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0b3416c973088efdf60056d2aae7f6cee0
> bd125be4370f3c0ff5324b@%3Cdev.openoffice.apache.org%3E
> for Ariel's tip on how to do this without a full checkout.
> 
> Someone with SourceForge access: Upload to SourceForge using rsync.
> 
> Modify OpenOffice web pages to reflect the new release.
> 
> Press release and announcement on apache.org home page.

Press release should certainly involve Sally at press@ so please tip her off 
now.

OpenOffice also have a Blog :-

https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/ 

Someone should step up and volunteer to add a post there (any committer 
can get an account if they don’t already have one)

Gav...




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



RE: Which source files in release?

2016-10-01 Thread Gavin McDonald
Instead of removing the .svn dirs/files with a script, use the built in  'svn 
export' which exports the 
checkout without all the .svn dirs/files.

http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.ref.svn.c.export.html


Gav...


> -Original Message-
> From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 11:28 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Which source files in release?
> 
> I just saw the bug report
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126605, "Make sure the source
> package does not contain extra files"
> 
> Since our build instructions and processes are based on the result of an svn
> checkout, basing the source package on one seemed obvious to me. The
> only change that seems to me to be absolutely required is removing the .svn
> directories, and that is a one-liner:
> 
> find . -type d -name '.svn' -exec rm -fr '{}' ';'
> 
> Removing other dot files is a refinement, but I think even without that I am
> closer to what should be packaged than working from the result of a
> configure.
> 
> On 9/30/2016 5:53 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> > I am trying to select the files that should go in the zip and tar
> > files for the source release for 4.1.3.
> >
> > I did a clean checkout of the 4.1.3 branch, and then deleted the .svn
> > directories that I know do not belong in the source release.
> >
> > The 4.1.2 release includes the following dot files:
> >
> > ./aoo-4.1.2/main/extras/unx/source/kde/applnk/.directory
> > ./aoo-4.1.2/main/vos/docu/.html
> >
> > The 4.1.3 tree contains those, and the following additional dot files:
> >
> > ./AOO413/main/.hgignore
> > ./AOO413/main/.hgtags
> > ./AOO413/test/testassistant/.classpath
> > ./AOO413/test/testassistant/.project
> > ./AOO413/test/testassistant/.settings
> > ./AOO413/test/testassistant.feature/.project
> > ./AOO413/test/testcommon/.classpath
> > ./AOO413/test/testcommon/.project
> > ./AOO413/test/testgui/.classpath
> > ./AOO413/test/testgui/.project
> > ./AOO413/test/testgui/.settings
> > ./AOO413/test/testuno/.classpath_linux
> > ./AOO413/test/testuno/.classpath_win
> > ./AOO413/test/testuno/.externalToolBuilders
> > ./AOO413/test/testuno/.project
> >
> > The .project and .classpath files may be to do with making it easier
> > to set up and run the tests under Eclipse.
> >
> > Opinions?
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> 
> 
> -
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2016.0.7797 / Virus Database: 4664/13120 - Release Date: 09/30/16


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



RE: Bootstrap fails

2016-09-27 Thread Gavin McDonald


> -Original Message-
> From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 11:00 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Bootstrap fails
> 
> Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> > I understand the attraction of having a Github mirror, but an out of
> > date one is worse than useless. Who gets to decide to kill it?
> 
> If there is agreement, we can ask Infra to remove it. This (once we do
have
> agreement) can be done by reopening
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11601
> or opening a similar Infra issue, saying that the project has consensus on
> removing the broken Github (non-)mirror.

How long has it been broken?
Has infra been asked to fix it?

Github mirrors do get stuck and go stale on occasion, and an Infra Jira to
ask
them to unstick it on those occasions should work.

(If not then we ask to have it removed)

Gav...

> 
> Regards,
>Andrea.
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> 
> 
> -
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2016.0.7797 / Virus Database: 4664/13099 - Release Date: 09/27/16


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



RE: Editing the release notes wiki

2016-09-27 Thread Gavin McDonald


> -Original Message-
> From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 10:22 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Editing the release notes wiki
> 
> Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> > Is the username "p...@apache.org" or just "pats"?
> 
> This was probably a misunderstanding when I enabled your account. I've now
> swapped the two. Privileges had been given to pats at apache.org when I
> enabled the account. Try with just "pats" now.

I see we overlapped :)

Gav...

> 
> Regards,
>Andrea.
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> 
> 
> -
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2016.0.7797 / Virus Database: 4664/13099 - Release Date: 09/27/16


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



RE: Editing the release notes wiki

2016-09-27 Thread Gavin McDonald


> -Original Message-
> From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 9:51 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Editing the release notes wiki
> 
 
> Is the username "p...@apache.org" or just "pats"?

Hi Patricia,

I see you have 2 accounts in cwiki, and you just mentioned them
both :)

You had enough perms in your "p...@apache.org" account but 
you had zero permissions in your "pats" account.

I assume therefore you have been logging in under "pats" and have 
updated that account with appropriate permissions.

Please try again.

In order to avoid confusion in the future can I suggest we delete or deactivate
the other account ? (p...@apache.org) which you haven’t logged into since 
June 2013.

HTH

Gav...



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



RE: [4.1.3 release] Procedure for uploading binaries

2016-09-24 Thread Gavin McDonald


> -Original Message-
> From: Ariel Constenla-Haile [mailto:arie...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2016 9:01 AM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: [4.1.3 release] Procedure for uploading binaries
> 
> Hi there,
> 
> IIRC we used to upload the packages to our home directory at
> people.apache.org, once there I don't recall what the RM did until the
> packages ended on the subversion dist repo.
> 
> Where should we upload the binaries now?

The normal place is 

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/ 

>From there the RM can just 'svn mv' them from 'dev' to 'release'

Gav...

> 
> 
> Regards
> --
> Ariel Constenla-Haile
> La Plata, Argentina


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



More Buildbot Information

2016-09-17 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi All,

For those wanting to follow along or assist in the ASF hosted Buildbot builds, 
I created a 
new wiki page with some info about the builds and their hosts, how to update, 
trigger builds etc.

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Buildbot+info

My work on migrating builds from old to new slaves is complete.

Project debs should check for failed builds. (Most are passing currently)

Gav…


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Buildbot Notifications

2016-09-12 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi All,

The commits list shows 142 commits so far this month - 98 of which are buildbot 
pass/fail notices. (69%)
Last month saw 415 commits - 205 of which were buildbot pass/fail notices. (49%)

That’s way too much noise I feel.

99% of the buildbot notices are repeats of the previous notice - i.e. 
pass,pass,pass,pass,fail etc.

I’m going to reduce this noise by only sending ‘change’ notifications - i.e. 
pass -> fail or fail -> pass


Thanks

Gav…



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Status of ASF Ubuntu Buildbots

2016-09-12 Thread Gavin McDonald

> On 12 Sep 2016, at 8:25 AM, Marcus <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote:
> 
> Am 09/10/2016 03:51 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>> Gavin McDonald wrote:
>>> I’ve been working on creating replacement VMs for the deprecated Tethys
>> 
>> Thanks a lot. This is really much appreciated.
> 
> yes, thanks so much for helping us with the buildbots.
> 
>>> I reduced the frequency of some builds - I mean why spend 9 hours
>>> building and uploading language packs every single day, there is
>>> no need - especially from the aoo410 branch thats seen like 2 commits
>>> in 9 months!
>> 
>> Well, this is correct SO FAR... but now we will definitely need to build
>> AOO410 often for 4.1.3, so a daily run would make sense as of now.
> 
> Or AOO413 as it will be now. With more commits than in the past a higher 
> build frequency makes sense now.

I have replaced the 410 RAT build with a 413 build.

output at: https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/AOO413/rat-output.html 
<https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/AOO413/rat-output.html> tl;dr no 
license header errors so far.

Now currently we have no 413 builds other than the RAT report.

What we do have is two (imho) useless ‘snapshot’ builds (based on 
openoffice/tags/SNAPSHOT
- Which hasn’t had a commit in 10 months and never will have because its a 
‘tag’.

So I’ll remove those builds and replace them with 413 branch builds.
Unless someone objects.

Gav…



> Marcus
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 



Re: Releasing OpenOffice 4.1.3 (reopening the AOO410 branch)

2016-09-10 Thread Gavin McDonald

> On 11 Sep 2016, at 7:13 AM, Patricia Shanahan  wrote:
> 
> On 9/10/2016 12:55 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 12:40:48AM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>> Recent events make it clear we will have to release OpenOffice 4.1.3 sooner
>>> or later, with some duplication of work with respect to 4.1.2-patch1 but
>>> with more clarity for those who couldn't see that we made a release last
>>> month.
>>> 
>>> I'll thus consider the AOO410 branch to be open again for the needed
>>> structural fixes, like version numbering and similar. And I can take care of
>>> fixing version numbers as I already did for 4.1.2.
>> 
>> I'd suggest we create a AOO413 branch, as suggested on private@.
>> 
>> Also, if the procedure didn't change, we should stick to the rule that
>> only code with a bug and release blocker flag approved by the Release
>> Manager can be checked in that branch; that is: if you want to include
>> changes in the AOO413 branch:
>> 
>> 1) open a bug
>> 2) request releaser blocker status
>> 3) only once the release manager approves the release blocker status,
>>   commit your changes
> 
> Andrea argues that it is traditional to put all point releases in the same 
> branch. Following that tradition we would use AOO410 for all 4.1.x releases.
> 
> The reasons are lost in the mists of antiquity. The argument for carrying on 
> that way for now is that there may be people following AOO410 and doing 
> downstream packaging that depend on that behaviour.

I really don’t get that reasoning. I’d like examples to understand why people 
downstream would be using a branch in the first place.
If anything, I’d half expect downstream to depend on the ‘Tag’ that a release 
was based on , not the branch (that has since changed.)

Tags seem to be labelled correctly, branches should follow suit. But I’ll leave 
it to you guys.

Gav…

Tags:-

.. 
AOO340/ 
AOO341/ 
AOO400/ 
AOO401/ 
AOO410/ 
AOO410_Beta/ 
AOO411/ 
AOO412/ 
AOO4121/ 
SNAPSHOT/ 

All those 41* tags (5 of them) were based on using the same 410 branch.

> 
> A possible compromise is to treat AOO410 as you recommend for AOO413 from now 
> on. We would still create AOO414, which I see as being necessary to become 
> more agile. We should overlap testing, voting, and uploading of 4.1.3 with 
> preparation of 4.1.4. Using the same branch for both would not be good.
> 
> I can go either way on this.
> 
> Patricia
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 



Status of ASF Ubuntu Buildbots

2016-09-09 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi All,

I’ve been working on creating replacement VMs for the deprecated Tethys (10.04 
64bit) , bb-vm2 (12.04 32bit) and bb-vm3 (12.04 32bit).
This work is now complete. 3 VMs replaced with 2 x 14.04 LTS VMs. (As an aside 
there is a 16.04 LTS buildbot available if you want to
do tests on it)

3 builds were moved from Tethys to bb_slave4_ubuntu - the linux64 nightly build 
and the two RAT builds (trunk and aoo410 testing)
All 3 builds are successful currently.

The linux32-nightly and linux32-snapshot builds have been moved from bb-vm2 and 
bb-vm3 to bb_slave5_ubuntu - initial builds are
still being performed.

I reduced the frequency of some builds - I mean why spend 9 hours building and 
uploading language packs every single day, there is 
no need - especially from the aoo410 branch thats seen like 2 commits in 9 
months!

the openoffice.conf file has been updated. Feel free to start tweaking the 
linux32 builds after the initial builds have completed in a day or so.

Any questions, I’m here on list.

Gav…


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [CWiki] Account Whitelisting

2015-09-20 Thread Gavin McDonald

> On 20 Sep 2015, at 2:15 am, OO Bugs  wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> My name is Lalith Ramesh, and I would like to request an account on the
> Confluence Wiki with the username "openofficebugs".  I would like to add
> myself to the Directory of Volunteers.

To be honest I think that username could be confusing to others, thinking that 
it
is some kind of official or role account.

Can you choose another please.

Gav…





signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


Re: [INFRA] help needed with link change on our buildbot output page

2015-09-02 Thread Gavin Mcdonald
Thanks Kay, for script changes, allow an hour to show on the Web as most run on 
an hour cron

HTH 

Gav...


On 2 Sep 2015 17:30, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- 
> Hash: SHA1 
>
>
>
> On 09/02/2015 04:06 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote: 
> > 
> >> On 2 Sep 2015, at 1:27 am, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com 
> >> <mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com>> wrote: 
> >> 
> >> Can someone provide instructions on how to make changes on our 
> >> buildbot output page-- 
> >> 
> >> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ 
> >> 
> >> Right now, the Win nightly link is going to: 
> >> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/win/log/unxlngx6.pro.build.html
> >>  
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> When it needs to go to: 
> >> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/win/log/wntmsci12.pro.build.html
> >>  
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> This would help us troubleshoot. 
> >> 
> >> I thought committers could do this, but if we can, I don't know 
> >> how. Sorry. 
> > 
> > So that page is generated from a script which lives at: 
> > 
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/public_html/projects/openoffice/create-ooo-snapshots-index.sh
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Any committer can edit that file and any other file under the 
> > projects/* part of the tree. 
> > 
> > However, I’ve fixed this for you and the updated link is now live. 
>
> Thank you for the fix and the information. There are a few more tweaks 
> that would be nice but I will happily fix them.:) 
>
> > 
> > HTH 
> > 
> > Gav… 
> > 
> >> 
> >> Thanks. 
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> -- 
> >> 
> >> 
> MzK 
> >> 
> >> “The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.” 
> >> --Lao Tzu 
> > 
> > 
>
> - -- 
> -  
> MzK 
>
> “The journey of a thousand miles begins 
> with a single step.” 
>   --Lao Tzu 
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- 
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) 
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV5yQPAAoJEJ8zlgVF1GcuxWQIAJCuaGtpupfHwSBR6YCnRCZt 
> qz402RxaxePd5KQirkVXyG0N/NK/Y3zdlNU6PQX81h+h3cXni4kgAPs2fswAKfVs 
> r0+e06g8kyb806/YCshRpDYSbEKReVUPfnb3wW3lRt/0cIYlkuURy4l2DXj1hJ2O 
> 1BeyMgcwpHSBioi1J1UFj7pJf2pELpD3V3IGLxg6UFC6izY1CPh/6yKBG8i8fwr0 
> 4LBlvJKj3FMtbX+ikP1AdvpkOQcC1lRjMRkTfpKGYpuQKYBfNy5fpXval30S7tsE 
> m9wG6xo8aVEcpLqXuttPPjnjfMJ/qWV/pkjFZMNk/UJGwr95EU2zVTWhimA0lAw= 
> =dGEf 
> -END PGP SIGNATURE- 
>
> - 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [INFRA] help needed with link change on our buildbot output page

2015-09-02 Thread Gavin McDonald

> On 2 Sep 2015, at 1:27 am, Kay Schenk  wrote:
> 
> Can someone provide instructions on how to make changes on our buildbot
> output page--
> 
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/
> 
> Right now, the Win nightly link is going to:
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/win/log/unxlngx6.pro.build.html
> 
> When it needs to go to:
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/win/log/wntmsci12.pro.build.html
> 
> This would help us troubleshoot.
> 
> I thought committers could do this, but if we can, I don't know how. Sorry.

So that page is generated from a script which lives at:

https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/public_html/projects/openoffice/create-ooo-snapshots-index.sh
 


Any committer can edit that file and any other file under the projects/* part 
of the tree.

However, I’ve fixed this for you and the updated link is now live.

HTH

Gav…

> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --
> -
> MzK
> 
> “The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.”
>  --Lao Tzu




signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


RAT Build on AOO410 branch

2015-07-18 Thread Gavin McDonald

Hi All,

Apologies for the initial build failures, but we now have a successful RAT 
build on the AOO410 branch
in addition to the normal RAT build on trunk.

See: https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/AOO410/rat-output.html 
https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/AOO410/rat-output.html

And yes we have a clean RAT pass! (as expected I guess, but nice to know.)

This RAT report will run and update on every commit to that branch.

I have added a link to this report on the 
https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ 
https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ page.

HTH

Gav…



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


Re: First bugs fixed for OpenOffice 4.1.2

2015-07-16 Thread Gavin McDonald

 On 16 Jul 2015, at 9:10 pm, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
 
 Marcus wrote:
 Am 07/16/2015 12:05 AM, schrieb jan i:
 I am not sure how the procedure works, but we need to secure that the
 rat-scan patches (gavin) are in 4.1.2
 Kay and Regina have committed the remaining stuff to Trunk. So, a merge
 to the 4.1.2 branch/tag should be all that needs to be done.
 
 If I recall correctly what Juergen wrote, the problematic files are on 
 trunk only, not in the AOO410 branch; I assume that 4.1.1 did not have false 
 positives at RAT scan, so the AOO410 branch should be fine. Anyway, Jan, 
 Marcus and whoever checked the patch: please do take a look, since if it 
 affects AOO410 (to be clear: AOO410 is 
 https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO410/ and it is the 
 branch where we commit code for 4.1.2) it is indeed a blocker.
 
 In my opinion, we also need to run a rat-scan on the final release
 candidate.
 how do we remember this?
 When the build bot(s) with ran scans are running currently on Trunk,
 then we should switch them to the 4.1.2 branch/tag.
 
 Yes, definitely. This will also clarify doubts like the above.

We don’t have to switch, but rather add a new scan to build on the branch.

I’ll get that started.

Gav…

 
 Regards,
  Andrea.
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 




signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


Re: Are the Buildbots down?

2015-07-15 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi Don,

This is great work, thanks!

I’m going to try this on our Buildbot tomorrow.

Gav…

 On 15 Jul 2015, at 6:33 pm, Don Lewis truck...@freebsd.org wrote:
 
 On 15 Jul, Don Lewis wrote:
 
 I'll install clang35 from ports and try again.
 
 Success!
 
 This is with trunk r1690992 and no additional patches.
 
 ***
 Successful packaging process!
 ***
copying log file to 
 /tmp/openoffice/aoo-4.2.0/main/instsetoo_native/unxfbsdx.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/archive/install/log/log_AOO420_en-US.log
 stopping log at Wed Jul 15 13:40:58 2015
 
 
 Here is my build script:
 
 autoconf
 CPP=clang-cpp35 CC=clang35 CXX=clang++35 CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include 
 LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib ./configure  --with-jdk-home=/usr/local/openjdk7 
 --with-gperf=/usr/bin/gperf --with-gnu-patch=/usr/local/bin/gpatch 
 --x-includes=/usr/local/include --x-libraries=/usr/local/lib --disable-gconf 
 --disable-gnome-vfs --without-junit --enable-verbose --without-stlport 
 --enable-category-b --disable-odk --with-system-zlib --with-system-stdlibs 
 --disable-gstreamer --with-system-libxml --with-system-openssl 
 --with-package-format=archive
 ./bootstrap
 . FreeBSDAMDEnv.Set.sh
 cd instsetoo_native/util
 LIBINTL_PREFIX=/usr/local build.pl --all
 
 
 To get this working on the buildbot:
  1) Install the clang35 pkg
  2) Pass CPP, CC, and CXX to configure
  3) Do not pass CPPFLAGS or LDFLAGS to build
  4) Pass LIBINTL_PREFIX to build
 
 The first two steps are only needed on FreeBSD 10 amd64.  The base
 compiler works properly on i386.  The base compiler in FreeBSD 11 works
 properly on both amd64 and i386.
 
 Bonus points for fixing configure to add LIBINTL_PREFIX to the
 environment.
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 

Gav...

  ((  ( 
 
   (  )\ ) )\ )   )\ )   (   )) 
 
   )\(()/((()/(  (()/(   )\ )  (   )  ( /( (  (( /( 
  (   (  (   
_)(   /(_))/(_))  /(_)) (   (()/(  )(   ( /(  (   )\()))())\   (   
)\()) ))\  )())\  
 )\ _ )\ (_)) (_))_| (_))   )\ ) /(_))(()\  )(_)) )\ (_))/(()\  /((_)  )\ (_))/ 
/((_)(()\  /((_) 
 (_)_\(_)/ __|| |_   |_ _| _(_/((_) _| ((_)((_)_ ((_)| |_  ((_)(_))(  ((_)| |_ 
(_))(  ((_)(_))   
  / _ \  \__ \| __|   | | | ' \))|  _|| '_|/ _` |(_-|  _|| '_|| || |/ _| |  
_|| || || '_|/ -_)  
 /_/ \_\ |___/|_||___||_||_| |_|  |_|  \__,_|/__/ \__||_|   \_,_|\__|  \__| 
\_,_||_|  \___|  

 






Re: Rat Patch take 2

2015-07-14 Thread Gavin McDonald
Just bumping this, anyone want to apply it?

Thanks

Gav…

 On 11 Jul 2015, at 7:54 pm, Gavin McDonald gmcdon...@apache.org wrote:
 
 
 HI All,
 
 So two issues with the last patch:
 
 1. I missed two pref file for excluding
 
 2. Four files are treated as binaries (.project and .classpath) and so the 
 diff never showed.
 
 I’ve forced the diff in those files so should be good now.
 
 I’ll talk about why those .project and .classpath have mime-types set in the 
 first place in another
 thread.
 
 Please find attached a patch to resolve the 6 remaining RAT license issues.
 
 HTH
 
 Gav…
 
 
 rat_patch.txt



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


Re: Rat Patch take 2

2015-07-14 Thread Gavin McDonald
rat build run and license issues down to just the two we need to exclude:-

https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/rat-output.html 
https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/rat-output.html

Gav…

 On 14 Jul 2015, at 12:44 pm, Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
 
 
 On 14 Jul 2015, at 12:37 pm, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de wrote:
 
 Hi Gavin,
 
 Gavin McDonald schrieb:
 Just bumping this, anyone want to apply it?
 
 As far as I see Kay has already done this with
 http://svn.apache.org/r1690817
 http://svn.apache.org/r1690818
 http://svn.apache.org/r1690819
 http://svn.apache.org/r1690820 http://svn.apache.org/r1690820
 
 Ah ok, thanks, the nightly RAT report run hasn’t updated to include these, 
 I’ll force a build.
 
 However, there is one file missed from being committed. At the bottom of the 
 patch is this:
 
 Index: main/rat-excludes
 ===
 --- main/rat-excludes (revision 1690389)
 +++ main/rat-excludes (working copy)
 @@ -1492,4 +1492,6 @@
 
 main/ooxml/source/framework/OOXMLViewer/.settings/org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs
 main/ooxml/source/framework/SchemaParser/.settings/org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs
 +main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaOOXMLParser/.settings/org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs
 +main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/.settings/org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs
 
 
 
 so the rat-excludes file still needs an update.
 
 Thanks, and thanks Kay for applying the previous patches!
 
 Gav…
 
 
 Kind regards
 Regina
 
 
 
 Thanks
 
 Gav…
 
 On 11 Jul 2015, at 7:54 pm, Gavin McDonald gmcdon...@apache.org wrote:
 
 
 HI All,
 
 So two issues with the last patch:
 
 1. I missed two pref file for excluding
 
 2. Four files are treated as binaries (.project and .classpath) and so the 
 diff never showed.
 
 I’ve forced the diff in those files so should be good now.
 
 I’ll talk about why those .project and .classpath have mime-types set in 
 the first place in another
 thread.
 
 Please find attached a patch to resolve the 6 remaining RAT license issues.
 
 HTH
 
 Gav…
 
 
 rat_patch.txt
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 
 
 Gav...
 
  ((  (
   
   (  )\ ) )\ )   )\ )   (   )
 )  
   )\(()/((()/(  (()/(   )\ )  (   )  ( /( (  (( 
 /(   (   (  (   
 _)(   /(_))/(_))  /(_)) (   (()/(  )(   ( /(  (   )\()))())\   (   
 )\()) ))\  )())\  
 )\ _ )\ (_)) (_))_| (_))   )\ ) /(_))(()\  )(_)) )\ (_))/(()\  /((_)  )\ 
 (_))/ /((_)(()\  /((_) 
 (_)_\(_)/ __|| |_   |_ _| _(_/((_) _| ((_)((_)_ ((_)| |_  ((_)(_))(  ((_)| |_ 
 (_))(  ((_)(_))   
  / _ \  \__ \| __|   | | | ' \))|  _|| '_|/ _` |(_-|  _|| '_|| || |/ _| |  
 _|| || || '_|/ -_)  
 /_/ \_\ |___/|_||___||_||_| |_|  |_|  \__,_|/__/ \__||_|   \_,_|\__|  
 \__| \_,_||_|  \___|  
 
 
 
 
 

Gav...

  ((  ( 
 
   (  )\ ) )\ )   )\ )   (   )) 
 
   )\(()/((()/(  (()/(   )\ )  (   )  ( /( (  (( /( 
  (   (  (   
_)(   /(_))/(_))  /(_)) (   (()/(  )(   ( /(  (   )\()))())\   (   
)\()) ))\  )())\  
 )\ _ )\ (_)) (_))_| (_))   )\ ) /(_))(()\  )(_)) )\ (_))/(()\  /((_)  )\ (_))/ 
/((_)(()\  /((_) 
 (_)_\(_)/ __|| |_   |_ _| _(_/((_) _| ((_)((_)_ ((_)| |_  ((_)(_))(  ((_)| |_ 
(_))(  ((_)(_))   
  / _ \  \__ \| __|   | | | ' \))|  _|| '_|/ _` |(_-|  _|| '_|| || |/ _| |  
_|| || || '_|/ -_)  
 /_/ \_\ |___/|_||___||_||_| |_|  |_|  \__,_|/__/ \__||_|   \_,_|\__|  \__| 
\_,_||_|  \___|  

 






Re: Rat Patch take 2

2015-07-14 Thread Gavin McDonald

 On 14 Jul 2015, at 12:37 pm, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de wrote:
 
 Hi Gavin,
 
 Gavin McDonald schrieb:
 Just bumping this, anyone want to apply it?
 
 As far as I see Kay has already done this with
 http://svn.apache.org/r1690817
 http://svn.apache.org/r1690818
 http://svn.apache.org/r1690819
 http://svn.apache.org/r1690820 http://svn.apache.org/r1690820

Ah ok, thanks, the nightly RAT report run hasn’t updated to include these, I’ll 
force a build.

However, there is one file missed from being committed. At the bottom of the 
patch is this:

Index: main/rat-excludes
===
--- main/rat-excludes   (revision 1690389)
+++ main/rat-excludes   (working copy)
@@ -1492,4 +1492,6 @@
 
 main/ooxml/source/framework/OOXMLViewer/.settings/org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs
 main/ooxml/source/framework/SchemaParser/.settings/org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs
+main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaOOXMLParser/.settings/org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs
+main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/.settings/org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs
 


so the rat-excludes file still needs an update.

Thanks, and thanks Kay for applying the previous patches!

Gav…

 
 Kind regards
 Regina
 
 
 
 Thanks
 
 Gav…
 
 On 11 Jul 2015, at 7:54 pm, Gavin McDonald gmcdon...@apache.org wrote:
 
 
 HI All,
 
 So two issues with the last patch:
 
 1. I missed two pref file for excluding
 
 2. Four files are treated as binaries (.project and .classpath) and so the 
 diff never showed.
 
 I’ve forced the diff in those files so should be good now.
 
 I’ll talk about why those .project and .classpath have mime-types set in 
 the first place in another
 thread.
 
 Please find attached a patch to resolve the 6 remaining RAT license issues.
 
 HTH
 
 Gav…
 
 
 rat_patch.txt
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 

Gav...

  ((  ( 
 
   (  )\ ) )\ )   )\ )   (   )) 
 
   )\(()/((()/(  (()/(   )\ )  (   )  ( /( (  (( /( 
  (   (  (   
_)(   /(_))/(_))  /(_)) (   (()/(  )(   ( /(  (   )\()))())\   (   
)\()) ))\  )())\  
 )\ _ )\ (_)) (_))_| (_))   )\ ) /(_))(()\  )(_)) )\ (_))/(()\  /((_)  )\ (_))/ 
/((_)(()\  /((_) 
 (_)_\(_)/ __|| |_   |_ _| _(_/((_) _| ((_)((_)_ ((_)| |_  ((_)(_))(  ((_)| |_ 
(_))(  ((_)(_))   
  / _ \  \__ \| __|   | | | ' \))|  _|| '_|/ _` |(_-|  _|| '_|| || |/ _| |  
_|| || || '_|/ -_)  
 /_/ \_\ |___/|_||___||_||_| |_|  |_|  \__,_|/__/ \__||_|   \_,_|\__|  \__| 
\_,_||_|  \___|  

 






Re: Rat Patch take 2

2015-07-14 Thread Gavin McDonald
Thanks Regina,

We are all green now! :)

https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/rat-output.html 
https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/rat-output.html



Gav…

 On 14 Jul 2015, at 3:40 pm, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de wrote:
 
 Hi Gavin,
 
 Gavin McDonald schrieb:
 
 On 14 Jul 2015, at 12:37 pm, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de 
 wrote:
 
 Hi Gavin,
 
 Gavin McDonald schrieb:
 Just bumping this, anyone want to apply it?
 
 As far as I see Kay has already done this with
 http://svn.apache.org/r1690817
 http://svn.apache.org/r1690818
 http://svn.apache.org/r1690819
 http://svn.apache.org/r1690820 http://svn.apache.org/r1690820
 
 Ah ok, thanks, the nightly RAT report run hasn’t updated to include these, 
 I’ll force a build.
 
 However, there is one file missed from being committed. At the bottom of the 
 patch is this:
 
 Index: main/rat-excludes
 ===
 --- main/rat-excludes(revision 1690389)
 +++ main/rat-excludes(working copy)
 @@ -1492,4 +1492,6 @@
 
  main/ooxml/source/framework/OOXMLViewer/.settings/org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs
  
 main/ooxml/source/framework/SchemaParser/.settings/org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs
 +main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaOOXMLParser/.settings/org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs
 +main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/.settings/org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs
 
 
 Done with http://svn.apache.org/r1690942
 
 We are happy, that you support us.
 
 Kind regards
 Regina
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 

Gav...

  ((  ( 
 
   (  )\ ) )\ )   )\ )   (   )) 
 
   )\(()/((()/(  (()/(   )\ )  (   )  ( /( (  (( /( 
  (   (  (   
_)(   /(_))/(_))  /(_)) (   (()/(  )(   ( /(  (   )\()))())\   (   
)\()) ))\  )())\  
 )\ _ )\ (_)) (_))_| (_))   )\ ) /(_))(()\  )(_)) )\ (_))/(()\  /((_)  )\ (_))/ 
/((_)(()\  /((_) 
 (_)_\(_)/ __|| |_   |_ _| _(_/((_) _| ((_)((_)_ ((_)| |_  ((_)(_))(  ((_)| |_ 
(_))(  ((_)(_))   
  / _ \  \__ \| __|   | | | ' \))|  _|| '_|/ _` |(_-|  _|| '_|| || |/ _| |  
_|| || || '_|/ -_)  
 /_/ \_\ |___/|_||___||_||_| |_|  |_|  \__,_|/__/ \__||_|   \_,_|\__|  \__| 
\_,_||_|  \___|  

 






Re: [RELEASE] Contents of OpenOffice 4.1.2

2015-07-13 Thread Gavin McDonald
With regards to digital signing, we have ‘test’ credits that can be used to 
practice on.

Gav…

 On 13 Jul 2015, at 9:04 am, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
 
 Hi
 
 I agree to use this as the overall plan, which of course needs to detailed.
 
 I do have a comment about digital signing. It is correct than I do not have
 spare
 cycles before mid october.
 
 Digital signing means in reality white listing the content, which are both
 our
 exe as well as many third part DLLs (some of the libraries are statically
 linked
 and not exposed outside the exe).
 
 Most of our third party libraries are pretty old (but works well for our
 purpose),
 and some of them have known security isses (not in the parts AOO uses). We
 need to upgrade the libraries that uses a DLL, otherwise we might whitelist
 a
 DLL with known security issues. This process is something we should do
 ahead of every release, and is not as such part of the digital signing, but
 digital
 signing makes it much more important.
 
 rgds
 jan I.
 
 
 On Sunday, July 12, 2015, Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
 
 Am 07/12/2015 03:57 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
 
 It's time to decide what goes into 4.1.2 and what doesn't. Not in terms
 of specific bugfixes (we have the standard process of nominating release
 blockers for this and I don't plan to change it), but in terms of
 categories. The following is a realistic list of what we can have in
 4.1.2. Shall we take it as the overall plan for 4.1.2?
 
 
 In general I see it the same way. Some comments inline.
 
 
 
 
 2. Features
 
 * Windows 10: Millions of our users will run Windows 10 within a few
 weeks. OpenOffice is reported to work smoothly on Windows 10
 pre-releases. Should any major Windows 10 incompatibilities appear, they
 should be fixed in 4.1.2.
 
 
 When we want to react on specific bug reports (we should do this in any
 case as Windows is still the most favorite platform) then we create
 automatically a release schedule of a few weeks after that date - which is
 for me late summer. Just to be sure we understand the same.
 
 BTW:
 Release date of Win10 is July, 29th.
 
 3. Localization
 
 * Existing translations: Pootle is now tracking the 4.2.0 release, so
 translators do not have an immediate way to fix translations for 4.1.2.
 There is a possibility to check whether we can reuse the 4.2.0 strings
 for 4.1.2, but due to the version clash I would prefer to fix strings
 upon request, in the SDF files directly and only in the case of major,
 well-defined bugs (example: the Italian version has a typo in a main
 menu item; it is fixed in Pootle for 4.2.0 AND we can edit the SDF file
 manually to fix it for the 4.1.x line).
 
 
 This has also the advantage (when we don't get too many change requests)
 that we know in detail what is changing.
 
 Marcus
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 
 
 
 -- 
 Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.

Gav...

  ((  ( 
 
   (  )\ ) )\ )   )\ )   (   )) 
 
   )\(()/((()/(  (()/(   )\ )  (   )  ( /( (  (( /( 
  (   (  (   
_)(   /(_))/(_))  /(_)) (   (()/(  )(   ( /(  (   )\()))())\   (   
)\()) ))\  )())\  
 )\ _ )\ (_)) (_))_| (_))   )\ ) /(_))(()\  )(_)) )\ (_))/(()\  /((_)  )\ (_))/ 
/((_)(()\  /((_) 
 (_)_\(_)/ __|| |_   |_ _| _(_/((_) _| ((_)((_)_ ((_)| |_  ((_)(_))(  ((_)| |_ 
(_))(  ((_)(_))   
  / _ \  \__ \| __|   | | | ' \))|  _|| '_|/ _` |(_-|  _|| '_|| || |/ _| |  
_|| || || '_|/ -_)  
 /_/ \_\ |___/|_||___||_||_| |_|  |_|  \__,_|/__/ \__||_|   \_,_|\__|  \__| 
\_,_||_|  \___|  

 






Re: Are the Buildbots down?

2015-07-12 Thread Gavin McDonald

 On 12 Jul 2015, at 4:50 pm, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
 
 Hello;
 
 On 07/11/15 10:39, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
 Hello;
 
 On 07/11/15 05:39, Marcus wrote:
 Am 07/11/2015 11:31 AM, schrieb Gavin McDonald:
 The ‘open office-fbsd-nightly’ fails the ‘build —all’ step and needs 
 investigating.
 
 1 module(s):
coinmp
 need(s) to be rebuilt
 
 Reason(s):
 
 ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making 
 /usr/home/buildslave27/slave27/openoffice-fbsd-nightly/build/ext_libraries/coinmp
 
 When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build by 
 running:
 
build --all:coinmp
 
 @Pedro:
 As FreeBSD is involved maybe you can give Gavin some help?
 
 
 I looked at it briefly but the buildbot offers little useful information.
 
 I have asked Don Lewis to look at it. He has been very helpful and
 is for most purposes the FreeBSD port maintainer these days.
 
 
 It may be a download error, but also the old FreeBSD version that is
 being used has a very old toolchain.

I have no idea why you keep saying we are using a very old version, I have
mentioned before:

This is what the bb-fbsd2 buildbot slave is using:

FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p10 (GENERIC) #0: Wed May 13 06:54:13 UTC 2015

Can you tell me why you think we are on an older version?

Gav…

 
 Note that 9.0 was released on January 2012. Last year we released
 9.3 and 10.1 and next month we will be releasing 10.2.
 
 Regards,
 
 Pedro.
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 




signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


Re: Are the Buildbots down?

2015-07-11 Thread Gavin McDonald
Thanks,

There is still more to do.

I have changed the information provided on this page:

https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ 
https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/

Before, Andrew Rist had been using wget to scrape results of builds into a nice 
table layout.
However, since I moved the Buildbot Master to a Cloud provider VM, it is behind 
a NAT
arrangement that currently won’t allow wget to reach ci.apache.org 
http://ci.apache.org/ (from within that network).
This caused the cron job that creates the page hourly to take hours to run and 
eventually fail,
this in effect also caused the page to never render correctly or fully.

So I have removed all the page scraping, and the table, replacing them instead 
with links
to an open office specific build results page. 
(s.apache.org/openoffice-builders http://s.apache.org/openoffice-builders)

The page now renders correctly in under a second and provides links to all the 
recently built
install packages.

There is still more work to do :-

The ‘open office-linux-64-rat’ fails , I know the issue with this and am 
working on it,

I would like advice on fixing the below 2 failed builds:-

--

The ‘open office-fbsd-nightly’ fails the ‘build —all’ step and needs 
investigating.

1 module(s):
coinmp
need(s) to be rebuilt

Reason(s):

ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making 
/usr/home/buildslave27/slave27/openoffice-fbsd-nightly/build/ext_libraries/coinmp

When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build by 
running:

build --all:coinmp

The ‘zoo-w7snap’ build fails the 'build.pl —all' step and needs investigating.

failure is:

2 module(s):
icc
cli_ure
need(s) to be rebuilt

Reason(s):

ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making 
/cygdrive/e/slave14/aoo-w7snap/build/main/icc
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making 
/cygdrive/e/slave14/aoo-w7snap/build/main/cli_ure/unotypes

When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build by 
running:

build --from icc cli_ure

Gav…

 On 10 Jul 2015, at 10:30 pm, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Signed PGP part
 
 
 On 07/09/2015 02:57 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
 
  On 9 Jul 2015, at 9:26 am, Regina Henschel
  rb.hensc...@t-online.de mailto:rb.hensc...@t-online.de
  wrote:
 
  JZA schrieb:
  Hi wonder if the Nightly builds down for AOO?
 
 
  Yes there are problems. You can look why it fails on
  https://ci.apache.org/builders/aoo-win7/builds/9
  https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-nightly/builds/9
 
 
 https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-snapshot/builds/2
  https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux64-nightly/builds/9
 
 
 
 I have already written a bug report, but have got no response so far.
  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9930
 
  Taking a look now.
 
  Gav…
 
 Thanks for coming to our rescue again Gavin! They're back in business!
 
 
 
 
  Kind regards Regina
 
 
  -
 
 
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
  mailto:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional
  commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
  mailto:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 
 
 
 
 --
 
 MzK
 
 We can all sleep easy at night knowing that
 somewhere at any given time,
 the Foo Fighters are out there fighting Foo.
   -- David Letterman
 



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


Rat Patch take 2

2015-07-11 Thread Gavin McDonald

HI All,

So two issues with the last patch:

1. I missed two pref file for excluding

2. Four files are treated as binaries (.project and .classpath) and so the diff 
never showed.

I’ve forced the diff in those files so should be good now.

I’ll talk about why those .project and .classpath have mime-types set in the 
first place in another
thread.

Please find attached a patch to resolve the 6 remaining RAT license issues.

HTH

Gav…


Index: main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/.classpath
===
--- main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/.classpath  (revision 
1690389)
+++ main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/.classpath  (working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,25 @@
 ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
+!--***
+ *
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * License); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * AS IS BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ *
+***--
+
 classpath
classpathentry kind=src path=src/
classpathentry kind=con 
path=org.eclipse.jdt.launching.JRE_CONTAINER/org.eclipse.jdt.internal.debug.ui.launcher.StandardVMType/JavaSE-1.7/
Index: main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/.project
===
--- main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/.project(revision 
1690389)
+++ main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/.project(working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,25 @@
 ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
++!--***
++ *   
++ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
++ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
++ * distributed with this work for additional information
++ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
++ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
++ * License); you may not use this file except in compliance
++ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
++ *   
++ *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
++ *   
++ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
++ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
++ * AS IS BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
++ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the 
++ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
++ * under the License.
++ *   
++***--
+
 projectDescription
nameJavaPartManager/name
comment/comment
Index: main/ooxml/source/framework/OOXMLViewer/.classpath
===
--- main/ooxml/source/framework/OOXMLViewer/.classpath  (revision 1690389)
+++ main/ooxml/source/framework/OOXMLViewer/.classpath  (working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,25 @@
 ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
+!--***
+ *
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * License); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * AS IS BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ *
+***--
+
 classpath
classpathentry kind=src path=src/
classpathentry kind=con 
path=org.eclipse.jdt.launching.JRE_CONTAINER/org.eclipse.jdt.internal.debug.ui.launcher.StandardVMType/JavaSE-1.7/
Index: main/ooxml/source/framework/OOXMLViewer/.project
===
--- 

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

2015-07-09 Thread Gavin McDonald

 On 9 Jul 2015, at 9:26 am, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de wrote:
 
 JZA schrieb:
 Hi wonder if the Nightly builds down for AOO?
 
 
 Yes there are problems. You can look why it fails on
 https://ci.apache.org/builders/aoo-win7/builds/9
 https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-nightly/builds/9
 https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-snapshot/builds/2
 https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux64-nightly/builds/9
 
 I have already written a bug report, but have got no response so far.
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9930 
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9930

Taking a look now.

Gav…

 
 Kind regards
 Regina
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 




signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


[PATCH] - Re: [RAT REPORT] - 30 files with an unknown or no License Header

2015-06-04 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi All,

Following on from this then I decided to add License headers to all but two of 
the
30 files, the remainder having entries in the rat-excludes file, so this patch
attached should clear up our RAT report as it stands.

Below is a svn st list of modified files and please find attached a patch.

HTH

Gav…

—

M   main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaOOXMLParser/.classpath
M   main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaOOXMLParser/.project
M   main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/.classpath
M   main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/.project
M   
main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/src/org/apache/openoffice/ooxml/framework/part/ContentType.java
M   
main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/src/org/apache/openoffice/ooxml/framework/part/ContentTypes.java
M   
main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/src/org/apache/openoffice/ooxml/framework/part/IReferenceProvider.java
M   
main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/src/org/apache/openoffice/ooxml/framework/part/OOXMLPackage.java
M   
main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/src/org/apache/openoffice/ooxml/framework/part/Package.java
M   
main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/src/org/apache/openoffice/ooxml/framework/part/Part.java
M   
main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/src/org/apache/openoffice/ooxml/framework/part/PartManager.java
M   
main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/src/org/apache/openoffice/ooxml/framework/part/PartManagerPrototype.java
M   
main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/src/org/apache/openoffice/ooxml/framework/part/PartName.java
M   
main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/src/org/apache/openoffice/ooxml/framework/part/RelatedParts.java
M   
main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/src/org/apache/openoffice/ooxml/framework/part/RelationshipType.java
M   
main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/src/org/apache/openoffice/ooxml/framework/part/parser/ContentTypesParser.java
M   
main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/src/org/apache/openoffice/ooxml/framework/part/parser/ParserFactory.java
M   
main/ooxml/source/framework/JavaPartManager/src/org/apache/openoffice/ooxml/framework/part/parser/RelationshipParser.java
M   main/ooxml/source/framework/OOXMLViewer/.classpath
M   main/ooxml/source/framework/OOXMLViewer/.project
M   main/ooxml/source/framework/SchemaParser/.classpath
M   main/ooxml/source/framework/SchemaParser/.project
M   
main/ooxml/source/framework/SchemaParser/src/org/apache/openoffice/ooxml/schema/generator/html/code.js
M   
main/ooxml/source/framework/SchemaParser/src/org/apache/openoffice/ooxml/schema/generator/html/display.css
M   
main/ooxml/source/framework/SchemaParser/src/org/apache/openoffice/ooxml/schema/generator/html/linking-template.html
M   
main/ooxml/source/framework/SchemaParser/src/org/apache/openoffice/ooxml/schema/generator/html/template.html
M   main/rat-excludes




rat-license.patch
Description: Binary data


 On 7 May 2015, at 8:06 am, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 On 06/05/15 14:45, jan i wrote:
 On 6 May 2015 at 14:14, Gavin McDonald gmcdon...@apache.org wrote:
 
 Hi All,
 
 http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/rat-output.html
 
 shows 30 files that need attention in getting valid license headers adding.
 
 A quick look shows to me that we should probably insert ASF license
 Headers
 in all of those files.
 
 If nobody gets to it before me I’ll provide a patch to that effect.
 
 I just had a look, all the files should really have ALv2 added. I wonder
 what happened, because I know a couple of these files used
 to have ALv2. I will take a look at svn log later.
 
 The archives however is covered by the general LICENSE file, when we make a
 distribution.
 
 Patches are welcome.
 rgds
 jan I.
 
 
 
 the files were from a new project that is currently stalled, I believe
 the headers were simply forgotten. They are not part of the office yet
 and if they are in the source tarball it is just a mistake.
 
 Juergen
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


Re: [BUILDBOT] - FreeBSD nightly (openoffice-fbsd-nightly)

2015-06-03 Thread Gavin McDonald


 On 8 May 2015, at 4:07 am, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
 
 Hello Gavin;
 
 Thank you for looking at it, I wasn't really aware the buildbot was still 
 available.
 
 In upstream FreeBSD we of course do our own builds with minimal patches
 but we use pre-packaged dependencies when possible.
 
 I strongly recommend upgrading the buildbot to FreeBSD 10 and using
 clang 3.5+ for the build. FreeBSD 9 requires a newer gcc version and also
 requires a patch related to libiconv (AOO Bugzilla i118574) which is not
 nice enough for the ASF repository.
 
 FreeBSD 10 and newer use the complete llvm/libc++ stack which is more
 interesting for the buildbot.

Right, so the fbsd build box has been on FreeBSD 10 for a while now.
It was on FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE.

Clang on this version was 3.3

I have just now upgraded to FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE and upgraded all
packages.

quote

FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p10 (GENERIC) #0: Wed May 13 06:54:13 UTC 2015

[gmcdonald@bb-fbsd2 ~]$ sudo pkg update
Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue...
FreeBSD repository is up-to-date.
All repositories are up-to-date.
[gmcdonald@bb-fbsd2 ~]$ clang --version
FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 20140512
Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.1
Thread model: posix

/quote

Therefore it looks like Clang 3.5+  is not available in the package tree
as you recommend.

I’ll perform a manual build now and see how it fairs.

Gav…


 
 Pedro.
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


Re: [BUILDBOT] - FreeBSD nightly (openoffice-fbsd-nightly)

2015-06-03 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi Again,

So now we have another error relating to coinmp this time - needs to be rebuilt.

What is the process for performing the rebuild?

I have rebuilt the coinmp port at the OS level but it made no difference so I’m
assuming it needs to be done a different way - or perhaps due to my upgrading
the Operating System from 10.0 to 10.1 and upgrading all packages and ports
that the config files need changing ?

I’ve done quite a few builds today and performed an OS upgrade so everything
is bang upto date as far as FreeBSD is concerned so now Im stuck and need
some advice on how to continue.

Thanks

Gav…


 On 6 May 2015, at 1:22 pm, Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org wrote:
 
 Hi Gavin,
 
 thanks for looking into this!
 
 On 2015-05-06 13:46, Gavin McDonald wrote:
 So the build got further, both configure and buildstrap passed.
 
 Now we get libtextcat errors , see:
 
 http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-fbsd-nightly/builds/328/steps/build%20--all/logs/stdio
 http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-fbsd-nightly/builds/328/steps/build
 --all/logs/stdio
 [...]
 ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
 /usr/home/buildslave27/slave27/openoffice-fbsd-nightly/build/main/libtextcat
 
 When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build
 by running:
 
 build --all:libtextcat
 
 Any ideas on that one?
 
 There should be a log file for the libtextcat problem with more specific 
 details about the error, but I can't look as the AOO FreeBSD buildbot log 
 files are not available where they should be [1] because their delivery 
 failed [2]. As a reference the corresponding good log file (e.g. for Linux) 
 is at [3]. Please check the log files on the build machine itself at
   main/libtextcat/unxfbsdx.pro/misc/logs
 
 [1] 
 http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/fbsdn/log/unxfbsdx.pro.build.html
 [2] 
 http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-fbsd-nightly/builds/328/steps/move%20logs%20to%20web/logs/stdio
 [3] 
 http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/linux64/main/libtextcat/unxlngx6.pro/misc/logs/libtextcat.txt
 
 Herbert
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


[BUILDBOT] - Windows Snapshot (aoo-w7snap)

2015-06-03 Thread Gavin McDonald

Hi All,

I have restored the w7snap build to a passing build.

http://ci.apache.org/builders/aoo-w7snap 
http://ci.apache.org/builders/aoo-w7snap

A fair amount of work had to be done on the OS in regards to permissions etc, 
and the
slave had actually ‘lost’ the buildslave user so I had to restore that too.

HTH

Gav…



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


[BUILDBOT] - Windows Nightly (aoo-win7)

2015-06-03 Thread Gavin McDonald

Hi All,

I have restored this build to passing again after MONTHS of being failing 
builds all the time.

See: http://ci.apache.org/builders/aoo-win7 
http://ci.apache.org/builders/aoo-win7

As per the other Windows build, lots of permissions etc needed fixing.

HTH

Gav…



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


[BUILDBOT] - Status of the Buildbot builds

2015-06-03 Thread Gavin McDonald

Hi All,

After going through all the builds we are now in a much healthier position.

See: http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ 
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/

Only ONE failing build as of writing (fbsd-nighty) and that is being looked 
into.

I have also added the mac-mini to that status page as is is on and ready for 
building.

HTH

Gav…



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


[BUILDBOT] - Linux 32bit Nightly (openoffice-linux32-nightly)

2015-05-08 Thread Gavin McDonald

Hi All,

So this build was ‘flapping’, i.e. passing/failing nearly every other build.

http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-nightly?numbuilds=50 
http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-nightly?numbuilds=50

This was mainly due to the use of the method=‘copy’ way of updating the source 
tree.

The SVN step performs two things when in ‘copy’ mode, it does a checkout to a 
‘source’
directory and then does a copy from there to the ‘build’ directory. The first 
has a default
timeout of 1200 whilst the latter has a (currently) unconfigurable timeout of 
120.
It is the latter 120 timeout during copy that makes the build fail, about 50% 
of the time it
hits the timeout limit before the copy is complete and so the build fails.

I have changed from using mode=‘full', method=‘copy’” to using 
mode=‘incremental’”
which basically means use ‘svn update’ directly on the build directory. I 
believe this will
stabilise this particular build. (I can’t remember why mode=copy was used 
originally.)

All the other builds also still use mode=copy but I haven’t spotted a failing 
pattern with
those so far because of it.

HTH

Gav…



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


Re: {BUILDBOT] - Linux 32bit Snapshot (openoffice-linux32-snapshot)

2015-05-07 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi again,

Subsequent build passed so we are all good here:-

http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-snapshot/builds/20 
http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-snapshot/builds/20

Gav…

 On 6 May 2015, at 2:51 pm, Gavin McDonald gmcdon...@apache.org wrote:
 
 
 Hi All,
 
 Last build for this was way back in October last year:
 
 http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-snapshot/builds/19 
 http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-snapshot/builds/19
 
 and failed due to disconnecting with the master, the slave itself has been 
 turned
 off for a while.
 
 I’ve re-enabled the slave VM and started a new build.
 
 It will take several hours to complete so I’ll report back when thats 
 complete.
 
 Gav…
 



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


Buildbot Builds

2015-05-06 Thread Gavin McDonald


 On 4 May 2015, at 7:49 am, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
 
 snip

 I will test stuff on the Linux version only. Our buildbots are not in great 
 shape
 http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/
 so (without reopening a discussion on installing new ones, please) we should 
 also look at fixing them to be able to find regressions quickly.

I’ll do what I can wrt to the Buildbot builds and setup so expect some mails 
from me on this.
Note that this is my ‘volunteer time’ so although my infra karma will help I’m 
not wearing that hat.

Gav…



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


using the correct mailing list

2015-05-06 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi All,

I notice that appoximatly half of the mails to this development list are user 
queries.

Rather than answer those user questions here can we maybe not answer them but 
redirect
them to the correct mailing list ?

This will help stop the dilution of this list and eventually we’ll end up with 
development discussion
without having to weed out the user queries.

i.e. - Im on this list for dev stuff only.

Gav...



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


[BUILDBOT] - FreeBSD nightly (openoffice-fbsd-nightly)

2015-05-06 Thread Gavin McDonald

Hi All,

So this build has been failing more or less forever:

http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-fbsd-nightly?numbuilds=100 
http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-fbsd-nightly?numbuilds=100

So it is failing the ‘configure’ and ‘buildstrap’ steps.

The latest build at:

http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-fbsd-nightly/builds/321/steps/configure/logs/stdio
 
http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-fbsd-nightly/builds/321/steps/configure/logs/stdio

shows errors that is the main theme of the previous build failures.

sh: can't access tty; job control turned off
configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --disable-mozilla
head: /etc/*-release: No such file or directory
checking which cppunit to use... configure: WARNING: not using cppunit
configure: error: hunspell headers not found.

First thing I’ll do is remove the —disable-mozilla and —with-system-hunspell 
options and
performa  a manual build , see if it gets any further.

I’d like to know however if these are ‘required’ options and if so what is 
needed in order to
stop those errors with these options.

Gav…






signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


[RAT REPORT] - 30 files with an unknown or no License Header

2015-05-06 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi All,

http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/rat-output.html 
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/rat-output.html

shows 30 files that need attention in getting valid license headers adding.

A quick look shows to me that we should probably insert ASF license Headers
in all of those files.

If nobody gets to it before me I’ll provide a patch to that effect.

HTH

Gav…




signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


{BUILDBOT] - Linux 32bit Snapshot (openoffice-linux32-snapshot)

2015-05-06 Thread Gavin McDonald

Hi All,

Last build for this was way back in October last year:

http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-snapshot/builds/19 
http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-snapshot/builds/19

and failed due to disconnecting with the master, the slave itself has been 
turned
off for a while.

I’ve re-enabled the slave VM and started a new build.

It will take several hours to complete so I’ll report back when thats complete.

Gav…



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


Re: [BUILDBOT] - FreeBSD nightly (openoffice-fbsd-nightly)

2015-05-06 Thread Gavin McDonald
So the build got further, both configure and buildstrap passed.

Now we get libtextcat errors , see:

http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-fbsd-nightly/builds/328/steps/build%20--all/logs/stdio
 
http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-fbsd-nightly/builds/328/steps/build%20--all/logs/stdio

details:

=
Building module libtextcat
=

Entering 
/usr/home/buildslave27/slave27/openoffice-fbsd-nightly/build/main/libtextcat

mkout -- version: 1.8

1 module(s):
libtextcat
need(s) to be rebuilt

Reason(s):

ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making 
/usr/home/buildslave27/slave27/openoffice-fbsd-nightly/build/main/libtextcat

When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build by 
running:

build --all:libtextcat

Any ideas on that one?

(could be a freeBSD env specific error.)

Gav…



 On 6 May 2015, at 11:23 am, Gavin McDonald gmcdon...@apache.org wrote:
 
 
 Hi All,
 
 So this build has been failing more or less forever:
 
 http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-fbsd-nightly?numbuilds=100 
 http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-fbsd-nightly?numbuilds=100
 
 So it is failing the ‘configure’ and ‘buildstrap’ steps.
 
 The latest build at:
 
 http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-fbsd-nightly/builds/321/steps/configure/logs/stdio
  
 http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-fbsd-nightly/builds/321/steps/configure/logs/stdio
 
 shows errors that is the main theme of the previous build failures.
 
 sh: can't access tty; job control turned off
 configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --disable-mozilla
 head: /etc/*-release: No such file or directory
 checking which cppunit to use... configure: WARNING: not using cppunit
 configure: error: hunspell headers not found.
 
 First thing I’ll do is remove the —disable-mozilla and —with-system-hunspell 
 options and
 performa  a manual build , see if it gets any further.
 
 I’d like to know however if these are ‘required’ options and if so what is 
 needed in order to
 stop those errors with these options.
 
 Gav…
 
 
 
 



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


Re: Open office crashes

2015-04-30 Thread Gavin McDonald


 On 30 Apr 2015, at 8:48 am, Barry Molkentin kknba...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi, Can you help I using open office 4.1.1 using presentation Im putting in
 a lot of photos. However the programme crashes every few minutes. What is
 wrongBarry Molkentin

Hi,

This is the OpenOffice Development mailing list, you might have better success
emailing the users mailing list and/or posting in the forums.

See:

http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html#users-mailing-list-public 
http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html#users-mailing-list-public

and

https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/ https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/

more info at:

http://www.openoffice.org/support/index.html 
http://www.openoffice.org/support/index.html

HTH

Gav…



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


Re: [CWiki] Account Whitelisting

2015-04-17 Thread Gavin McDonald
resending, no reply from Tim in 9 days:

HTH

Gav…

 On 8 Apr 2015, at 8:27 am, Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
 
 Hi Tim,
 
 On 8 Apr 2015, at 2:44 am, Timothy Monk timm...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Username:  timmonk
 
 Real name: Timothy Monk
 
 
 There doesn’t seem to be a CWIKI username matching that id.
 
 Can you check your Confluence id - if not exist please create one first.
 
 Thanks!
 
 Gav…
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [CWiki] Account Whitelisting

2015-04-08 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi Tim,

 On 8 Apr 2015, at 2:44 am, Timothy Monk timm...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Username:  timmonk
 
 Real name: Timothy Monk
 

There doesn’t seem to be a CWIKI username matching that id.

Can you check your Confluence id - if not exist please create one first.

Thanks!

Gav…


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Windows buildbot failures -- can you help?

2015-04-08 Thread Gavin McDonald

 On 8 Apr 2015, at 2:15 pm, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote:
 
 On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 09:12:15AM -0700, Kay Schenk wrote:
 I saw these errors but since I am not on Windows, I didn't know how to
 interpret them. Are you saying that AOO will not compile with this
 version of MSPDBBD.DLL or, is something now wrong with this DLL?
 
 In any case, I do not have root level access to the win7 buildbot. So,
 either someone that does can check this out, or, request this type of
 access from infra.
 
 Yes, it seems that someone must open a JIRA ticket and request access to
 the buildbot.

Ok so the win7 build machine is maintained by Infra; and no accounts are 
issued. 

feel free to open a BUILDS jira and I’ll take a look.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS 

Gav…

 
 
 Regards
 -- 
 Ariel Constenla-Haile
 La Plata, Argentina



Re: Board report proposal, please comment before April 5.

2015-04-05 Thread Gavin McDonald

 On 5 Apr 2015, at 8:07 am, Guy Waterval waterval@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi Jan,
 Hi all,
 
 
 2015-04-05 8:20 GMT+02:00 jan i j...@apache.org:
 
 On Sunday, April 5, 2015, jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 On 05/04/15 00:37, jan i wrote:
 
 felt that I as new AOO chair, had formulated the report too negative
 and
 against the wishes of the community
 
 I'm going to suggest that said PMC Member was simply shocked at the
 radical difference in reporting styles.
 
 
 Is it so important ? What are the possible consequences of a bad report ?
 I thought it was only a simple information about the activities in a
 project.

Ok so I think a negative report can have a negative impact on a community, 
rather 
than encouraging more volunteer time it may be seen as all doom and gloom and 
perhaps push potential volunteers away. 

Sure, if a project is in trouble, then that needs to be reported, but there are 
ways of 
doing so.

If someone new pops up on a project and sees doom and gloom, sees the folks 
that 
are already there talking down the project, instead of talking it up, I reckon 
they’ll 
turn tail and scarper.

I suggested (that is the word suggested; and yes it was me!) that some 
sentences be 
reworded slightly  - to say the same thing, but in a more positive light, in 
such a way 
as that it might actually encourage more folks to step forward. That is what is 
needed 
here right?

I’ll post my reworded version of the original submitted community consensus 
report 
on this list for folks to mull over. 

Again, it was clear that I made suggestions, and I also made it clear that 
everyone was 
free to ignore any and all of them and submit the report as is. I felt by 
making those 
suggestions, it may help the project. 

You folks are doing a grand job here, and so you’ll do whats best.

Gav…

 
 Regards
 -- 
 gw
 
 
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Community Board Report - with suggested changes.

2015-04-05 Thread Gavin McDonald
Hi Folks, 

So here is the original report as submitted to the board, and I annotate inline 
the changes 
I suggested be considered.

As originally stated, please feel free to incorporate any or none of the 
changes at your leisure - 
I won’t be offended :)

The intent of my changes was to put a more positive angle to some aspects of 
the report - potential 
newcomers read these publicly published reports too, so some encouragement for 
possible 
contributions can be made there as well as on the mailing lists and wikis et al.

—begin report

 ## Description:
 Apache OpenOffice is an open-source, office-document productivity
 suite providing six productivity applications based around the
 OpenDocument Format (ODF). OpenOffice is released on multiple
 platforms and in dozens of languages.
 
 ## Activity:
 
 Andrea Pescetti resigned as Chair, and Jan Iversen was elected as
 new Chair, the change went as expected smoothly.


‘...After two and half years at the helm - since OpenOffice came to the
ASF, Andrea Pescetti has decided to step down as Chair and pass 
the baton on to someone new for this challenging yet rewarding role.
We thank Andrea for his time and effort as VP...’

 
 The mailing lists for users and the development list are fairly
 active, while specialized lists see a lower, but steady, activity.
 
 New volunteers for development show up regularly, but without
 mentors we have not been able to keep them motivated and on the
 project.

“…New volunteers for development show up regularly, but there is a 
need for other more experienced devs on the project to guide them
in the right direction and encourage contributions. Those contributions 
then need to be dealt with in a timely manner…”

 The level of commits on trunk remain low, only a few
 simple fixes have been committed.

“… The level of commits on trunk is running at a low pace, whilst 
patches that come in are being applied…”

 
 Nobody has shown interest in becoming the new release manager,
 which have been missing for approx. last 5 months,

Very negative sentence here, I quite like :-

“… The search continues for someone to step up to the very challenging 
role as the next Release Manager (RM) for the next public release of 
Apache OpenOffice. This mammoth task requires dedication and commitment 
over a period of time. 

optional It may need someone with vision to rewrite the whole 
release process and simplify things to make future releases less of a burden 
than they currently are /optional 

…”

 
 The 2 MAC (buildbot) delivered Q3/14 from Infra are not operational,
 due to lack of a volunteer to install the AOO development platform.

“… A volunteer or two are still needed in order to make use of two 
MAC (buildbot slave) machines. We will send another note to both 
the dev and user lists to see if anyone is willing, accompanied by a 
description of what the role entails…”

 
 Proof of concept for Digital Signing was made mid. 2014, no further
 work have been done.

“… Proof of concept for the ASF Digital Signing service was made mid 2014, 
and needs revisiting to take advantage…”

 
 OpenOffice was present at FOSDEM (January 2015 in Brussels,
 Belgium), with talks as well as a table.
 
 A BoF is being arranged for CSDN OSTC (March 2015, China).
 
 2 Volunteers took on preparing a AOO track for Austin, in the end, 
 no presentation was submitted (CFP). Traditionally Europe is 
 stronger for AOO so we look forward to Budapest.
 
 [private]
 After informal approaches at FOSDEM in February 2015, the PMC
 received an initial proposal/mail from TDF, which was clearly
 unacceptable even as a start of  negotiations, and later after
 informal talks between jani and TDF, the PMC recieved another
 proposal/mail on behalf of the TDF Board which was considered
 too vague by part of the PMC
 
 There is understanding (not consensus) in the PMC that power to
 exploit cooperation possibilities with TDF on behalf on the PMC
 will not be delegated to an individual.
 
 The PMC has for the last 2 month collected information, mainly why
 the proposals from TDF/LO was unacceptable. no responses or counter
 proposals have been formulated, and all activity including the
 informal talks have stalled.
 [/private]
   
 
 ## Issues:
 
 The current CMS discussion based on a proposal to decommission
 the tool and ask projects to find other solutions would cause a
 significant problem for AOO. The AOO Web pages depend on the
 features of CMS  that cannot be easily ported to other tools.
 If Infra is to stop the service, AOO will need to either only
 maintain only a few pages or run CMS on a project VM. The Board
 should remember to look at the total cost of this change, not
 only the Infra costs.
 


 A major issue for AOO is the current activity level (practically
 no development) which combined with minimal interest in discussing
 solutions, are a potential problem, that might cause a community
 breakdown. The community only has a few developers left, which
 makes 

Re: Board report proposal, please comment before April 5.

2015-04-05 Thread Gavin McDonald

 On 5 Apr 2015, at 7:20 am, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
 
 On Sunday, April 5, 2015, jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 On 05/04/15 00:37, jan i wrote:
 
 felt that I as new AOO chair, had formulated the report too negative and
 against the wishes of the community
 
 I'm going to suggest that said PMC Member was simply shocked at the
 radical difference in reporting styles.
 
 Just to clarify, this did not come from a AOO PMC! It came from a ASF Member
 who read the board mailing list.

Yep, that was me. 

 No AOO PMC has at this point in time,
 written that I
 have acted against the interest of the community.

And neither did I — in fact you couldn’t act against the interest of the 
community 
because you posted a report created by the community , correct?

So I made ‘suggestions’ based on  a community based board report. 

In other words, none of this is an attack on you Jan, or an attack of any kind.

Please lets not over-react to what was just some helpful notes.

Gav…

 
 
 You (Jan) do not like negative surprises. Consequently, your reports
 reflect that POV.
 Andrea is more surprise-tolerant, and consequently reports reflect that
 POV.
 
 Both reports are accurate. The difference is simply one of managerial
 style --- mention potential risks, or only mention documented risks.
 Both styles have their virtues.  Both styles have their vices.  The
 people kicked upstairs can be traumatized by the difference in reporting
 styles, during the transition process.
 
 Agreed, I will however, due to pressure, from non AOO PMC, change the
 report, and have a new discussion start on this mailing list. I have asked
 the
 people in question to come forward in here and explain their opinions.
 
 I apologize to the community, for not having realized that consensus in
 AOO,
 is not enough, when making a board report.
 
 rgds
 jan i
 
 
 
 
 
 
 jonathon
 
  * English - detected
  * English
 
  * English
 
 javascript:void(0);
 
 
 
 -- 
 Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Board report proposal, please comment before April 5.

2015-04-05 Thread Gavin McDonald

 On 5 Apr 2015, at 2:17 am, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
 
 On 5 Apr 2015 02:05, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
 I can
 replace the report with a short note stating the I (as chair) have removed
 it, because the community need more
 time to discuss the content.
 
 
 That seems crazy, given the long review window and the absence of criticism
 on this list. The report was openly discussed for longer than I recall any
 other Board report. Any member claiming there was community opposition
 should produce evidence to that effect.

Ok so nobody has said there was any community opposition at all. I thought 
that the report was worded negatively and suggested a few changes to give 
it a more positive flow that might help the project.

 
 The report should stand as-is rather than be voided by a private request
 that seems to fly in the face of the public evidence.

My suggestions were just that, and I made it clear they could be incorporated 
or ignored at leisure. I’m totally fine with whatever is decided.

Gav…

 
 S.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org