Re: [DISCUSS] Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.1 (RC3)
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.1 I clean install RC3 on Windows 7, test with my documents, recheck some showstopper bugs, no new problems found. On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Jose R R jose@metztli.com wrote: +1 Release ApacheOO 4.1.1 RC3 Thanks for the hint, Andrea- After erasing all files, I used wget to download the 4 files -- including the Apache OpenOffice actual program (whereas before I had downloaded it with my browser [Epiphany]) and everything checks fine now. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BvTpXqlCYAEey0u.png:large Sorry for my mistake, Jürgen and Kay. On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: On 16/08/2014 Jose R R wrote: $ sha256sum -b Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1*gz 5121c9333b47bca9af71ca2f0dd41da463748a5cfb1a41eb8232284ad98323c2 *Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz $ cat Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz.sha256 9624930a634891ed7ed6b2d19dd71303da1e900cf7ced56885f6d0bdceced4a9 *Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz Some browsers are too smart and will decompress .gz files on the fly. If I download the .tar.gz file, checksum is the expected one (96...). If I gunzip it, checksum is the one you found (51...). So, in short: your browser/downloader/whatever has uncompressed the file for you, and you will see that the size is 162416640 and not 160101345, but it left the filename as ...tar.gz and not simply tar. $ gpg --verify Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.1_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz.asc gpg: Signature made Wed 13 Aug 2014 04:40:19 AM PDT using RSA key ID 51B5FDE8 gpg: BAD signature from Juergen Schmidt j...@apache.org Am I doing something incorrectly? Haven't checked this yet, but please make sure it's not related to the above. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Jose R R http://www.metztli-it.com - NEW Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0! Download for GNU/Linux, Mac OS, Windows. - Daylight Saving Time in USA Canada ends: Sunday, November 02, 2014 - - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen
[QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20140811
Hi All, AOO 4.1.1 Full Path Regression Test(FPR) have been closed on Aug 8, we continue testing RC1 as wait for RC2, here is the weekly update (8/5 - 8/11): *Test execution:* We have assigned 176 text executions to about 20 volunteers, and completed about 75.6% in execution (133 test executions done). Although we do not meet the 100% completion goal before planned date, Aug 8, the execution coverage and test result so far are good among platforms. Test CategoryTotalNot RunPassedFailedBlocked Completed [%] AOO Calc5313362275.47 Fidelity5120280.00 AOO Impress68173912075.00 AOO Writer5012362076.00 Total1764311316475.60 PlatformTotalNot RunPassedFailedBlockedCompleted [%] MacOS X3213154059.38 Redhat Linux 32bit12381075.00 Redhat Linux 64bit4513239071.11 Ubuntu Linux 64bit181131394.44 Windows 7367290080.56 Windows 8172131188.24 Windows Server 2012164120075.00 Total1764311316475.60 *Defect summary:* 1. We have verified 58 of 4.1.1 resolved showstopper bugs (Total 75 as of Aug 11, increased 2 since Aug 4. Backlog is 17, none for function bugs) https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremlist_id=153261namedcmd=4.1.1_release_blocker%2B%3Fremaction=runsharer_id=249089 *Issues quality highlight:* 1. We have completed to verify all function defects! We still need defect verification volunteers, to verify language bugs and API/code level bugs 2. Test execution volunteers on Mac Redhat Linux 64bitMac have caught up this week 3. No critical and potential showstopper have been reported, every thing is good so far *Volunteer status: * 1. We have total 20 test execution volunteers joined in FPR execution work since June 24, 2 are from Apache OpenOffice Forum 2. We have total 16 defect verification volunteers joined in 4.1.1 resolved showstopper bug verification work since June 23 *Plan for next week:* 1. Continue testing with RC1, by executing not-run test cases in FPR 2. Switch testing with RC2 once it is available 3. Continue to organize the RC test and bug verification Thank you all for effort provided last week, especially on Mac/Linux Redhat! Regards, Yu Zhen
[QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20140804
Hi All, We started doing the AOO 4.1.1 Full Path Regression Test(FPR) on June 25, and will close it before Aug 8. here is the bi-weekly update (7/21 - 8/4): *Test execution:* 1. We have assigned 176 text executions to about 20 volunteers, and completed about 63.6% in execution (112 test executions done). We are behind schedule to finish feature FVT before Aug 8. The planned completion is 84.8% as of Aug 4 2. From below test results distributed among platforms, we need to speed up the testing on Redhat Linux 64bit(because completed percentage is 46.67% which is lower than the average 63.6%) and Mac(made progress on Mac) Test CategoryTotalNot RunPassedFailedBlocked Completed [%] AOO Calc5318312266.04 Fidelity5310140.00 AOO Impress6827338060.29 AOO Writer5016322068.00 Total176649712363.60 PlatformTotalNot RunPassedFailedBlockedCompleted [%] MacOS X3218104043.75 Redhat Linux 32bit12381075.00 Redhat Linux 64bit4524165046.67 Ubuntu Linux 64bit181131394.44 Windows 7367290080.56 Windows 8176101064.71 Windows Server 2012165110068.75 Total176649712363.60 *Defect summary:* 1. We have verified 55 of 4.1.1 resolved showstopper bugs (Total 73 as of Aug 4, increased 22 since July 20. Backlog is 18 for all bugs) https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremlist_id=153261namedcmd=4.1.1_release_blocker%2B%3Fremaction=runsharer_id=249089 *Issues quality highlight:* 1. We have made big progress these two weeks to verify total 55 defects! We still need more defect verification volunteers, to verify language bugs 2. We(test cases assignees) need speed up testing on Mac Redhat Linux 64bitMac(made progress on Mac) *Volunteer status: * 1. We have total 20 test execution volunteers joined in FPR execution work since June 24, 2 are from Apache OpenOffice Forum 2. We have total 16 defect verification volunteers joined in 4.1.1 resolved showstopper bug verification work since June 23, 11 new joined these 2 weeks! *Plan for next week:* 1. Continue to do FPR test with RC1 and bug verification 2. Remind some test execution volunteers to complete their assignments 3. Continue to organize the FPR test and bug verification Thank you all for effort provided last week, we need your continuous help to catch up, especially on Mac/Linux Redhat! Regards, Yu Zhen
Towards AOO 4.1.1 Release - Please verify resolved language bugs(show stopper)
Dear all, Lots of language bugs are prioritized as 4.1.1 show stoppers and they have already been resolved. Please locate your interested bugs in below list[1] and do verification as soon as possible, your help means much to make release out! Quick steps on how to do: 1. Work on the Language bugs: Product is Native-LANG 2. Change the Status: from RESOLVED to VERIFIED and add the comment. [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremlist_id=155218namedcmd=4.1.1_release_blocker%2Bremaction=runsharer_id=249089 -- Regards, Yu Zhen
[QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20140720
Hi All, We started doing the AOO 4.1.1 Full Path Regression Test(FPR) on June 25, here is the weekly update (7/15 - 7/20): *Test execution:*1. We have assigned 176 text executions to about 20 volunteers, and completed about 50.6% in execution (89 test executions done). We are behind schedule to finish feature FVT before Aug 8. The planned completion is 67.8% as of July 20. 2. From below test results distributed among Apps, we have made progress in testing on Writer, but still need to speed up testing on Impress(because completed percentage is 35.29% which is lower than the average 50.6%) 3. From below test results distributed among platforms, we need to speed up the testing on Redhat Linux 64bit(because completed percentage is 28.89% which is lower than the average 50.6%) and Mac(No progress on Mac!!) Test CategoryTotalNot RunPassedFailedBlocked Completed [%] AOO Calc5323280256.60 Fidelity5310140.00 AOO Impress6844213035.29 AOO Writer5017321066.00 Total17687824350.60 PlatformTotalNot RunPassedFailedBlockedCompleted [%] MacOS X32320000.00 Redhat Linux 32bit12381075.00 Redhat Linux 64bit4532121028.89 Ubuntu Linux 64bit181131394.44 Windows 7367290080.56 Windows 8176101064.71 Windows Server 2012166100062.50 Total17687824350.60 *Defect summary:* 1. We have verified 23 of 4.1.1 resolved showstopper bugs (Total 51 as of July 14, increased 6 more since July 14. Backlog is 28 for function bugs) https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremlist_id=153261namedcmd=4.1.1_release_blocker%2B%3Fremaction=runsharer_id=249089 *Issues quality highlight:* 1. We need more defect verification volunteers, especially bug reporters or bug confirmators who have ever reproduced bugs 2. We(test cases assignees) need speed up testing on Mac Redhat Linux 64bit, and on Impress *Volunteer status: * 1. We have total 20 test execution volunteers joined in FPR execution work since June 24, 2 new comers in this week are from Apache OpenOffice Forum. 2. We have total 5 defect verification volunteers joined in 4.1.1 resolved showstopper bug verification work since June 23, 2 new comers in this week are from Apache OpenOffice Forum, but need more as low progress now *Plan for next week:* 1. Continue to do FPR test with M2 and M3 and bug verification 2. Remind some test execution volunteers to complete their assignments 3. Continue to organize the FPR test and bug verification 4. I (Fan, Yuzhen) will be on vacation, may check email occasionally Thank you all for effort provided last week, we need your continuous help to catch up, especially on Mac/Linux Redhat and Impress, as well as the bug verification! Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: [QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20140714
Hi Alexandro, there is no unassigned test cases on Linux so far, I will let you know if any untested test cases need to balance from other Linux volunteers. If you like, could you please check below bug on Linux? I have checked it on Windows and Mac, need check result on Linux. Thanks! *Issue 125111* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125111 - Huge memory usage with docs which contain many graphics On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: No, Linux only. On 7/16/14, Greg Rivera gregrive...@gmail.com wrote: I have windows 8 as well. Please divide up the test cases between linux/windows 8 as you see fit on my end. Thanks! On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: To Greg and Kay, Please retest failed/blocked test case if new build is available, current build is 4.1.1 -- AOO411m2(Build:9771) - Rev. 1608452 as Kay installed. The frequency of snapshot build for testing is once a week(*Jürgen*, please correct me if I am wrong) To Greg and Alexandro, do you have Mac or Windows 8, so that I can balance some assigned but untested test cases on these platforms to you? Thanks! On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:36 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On 07/15/2014 10:45 AM, Greg Rivera wrote: Hi! I have finished testing the cases assigned to me. Please feel free to assign me more. Also, do I have to let anyone know if test cases blocked or failed? Last, how often are there builds? Like when should I grab a new copy of 4.1.1 to test on? Please let me know :) On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, We start doing the AOO 4.1.1 Full Path Regression Test(FPR) on June 25, here is the weekly update (7/8 - 7/14): *Test execution:* 1. We have assigned 176 text executions to about 19 volunteers, and completed about 42.6% in execution (69 test executions done). We are behind schedule to finish feature FVT before Aug 8. The planned completion is 50% as of July 14. 2. From below test results distributed among Apps, we need to speed up the testing on Writer(because most of 4.1.1 resolved showstopper bugs are for Writer), and on Impress(because completed percentage is 30.88% which is lower than the average 42.6%) 3. From below test results distributed among platforms, we need to speed up the testing on Redhat Linux 64bit(because completed percentage is 15.56% which is lower than the average 42.6%) and Mac(No progress on Mac!) Test CategoryTotalNot RunPassedFailedBlocked Completed [%] AOO Calc5323280256.60 Fidelity5400120.00 AOO Impress6847192030.88 AOO Writer5027221946.00 Total176101693342.60 PlatformTotalNot RunPassedFailedBlocked Completed [%] MacOS X32320000.00 Redhat Linux 32bit12381075.00 Redhat Linux 64bit453870015.56 Ubuntu Linux 64bit181131394.44 Windows 73615210058.33 Windows 8176101064.71 Windows Server 2012166100062.50 Total176101693342.60 *Defect summary:* 1. We have verified 17 of 4.1.1 resolved showstopper bugs (Total 45 as of July 14, increased 10 more since July 7. Backlog is 28 for function bugs) https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremlist_id=153261namedcmd=4.1.1_release_blocker%2B%3Fremaction=runsharer_id=249089 Somewhat related to Greg's. Do we need reverification, or, in some cases, initial verification, on the above issues? I now have installed 4.1.1 -- AOO411m2(Build:9771) - Rev. 1608452 2014-07-07 15:22 - Linux i686 *Issues quality highlight:* 1. We need more defect verification volunteers, especially bug reporters or bug confirmators who have ever reproduced bugs 2. We need speed up testing on Mac Redhat Linux 64bit, and on Writer Impress 3. Testlink system is so slow as to impact test execution's efficiency *Volunteer status: * 1. We have total 19 test execution volunteers joined in FPR execution work since June 24, 8 of 12 new comers in this week are for Redhat Linux. 2. We have total 3 defect verification volunteers joined in 4.1.1 resolved showstopper bug verification work since June 23, but need more as low progress now *Plan for next week:* 1. Continue to do FPR test with M2 2. Remind some test execution volunteers to complete
Re: [QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20140714
Hi Greg, I have just assigned you 5 more test cases, 1 on Linux and 4 on Windows 8. Thanks! On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Greg Rivera gregrive...@gmail.com wrote: I have windows 8 as well. Please divide up the test cases between linux/windows 8 as you see fit on my end. Thanks! On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: To Greg and Kay, Please retest failed/blocked test case if new build is available, current build is 4.1.1 -- AOO411m2(Build:9771) - Rev. 1608452 as Kay installed. The frequency of snapshot build for testing is once a week(*Jürgen*, please correct me if I am wrong) To Greg and Alexandro, do you have Mac or Windows 8, so that I can balance some assigned but untested test cases on these platforms to you? Thanks! On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:36 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On 07/15/2014 10:45 AM, Greg Rivera wrote: Hi! I have finished testing the cases assigned to me. Please feel free to assign me more. Also, do I have to let anyone know if test cases blocked or failed? Last, how often are there builds? Like when should I grab a new copy of 4.1.1 to test on? Please let me know :) On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, We start doing the AOO 4.1.1 Full Path Regression Test(FPR) on June 25, here is the weekly update (7/8 - 7/14): *Test execution:* 1. We have assigned 176 text executions to about 19 volunteers, and completed about 42.6% in execution (69 test executions done). We are behind schedule to finish feature FVT before Aug 8. The planned completion is 50% as of July 14. 2. From below test results distributed among Apps, we need to speed up the testing on Writer(because most of 4.1.1 resolved showstopper bugs are for Writer), and on Impress(because completed percentage is 30.88% which is lower than the average 42.6%) 3. From below test results distributed among platforms, we need to speed up the testing on Redhat Linux 64bit(because completed percentage is 15.56% which is lower than the average 42.6%) and Mac(No progress on Mac!) Test CategoryTotalNot RunPassedFailedBlocked Completed [%] AOO Calc5323280256.60 Fidelity5400120.00 AOO Impress6847192030.88 AOO Writer5027221946.00 Total176101693342.60 PlatformTotalNot RunPassedFailedBlocked Completed [%] MacOS X32320000.00 Redhat Linux 32bit12381075.00 Redhat Linux 64bit453870015.56 Ubuntu Linux 64bit181131394.44 Windows 73615210058.33 Windows 8176101064.71 Windows Server 2012166100062.50 Total176101693342.60 *Defect summary:* 1. We have verified 17 of 4.1.1 resolved showstopper bugs (Total 45 as of July 14, increased 10 more since July 7. Backlog is 28 for function bugs) https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremlist_id=153261namedcmd=4.1.1_release_blocker%2B%3Fremaction=runsharer_id=249089 Somewhat related to Greg's. Do we need reverification, or, in some cases, initial verification, on the above issues? I now have installed 4.1.1 -- AOO411m2(Build:9771) - Rev. 1608452 2014-07-07 15:22 - Linux i686 *Issues quality highlight:* 1. We need more defect verification volunteers, especially bug reporters or bug confirmators who have ever reproduced bugs 2. We need speed up testing on Mac Redhat Linux 64bit, and on Writer Impress 3. Testlink system is so slow as to impact test execution's efficiency *Volunteer status: * 1. We have total 19 test execution volunteers joined in FPR execution work since June 24, 8 of 12 new comers in this week are for Redhat Linux. 2. We have total 3 defect verification volunteers joined in 4.1.1 resolved showstopper bug verification work since June 23, but need more as low progress now *Plan for next week:* 1. Continue to do FPR test with M2 2. Remind some test execution volunteers to complete their assignments 3. Continue to organize the FPR test Thank you all for effort provided last week, we have made a good progress, but we still need your continuous help to catch up, especially on Mac/Linux Redhat and Writer/Impress! Regards, Yu Zhen -- - MzK To be trusted is a greater compliment than
[QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20140714
Hi All, We start doing the AOO 4.1.1 Full Path Regression Test(FPR) on June 25, here is the weekly update (7/8 - 7/14): *Test execution:* 1. We have assigned 176 text executions to about 19 volunteers, and completed about 42.6% in execution (69 test executions done). We are behind schedule to finish feature FVT before Aug 8. The planned completion is 50% as of July 14. 2. From below test results distributed among Apps, we need to speed up the testing on Writer(because most of 4.1.1 resolved showstopper bugs are for Writer), and on Impress(because completed percentage is 30.88% which is lower than the average 42.6%) 3. From below test results distributed among platforms, we need to speed up the testing on Redhat Linux 64bit(because completed percentage is 15.56% which is lower than the average 42.6%) and Mac(No progress on Mac!) Test CategoryTotalNot RunPassedFailedBlocked Completed [%] AOO Calc5323280256.60 Fidelity5400120.00 AOO Impress6847192030.88 AOO Writer5027221946.00 Total176101693342.60 PlatformTotalNot RunPassedFailedBlockedCompleted [%] MacOS X32320000.00 Redhat Linux 32bit12381075.00 Redhat Linux 64bit453870015.56 Ubuntu Linux 64bit181131394.44 Windows 73615210058.33 Windows 8176101064.71 Windows Server 2012166100062.50 Total176101693342.60 *Defect summary:* 1. We have verified 17 of 4.1.1 resolved showstopper bugs (Total 45 as of July 14, increased 10 more since July 7. Backlog is 28 for function bugs) https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremlist_id=153261namedcmd=4.1.1_release_blocker%2B%3Fremaction=runsharer_id=249089 *Issues quality highlight:* 1. We need more defect verification volunteers, especially bug reporters or bug confirmators who have ever reproduced bugs 2. We need speed up testing on Mac Redhat Linux 64bit, and on Writer Impress 3. Testlink system is so slow as to impact test execution's efficiency *Volunteer status: * 1. We have total 19 test execution volunteers joined in FPR execution work since June 24, 8 of 12 new comers in this week are for Redhat Linux. 2. We have total 3 defect verification volunteers joined in 4.1.1 resolved showstopper bug verification work since June 23, but need more as low progress now *Plan for next week:* 1. Continue to do FPR test with M2 2. Remind some test execution volunteers to complete their assignments 3. Continue to organize the FPR test Thank you all for effort provided last week, we have made a good progress, but we still need your continuous help to catch up, especially on Mac/Linux Redhat and Writer/Impress! Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: [QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20140714
To Greg and Kay, Please retest failed/blocked test case if new build is available, current build is 4.1.1 -- AOO411m2(Build:9771) - Rev. 1608452 as Kay installed. The frequency of snapshot build for testing is once a week(*Jürgen*, please correct me if I am wrong) To Greg and Alexandro, do you have Mac or Windows 8, so that I can balance some assigned but untested test cases on these platforms to you? Thanks! On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:36 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On 07/15/2014 10:45 AM, Greg Rivera wrote: Hi! I have finished testing the cases assigned to me. Please feel free to assign me more. Also, do I have to let anyone know if test cases blocked or failed? Last, how often are there builds? Like when should I grab a new copy of 4.1.1 to test on? Please let me know :) On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, We start doing the AOO 4.1.1 Full Path Regression Test(FPR) on June 25, here is the weekly update (7/8 - 7/14): *Test execution:* 1. We have assigned 176 text executions to about 19 volunteers, and completed about 42.6% in execution (69 test executions done). We are behind schedule to finish feature FVT before Aug 8. The planned completion is 50% as of July 14. 2. From below test results distributed among Apps, we need to speed up the testing on Writer(because most of 4.1.1 resolved showstopper bugs are for Writer), and on Impress(because completed percentage is 30.88% which is lower than the average 42.6%) 3. From below test results distributed among platforms, we need to speed up the testing on Redhat Linux 64bit(because completed percentage is 15.56% which is lower than the average 42.6%) and Mac(No progress on Mac!) Test CategoryTotalNot RunPassedFailedBlocked Completed [%] AOO Calc5323280256.60 Fidelity5400120.00 AOO Impress6847192030.88 AOO Writer5027221946.00 Total176101693342.60 PlatformTotalNot RunPassedFailedBlockedCompleted [%] MacOS X32320000.00 Redhat Linux 32bit12381075.00 Redhat Linux 64bit453870015.56 Ubuntu Linux 64bit181131394.44 Windows 73615210058.33 Windows 8176101064.71 Windows Server 2012166100062.50 Total176101693342.60 *Defect summary:* 1. We have verified 17 of 4.1.1 resolved showstopper bugs (Total 45 as of July 14, increased 10 more since July 7. Backlog is 28 for function bugs) https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremlist_id=153261namedcmd=4.1.1_release_blocker%2B%3Fremaction=runsharer_id=249089 Somewhat related to Greg's. Do we need reverification, or, in some cases, initial verification, on the above issues? I now have installed 4.1.1 -- AOO411m2(Build:9771) - Rev. 1608452 2014-07-07 15:22 - Linux i686 *Issues quality highlight:* 1. We need more defect verification volunteers, especially bug reporters or bug confirmators who have ever reproduced bugs 2. We need speed up testing on Mac Redhat Linux 64bit, and on Writer Impress 3. Testlink system is so slow as to impact test execution's efficiency *Volunteer status: * 1. We have total 19 test execution volunteers joined in FPR execution work since June 24, 8 of 12 new comers in this week are for Redhat Linux. 2. We have total 3 defect verification volunteers joined in 4.1.1 resolved showstopper bug verification work since June 23, but need more as low progress now *Plan for next week:* 1. Continue to do FPR test with M2 2. Remind some test execution volunteers to complete their assignments 3. Continue to organize the FPR test Thank you all for effort provided last week, we have made a good progress, but we still need your continuous help to catch up, especially on Mac/Linux Redhat and Writer/Impress! Regards, Yu Zhen -- - MzK To be trusted is a greater compliment than being loved. -- George MacDonald - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: Call for volunteers to verify 4.1.1 resolved showstopper defects
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On 07/07/2014 12:26 AM, Yuzhen Fan wrote: Hi All, The progress of bug verification is slow and the backlog increases to 38 now. Today, I go through the bugs with comp as code, sdk, [Lang] and spell checking, and categorize them(total 15) as following types/actions: 1. Verify them though build level testing, aka, the bug would be verified fixed once a test case in related platform is passed *Issue 124896* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124896 - remove obsoleted module-internal custom allocator in SAL *Issue 124908* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124908 - remove custom allocator support in stlport-replacement headers *Issue 125086* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125086 - Regression Textfield.user cant be deleted via Script *Issue 122368* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122368 - nbintegration: Blanks or Colons in path seem unsupported under windows *Issue 125112* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125112 - CStringEqual can return true for non-equal c-strings *Issue 125084* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125084 - update meta data for AOO 4.1.1 2. Verify them by particular steps/sample files *Issue 124999* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124999 - Huge memory consumption for very large and complex .odt *Issue 125000* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125000 - CRASH when scroll through very large and complex .odt The above 2 issues reference issue 118725 -- https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118725#c13 and the test document is not easily found. If it is available by someone, and due to size can not be attached to an issue, can it be committed to the svn test area perhaps? Clarence has helped to commit the test document(TestBook2.odt) to the svn as following url: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/test/test-data/bugzilla_samples/ I have checked these 2 issues with TestBook2.odt, they are verified fixed. *Issue 122471* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122471 - The Lookup Gesture looks up the wrong word 3. Verify them by GVT *Issue 125115* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125115 - German Windows: unoinfo java indicates UTF-16LE encoding, but encoding is not UTF-16 *Issue 124789* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124789 - Update PL (Polish) translation from Pootle *Issue 124766* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124766 - Update Hebrew (he) translation from Pootle for AOO 4.1.1 *Issue 125133* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125133 - Pootle damaged file *Issue 125130* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125130 - Lithuanian (lt) translation update for OpenOffice 4.1.1 *Issue 125182* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125182 - Update English dictionaries for OpenOffice 4.1.1 On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Currently we have about 30 resolved showstopper bugs in 4.1.1[1], if you have interest in joining the bug verification work, could you please pick up what you would like to verify and change the bug status according to your verification result? Thanks very much! [1] all approved showstopper issues for AOO 4.1.1 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremlist_id=153261namedcmd=4.1.1_release_blocker%2B%3Fremaction=runsharer_id=249089 [2] build download website (the upload is ongoing) https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds Regard, Yu Zhen On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, well we have not finally defined the release schedule for AOO 4.1.1 but the train has started already and I have prepared a first milestone build that is currently uploading. The milestone (m1) build is based on the AOO410 branch on revision 1603804. The fixed issue compared to AOO 4.1 can be found under [1] and the binaries can be found under [2] (when the upload is finished). The upload is ongoing and I expect it will be finished tonight or tomorrow, yes we still have a bottleneck here. But anyway no pressure at the moment but I invite all volunteers to give it a try as early as possible and provide feedback. Next week we will define in more detail the release schedule and I hope that we can address the most important and serious problems we have currently. [1] http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.1-m1-r1603804/AOO4.1.1_fixes.html [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail
Re: Call for volunteers to verify 4.1.1 resolved showstopper defects
Hi All, The progress of bug verification is slow and the backlog increases to 38 now. Today, I go through the bugs with comp as code, sdk, [Lang] and spell checking, and categorize them(total 15) as following types/actions: 1. Verify them though build level testing, aka, the bug would be verified fixed once a test case in related platform is passed *Issue 124896* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124896 - remove obsoleted module-internal custom allocator in SAL *Issue 124908* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124908 - remove custom allocator support in stlport-replacement headers *Issue 125086* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125086 - Regression Textfield.user cant be deleted via Script *Issue 122368* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122368 - nbintegration: Blanks or Colons in path seem unsupported under windows *Issue 125112* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125112 - CStringEqual can return true for non-equal c-strings *Issue 125084* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125084 - update meta data for AOO 4.1.1 2. Verify them by particular steps/sample files *Issue 124999* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124999 - Huge memory consumption for very large and complex .odt *Issue 125000* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125000 - CRASH when scroll through very large and complex .odt *Issue 122471* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122471 - The Lookup Gesture looks up the wrong word 3. Verify them by GVT *Issue 125115* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125115 - German Windows: unoinfo java indicates UTF-16LE encoding, but encoding is not UTF-16 *Issue 124789* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124789 - Update PL (Polish) translation from Pootle *Issue 124766* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124766 - Update Hebrew (he) translation from Pootle for AOO 4.1.1 *Issue 125133* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125133 - Pootle damaged file *Issue 125130* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125130 - Lithuanian (lt) translation update for OpenOffice 4.1.1 *Issue 125182* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125182 - Update English dictionaries for OpenOffice 4.1.1 On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Currently we have about 30 resolved showstopper bugs in 4.1.1[1], if you have interest in joining the bug verification work, could you please pick up what you would like to verify and change the bug status according to your verification result? Thanks very much! [1] all approved showstopper issues for AOO 4.1.1 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremlist_id=153261namedcmd=4.1.1_release_blocker%2B%3Fremaction=runsharer_id=249089 [2] build download website (the upload is ongoing) https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds Regard, Yu Zhen On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, well we have not finally defined the release schedule for AOO 4.1.1 but the train has started already and I have prepared a first milestone build that is currently uploading. The milestone (m1) build is based on the AOO410 branch on revision 1603804. The fixed issue compared to AOO 4.1 can be found under [1] and the binaries can be found under [2] (when the upload is finished). The upload is ongoing and I expect it will be finished tonight or tomorrow, yes we still have a bottleneck here. But anyway no pressure at the moment but I invite all volunteers to give it a try as early as possible and provide feedback. Next week we will define in more detail the release schedule and I hope that we can address the most important and serious problems we have currently. [1] http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.1-m1-r1603804/AOO4.1.1_fixes.html [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: Test Schedule - AOO 4.1.1 Test Starts! Call for volunteers!
Thanks for your asking, please execute steps described on AOOTest-49 and AOOTest-196 with manual, we usually do automation testing in Build Verification Test(BVT) but not in FPR(Full Path Regression). On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: Hi this is the first time I am doing automated cases, can I get some resources on how to go about it. I looked on the wiki but so far I haven't found a guide about it. It seems all the steps would be run from a JAVA piece of code. Then it would be run and the steps described on the TC would be executed in an automatic manner. Some question arise here: Where do I get this script? How do I run it? (version of java, etc.) Do I run it from CLI or from internal AOO application. If there is a guide about creating and executing these testcase https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/test_automation_guide and https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto/A_step_by_step_example However I have some questions about them, such as Firstly compile the project with the command under test module. Does that mean I need to re-compile AOO or just the script? Do I need to put JUnit and Ant on my system? On 7/2/14, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Alexandro, I have assigned you 11 test cases on Linux Redhat 32bit in Testlink as the first batch. You can find them in Test Case Assigned to Me. Please report issues in Bugzilla and warn for severe ones in QA mailing list ( q...@openoffice.apache.org). Please let me know when you are done. Thanks again for your support to AOO testing! On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: Count me for Linux 32 bits, RPM. On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 6:44 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Greg for your testing and update! Do you have interest to run Linux test cases for 4.1.1? If yes, I can assign them to you in Testlink. Thanks! On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Greg Madden gomadtr...@gmail.com wrote: I am using Debian stable, not an 'offical tester'. I do use AOO in my business have lots of templates and archived docs. I test my use pattern. Writer and Calc work fine here..no regressions anyway. Good work..thanks to all. Greg M. On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Here comes the update for test schedule, we plan to do test for AOO 4.1.1(execute test cases and verify showstopper bugs) for about *6* weeks. That means it starts now and is expected to be completed before *Aug 8*. We have three Windows volunteers(Wan Yun, Noel and Yu Zhen) joined since we call for AOO 4.1.1 test yesterday. We still need more volunteers on other platforms, Linux and Mac. Thanks! -- Forwarded message -- From: Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com Date: Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 5:13 PM Subject: AOO 4.1.1 Test Starts! Call for volunteers! To: qa q...@openoffice.apache.org Cc: dev dev@openoffice.apache.org Hi All, As Juergen announced, the first milestone build (m1) for AOO 4.1.1 is currently uploading. Then here comes the call for volunteers on AOO 4.1.1 testing. If you have interest and can help over the next few weeks, on Linux Redhat 64bit, Linux Ubuntu 64bit, Mac 10.9, Windows 7, Windows 8 and Window 2012, please send a note to the QA mailing list ( q...@openoffice.apache.org ). If you have a Testlink account[1] send your ID as well as what platform you can help test(if you haven't a Testlink account, you can register one). You should also get installation sets from [2] and report issues in Bugzilla [3]. You may want to refer Test Plan in [4]. [1] http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds [3] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ [4] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.1+Testing+Plan https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Full+Regression+Test+Guidance Thanks! -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- Forwarded message -- From: Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:39 PM Subject: [RELEASE][MILESTONE]: preparation of AOO 4.1.1 milestone 1 To: dev dev@openoffice.apache.org Hi, well we have not finally defined the release schedule for AOO 4.1.1 but the train has started already and I have prepared a first milestone build that is currently uploading. The milestone (m1) build is based on the AOO410 branch on revision 1603804. The fixed issue
Re: Test Schedule - AOO 4.1.1 Test Starts! Call for volunteers!
Hi Alexandro, I have assigned you 11 test cases on Linux Redhat 32bit in Testlink as the first batch. You can find them in Test Case Assigned to Me. Please report issues in Bugzilla and warn for severe ones in QA mailing list ( q...@openoffice.apache.org). Please let me know when you are done. Thanks again for your support to AOO testing! On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: Count me for Linux 32 bits, RPM. On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 6:44 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Greg for your testing and update! Do you have interest to run Linux test cases for 4.1.1? If yes, I can assign them to you in Testlink. Thanks! On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Greg Madden gomadtr...@gmail.com wrote: I am using Debian stable, not an 'offical tester'. I do use AOO in my business have lots of templates and archived docs. I test my use pattern. Writer and Calc work fine here..no regressions anyway. Good work..thanks to all. Greg M. On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Here comes the update for test schedule, we plan to do test for AOO 4.1.1(execute test cases and verify showstopper bugs) for about *6* weeks. That means it starts now and is expected to be completed before *Aug 8*. We have three Windows volunteers(Wan Yun, Noel and Yu Zhen) joined since we call for AOO 4.1.1 test yesterday. We still need more volunteers on other platforms, Linux and Mac. Thanks! -- Forwarded message -- From: Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com Date: Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 5:13 PM Subject: AOO 4.1.1 Test Starts! Call for volunteers! To: qa q...@openoffice.apache.org Cc: dev dev@openoffice.apache.org Hi All, As Juergen announced, the first milestone build (m1) for AOO 4.1.1 is currently uploading. Then here comes the call for volunteers on AOO 4.1.1 testing. If you have interest and can help over the next few weeks, on Linux Redhat 64bit, Linux Ubuntu 64bit, Mac 10.9, Windows 7, Windows 8 and Window 2012, please send a note to the QA mailing list (q...@openoffice.apache.org ). If you have a Testlink account[1] send your ID as well as what platform you can help test(if you haven't a Testlink account, you can register one). You should also get installation sets from [2] and report issues in Bugzilla [3]. You may want to refer Test Plan in [4]. [1] http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds [3] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ [4] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.1+Testing+Plan https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Full+Regression+Test+Guidance Thanks! -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- Forwarded message -- From: Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:39 PM Subject: [RELEASE][MILESTONE]: preparation of AOO 4.1.1 milestone 1 To: dev dev@openoffice.apache.org Hi, well we have not finally defined the release schedule for AOO 4.1.1 but the train has started already and I have prepared a first milestone build that is currently uploading. The milestone (m1) build is based on the AOO410 branch on revision 1603804. The fixed issue compared to AOO 4.1 can be found under [1] and the binaries can be found under [2] (when the upload is finished). The upload is ongoing and I expect it will be finished tonight or tomorrow, yes we still have a bottleneck here. But anyway no pressure at the moment but I invite all volunteers to give it a try as early as possible and provide feedback. Next week we will define in more detail the release schedule and I hope that we can address the most important and serious problems we have currently. [1] http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.1-m1-r1603804/AOO4.1.1_fixes.html [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.or dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- Peace Greg Madden -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor 882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9 5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614 -- Regards, Yu Zhen
[QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20140630
Hi All, We start doing the AOO 4.1.1 Full Path Regression Test(FPR) on June 25, here is the weekly update (6/25 - 6/30): *Test execution:* 1. Complete *11%* of all test executions(Windows, Ubuntu) on M1 build, it is behind schedule compared to the planned *14%* need to be completed It covers major test of following: (1) Basic, advanced operations in Writer, Spreadsheet, Impress (2) Impacted areas testing by changes made (bug fixes) (3) Windows 2012 Server OS support *Defect summary:* 1. New severe bugs opened during FPR: 125161 - OpenOffice Writer crashed on open File 2. 4.1.1 resolved showstopper bugs to be verified (Total 35) https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremlist_id=153261namedcmd=4.1.1_release_blocker%2B%3Fremaction=runsharer_id=249089 *Issues quality highlight:* 1. One crash is found during this test cycle, need to confirm 2. Testlink system is so slow as to impact test execution's efficiency 3. *We need more test volunteers, especially on Mac* *Volunteer status: * 1. We have total 7 test execution volunteers joined in FPR execution work since June 24, 6 of them have got / will get test cases assigned, 1 of them need to provide Testlink ID 2. We have 2 defect verification volunteers joined in 4.1.1 resolved showstopper bug verification work since June 23, but wait for either his Bugzilla ID or his bug selection *Plan for next week:* 1. Continue to do FPR test with M1 or M2 if have 2. Remind some test execution volunteers to complete their assignments 3. Continue to organize the FPR test Thank you all for effort provided last week, we have made a good start, but we still need your continuous help on all platforms, especially on Mac! -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: Test Schedule - AOO 4.1.1 Test Starts! Call for volunteers!
Thanks Greg for your testing and update! Do you have interest to run Linux test cases for 4.1.1? If yes, I can assign them to you in Testlink. Thanks! On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Greg Madden gomadtr...@gmail.com wrote: I am using Debian stable, not an 'offical tester'. I do use AOO in my business have lots of templates and archived docs. I test my use pattern. Writer and Calc work fine here..no regressions anyway. Good work..thanks to all. Greg M. On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Here comes the update for test schedule, we plan to do test for AOO 4.1.1(execute test cases and verify showstopper bugs) for about *6* weeks. That means it starts now and is expected to be completed before *Aug 8*. We have three Windows volunteers(Wan Yun, Noel and Yu Zhen) joined since we call for AOO 4.1.1 test yesterday. We still need more volunteers on other platforms, Linux and Mac. Thanks! -- Forwarded message -- From: Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com Date: Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 5:13 PM Subject: AOO 4.1.1 Test Starts! Call for volunteers! To: qa q...@openoffice.apache.org Cc: dev dev@openoffice.apache.org Hi All, As Juergen announced, the first milestone build (m1) for AOO 4.1.1 is currently uploading. Then here comes the call for volunteers on AOO 4.1.1 testing. If you have interest and can help over the next few weeks, on Linux Redhat 64bit, Linux Ubuntu 64bit, Mac 10.9, Windows 7, Windows 8 and Window 2012, please send a note to the QA mailing list (q...@openoffice.apache.org). If you have a Testlink account[1] send your ID as well as what platform you can help test(if you haven't a Testlink account, you can register one). You should also get installation sets from [2] and report issues in Bugzilla [3]. You may want to refer Test Plan in [4]. [1] http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds [3] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ [4] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.1+Testing+Plan https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Full+Regression+Test+Guidance Thanks! -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- Forwarded message -- From: Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:39 PM Subject: [RELEASE][MILESTONE]: preparation of AOO 4.1.1 milestone 1 To: dev dev@openoffice.apache.org Hi, well we have not finally defined the release schedule for AOO 4.1.1 but the train has started already and I have prepared a first milestone build that is currently uploading. The milestone (m1) build is based on the AOO410 branch on revision 1603804. The fixed issue compared to AOO 4.1 can be found under [1] and the binaries can be found under [2] (when the upload is finished). The upload is ongoing and I expect it will be finished tonight or tomorrow, yes we still have a bottleneck here. But anyway no pressure at the moment but I invite all volunteers to give it a try as early as possible and provide feedback. Next week we will define in more detail the release schedule and I hope that we can address the most important and serious problems we have currently. [1] http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.1-m1-r1603804/AOO4.1.1_fixes.html [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.or dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- Peace Greg Madden -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Test Schedule - AOO 4.1.1 Test Starts! Call for volunteers!
Here comes the update for test schedule, we plan to do test for AOO 4.1.1(execute test cases and verify showstopper bugs) for about *6* weeks. That means it starts now and is expected to be completed before *Aug 8*. We have three Windows volunteers(Wan Yun, Noel and Yu Zhen) joined since we call for AOO 4.1.1 test yesterday. We still need more volunteers on other platforms, Linux and Mac. Thanks! -- Forwarded message -- From: Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com Date: Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 5:13 PM Subject: AOO 4.1.1 Test Starts! Call for volunteers! To: qa q...@openoffice.apache.org Cc: dev dev@openoffice.apache.org Hi All, As Juergen announced, the first milestone build (m1) for AOO 4.1.1 is currently uploading. Then here comes the call for volunteers on AOO 4.1.1 testing. If you have interest and can help over the next few weeks, on Linux Redhat 64bit, Linux Ubuntu 64bit, Mac 10.9, Windows 7, Windows 8 and Window 2012, please send a note to the QA mailing list (q...@openoffice.apache.org). If you have a Testlink account[1] send your ID as well as what platform you can help test(if you haven't a Testlink account, you can register one). You should also get installation sets from [2] and report issues in Bugzilla [3]. You may want to refer Test Plan in [4]. [1] http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds [3] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ [4] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.1+Testing+Plan https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Full+Regression+Test+Guidance Thanks! -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- Forwarded message -- From: Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:39 PM Subject: [RELEASE][MILESTONE]: preparation of AOO 4.1.1 milestone 1 To: dev dev@openoffice.apache.org Hi, well we have not finally defined the release schedule for AOO 4.1.1 but the train has started already and I have prepared a first milestone build that is currently uploading. The milestone (m1) build is based on the AOO410 branch on revision 1603804. The fixed issue compared to AOO 4.1 can be found under [1] and the binaries can be found under [2] (when the upload is finished). The upload is ongoing and I expect it will be finished tonight or tomorrow, yes we still have a bottleneck here. But anyway no pressure at the moment but I invite all volunteers to give it a try as early as possible and provide feedback. Next week we will define in more detail the release schedule and I hope that we can address the most important and serious problems we have currently. [1] http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.1-m1-r1603804/AOO4.1.1_fixes.html [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.or dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Call for volunteers to verify 4.1.1 resolved showstopper defects
Hi All, Currently we have about 30 resolved showstopper bugs in 4.1.1[1], if you have interest in joining the bug verification work, could you please pick up what you would like to verify and change the bug status according to your verification result? Thanks very much! [1] all approved showstopper issues for AOO 4.1.1 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremlist_id=153261namedcmd=4.1.1_release_blocker%2B%3Fremaction=runsharer_id=249089 [2] build download website (the upload is ongoing) https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds Regard, Yu Zhen On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, well we have not finally defined the release schedule for AOO 4.1.1 but the train has started already and I have prepared a first milestone build that is currently uploading. The milestone (m1) build is based on the AOO410 branch on revision 1603804. The fixed issue compared to AOO 4.1 can be found under [1] and the binaries can be found under [2] (when the upload is finished). The upload is ongoing and I expect it will be finished tonight or tomorrow, yes we still have a bottleneck here. But anyway no pressure at the moment but I invite all volunteers to give it a try as early as possible and provide feedback. Next week we will define in more detail the release schedule and I hope that we can address the most important and serious problems we have currently. [1] http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.1-m1-r1603804/AOO4.1.1_fixes.html [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen
AOO 4.1.1 Test Starts! Call for volunteers!
Hi All, As Juergen announced, the first milestone build (m1) for AOO 4.1.1 is currently uploading. Then here comes the call for volunteers on AOO 4.1.1 testing. If you have interest and can help over the next few weeks, on Linux Redhat 64bit, Linux Ubuntu 64bit, Mac 10.9, Windows 7, Windows 8 and Window 2012, please send a note to the QA mailing list (q...@openoffice.apache.org). If you have a Testlink account[1] send your ID as well as what platform you can help test(if you haven't a Testlink account, you can register one). You should also get installation sets from [2] and report issues in Bugzilla [3]. You may want to refer Test Plan in [4]. [1] http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds [3] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ [4] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.1+Testing+Plan https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Full+Regression+Test+Guidance Thanks! -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- Forwarded message -- From: Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:39 PM Subject: [RELEASE][MILESTONE]: preparation of AOO 4.1.1 milestone 1 To: dev dev@openoffice.apache.org Hi, well we have not finally defined the release schedule for AOO 4.1.1 but the train has started already and I have prepared a first milestone build that is currently uploading. The milestone (m1) build is based on the AOO410 branch on revision 1603804. The fixed issue compared to AOO 4.1 can be found under [1] and the binaries can be found under [2] (when the upload is finished). The upload is ongoing and I expect it will be finished tonight or tomorrow, yes we still have a bottleneck here. But anyway no pressure at the moment but I invite all volunteers to give it a try as early as possible and provide feedback. Next week we will define in more detail the release schedule and I hope that we can address the most important and serious problems we have currently. [1] http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.1-m1-r1603804/AOO4.1.1_fixes.html [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.or dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: can't install 4.0.1
Hi Nathan, How are you going on with your installation for AOO 4.0.1, is the problem resolved? I notice that you are likely doing upgrade install from 3.x to 4.x, here is the related information about upgrade for Windows, in case you need it. *Upgrading OpenOffice for Windows* If the current version is 3.x, you can remove it before you upgrade to version 4.x, or keep it and install 4.x as an additional version. 1. In the Installation Wizard, do one of the following: - To remove 3.x and install 4.x, select Remove all older product versions. The startup group item, desktop icon, and entry in the Add/Remove Programs list will all refer to 4.x. - To have both 3.x and 4.x on your computer, deselect Remove all older product versions. Each version will have its own startup group item, desktop icon, and entry in the Add/Remove Programs list. 2. If the current version is 4.x, but is older than the point version that you want to install (for example, you have 4.0.0 but want to install 4.0.1), the older version will be removed and the later one will be installed. The startup group item, desktop icon, and entry in the Add/Remove Programs list will all refer to the later version. On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Nathan Price nateprice...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: I am on a windows 7. I downloaded openoffice(OO) 3.2. I then upgraded to 3.3 and 3.4. Now I want to install 4.0.1, but I am reviving a message that OO is still running. I have exited and went in to task manager and killed soffice it is not running anywhere.l I checked all users. I tried to do a repair install, but same thing. I singed up for the forum,but couldn't post a question. So here I am. Please Help me... C 717.557.5723 email nateprice...@yahoo.com I'm not a Windows users but I suspect if you're on 3.4, this might be due to the quickstarter enabled. Please see the following forum topics for help -- https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6t=8161 https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7t=65670 -- - MzK What you can do, or dream you can do, begin it; Boldness has genius, power and magic in it. -- attributed to Johann Wolfgang von Goethe -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: AOO 4.1.1 - any chance to solve issue 124107?
This issue occurs since version 3.4.0 under some special conditions, it is not as serious as recent regression which occurs since 4.0.0 under common conditions. If we have no fix in hand or the fix we have is with risk, I will not nominate it as candidate of 4.1.1 showstopper. On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Mathias Röllig mroellig.n...@gmx.net wrote: Hello! Issue 124107 - Inherited style property Space above/below Paragraph lost for particular styles https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124107 Is there any chance that inherited styles will work again in AOO 4.1.1? Regards, Mathias - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: [RELEASE]: AOO 4.1.1 code base and some additional proposed fixes
Hi, I have set flag 4.1.1_release_blocker? to bugs which we have proposed to be 4.1.1 showstopper candidates, here is the list. They are either fixed or under investigated by developers. *Priority 1:* Issue 124891 - CRASH when 'View - close sidebar' with Navigator active - regression, since 4.1.0 Issue 125000 - CRASH when scroll through very large and complex .odt - regression, since 4.1.0 Issue 125024 - Crash: after applying the comment arises the problem with using table - regression, since 4.1.0 Issue 124717 - Embedded GDI Metafiles replaced by Read Error box after File - Save - data loss, introduced in 4.1.0 Issue 124877 - reset formatting behind special formattings hangs AOO - regression, hung, since 4.1.0 *Priority 2:* Issue 124966 - Picture loss on save - data loss, since OOo 3.4 beta Issue 124947 - Standard Filter in Fullscreen mode appears invisible, locks Calc Window - lock, since OOo 3.3 Issue 114361 - Read Error with embedded images after saving in Writer - data loss, since OOo 3.2 Issue 125030 - CRASH when open edit mode copy of older document.odt version - regression On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 06/12/2014 09:01 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: On 12/06/14 08:19, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 11/06/14 19:51, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 06/11/2014 11:14 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: Hi, a possible schedule for AOO 4.1.1 is not yet finally discussed and defined but I would like to propose some further issues that are related to make the code working on MacOS 10.9.3. First I propose that we develop the AOO 4.1.1 on the existing branch AOO410 because it should be a minor bugfix release with some translation updates. But no bigger features. Don't we have created a branch for every new release even when it was a micro release like 4.1.1? To keep a clean repository for those who want to build a specific release from scratch? Or will you do some magic with SVN tags to reach this? no magic, but the difference between a branch and a tag is minimal. I would create a new branch based on branch AOO410. The release version is tagged and we tag the 4.1.1 as well. And we still have no Mac build bot but I have updated my Mac where I have built the release in the past. Means I have no 10.7 system in place and have to build on MacOs 10.9.3. We made these changes already on trunk and I propose the following issues for integration in AOO 4.1.1 to make the build possible on MacOS 10.9.3. It will still work on 10.7. Well I have already prepared a build and did a first basic test but it will need some more testing of course. The issues are: 124896 remove obsoleted module-internal custom allocator in SAL, https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124896 Should be decided by code developers. 124908 remove custom allocator support in stlport-replacement headers, https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124908 Should be decided by code developers. 124422 Build no more possible with Xcode 5.1 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124422 OK, looks reasonable. 124442 Mac and Java Oracle 1.7, https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124442 The last issue should be already fixed in AOO 4.1.0. Thats what I understood from the issue text and target milestone. ;-) I will check it, maybe I picked the wrong one. I had to make a further changes on trunk for building on Mavericks and clean this up but without an issue :-( I will reuse this issue for integrate the change. Juergen But the message is that I plan to integrate some necessary changes to make the build possible ;-) that's always one of the best reasons. When it is not buildable, the complete software is simply not ready to release. ;-) Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Call for evaluation test on W2K12 server
We have got some enquiry for AOO support on W2K12 server. Although we have no official support for W2K12 server for AOO 4.1, I think we could make an evaluation for this platform. If you have W2K12 server, and can help testing on this platform over the next weeks, please send a note to the QA mailing list ( q...@openoffice.apache.org) with your Testlink account[1] (if you haven't a Testlink account, you can register one). You should also get installation sets from trunk [2] and report issues in Bugzilla [3]. [1] http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php [2] http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ [3] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ Thanks! -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: AOO Post 4.1 Test Starts! Call for volunteers!
Hi Maryna, I have just assigned you 23 test cases on Windows 8. On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Maryna, Thanks for your continuously help, I have assigned you 4 test cases on Ubuntu Linux 64bit. On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Maryna Martynenko marmary...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Yu Zhen, My TestLink Id : Maryna. I can test Win 8, Ubuntu 64bit. Regards, Maryna On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, We have released AOO 4.1 successfully on Apr 29 with voting, but we still have some test cases not completed during 4.1 stage, in order to check the post 4.1 quality status, here comes the call for volunteers on AOO post 4.1 testing. If you have interest and can help over the next few weeks, on Linux Redhat 64bit, Linux Redhat 32bit, Linux Ubuntu 64bit, Mac 10.9, Windows 7 and Windows 8, please send a note to the QA mailing list ( q...@openoffice.apache.org). If you have a Testlink account[1] send your ID as well as what platform you can help test(if you haven't a Testlink account, you can register one). You should also get installation sets from trunk [2] and report issues in Bugzilla [3]. You may want to see detail instructions in Test Guidence [4]. [1] http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php [2] http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ [3] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ [4] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Full+Regression+Test+Guidance Thanks! -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: AOO Post 4.1 Test Starts! Call for volunteers!
Hi Maryna, Thanks for your continuously help, I have assigned you 4 test cases on Ubuntu Linux 64bit. On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Maryna Martynenko marmary...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Yu Zhen, My TestLink Id : Maryna. I can test Win 8, Ubuntu 64bit. Regards, Maryna On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, We have released AOO 4.1 successfully on Apr 29 with voting, but we still have some test cases not completed during 4.1 stage, in order to check the post 4.1 quality status, here comes the call for volunteers on AOO post 4.1 testing. If you have interest and can help over the next few weeks, on Linux Redhat 64bit, Linux Redhat 32bit, Linux Ubuntu 64bit, Mac 10.9, Windows 7 and Windows 8, please send a note to the QA mailing list ( q...@openoffice.apache.org). If you have a Testlink account[1] send your ID as well as what platform you can help test(if you haven't a Testlink account, you can register one). You should also get installation sets from trunk [2] and report issues in Bugzilla [3]. You may want to see detail instructions in Test Guidence [4]. [1] http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php [2] http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ [3] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ [4] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Full+Regression+Test+Guidance Thanks! -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: AOO Post 4.1 Test Starts! Call for volunteers!
Hi Kay, Thanks for your continuously help, I have assigned you 21 test cases on Redhat Linux 32-bit. On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, We have released AOO 4.1 successfully on Apr 29 with voting, but we still have some test cases not completed during 4.1 stage, in order to check the post 4.1 quality status, here comes the call for volunteers on AOO post 4.1 testing. If you have interest and can help over the next few weeks, on Linux Redhat 64bit, Linux Redhat 32bit, Linux Ubuntu 64bit, Mac 10.9, Windows 7 and Windows 8, please send a note to the QA mailing list ( q...@openoffice.apache.org). If you have a Testlink account[1] send your ID as well as what platform you can help test(if you haven't a Testlink account, you can register one). You should also get installation sets from trunk [2] and report issues in Bugzilla [3]. You may want to see detail instructions in Test Guidence [4]. [1] http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php [2] http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ [3] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ [4] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Full+Regression+Test+Guidance Thanks! -- Regards, Yu Zhen I can help with Linux-32 but I use openSUSE 11.3 currently. My testlink id is kschenk. II will be happy to help over the next few weeks if you can set up some cases for me. -- - MzK Life is either a daring adventure, or nothing. -- Helen Keller -- Regards, Yu Zhen
AOO Post 4.1 Test Starts! Call for volunteers!
Hi All, We have released AOO 4.1 successfully on Apr 29 with voting, but we still have some test cases not completed during 4.1 stage, in order to check the post 4.1 quality status, here comes the call for volunteers on AOO post 4.1 testing. If you have interest and can help over the next few weeks, on Linux Redhat 64bit, Linux Redhat 32bit, Linux Ubuntu 64bit, Mac 10.9, Windows 7 and Windows 8, please send a note to the QA mailing list ( q...@openoffice.apache.org). If you have a Testlink account[1] send your ID as well as what platform you can help test(if you haven't a Testlink account, you can register one). You should also get installation sets from trunk [2] and report issues in Bugzilla [3]. You may want to see detail instructions in Test Guidence [4]. [1] http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php [2] http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ [3] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ [4] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Full+Regression+Test+Guidance Thanks! -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: Re:Re: Re: Display About OpenOffice
Dear osimeno, Is there any problem when set language as Chinese in your Chinese Redhat? On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:08 PM, osimeno osim...@163.com wrote: hi, Do you need some other infomation ? I had reintasll the software,but it can't resolve the problem. Thank You! 在 2014-04-16 20:20:08，osimeno osim...@163.com 写道： Hi ： I used chinese on redhat，but i had changed the language to english，the problem always be there。 At 2014-04-16 14:16:53,Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Dear osimeno, What's the locale in your Redhat? Steve, could you please have a look at this problem? Thanks! On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 3:36 PM, osimeno osim...@163.com wrote: Dear Yuzhen Fan,Marcus: Here is the pirture.The attachment. Thanks~ At 2014-04-15 03:39:04,Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 04/14/2014 12:26 PM, schrieb Yuzhen Fan: Hi Please send the picture you mentioned as attachment, I guess you just pasted it as RTF in your original email which is not displayed. On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:46 AM, osimenoosim...@163.com wrote: Thanks dear Marcus, I send a picture on last mail,maybe you can't see that.The problem is there are some characters display like box,some characters display chinese very well.I want to show chinese all,but i don't know how to do. I'm sorry but I'm not familiar with Chinese. Please send your question to the Users mailing list. I'm sure there are much more people with Chinese skills who can help you. See here: http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html#users-mailing-list-public Thanks Marcus At 2014-04-12 03:16:45,Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 04/11/2014 07:38 AM, schrieb osimeno: Hi, I had installed the openoffice 4,there are some problems maybe you can help me. My system is rhel6.3_X64 and use chinese . My first step : tar -xvf openoffice -C /usr/src/ My second step : cd /usr/src/zh-CN/RPMS rpm - ivh openoffice-* My third step : cd desktop* rpm -ivh openoffice4.0-redhat* And i had reboot the system. the problem is that: so can you help me? Unfortunately, you don't have mentioned the actual problem or error message. Nevertheless I would recommend you to use the users mailing list for discussing problems: http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html#users-mailing-list-public Marcus -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: [DISCUSS]: Digital signing of documents and macros
Hi, Besides we validate issue below with some self-signed certificates that are attached to this issue, we are looking for volunteers to test this feature with the upcoming RC4 by: 1. Create a new authority certificate and use this to create new test certs 2. Test the validation with these test certs Please let us know your test results and share(upload) your test documents with valid and good certificates, in below issue if possible. Thanks! https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124701 On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Jose R R jose@metztli-it.com wrote: Niltze, all! On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Juergen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: Am Donnerstag, 17. April 2014 um 17:59 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 4/17/14 3:53 PM, Herbert Duerr wrote: A small update on that topic: there is a simple workaround! Signing also works on Mac and Linux if the environment variable MOZILLA_CERTIFICATE_FOLDER is set to the currently active mozilla/thunderbird/firefox/etc. profile. ... we have verified this on Linux as well and I think it is very usable and good workaround for now. Thanks a lot for this. It shows, once again, that we take users into consideration. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124701 Am I right in understanding that no code changes are necessary then, merely configuring the environment appropriately? And that (waiting for the servers to wake up) this can be tested on 4.1.0-beta or any previous RC too? yes it should work with any RC and Beta (not tested) as well. We are indeed happen that Herbert find this workaround because everything else would have been taken much longer. The good thing for me is that I learned something new ;-) Juergen Yes, really good news! And thank you Herbert for this simple and creative solution! Although I am not familiar with the sql: prefix reference for environment variables (??) Good going! Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- - MzK Life is either a daring adventure, or nothing. -- Helen Keller Test case -- using GNU/LInux Debian with Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 RC3: Follow instructions to create PKCS12 file (works on GNU/Linux, as well): http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20445365/create-pkcs12-file-with-self-signed-certificate-via-openssl-in-windows-for-my-a Import the self signed-certificate into Iceweasel (Firefox): Edit -- Preferences -- Certificates -- View Certificates -- Import -- (select file location) Close ApacheOO 4.1.0 RC3, if open. As explained at ( https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Certificate_Detection), at the Bash prompt type: export MOZILLA_CERTIFICATE_FOLDER=~/.mozilla/firefox/here put your user profile Subsequently -- from the same environment -- type command apacheoo --Assumed Setup - ApacheOO unpacks itself on /opt/openoffice4/ Accordingly (as root) it is necessary to create a symlink to start the application from the command line: ln -s /opt/openoffice4/program/soffice /usr/bin/apacheoo cd /opt/openoffice4/program/ ln -s soffice.bin apacheoo.bin This way any user in a GNU/Linux environment can start its /usr/bin/apacheoo instance from the Bash command. -- Picture: http://www.metztli-it.com/blog/index.php/ixiptli/aF9 -- Jose R R http://www.metztli-it.com - NEW Apache OpenOffice 4.0.1! Download for GNU/Linux, Mac OS, Windows. - Daylight Saving Time in USA Canada ends: Sunday, November 02, 2014 - - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: Fwd: [RELEASE]: propose RC3 on revision 1586584
RC 3 is announced available by Juergen : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Edwin Sharp el...@mail-page.com wrote: Another suggestion: We should aim for smallest code base. The smaller the code is, the better chances an update won't break anything. This can be achieved by: a. removal of non used features b. making less used features available via extensions c. one UI element per task (avoiding duplicates in UI) d. rewriting certain modules more efficiently (i.e. performing the same task with 80 lines of code instead 100 lines of code) On Fri, Apr 11, 2014, at 14:24, Yuzhen Fan wrote: Hi QAs and all volunteers, You are invited to test this RC3 if you have time and would like contribute to the AOO 4.1.0. Please do testing widely and intensively, from installation, functions to integration with other applications in your system. Any critical problems you find, please report immediately. Thank you! -- Forwarded message -- From: Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 6:57 PM Subject: [RELEASE]: propose RC3 on revision 1586584 To: dev dev@openoffice.apache.org Hi, I would like to propose a new RC3 based on revision 1586584 of our AOO410 release branch. Integrated fixes for https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124617 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124639 The fix for https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124636 is not integrated because it is not really critical and the fix is not yet well enough tested. It is potentially not understandable for people why we don't integrate all available fixes but our experience have shown that even minor and on the first look uncritical fixes can cause regressions. As acting release manager it is my goal to stabilize the release branch and bring the planned release out. I am sometimes to optimistic and over motivated and try to push a release. But this time it becomes again clear that our code base is tricky and complex and we need probably more time to stabilize and test it. We published a Beta with 20 downloads and received no critical feedback which was promising. But with the first RC we got several critical issues and partly on code that is in the product since last year. I am sure we can do better and the question after the release will be how we can improve this. Quality is important for us and I invite all to think about ways how we can improve this together. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: Re: Display About OpenOffice
Hi Please send the picture you mentioned as attachment, I guess you just pasted it as RTF in your original email which is not displayed. On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:46 AM, osimeno osim...@163.com wrote: Thanks dear Marcus, I send a picture on last mail,maybe you can't see that.The problem is there are some characters display like box,some characters display chinese very well.I want to show chinese all,but i don't know how to do. At 2014-04-12 03:16:45,Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 04/11/2014 07:38 AM, schrieb osimeno: Hi, I had installed the openoffice 4,there are some problems maybe you can help me. My system is rhel6.3_X64 and use chinese . My first step : tar -xvf openoffice -C /usr/src/ My second step : cd /usr/src/zh-CN/RPMS rpm - ivh openoffice-* My third step : cd desktop* rpm -ivh openoffice4.0-redhat* And i had reboot the system. the problem is that: so can you help me? Unfortunately, you don't have mentioned the actual problem or error message. Nevertheless I would recommend you to use the users mailing list for discussing problems: http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html#users-mailing-list-public Marcus -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: Windows 4.1.0 installer does not remove the startup group icon(empty group) after uninstall
Hi Oliver and all, It also happens on OOo 3.3.0 besides on AOO 3.4.1, AOO 4.0.0 and AOO 4.1.0 RC2. There is an existing bug 13669[1] in Bugzilla which was closed as irreproducible in 2003, I reopen it with reproducible steps and confirmed versions above. [1] *Issue 13669* https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=13669 - program group does not get removed after uninstall On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Oliver, It has same problem on AOO 3.4.1, AOO 4.0.0. I am downloading OOo 3.3.0, will check it when I get the installation package. On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, On 10.04.2014 02:42, Yuzhen Fan wrote: Hi all, Here are the steps to reproduce this problem, I will check Bugzilla when it recovers to me: 1. Install 4.1.0 RC2 (clean install or upgrade install) 2. Run the installation again and select Remove in Program Maintenance of installation Wizard, and click Next (see screenshot post below) 3. Check startup group after uninstall finish Problem: the startup group OpenOffice 4.1.0 is empty(it is expected) while the group icon still remains Could you please check former OpenOffice version (e.g.: OOo 3.3.0, AOO 3.4.0, AOO 4.0.0) as well? Thanks in advance, Oliver. Notes: there is no such problem when uninstall AOO by Windows's uninstaller in Control Panel Empty startup group remains, should be removed - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: Installation guide are asked to review and update when fix bug 124599
Dear Pedro Per Juergen, we won't release msp's because of some issues that we have to solve first. So I think, we will not mention MSP in Installation guide although the fix in situation 2) is also included in the MSP. How do you think? On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Pedro Lino pedl...@gmail.com wrote: Sounds perfect. Adding options (instead of assuming and deciding for the user) is always positive ;) Please make sure that the fix in situation 2) is also included in the MSP On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Bug 124599 [2] is verified fixed in AOO 4.1.0 RC2, from current behaviors and comments provided in this bug, the expected behaviors for upgrade on Windows could be: 1. If the former version is 3.x, there will be a check box in Installation Wizard providing the option to keep or remove the former version - If select Remove all older product versions, then 3.x will be removed and 4.x will be installed with 1 startup group, 1 desktop icon and 1 entry in the Add/Remove Programs list. This artifact is for 4.x - If de-select Remove all older product versions, then 4.x will be installed with keeping 3.x, there will be 2 startup groups, 2 desktop icons and 2 entries in the Add/Remove Programs list. These artifacts are one suite for 3.x and the other suite for 4.x 2. If the former version is also 4.x, but older than current installing one(e.g. install 4.1.0 over 4.0.0), then the older one will be removed and the newer one will be installed with 1 startup group, 1 desktop icon and 1 entry in the Add/Remove Programs list. This artifact is for the newer one. I think above behaviors are acceptable, I propose to update the installation instructions [1] according those. Any comments, or any objections? [1] http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html#winoverview [2] Issue 124599 - Windows 4.1.0 installer does not recognize former versions correctly On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The current installation instructions [1] (last updated on 2014-03-26) does not differentiate the clean installation and upgrade installation for Windows, thus it does not state the option to keep or delete the old version for an upgrade installation. I propose development update the installation instructions [1] when submit the fix to bug 124599 [2], to provide what is expected to see with details as below: 1. Upgrade from old version to relative new version (e.g. from 3.3 to 3.4.1, from 3.4.1 to 4.1.0, from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0, etc) 2. Specify the different behavior/experience on all platforms (Windows, Linux and Mac) - I do not see problems in the current instructions on Linux and Mac, but need confirmation That is essential, because for testers we need this as criteria for testing, and for end users we need this as instructions for guiding. You are right. We need to have our installations instructions accurate! Commmitters can directly edit this page and commit. Others can submit patches which we can review. We could use help from all folks using our installation binaries on this. [1] http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html#winoverview [2] Issue 124599 - Windows 4.1.0 installer does not recognize former versions correctly -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- - MzK Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect. -- James Mason -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: Installation guide are asked to review and update when fix bug 124599
Hi All, Thank you all for valuable comments, I am contacting the native speaker for tweaking the wording. (Added d...@openoffice.apache.org in this mail thread) On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Pedro Per Juergen, we won't release msp's because of some issues that we have to solve first. So I think, we will not mention MSP in Installation guide although the fix in situation 2) is also included in the MSP. How do you think? On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Pedro Lino pedl...@gmail.com wrote: Sounds perfect. Adding options (instead of assuming and deciding for the user) is always positive ;) Please make sure that the fix in situation 2) is also included in the MSP On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Bug 124599 [2] is verified fixed in AOO 4.1.0 RC2, from current behaviors and comments provided in this bug, the expected behaviors for upgrade on Windows could be: 1. If the former version is 3.x, there will be a check box in Installation Wizard providing the option to keep or remove the former version - If select Remove all older product versions, then 3.x will be removed and 4.x will be installed with 1 startup group, 1 desktop icon and 1 entry in the Add/Remove Programs list. This artifact is for 4.x - If de-select Remove all older product versions, then 4.x will be installed with keeping 3.x, there will be 2 startup groups, 2 desktop icons and 2 entries in the Add/Remove Programs list. These artifacts are one suite for 3.x and the other suite for 4.x 2. If the former version is also 4.x, but older than current installing one(e.g. install 4.1.0 over 4.0.0), then the older one will be removed and the newer one will be installed with 1 startup group, 1 desktop icon and 1 entry in the Add/Remove Programs list. This artifact is for the newer one. I think above behaviors are acceptable, I propose to update the installation instructions [1] according those. Any comments, or any objections? [1] http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html#winoverview [2] Issue 124599 - Windows 4.1.0 installer does not recognize former versions correctly On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The current installation instructions [1] (last updated on 2014-03-26) does not differentiate the clean installation and upgrade installation for Windows, thus it does not state the option to keep or delete the old version for an upgrade installation. I propose development update the installation instructions [1] when submit the fix to bug 124599 [2], to provide what is expected to see with details as below: 1. Upgrade from old version to relative new version (e.g. from 3.3 to 3.4.1, from 3.4.1 to 4.1.0, from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0, etc) 2. Specify the different behavior/experience on all platforms (Windows, Linux and Mac) - I do not see problems in the current instructions on Linux and Mac, but need confirmation That is essential, because for testers we need this as criteria for testing, and for end users we need this as instructions for guiding. You are right. We need to have our installations instructions accurate! Commmitters can directly edit this page and commit. Others can submit patches which we can review. We could use help from all folks using our installation binaries on this. [1] http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html#winoverview [2] Issue 124599 - Windows 4.1.0 installer does not recognize former versions correctly -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- - MzK Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect. -- James Mason -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Fwd: [RELEASE]: propose RC3 on revision 1586584
Hi QAs and all volunteers, You are invited to test this RC3 if you have time and would like contribute to the AOO 4.1.0. Please do testing widely and intensively, from installation, functions to integration with other applications in your system. Any critical problems you find, please report immediately. Thank you! -- Forwarded message -- From: Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 6:57 PM Subject: [RELEASE]: propose RC3 on revision 1586584 To: dev dev@openoffice.apache.org Hi, I would like to propose a new RC3 based on revision 1586584 of our AOO410 release branch. Integrated fixes for https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124617 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124639 The fix for https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124636 is not integrated because it is not really critical and the fix is not yet well enough tested. It is potentially not understandable for people why we don't integrate all available fixes but our experience have shown that even minor and on the first look uncritical fixes can cause regressions. As acting release manager it is my goal to stabilize the release branch and bring the planned release out. I am sometimes to optimistic and over motivated and try to push a release. But this time it becomes again clear that our code base is tricky and complex and we need probably more time to stabilize and test it. We published a Beta with 20 downloads and received no critical feedback which was promising. But with the first RC we got several critical issues and partly on code that is in the product since last year. I am sure we can do better and the question after the release will be how we can improve this. Quality is important for us and I invite all to think about ways how we can improve this together. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: Windows 4.1.0 installer does not remove the startup group icon(empty group) after uninstall
Hi Oliver, It has same problem on AOO 3.4.1, AOO 4.0.0. I am downloading OOo 3.3.0, will check it when I get the installation package. On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, On 10.04.2014 02:42, Yuzhen Fan wrote: Hi all, Here are the steps to reproduce this problem, I will check Bugzilla when it recovers to me: 1. Install 4.1.0 RC2 (clean install or upgrade install) 2. Run the installation again and select Remove in Program Maintenance of installation Wizard, and click Next (see screenshot post below) 3. Check startup group after uninstall finish Problem: the startup group OpenOffice 4.1.0 is empty(it is expected) while the group icon still remains Could you please check former OpenOffice version (e.g.: OOo 3.3.0, AOO 3.4.0, AOO 4.0.0) as well? Thanks in advance, Oliver. Notes: there is no such problem when uninstall AOO by Windows's uninstaller in Control Panel Empty startup group remains, should be removed - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Windows 4.1.0 installer does not remove the startup group icon(empty group) after uninstall
Hi all, Here are the steps to reproduce this problem, I will check Bugzilla when it recovers to me: 1. Install 4.1.0 RC2 (clean install or upgrade install) 2. Run the installation again and select Remove in Program Maintenance of installation Wizard, and click Next (see screenshot post below) 3. Check startup group after uninstall finish Problem: the startup group OpenOffice 4.1.0 is empty(it is expected) while the group icon still remains Notes: there is no such problem when uninstall AOO by Windows's uninstaller in Control Panel Empty startup group remains, should be removed -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: Windows 4.1.0 installer does not remove the startup group icon(empty group) after uninstall
No, I can not access Bugzilla today, when it recovers to me, I will search if there is existing one and document a bug if no found. On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com wrote: Yu Zhen, Is there a defect in Bugzilla to trace this issue? - Shenfeng (Simon) 2014-04-10 8:42 GMT+08:00 Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com: Hi all, Here are the steps to reproduce this problem, I will check Bugzilla when it recovers to me: 1. Install 4.1.0 RC2 (clean install or upgrade install) 2. Run the installation again and select Remove in Program Maintenance of installation Wizard, and click Next (see screenshot post below) 3. Check startup group after uninstall finish Problem: the startup group OpenOffice 4.1.0 is empty(it is expected) while the group icon still remains Notes: there is no such problem when uninstall AOO by Windows's uninstaller in Control Panel Empty startup group remains, should be removed -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: Installation guide are asked to review and update when fix bug 124599
Hi all, Bug 124599 [2] is verified fixed in AOO 4.1.0 RC2, from current behaviors and comments provided in this bug, the expected behaviors for upgrade on Windows could be: 1. If the former version is 3.x, there will be a check box in Installation Wizard providing the option to keep or remove the former version - If select Remove all older product versions, then 3.x will be removed and 4.x will be installed with 1 startup group, 1 desktop icon and 1 entry in the Add/Remove Programs list. This artifact is for 4.x - If de-select Remove all older product versions, then 4.x will be installed with keeping 3.x, there will be 2 startup groups, 2 desktop icons and 2 entries in the Add/Remove Programs list. These artifacts are one suite for 3.x and the other suite for 4.x 2. If the former version is also 4.x, but older than current installing one(e.g. install 4.1.0 over 4.0.0), then the older one will be removed and the newer one will be installed with 1 startup group, 1 desktop icon and 1 entry in the Add/Remove Programs list. This artifact is for the newer one. I think above behaviors are acceptable, I propose to update the installation instructions [1] according those. Any comments, or any objections? [1] http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html#winoverview [2] Issue 124599 - Windows 4.1.0 installer does not recognize former versions correctly On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The current installation instructions [1] (last updated on 2014-03-26) does not differentiate the clean installation and upgrade installation for Windows, thus it does not state the option to keep or delete the old version for an upgrade installation. I propose development update the installation instructions [1] when submit the fix to bug 124599 [2], to provide what is expected to see with details as below: 1. Upgrade from old version to relative new version (e.g. from 3.3 to 3.4.1, from 3.4.1 to 4.1.0, from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0, etc) 2. Specify the different behavior/experience on all platforms (Windows, Linux and Mac) - I do not see problems in the current instructions on Linux and Mac, but need confirmation That is essential, because for testers we need this as criteria for testing, and for end users we need this as instructions for guiding. You are right. We need to have our installations instructions accurate! Commmitters can directly edit this page and commit. Others can submit patches which we can review. We could use help from all folks using our installation binaries on this. [1] http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html#winoverview [2] Issue 124599 - Windows 4.1.0 installer does not recognize former versions correctly -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- - MzK Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect. -- James Mason -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Installation guide are asked to review and update when fix bug 124599
Hi, The current installation instructions [1] (last updated on 2014-03-26) does not differentiate the clean installation and upgrade installation for Windows, thus it does not state the option to keep or delete the old version for an upgrade installation. I propose development update the installation instructions [1] when submit the fix to bug 124599 [2], to provide what is expected to see with details as below: 1. Upgrade from old version to relative new version (e.g. from 3.3 to 3.4.1, from 3.4.1 to 4.1.0, from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0, etc) 2. Specify the different behavior/experience on all platforms (Windows, Linux and Mac) - I do not see problems in the current instructions on Linux and Mac, but need confirmation That is essential, because for testers we need this as criteria for testing, and for end users we need this as instructions for guiding. [1] http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html#winoverview [2] Issue 124599 - Windows 4.1.0 installer does not recognize former versions correctly -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC
Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on en_US. From testing perspective: 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting. 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical scenarios on all language packages - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1) - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1 On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin steve.yin@gmail.com wrote: No problem found. On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin steve.yin@gmail.com wrote: It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now. On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3. The whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have overseen a small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and have to test the patch mechanism a little bit more. That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful. They work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential 4.2 or 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1. The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be installed over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now ;-) I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further confusion. Stay tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available. Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy testing and voting and will be back on Monday. We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain the same values as before. Juergen Juergen Juergen Juergen On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi, FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!! Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release. We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the release relevant bits are the source release. The RC builds can be found as always under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into this release can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html. I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes should be verified by native speakers. A related RAT scan can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages we have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test the functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the future as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1 (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-) I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful. Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest. We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because they were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on those who are relevant for most of our users. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Best Regards, Steve Yin -- Best Regards, Steve Yin -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC
Hi Pedro, Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks! On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino pedl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers! I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US. Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder. In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the 4.1.0. I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for users. I can create a bugzilla report if necessary. Regards, Pedro On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on en_US. From testing perspective: 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting. 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical scenarios on all language packages - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1) - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1 On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin steve.yin@gmail.com wrote: No problem found. On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin steve.yin@gmail.com wrote: It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now. On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3. The whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have overseen a small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and have to test the patch mechanism a little bit more. That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful. They work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential 4.2 or 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1. The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be installed over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now ;-) I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further confusion. Stay tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available. Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy testing and voting and will be back on Monday. We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain the same values as before. Juergen Juergen Juergen Juergen On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi, FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!! Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release. We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the release relevant bits are the source release. The RC builds can be found as always under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into this release can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html . I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes should be verified by native speakers. A related RAT scan can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages we have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use
Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC
Hi Pedro, I mean the full installation package On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Pedro Lino pedl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Yuzhen Is there a patch to update 4.0.0 to 4.0.1? Or do you mean with the full installer? On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Pedro, Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks! On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino pedl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers! I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US. Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder. In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the 4.1.0. I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for users. I can create a bugzilla report if necessary. Regards, Pedro On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on en_US. From testing perspective: 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting. 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical scenarios on all language packages - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1) - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1 On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin steve.yin@gmail.com wrote: No problem found. On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin steve.yin@gmail.com wrote: It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now. On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote will continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install packages I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future patches that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an 4.3. The whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have overseen a small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and have to test the patch mechanism a little bit more. That means also that the msp have to be used even more careful. They work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a potential 4.2 or 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1. The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be installed over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for now ;-) I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further confusion. Stay tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available. Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy testing and voting and will be back on Monday. We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain the same values as before. Juergen Juergen Juergen Juergen On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi, FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!! Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release. We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the release relevant bits are the source release. The RC builds can be found as always under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going
[QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20140404
Hi All, We have completed the AOO 4.1 Full Path Regression Test(FPR), here is the weekly update (4/01 - 4/04): *Test execution:* 1. Complete the left test executions on new snapshot build (AOO410m15(Build:9761) - Rev. 1583666) and spot check the previous tests completed last week *Defect summary:* 1. New bugs opened this week: 124584 - open the sample file in AOO, group shape containing ellipse shape and table not imported correct (already confirmed, not showstopper) 2. About 60 bugs(include crashes) have been verified by Juergen, Oliver, Edwin, Steve, Clarence, Shao Zhi, Liu Ping, Yu Zhen, etc *Issues quality highlight:* 1. AOO 4.1.0 RC1 (AOO410m15(Build:9761) - Rev. 1583666) is proposed and in voting 2. There is a upgrade install issue, reported by Pedro Lino on RC build, need a bug in Bugzilla for tracking the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder. In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the 4.1.0. 3. We need volunteers to retest the installation for below two typical scenarios on all language packages - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1) - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1 *Volunteer status: * 1. We have total 10 test execution volunteers joined to FPR execution work since Mar 24 2. We have 8 defect verification volunteers on 4.1 resolved crash bugs since Mar 31 3. We have 3 - 5 defect checking volunteers on 4.1 regression bugs since Mar 19 - led by Rainer Bielefeld *Plan for next week:* 1. Vote for AOO 4.1.0 before Sunday evening, 6 April: 2014-04-06 11:00pm UTC 2. Stand-to for RC testing if We have RC2 (hopefully not :-)) Thank you all for effort provided last week, we are towards to the release of AOO 4.1.0, let's continue and make progress this week! Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC)
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Edwin Sharp el...@mail-page.com wrote: +1 On Thu, Apr 3, 2014, at 10:56, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate (RC) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0. Apache OpenOffice 4.1 is a minor update with many bugfixes and at least 2 major improvements. It's the first version where we have the iAccessibility2 support integrated and available. A very huge step forward to reach and better support disabled users especially on Windows. The second improvement is the switch to 64 bit on MacOS. A long and overdue must do shift forward to support newer APIs (replace deprecated APIs) and platforms on MacOS. And we can provide again more complete UI translations and have now support for 38 languages. New languages for this release compared to 4.0.1 are Bulgarian, Danish, Hebrew, Hindi, Norwegian Bokmal and Thai. Apache OpenOffice 4.1 will be a further key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice. An overview of the integrated release issues can be found under: http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html The release candidate artifacts (1) (source release, as well as binary releases for 38 languages) and further information how to verify and review Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 can be found on the following wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds The RC is based on the release branch AOO410, revision 1583666! And a fresh and clean RAT scan output of this revision can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 The vote starts now and will be open until: Sunday evening, 6 April: 2014-04-06 11:00pm UTC. But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would like to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project members. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... (1) the upload for the Linux 32 bit artifacts is still ongoing, but 64 bit is already available. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: volunteer
Welcome, Tiago! On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Steve Yin steve.yin@gmail.com wrote: Hi Tiago, Welcome to AOO community! Could you also subscribe the Localization Mailing List http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html#localization-mailing-list-public ? Thank you. On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Tiago Leichsenring tiagolei...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, my name is Tiago and I am Brazilian. I would like to work with you as a translator, I can translate into Portuguese and help you to create a grammar and spelling corrector. Best regards -- Paz do Senhor Tiago Leichsenring -- Best Regards, Steve Yin -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Call for volunteers to verify 4.1.0 resolved crash defects
Hi All, Currently we have about *14 *resolved crash bugs in 4.1.0 as below, if you have interest in bug verification work, please select bugs where you have knowledge/skill and add yourselves to QA Contact in bugs, then provide bug numbers what you have verified in the mail here. Thanks very much! Issue IDProductComponentAssigneeStatusResolution Summary 124456Impressopen-importiss...@openoffice.apache.org RESOLVEDFIXEDCrash on opening attachment from issue 114998 124338Writercodeo...@apache.orgRESOLVEDFIXEDCrash when opening ODF document containing combination of alphabetical index mark and bookmark at a paragraph 123956Writeropen-importiss...@openoffice.apache.org RESOLVEDFIXEDCrash when opening .docx files 123761Writeropen-importiss...@openoffice.apache.org RESOLVEDFIXEDDOCX files created with Pages 5 crash OpenOffice 123672Calcviewingarmin.le.gr...@me.comRESOLVEDFIXED Particular.ods will CRASH when attempt page preview 123539Calcopen-importarmin.le.gr...@me.comRESOLVED FIXEDCRASH when open particular .XLS with 3D Chart 123480Writereditingo...@apache.orgRESOLVEDFIXEDCRASH when delete contents in particular document with active 'Record Changes' 123359Impresseditingarmin.le.gr...@me.comRESOLVED FIXEDTable in Title, Content layout causing crash 123042Drawopen-importarmin.le.gr...@me.comRESOLVED FIXED[SVG] Crash: svg with image element fails to insert as linked graphic in Draw 122576Writereditingawf@googlemail.comRESOLVED FIXEDAttempting to delete an Ole object crashes 121289Mathui iss...@openoffice.apache.orgRESOLVEDFIXED textoutputstream.writeString crashes openoffice 118640Impressopen-importarmin.le.gr...@me.comRESOLVED FIXEDOpening the presentation document causes OpenOffice 3.3 on Windows or Solaris to crash 117756Writeropen-importopenoff...@henning-brinkmann.de RESOLVEDFIXEDCrash with an array in a docx file. 75731Calccodej...@apache.orgRESOLVEDFIXED textoutputstream.writeString crashes openoffice [1] build download website http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/index.html [2] Bugzilla website https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ Regard, Yu Zhen
AOO 4.1 Full Regression Test Starts! Call for volunteers!
Hi All, We have released AOO 4.1 Beta sucessfully on Mar 9 with voting, the next test stage is FPR(full regression test) targeting for release candidate of GA [1]. This is the call for volunteers on FPR, on Linux Redhat 64bit, Linux Redhat 32bit, Linux Ubuntu 64bit, Mac 10.9, Windows 7 and Windows 8. If you have interest and can help over the next few weeks, please send a note to the QA mailing list (q...@openoffice.apache.org). If you have a Testlink account[2] send your ID as well as what platform you can help test(if you haven't a Testlink account, you can register one). You should also get installation sets from trunk [3] and report issues in Bugzilla [4]. You may want to see detail instructions in Test Guidence [5]. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Release+Planning [2] http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php [3] http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ [4] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ [5] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Full+Regression+Test+Guidance Thanks! Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: 4.1. Regressions
Here is the analysis of possible cases for bugs in query [1], together with the proposed instructions to review them, any comments and suggestions, please let me know. 1. New issue happens on new feature in 4.1, or migration issue only applies to 4.1(e.g. *Issue 124437*https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124437- Opening password protected files not possible) - Leave the Version field to 4.1 2. New found issue being observed in 4.1 - Determine and refine the Version field to version in which the issue occurs first 3. Regression issue works in 4.0.1 but breaks in 4.1 - Leave the Version field to 4.1 and set the Keywords field to regression, then specify the comparison build and regression build clearly in Additional *C*omments field Here, let's call for volunteers to assist: 1. Any one who can help on this, please send me your Bugzilla ID, I will send you bug list for your review 2. Any one who has already started reviewing, could you please share and book your bug IDs to avoid duplicated effort among us. Hyperlinks: [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremlist_id=130944namedcmd=410_RegressionTestremaction=runsharer_id=8583 (shared with canconfirm) On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.comwrote: On 3/11/14 6:33 PM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Hi, I think Bugzilla Help https://issues.apache.org/ooo/describekeywords.cgi tells it all. There only is no common sense whether key word should be used also for very old regressions (regression in OOo 1.0.1 compared to OOo 1.0.0), from developer's point of view only regressions in AOO 3.4-dev and later are of interest. https://www.mail-archive.com/qa@openoffice.apache.org/msg01787.html Generally problems with newly integrated features can not be regressions. But if the code of a newly integrated feature damages an older function so that it does not work correctly since integration, that damage deserves key word regression. But I do not think that many regression key words will have to be added. The problem with the Bugs in the list is that at least one of following mistakes is in data for the Bugs: * Version has been changed to 4.1 in error, example: (Bug 105492 - Text Orientation Degrees Entry Field * It has not been tested with what Version the bug has appeared, example: (Bug 124259 - mathvariant=normal is ignored on import of .mml file) So far my personal thoughts, what are result of long co-working in open source projects, communication is the key here. We have experienced QA volunteers who know how to set the fields and we have volunteers with less experience. I suggest that we clean up the various fields and update the how submit a bug page with a clear and updated explanation of what we think is best. If somebody is not sure it is best to let the fields unset or open and ask on the QA list for support/help. Juergen CU Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: 4.1. Regressions
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Rainer Bielefeld rainerbielefeld_ooo...@bielefeldundbuss.de wrote: Yuzhen Fan schrieb: Here is the analysis of possible cases Hi, plausible description of the task, I'm more or less proceeding so. I will send you bug list for your review Difficult - I currently prefer to check issues where I have knowledge first, not to proceed a list. Other volunteers might think similar. If you agree we can use my https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype= runnamedlist_id=133742namedcmd=410_RegressionTest (or something similar?) for a while, I can add Exclude issue numbers what have been checked and are no regressions after short mail here, rest fall out of the list one by one because they got keyword regression or more early version number or whatever. Hi, I cannot open your query above, it returns red warning, have you shared it? Nevertheless, we should find proceedings what can increase efficiency by avoiding double work. May be some volunteers add themselves to QA Contact in bugs where they have skills and want to proceed them within a week or so? Sounds good, but how about the defects already have value in QA Contact (although I do not find one so far)? CU Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: Please Review 4.1 Release Notes
The content in sections Performance Improvements/Enhancements and Bug Fixes are empty, should we remove the section Performance Improvements/Enhancements and add bug items in the section Bug Fixes? On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Release+Notes I notice that the Release Notes say nothing about the IAccesible2 support. Shouldn't we have something there about it? Maybe mention what AT have been tested and work, and if there are any useful tips for users? Any other topics? The hope is to release the beta early next week. So it is important that we have good release notes for that. Regards, -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen
[QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20140310
Hi All, We continue doing the AOO 4.1 Function Verification test(FVT), here is the weekly update (2/25 - 3/10): *Test execution:* 1. Existing feature on 3 APP testing - Ongoing We have assigned 998(853 as of 2/14) test executions to about 42 volunteers, and completed about 56.0%(45.8% as of 3/10) in execution (654 test executions done, 535 as of 2/14). We have executed 120 test cases since Feb 14 with 3 more test execution volunteers. Total Not Run Passed Failed Blocked Completed [%] Debian Linux 64bit 56 7 36 10 3 87.5 MacOS X 209 81 95 20 7 61.24 Redhat Linux 32bit 69 66 1 2 0 4.35 Redhat Linux 64bit 277 121 110 42 4 56.32 Ubuntu Linux 64bit 167 37 95 30 5 77.84 Windows 7 209 102 82 22 3 51.2 Windows 8 182 101 62 19 0 44.51 Total 1169 515 481 145 22 56.0 *Defect summary:* 1. Complete verifcation for 44 resolved bugs which were identified to verify before beta candidate release, several reopened bugs are resolved and need verification again *Issues quality highlight:* 1. Apache OpenOffice 4.1 Beta(based on release branch AOO410, revision 1573601) is released after successfully votes 2. We do not complete FVT on schedule. From above execution statistic, the coverage on Linux, Mac and Windows is with balance, the low execution rate on Linux 32bit is not critical as low priority on platform Linux 32bit 3. We still need to run left test executions in FVT, especially on Windows 8 and Ubuntu 64 *Volunteer status:* 1. No new test execution volunteers(total 42 so far) joined on FVT execution work since Feb 14 2. Need defect volunteers to check regression bugs in Bugzilla *Plan for next week:* 1. Call for defect volunteers to check 4.1 regression bugs in Bugzilla 2. Continue to do FVT test on Mac, Linux and Windows 3. Remind some test execution volunteers to complete their assignments or do reassignment Thanks you all for effort this week, although we do not complete FVT on schedule, we really have some test execution volunteers participating actively and make progress day and day. Let's continue and work together to make preparation for beta release candidate! Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: [QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20140224
Thanks Kay for your asking. This URL lists all resolved bugs(total#=193 as of Feb 24) https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremlist_id=126069namedcmd=AOO_Need_Verify_4.1remaction=runsharer_id=249289 From above query, we have identified 46 outstanding/critical bugs(as of Feb 24) which need to be verified before we release beta candidate(Feb 28), they includes all blockercriticalMajor bugs. ( search criteria of above URL is: Resolution: FIXED, DUPLICATE, IRREPRODUCIBLE, WONTFIX, MOVED Status: RESOLVED Target Milestone: 4.1.0, AOO 4.1 Changed: (is greater than or equal to) 20110701 Status: (changed to) RESOLVED Status: (changed after) 20110701 Issue Type: (is not equal to) Patch Issue Type: (is not equal to) Task Product: (is not equal to) qa ) On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:35 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, We continue doing the AOO 4.1 Function Verification test(FVT), here is the weekly update (2/15 - 2/24): *Test execution:* 1. Template validation - hold on, sent below issues and question to development Question: A new .odp is created with the template when try to open .otp file, is it intended? Issues: - only the first slide in template is available for apply to the existing presentation in AOO - It gets messed when apply template to an existing presentation 2. Existing feature on 3 APP testing - Ongoing We have assigned 853(817 as of 2/14) test executions to about 42(39 as of 2/14) volunteers, and completed about 45.8%(39.4% as of 2/14) in execution (535 test executions done, 461 as of 2/14). We get 3 more test execution volunteers since Feb 14 to speed up the test execution, we do not complete FVT as planned on Feb 24 TotalNot RunPassedFailedBlockedCompleted [%] Debian Linux 64bit5673610387.5 MacOS X209959020454.55 Redhat Linux 32bit69670202.90 Redhat Linux 64bit27712410941355.23 Ubuntu Linux 64bit167111479033.53 Windows 72091077722348.8 Windows 81821234415032.42 Total11696344031191345.8 *Defect summary:* 1. 46 resolved bugs are identified to verify before beta candidate release(Feb 28) (bug list is attached) *Issues quality highlight:* 1. We do not complete FVT on schedule. From above execution statistic, the coverage on Linux, Mac and Windows is with balance, the low execution rate on Linux 32bit is not critical as low priority on platform Linux 32bit 2. To release beta candidate safely, we need to verify proposed resolved bugs(total# = 46 so far) and check related function areas to see if any regression, will call for volunteers in community 3. We still need to run left test executions in FVT *Volunteer status: * 1. 3 new test execution volunteers(total 42 so far) joined on FVT execution work since Feb 14 2. Need defect volunteers to verify high priority bugs in Bugzilla (see above in Defect summary, any one can contribute on this, please let me know and provide the platforms you can help with) *Plan for next week:* 1. Verify identified high priority bugs 2. Continue to do FVT test on Mac, Linux and Windows Thanks you all for effort this week, although we do not complete FVT on schedule, we really have some test execution volunteers participating actively and make progress day and day. Let's continue and work together to make preparation for beta release candidate! -- Regards, Yu Zhen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org Is this still the correct URL for these outstanding/critical issues? https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremlist_id=128088namedcmd=AOO_Need_Verify_4.1remaction=runsharer_id=249289 it seems like it is from the issues you attached above ... -- - MzK Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect. -- James Mason -- Regards, Yu Zhen
[QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20140224
Hi All, We continue doing the AOO 4.1 Function Verification test(FVT), here is the weekly update (2/15 - 2/24): *Test execution:* 1. Template validation - hold on, sent below issues and question to development Question: A new .odp is created with the template when try to open .otp file, is it intended? Issues: - only the first slide in template is available for apply to the existing presentation in AOO - It gets messed when apply template to an existing presentation 2. Existing feature on 3 APP testing - Ongoing We have assigned 853(817 as of 2/14) test executions to about 42(39 as of 2/14) volunteers, and completed about 45.8%(39.4% as of 2/14) in execution (535 test executions done, 461 as of 2/14). We get 3 more test execution volunteers since Feb 14 to speed up the test execution, we do not complete FVT as planned on Feb 24 TotalNot RunPassedFailedBlockedCompleted [%] Debian Linux 64bit5673610387.5 MacOS X209959020454.55 Redhat Linux 32bit69670202.90 Redhat Linux 64bit27712410941355.23 Ubuntu Linux 64bit167111479033.53 Windows 72091077722348.8 Windows 81821234415032.42 Total11696344031191345.8 *Defect summary:* 1. 46 resolved bugs are identified to verify before beta candidate release(Feb 28) (bug list is attached) *Issues quality highlight:* 1. We do not complete FVT on schedule. From above execution statistic, the coverage on Linux, Mac and Windows is with balance, the low execution rate on Linux 32bit is not critical as low priority on platform Linux 32bit 2. To release beta candidate safely, we need to verify proposed resolved bugs(total# = 46 so far) and check related function areas to see if any regression, will call for volunteers in community 3. We still need to run left test executions in FVT *Volunteer status: * 1. 3 new test execution volunteers(total 42 so far) joined on FVT execution work since Feb 14 2. Need defect volunteers to verify high priority bugs in Bugzilla (see above in Defect summary, any one can contribute on this, please let me know and provide the platforms you can help with) *Plan for next week:* 1. Verify identified high priority bugs 2. Continue to do FVT test on Mac, Linux and Windows Thanks you all for effort this week, although we do not complete FVT on schedule, we really have some test execution volunteers participating actively and make progress day and day. Let's continue and work together to make preparation for beta release candidate! -- Regards, Yu Zhen bugs-2014-02-24_Beta.ods Description: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.spreadsheet - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20140214
Oliver, thanks for the comment, please see my reply below. On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, thanks for the status report. I have a question about the given query - see below. On 17.02.2014 12:19, Yuzhen Fan wrote: Hi All, We continue doing the AOO 4.1 Function Verification test(FVT), here is the weekly update (2/10 - 2/14): *Test execution:* 1. Template validation - Ongoing Question: A new .odp is created with the template when try to open .otp file, is it intended? Issue: only the first slide in template is available for apply to the existing presentation in AOO 2. Existing feature on 3 APP testing - Ongoing We have assigned 817(673 as of 1/24) test executions to about 39(28 as of 1/24) volunteers, and completed about 39.4%(23% as of 1/24) in execution (461 test executions done, 250 as of 1/24). We get 11 more test execution volunteers since Jan 24, although the target date to complete FVT is moved to Feb 24, we need to remind volunteers in this week TotalNot RunPassedFailedBlockedCompleted [%] Debian Linux 64bit5673610387.5 MacOS X2091444914231.10 Redhat Linux 32bit69670202.90 Redhat Linux 64bit2771439832448.38 Ubuntu Linux 64bit167111479033.53 Windows 72091097522347.85 Windows 81821274114030.22 Total11697083461031239.4 *Defect summary:* 1. Summary of resolved issues in Bugzilla, about 28 issues are (severity = blocker or critical) https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem; list_id=125237namedcmd=AOO_Need_Verify_4.1remaction=run sharer_id=249289 Which issues are shown by this query? Looking at the search criteria it is not clear to me. The search criteria are: - Status = RESOLVED - Resolution = FIXED, DUPLICATE, IRREPRODUCIBLE, WONTFIX, MOVED - Version = 4.1.0-dev -- Why only issues reported on this version? -- You are right and I update the query with Target Milestone = 4.1.0 or Target Milestone = AOO 4.1 , as we verify the issues solved for AOO 4.1 - Status changed after 2011-07-01 - Issue Type != Patch or Task -- Why are these issues excluded? -- For testers, we will verify bugs existed and solved in product, as my understanding: Task is expected to be handled by developers and Patch would be selected for tester's verification on demand. - Product != qa My search criteria for issue solved for AOO 4.1 would be - Status = RESOLVED - Target Milestone = 4.1.0 Best regards, Oliver. *Issues quality highlight:* 1. We need to remind test execution volunteers to complete their assignments before Feb 24, as it is one week left 2. We have execution gap in FVT test as lack Mac text execution volunteers in testing, have sent the call in forum for test execution volunteers on Mac and other platforms(except Linux Redhat 64bit) *Volunteer status: * 1. 11 new test execution volunteers(total 39 so far) joined on FVT execution work since Jan 24 2. Need defect volunteers to verify high priority issues in Bugzilla (see above in Defect summary) *Plan for next week:* 1. Continue to do FVT test on Mac, Linux and Windows 2. Start to verify high high priority issues 3. Continue to do template validation Thanks you all for effort since Jan 24, we have one week left to FVT target date(Feb 24), let's continue and make progress next week! Regards, Yu Zhen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen
[QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20140214
Hi All, We continue doing the AOO 4.1 Function Verification test(FVT), here is the weekly update (2/10 - 2/14): *Test execution:* 1. Template validation - Ongoing Question: A new .odp is created with the template when try to open .otp file, is it intended? Issue: only the first slide in template is available for apply to the existing presentation in AOO 2. Existing feature on 3 APP testing - Ongoing We have assigned 817(673 as of 1/24) test executions to about 39(28 as of 1/24) volunteers, and completed about 39.4%(23% as of 1/24) in execution (461 test executions done, 250 as of 1/24). We get 11 more test execution volunteers since Jan 24, although the target date to complete FVT is moved to Feb 24, we need to remind volunteers in this week TotalNot RunPassedFailedBlockedCompleted [%] Debian Linux 64bit5673610387.5 MacOS X2091444914231.10 Redhat Linux 32bit69670202.90 Redhat Linux 64bit2771439832448.38 Ubuntu Linux 64bit167111479033.53 Windows 72091097522347.85 Windows 81821274114030.22 Total11697083461031239.4 *Defect summary:* 1. Summary of resolved issues in Bugzilla, about 28 issues are (severity = blocker or critical) https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremlist_id=125237namedcmd=AOO_Need_Verify_4.1remaction=runsharer_id=249289 *Issues quality highlight:* 1. We need to remind test execution volunteers to complete their assignments before Feb 24, as it is one week left 2. We have execution gap in FVT test as lack Mac text execution volunteers in testing, have sent the call in forum for test execution volunteers on Mac and other platforms(except Linux Redhat 64bit) *Volunteer status: * 1. 11 new test execution volunteers(total 39 so far) joined on FVT execution work since Jan 24 2. Need defect volunteers to verify high priority issues in Bugzilla (see above in Defect summary) *Plan for next week:* 1. Continue to do FVT test on Mac, Linux and Windows 2. Start to verify high high priority issues 3. Continue to do template validation Thanks you all for effort since Jan 24, we have one week left to FVT target date(Feb 24), let's continue and make progress next week! Regards, Yu Zhen
[QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20140124
Hi All, We continue doing the AOO 4.1 Function Verification test(FVT), here is the weekly update (1/18 - 1/24): Test execution: 1. New feature testing on comments/Annotations on text ranges - Ongoing Bug 124079 - The emphasis mark in comment/annotation text is at top text incorrectly when import .docx file to AOO(existed in AOO 3.4.0) 2. Existing feature on 3 APP testing - Ongoing We have assigned 673(287 last week) test executions to about 28(last week 5) volunteers, and completed about 23%(last week 13.8%) in execution (250 test executions done, last week 150). Although we are still tight to finish feature FVT before Feb 13, we get 23 more test execution volunteers this week, we can speed up hopefully TotalNot RunPassedFailedBlockedCompleted [%] Debian Linux 64bit5673610387.5 MacOS X209184169011.96 Redhat Linux 32bit69670202.90 Redhat Linux 64bit22220120109.46 Ubuntu Linux 64bit167137273017.96 Windows 7180896721350.56 Windows 8182150265117.58 Total108583519251723.0 Defect summary: 1. Summay of proposed high priority issues in Bugzilla, the creteria is: Priority =P1, P2 and Severity = blocker, critical https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremlist_id=119849namedcmd=AOO_Critical_P1P2_Need_Fixremaction=runsharer_id=249289 Issues quality highlight: 1. We have execution gap in FVT test as lack Mac text execution volunteers in testing, have sent the call in forum for test execution volunteers on Mac and other platfroms(except Linux Redhat 64bit) 2. Build for Mac 64bit and Linux will be available in buildbot and dev snapshot next Monday (Jan 27), informed people to use snapshot build as it contains the lastest stuff for OS X 64bit and also a corresponding installation package for OS X. Volunteer status: 1. 23 new test execution volunteers(total 28 so far, 18 are for Linux Redhat 64bit) joined on FVT execution work 2. Need defect volunteers to confirm proposed high priority issues in Bugzilla (see above in Defect summary) Plan for next week: 1. Continue to do FVT test on Mac, Linux and Windows 2. Complete to do testing on comments/Annotations on text ranges 3. Complete to add test cases(BVT level) for IA2 testing in Testlink A tremendous thanks to you all for offering to assist with the AOO 4.1 FVT, especially John Walicki and other Linux platform testers as your help will fill the gap in testing on Linux Redhat 64bit! Thanks you all for effort this week, let's continue and make progress next week! Regards, Yu Zhen
Need QA (test) volunteers on Mac 64bit OSX for AOO 4.1 FVT - Re: AOO 4.1 Feature Verification Test needs your help -- Call for volunteers!
Hi All, We have got more volunteers offering help on Linux Redhat 64bit, Linux Ubuntu 64bit, Windows 7 and Windows 8 this week, but we have only one volunteer on Mac 64bit OSX while the support to this platform is new added in AOO 4.1. As the dev snapshot build for Mac 64bit will be ready in this weekend(around Jan 24), we're looking for people who can help test on Mac 64bit OSX over the next few weeks. If you have interest on it, please send your Testlink ID (if you haven't a Testlink account, you can register one[2]), and I will assign test cases to you. You should also get installation sets from dev snapshot [3] and report issues in Bugzilla [4]. Thanks! [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Release+Planning [2] http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php [3] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshotfullsets [4] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ Yuzhen Fan(范玉珍) On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, We have made some progress on the 4.1 Feature Verification Test (FVT) execution with help from Edwin, Maryna and Liu Ping and will get even more done with upcoming helping from Nadya and Simon. But we still have a lot of work to do. We still have 945 testcases to run. Completing these tests is critical to finish feature FVT before February 13th, so we can start the beta for AOO 4.1 on time as scheduled [1]. We need your help. Even if you don't consider yourself a tester, you can still help. You just need to be familiar with the OpenOffice product and be able to follow test instructions and record your results. If every volunteer can do a number of executions, then we will get a great achievement. We need volunteers on Linux Redhat 64bit, Linux Redhat 32bit, Linux Ubuntu 64bit, Mac 10.8/10.9, Windows 7 and Windows 8. If you have interest and can help over the next few weeks, please send a note to the QA mailing list (q...@openoffice.apache.org). If you have a Testlink account[2] send your ID as well as what platform you can help test. You should also get installation sets from trunk [3] and report issues in Bugzilla [4]. Thanks! [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Release+Planning [2] http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php [3] http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ [4] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ Yuzhen Fan(范玉珍) -- Regards, Yu Zhen
AOO 4.1 Feature Verification Test needs your help -- Call for volunteers!
Hi All, We have made some progress on the 4.1 Feature Verification Test (FVT) execution with help from Edwin, Maryna and Liu Ping and will get even more done with upcoming helping from Nadya and Simon. But we still have a lot of work to do. We still have 945 testcases to run. Completing these tests is critical to finish feature FVT before February 13th, so we can start the beta for AOO 4.1 on time as scheduled [1]. We need your help. Even if you don't consider yourself a tester, you can still help. You just need to be familiar with the OpenOffice product and be able to follow test instructions and record your results. If every volunteer can do a number of executions, then we will get a great achievement. We need volunteers on Linux Redhat 64bit, Linux Redhat 32bit, Linux Ubuntu 64bit, Mac 10.8/10.9, Windows 7 and Windows 8. If you have interest and can help over the next few weeks, please send a note to the QA mailing list (q...@openoffice.apache.org). If you have a Testlink account[2] send your ID as well as what platform you can help test. You should also get installation sets from trunk [3] and report issues in Bugzilla [4]. Thanks! [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Release+Planning [2] http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php [3] http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ [4] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ Yuzhen Fan(范玉珍)
Re: Issues found when testing comments/annotations on test ranges - 1st batch
Oliver, thank you for the quick response, I will verify the fix in next buildbot build. On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, On 16.01.2014 10:59, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 15.01.2014 14:33, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 15.01.2014 12:08, Yuzhen Fan wrote: I start executing test cases for the integration of OSBA OOXML improvement project's use case 4 - comments/annotations on text ranges, here is the first batch of bugs: Bug 124030 - Failed to open ODT file exported from AOO with comment/annotation in original docx file Yes, this is very critical and I will provide a patch today. The crash occurs in case there a character formatting at the annotated text range. Issue is fixed, now. The next buildbot builds will contain the fix. Best regards, Oliver. Bug 124028 - Highlight of commented/annotated text range gets lost when export as PDF by AOO Please have a look at my comment in the issue. Short version: PDF export of AOO and Microsoft Word regarding comments/annotations are not comparable. To enhance AOO's PDF for comments/annotations on text ranges further details from the PDF format are needed. Bug 124027 - The list numbers/bullets in comment/annotation get lost when import .docx file to AOO This issue is not related to the new introduced feature to apply comments/annotations on text ranges. For further details have a look at my comment to the issue. Best regards, Oliver. The first one is critical and fails all test cases. I will have a look at these issues. Best regards, Oliver. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen
[QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20140117
Hi All, We started doing the AOO 4.1 Function Verification test(FVT), here is the weekly update (1/13 - 1/17): *Test execution:* 1. New feature testing on comments/Annotations on text ranges - Ongoing Bugs found: (red one is critical) Bug 124030 - Failed to open ODT file exported from AOO with comment/annotation in original docx file (fix submitted by Oliver, will verify with next build) Bug 124028 - Highlight of commented/annotated text range gets lost when export as PDF by AOO Bug 124027 - The list numbers/bullets in comment/annotation get lost when import .docx file to AOO 2. Improved feature testing on In-place editing of Input Fields - Complete Bugs found: Bug 123827- [Accessibility][IA2]Focus value of Field function type list can't be identified in writer Bug 123828 - [Accessibility]Tab Key can't travel in input field dialogue in writer Bug 123825 - The content change when importing .docx with “Date field Bug 123826 - The content lost when importing .docx with “Fill-in field 3. Existing feature on 3 APP testing - Ongoing We have assigned 287 text executions to about 5 volunteers, and completed about 13.8% in execution (150 test executions done). We are far from and tight to finish feature FVT before Feb 13 with current resource. I have sent 2nd call for volunteers in community. TotalNot RunPassedFailedBlockedCompleted [%] Debian Linux 64bit5673610387.5 MacOS X20918515908.13 Redhat Linux 32bit69670202.90 Redhat Linux 64bit2222193001.35 Ubuntu Linux 64bit1671652001.20 Windows 71801253817231.67 Windows 818216911207.14 Total108593710540513.8 *Defect summary:* see above bug lists in Test execution *Issues quality highlight:* 1. We have execution gap in FVT test as lack volunteers in testing, have sent the 2nd call for volunteers 2. Build for Mac 64bit is not available in buildbot and dev snapshot 3. Build for Linux is not available in dev snapshot *Volunteer status: * 1. No new volunteers(total 5 so far) on FVT execution work, 2 person(Edwin and Liu Ping) ask for more as they have completed their assignment *Plan for next week:* 1. Continue to do FVT test on Mac, Linux and Windows 2. Continue to do testing on comments/Annotations on text ranges 3. Summarize high priority issues in Bugzilla Thanks you all for effort this week, let's continue and make progress next week! Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: Hello to the Apache Project Team
Hi Shari, Thanks for your volunteering to help, if you are interested in 4.1 testing and would like get started to do test execution and bug confirmation/verification, or join other test activities, please let me know, thanks! On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Shari Bradstream counselingwithhor...@gmail.com wrote: Good evening, I came across the Apache Open Office software and find it intriguing. I like what I read so decided to invest a little time each week to work on project materials in the areas that help is needed. I am not a computer programmer or coder, however; I am very creative and able to navigate my way through directions and can think outside the box. I am a licensed professional counselor and a certified addictions therapist in South Dakota at a non-profit company I started. I am working with high risk offenders, vulnerable populations in a culturally diverse office setting, and best of all using Equine Assisted Learning in all my individual and group settings. I look forward to being a part of a creative team invested in providing a service to others - especially in the computer technology arena. Hello Shari, Thank for writing and volunteering to help. You can read more about different areas of the project here: http://openoffice.apache.org/get-involved.html As you will see, it takes a lot more than just programmers to make Apache OpenOffice successful. Volunteers are welcome in any of these areas. We're currently in the testing phase for our 4.1 release. If that interests you at all, we certainly need help there. You can write to our QA mailing list at q...@openoffice.apache.org to get started there. We also have new volunteer orientation modules on the website that give more background on the project and how it works. It also describes to get involved in areas like documentation, marketing, etc.: http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/index.html Let me know if you any questions getting started. Regards, -Rob, Apache OpenOffice Project Management Committee My best regards, Shari Bradstream Shari L. Bradstream MS, LAC, LPC Director, HorsePlay Productions Hlg. Ctr. 22800 Spruce Drive Box Elder, SD 57719 Phone: 605-393- Do what is right...even if it is hard. ~ Anonymous This message is intended only for the use of the individuals or entity to which it is addresses and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable federal or state law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender and destroy or return all copies of this email and all attachments. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Issues found when testing comments/annotations on test ranges - 1st batch
I start executing test cases for the integration of OSBA OOXML improvement project's use case 4 - comments/annotations on text ranges, here is the first batch of bugs: Bug 124030 - Failed to open ODT file exported from AOO with comment/annotation in original docx file Bug 124028 - Highlight of commented/annotated text range gets lost when export as PDF by AOO Bug 124027 - The list numbers/bullets in comment/annotation get lost when import .docx file to AOO The first one is critical and fails all test cases. -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: Interest in Volunteering With the OpenOffice Project
Hi Tyler, welcome to the project! Liuping Tan(doneyours...@gmail.com) has executed IA2 testing on BVT level test cases and FVT(Sidebar) level testcases, you can also contact her for information exchange when you do testing on IA2. On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:54 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Tyler Kavanaugh tw...@kc.rr.com wrote: Hello all: My name is Tyler Kavanaugh, and I am from Kansas, in the United States. I would very much like to be a part of the OpenOffice project, with a focus on QA/accessibility, as I am a blind user who uses screen-access software to accomplish everyday tasks on the computer. I am aware that the product recently (as of November or December 2013) finished its implementation of MSAA/IAccessible2, and this has piqued my interest. Where would you all suggest that I start? Hi Tyler, welcome to the project. Others have already sent you some good info. At the risk of overloading you with info, here's another resource you might want to review, our New Volunteer Orientation modules: http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/ For QA specifically there is this orientation module: http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/intro-qa.html It has some useful information on bug handling and will lead you to sign up for a Bugzilla account, etc. Regards, -Rob Thanks, -Tyler - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: [RELEASE]: proposal for our next release AOO 4.1
I update the AOO 4.1 Release Planning [1] to sync the schedule in discussion here, it is mainly based on Juergen's proposal on Dec 17 with QE's comments. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Release+Planning On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 2:59 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On 28 December 2013 19:52, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: On 17/12/2013 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: I don't know what others think but based on this new information I would like to move my proposed schedule a little bit. Jan 24, 2014 feature freeze Jan 27, 2014 translation freeze ... Mar 21, 2014 RC1? Apr 1, 2014 GA? (I like this date if possible) In general I agree with the schedule, but what strikes me here is the 2 months between the translation deadline and the RC1. I know the integration work takes time, but 2 months seem excessive. This would mean that a translation completed in February must already wait for the (possible) language update release. In this time period we also have a public beta release. That is the where the additional time goes. If we want translations in the beta (why wouldn't we?) then we end up with a schedule like this. I think a beta is a good idea, could we please agree to name it something like beta1 to differentiate it from RC1, which is something internal to me. some time ago we have discussed a language only release on base of 4.0.1. And even a language release requires a lot of work. Until today I see 3 potential languages ready which is not enough from my perspective. We are now at 4 new languages at 100% (bg, da, nb, th). Even if your proposed schedule (new version) is respected, this means that Danish, that was completed back in October just after the 4.0.1 release, would stay unreleased until April. Thanks to your and Herbert's work we will have snapshots available for those languages from the buildbots in a couple days, so most of the integration work has already been done. Wouldn't it make sense to release 4.0.1 in the additional 4 languages in January, to avoid the 6-months gap? This sounds like a good idea to me, a language refresh like we did with 3.4.1. If I remember right, we did not make a new version, just release the new languages (incl. danish) for the same version. rgds jan I. -Rob Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website
Hi Carol, thanks for your reporting! I cannot reproduce the issue you report, to make us on the same page, could you please list the steps in sequence, as well as screenshots if necessary? Which is the window keep coming up and wont stop (Recovery2.jpg, Recovery3.jpg, Recovery4.jpg or any else)? If possible, could you please send me the file you encounter problem? Thanks. On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:13 AM, carol lamb tlcl...@outlook.com wrote: hello. I tried to save something and it said openoffice crashed and doc’s will be saved. I restarted my comp b/c the windows saying start recovery, then it is recovered push okay. I said ok and the windows keep coming up and wont stop. I tried to delete the page I was saving and it wont let me, saying it is open to close it!!! help please! thanx, carol Sent from Windows Mail -- Regards, Yu Zhen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Merry Christmas and a happy new year
Merry X-Mas and Happy New Year to everyone! Regards, Yu Zhen On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 3:56 AM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: I also wish everybody Merry X-Mas A Happy New Year. :-) Marcus Am 12/20/2013 04:05 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: Hi, I will go into Christmas holidays today and will not read my emails regularly, I plan to take a real break ;-) I wish you all merry Christmas and a happy new year! Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RELEASE]: proposal for our next release AOO 4.1
Feb ??, 2014 feature FVT finish (I know in China is public holiday as well from Jan 31 - Feb 7) QA needs about 70 PD to complete the left 1061 executions (total 1061, suppose 15 executions per day per QA volunteer being concentrated on this work) on Writer(140), Calc(330) and Impress(591). We started the feature FVT early on Oct 29, the original plan is to complete Writer on 11/29, Calc on 12/27 and Impress on 1/24, we are very behind the planned schedule now because of the less volunteers. It would be optimistic to finish feature FVT before Feb 13. Feb 21 - ? full regression testing and bug fixing Based on the experience from 4.0 Full Regression(22 QA volunteers completed 1,221 regression test executions during 10 weeks), if we take the same volume of executions and execution rate in 4.1, we may not complete it before Mar 20(4 weeks). The complete date would depend on how many QA volunteers will participate and how much effort they will provide, as well as how many defects are found. Regards, Yu Zhen On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, well it seems that I was a little bit to optimistic or do I need a break? I don't know probably both but I talked with the developers in my direct surrounding field and taking the Christmas break, vacation etc. into account we believe that my proposal was a little bit to optimistic. I don't know what others think but based on this new information I would like to move my proposed schedule a little bit. Jan 24, 2014 feature freeze Jan 27, 2014 translation freeze Feb ??, 2014 feature FVT finish (I know in China is public holiday as well from Jan 31 - Feb 7) Feb 14, 2014 4.1 beta candidate Feb 21, 2014 4.1 beta release for pubic review Feb 21 - ? full regression testing and bug fixing Mar 21, 2014 RC1? Apr 1, 2014 GA? (I like this date if possible) It would nice to hear other opinions or general feedback. Juergen On 12/6/13 9:41 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi, some time ago we have discussed a language only release on base of 4.0.1. And even a language release requires a lot of work. Until today I see 3 potential languages ready which is not enough from my perspective. But on the other side we have some nice stuff in place that should be released asap, for example the iAccessibility support which is a great step forward and will help a lot of people. I would like to propose a new release AOO 4.1 early next year and as soon as possible. Taking into account that Christmas and the related holidays in many countries will slow down all the activities a little bit I can think of the following: Jan 10, 2014features freeze Jan 13, 2014 translation freeze for beta Jan 20, 2014 feature FVT finish Jan 21, 2014 4.1 beta candidate, with major features and languages Jan 27, 2014 4.1 beta release for public review Jan 27 - ?full regression testing and bug fixing ? RC1 Feb 28, or later? GA ? I really would like to see the iAccessibility improvements publicly available as soon as possible because from my perspective it is a further huge milestone for AOO. And I would like to support the new languages as soon as possible and hopefully we can have a few more. Some are very close to be ready. Opinions and feedback is welcome and I hope may of you can share my view. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Test cases are ready for OOXML improvements - OSBA patches use case 4
Hi All, I have completed writing test cases for OOXML improvements - OSBA patches use case 4 in TestLink[1], they are listed in tree Apache OpenOffice testproject - Fidelity - OSBA OOXML Improvements - Use Case 4, in Test Specification when select Test Project as Apache OpenOffice testproject The test cases (total number is 14) cover all places/objects which can have comments and will check those comments made in Microsoft Word and saved in OOXML format can be imported as a true presentation into AOO, and subsequently exported back to OOXML The precondition is the requirement of apache.org account to get test documents. [1] http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: I join the IPMC and start as Mentor at the Incubator
Congratulations Raphael ! Btw, do you know any thing about TestLink design? Can we refer to you for request like TestLink customization? I send you some questions about TestLink today .. thought you may know. Regards, Yu Zhen On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 6:47 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On 27 November 2013 23:17, Dave Fisher w...@apache.org wrote: Jan, A good idea for the whole IPMC which is about 20-30 active with about 175 members. Constant flux. I did not know that there were that many. I think my C++ skills, general project/ASF knowledge and maybe most important my infra work could be helpful for some project. Every time I tried I was told to seek out a project myself, which of course means nothing happens. I believe a register would be helpful for new projects, and especially for mentors, so I am happy you find it a good idea. rgds jan I. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone On Nov 27, 2013, at 4:07 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On 27 November 2013 22:44, Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch wrote: Hi all Not realy a important message, but I want to let you know, that I'm voted in to the Incubator PMC. I will also start as Mentor there. Congratulations ! maybe you can do something about making a register of committers and skills who are willing to help. Its no fun being told just to look through the project and ques who could not help with a given skillset. rgds. jan I. Greetings Raphael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Greetings
Hi Will Welcome at Apache OpenOffice!!! If you are taking on reported bugs, you can pick up unconfirmed bugs to confirm, that way can help you to be familiar with the products in AOO. Regards, Yu Zhen On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Steve Yin steve.yin@gmail.com wrote: Hi Will, Welcome to join us! On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Liu Ping doneyours...@gmail.com wrote: Hi will Welcome If you are interested in QA work , you may find some useful information: http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/intro-qa.html subscribing to the mailing list , you'll receive the various requests for help and you can choose how to contribute. Don't hesitate to send along any questions! On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch wrote: Hi will Am 09.11.13 11:32, schrieb Will Blades: Hello, Apologies for the rather late reply. You have not to apologies. Everyone here does the work when he has time. It's up to you to decide when and on what you work. Thank you for your acceptance and kind words. I have been subscribed myself to both the dev and qa lists, and I probably will begin This is a good start by taking on reported bugs. I read the orientation document is rather extensive, but if you notice that I did not follow procedure or the like, kindly let me know . I offer you to review your first issues, and mentoring you a little bit, if you want. Simply write me a e-mail with the bugs you have commented. Byside I'm also aviable on IRC: Channel freenode, Room: # dev.openoffice.org my nick is rbircher. Good luck for your start Greetings Raphael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Best Regards, Steve Yin
Re: Need QA (test) volunteers on MacOS Mavericks
Raphael, Glad to know that, thanks very much for your testing and reporting! Regards, Yu Zhen On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch wrote: Am 29.10.13 08:32, schrieb Yuzhen Fan: Hi, We're looking for people who can spend a few time over this and next week to run pre-defined checklist on their MacOS Mavericks operating system, and to enter Bugzilla issues for any failed test functions, as well as to highlighter the critical bugs in the test report. If you have interest on it, please let me know as soon as possible, I will send you the general testing list. Thanks! I have allready tested the critical Mac OS X stuff with Maverick Maverick has not changed that much, so it should not have a load of problem Tested: - Mac OS Internal Spellchecker (works) - Open/Save dialog (works) - Printing. First it doesn't recognise the printer, but arter restartin the Computer it works fine - Java 32 bit verion works fine - The known GateKeeper issue is also present in Maverick In the sumary, It works well, the issues I found are allready known, exept the one with the printer. +1 for me that we offizialy support Mac OS 10.9 maverick. Greetings Raphael --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Need QA (test) volunteers on MacOS Mavericks
Hi, We're looking for people who can spend a few time over this and next week to run pre-defined checklist on their MacOS Mavericks operating system, and to enter Bugzilla issues for any failed test functions, as well as to highlighter the critical bugs in the test report. If you have interest on it, please let me know as soon as possible, I will send you the general testing list. Thanks! Regards, Yu Zhen
AOO 4.1 FVT Starts! Call for volunteers on Writer!
Hi All, The trunk build is ready, and we can start doing FVT(functional verification test) now. This is the call for volunteers on testing Writer product. Any one who can contribute to the testing, please provide your TestLink ID and preferred platforms (Windows, Mac and Linux, we plan to move Linux testing completely to 64 bit and do only basic testing on 32 bit as most used Linux systems today are 64bit systems), then I will assign you test cases in TestLink [1]. Please note to get build bot installation sets from trunk [2] Thanks! [1] http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php [2] http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.0.1 (RC3)
Considering that: 1. The first two defects[1] are regressions introduced in AOO 4.0 and not AOO 4.0.1 release blockers 2. The installation defect[1] on Redhat6.4 64bit has workaround I agree to release AOO401rc3 (a.k.a. r1524958) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0.1. [1] Bug 123345 - [Regression]Docx embedded table display incorrectly Bug 123346 - [Regression]the bullet display incorrectly when open docx file in AOO Bug 123348 - Cannot integrate AOO 4.0.0 in desktop menu in Redhat6.4 64bit Regards, Yu Zhen On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/9/26 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, resending as my reply to list goes only to qa@o.a.o On 25.09.2013 12:17, Yuzhen Fan wrote: -1: I vote -1 for RC3 because of these 3 issues, the first two are function regressions from 3.4.1 and 4.0.0, the last one is for bad user experience on Redhat 64bit installation. Bug 123345 - [Regression]Docx embedded table display incorrectly Bug 123346 - [Regression]the bullet display incorrectly when open docx file in AOO Bug 123348 - Cannot integrate AOO 4.0.0 in desktop menu in Redhat6.4 64bit I can confirm that 123345 and 123346 are regressions which had been introduced in AOO 4.0.0 So these are not new defects in 4.0.1? I confirmed that the 2 defects are also in 4.0. Then I agree that they are not 4.0.1 ship blocker. - Shenfeng (Simon) On the one hand I agree that regressions introduced in the latest release should be fixed in the next release. On the other hand we are already quite far in our planned AOO 4.0.1 release schedule and AOO401rc3 contains a lot of important bug fixes and improvements regarding our supported languages. Thus, I strongly vote for releasing AOO401rc3 as AOO 4.0.1 under these circumstances. From my point of view 123345 and 123346 should be release blocker for our next release. It is important that we understand the different role of a minor x.y.1 release. When we have a major release, like 4.0.0, we're making tons of code changes, adding new features, and potentially (and very likely actually) introducing many regressions. So the QA effort for a major release has many aims: -- test new features -- verify new fixes -- identify the regressions introduced in the code We can never test 100% of a product. Maybe computer-based proofs of correctness have been done in some chip designs, but generally complete coverage is never possible. So we focus on the most-commonly used features of the product, across a large matrix of platforms and applications. The goal, if you think about it is: to increase the confidence that we are *not* releasing a product that has a bug in it that will make it unusable for our users. We can never guarantee this. We can only increase our confidence in this. At whatever finite point we stop our testing it is always possible that the next test would have found a killer defect. So the challenge in designing a test plan is to identify what tests can be performed in a reasonable finite test pass (or passes) that will reduce the chances of a killer defect still being in the code. I think Yuzhen did a great job at designing the test plans for the releases. The quality approach in a minor maintenance release like 4.0.1 is different. We don't make tons of code changes. In fact we are very restrictive. We only fixed showstopper bugs that were proposed on the mailing list, discussed and approved by the Release Manager. The goal is have no new regressions introduced. The goal is to fix targeted bugs, and get those fixes out to users quickly. If we didn't think that speed of release was an important thing here then we would all be working on 4.1.0, not 4.0.1. So the fact that we are working on 4.0.1 at all shows that there is some urgency to get bug fixes released. In any case, if new bugs are found in 4.0.1 testing, I don't think it matters whether they were found in RC1, RC2, RC3, during the vote or the day after the vote. It doesn't matter who discovered the bug or when they discovered it. The question is: How severe is the defect? Is it a showstopper? Is it something we hold back 4.0.1 for? Or something less severe that we put in 4.1.0? Regarding issue 123348: As far as I know this issue is not new and already known. I think a workaround exist. Thus, for me this is not a release blocker. Yu Zhen, do you think you can change your mind regarding your vote? I don't think we should ask anyone to change their votes. A release is approved by majority vote. It does not need to be unanimous. We should not be afraid to have a dissenting vote. But I do hope we can develop a shared view of the true value of QA
Complete Testing for OpenOffice 4.0.1 (RC) on 09/25 and Reject RC3
Hi, we have completed planned testing then *reject *the RC3, please see details as following: Summary: Reject because of these 3 issues: Bug 123345 - [Regression]Docx embedded table display incorrectly Bug 123346 - [Regression]the bullet display incorrectly when open docx file in AOO Bug 123348 - Cannot integrate AOO 4.0.0 in desktop menu in Redhat6.4 64bit Detail result: 1. Bug(showstopper)verification and impacted area testing - Complete for function bugs, all verified fixed or inreproducible 122885 - Cannot reproduce it in problematic build (4.0.0), thus does not know if it is fixed in 4.0.1, add comment in Bugzilla 2. General testing for Calc, Writer, Impress on Windows, Linux and Mac - Complete, please see details as below: Windows: Complete Prachi is for Writer - test on RC2 and couldn't find any bugs on Windows 7 Akriti is for Calc - test on RC2 and find 10 issues(6 confirmed, no critical problems for showstopper) on windows 8 Dick is for Impress - test on RC1 and all seems well and no critical bugs were found on Windows 7 Linux: Complete Kay is for Writer - test on RC3 and no issues are found on OpenSuse 12.3 Alexandro is for Calc - test on RC3 and find issues on name range and data validity on Mandriva Linux 2012 - Kernel 2.6.39 Edwin is for Impress - test on Rev. 1525015 and find issues mainly on table, header and footer, hyperlink on Debian 64 Mac: Complete Liu Ping is for Writer - failed on RC3, 2 function regression issues found Yu Zhen is for Calc -passed on RC3 with 1 issue on data validity Liu Ping is for Impress - passed on RC2 3. Build verification test on RC3 - Complete Build installation on Redhat 32bit /Ubuntu 32bit /Ubuntu 64bit / Mac / Windows 7 / Windows 8 - passed, on Redhat 64bit - failed, find 1 bad user experience issue. Open three apps(Calc, Writer, Impress) successfully 4. GUI PVT on RC1 compared with 4.0.0 Gold - Complete, no obvious reproducible performance downgrade on RC3 Thanks all for your time and effort on testing, we cannot complete the testing on time without your great support! Regards, Yu Zhen
Update on Testing for Apache OpenOffice 4.0.1 (RCs) as of 09/24 - have testing gap on Linux
Hi all, This is the update for showstopper defect verification/impacted area testing, general testing and PVT: *1.* Bug(showstopper)verification and impacted area testing - *Almost done*for function bugs, all verified fixed and passed impacted area testing related to the bugs(with attached samples and limited variation), except: 122885 - Cannot reproduce it in problematic build (4.0.0), thus does not know if it is fixed in 4.0.1, add comment in Bugzilla *2.* General testing for Calc, Writer, Impress on Windows, Linux and Mac - *In progress*, please see details as below: Windows: *Complete* Writer - Prachi test on RC2 and couldn't find any bugs on Windows 7 Calc - Akriti test on RC2 and find 10 issues(6 confirmed, no critical problems for showstopper) on windows 8 Impress - Dick test on RC1 and all seems well and no critical bugs were found on Windows 7 Linux: *In progress with gap* Writer - Kay test on RC3 and no issues are found on OpenSuse 12.3 Calc - Haven't received test result so far (any one can share your test result if you have done or help execute attached general testing list on Calc) Impress - Started on RC3 by Edwin Mac: *In progress and safe* Impress - passed on RC2 by Liu Ping Calc -passed on RC3 by Yu Zhen Writer - started on RC3 by Liu Ping, will complete it tomorrow 09/25 *3. *Build verification test on RC3 - *In progress and safe* Build installation on Redhat 32bit /Ubuntu 32bit /Ubuntu 64bit / Mac / Windows 7 / Windows 8 - passed by Liu Ping and Yu Zhen; on Redhat 64bit - not started, Yu Zhen will complete it tomorrow 09/25 Open three apps(Calc, Writer, Impress) successfully *4. *GUI PVT on RC1 compared with 4.0.0 Gold - *Complete *by Liu Ping, no obvious reproducible performance downgrade on RC3 As we are closed to the deadline(*2013-09-25*) of vote for AOO 4.0.1(RC3), your volunteering to fill the gap on Linux testing will be appreciated! Regards Yu Zhen General Testing List.ods Description: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.spreadsheet - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RELEASE]: propose a further RC3 for AOO 4.0.1
Thanks a lot Herbert for your detail information and confirmation, then we will only do BVT level test on RC3 and leverage test results on RC2. Regards, Yu Zhen On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org wrote: Hi Yuzhen, On 22.09.2013 10:47, Yuzhen Fan wrote: For RC3, could you please share a little bit more on the impact to the functions of the AOO, from testing perspective? QE have been doing RC build acceptance test on RC1 and RC2 from last week, we'd like to know then evaluate what level test we need to consider for RC3. Thanks! Thanks for asking. I created the detailed list of changes and issues fixed by RC3: http://people.apache.org/~hdu/**izlist_aoo401_rc2_vs_rc3.htmhttp://people.apache.org/~hdu/izlist_aoo401_rc2_vs_rc3.htm In short the relevant changes were fixes for the AOO's SDK on Windows, which is only developer-testable and it doesn't impact end users. Another important update in the respin was that the just finished Turkish translation was integrated for RC3, even though it was way past the original l10n deadline. So from an end-user perspective RC2 and RC3 are identical except that now there is a Turkish localization. All testing results can be reused. Herbert
Re: [RELEASE]: propose a further RC3 for AOO 4.0.1
Hi Herbert and Juergen, For RC3, could you please share a little bit more on the impact to the functions of the AOO, from testing perspective? QE have been doing RC build acceptance test on RC1 and RC2 from last week, we'd like to know then evaluate what level test we need to consider for RC3. Thanks! Regards, Yu Zhen On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I propose a further RC3 for AOO 4.0.1 based on branch AOO401 rev. 1524958. I have fixed 2 further serious issues that are important for office automation tasks. The fixes are locally and affect only a few places. It's mainly my fault and I did some stupid mistakes when I fixed it initially. Some tests worked but the tests were not complete. Anyway we are now preparing the RC3 and it should become available over the weekend. The upload is very slow. We changed also the update Url for better tracking of this release and I integrated a further language Turkish which was ready and 100% UI complete. But we should keep in mind the translation deadline for AOO 4.0.1 was Sep. 6th. I will be on vacation but Herbert will replace me as acting release manager and will take care that the bits are available finally on dist. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Testing for OpenOffice 4.0.1 (RC) Start! Call for volunteers!
Thanks Prachi, Kay, Alexandro, Akriti, Edwin, Dick and Liu Ping for your quick response and volunteering! Here is the assignment for you all and general testing list is attached. Windows: Prachi is for Writer Akriti is for Calc Dick is for Impress Linux: Kay is for Writer Alexandro is for Calc Edwin is for Impress Mac: Liu Ping is for Writer Yu Zhen is for Calc (One more volunteer is needed for Impress!) Testing requirement: 1. Do a quick go through with RC build following general testing list on your platform 2. Notify us once critical bugs are discovered 3. Send the test result to me for consolidation with other platforms before Sep 18 Thanks again for your participate!! Regards, Yu Zhen General Testing List.ods Description: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.spreadsheet - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Verify AOO 4.0.1 Release Candidate - Please verify resolved language bugs(show stopper)
Dear all, Lots of language bugs are prioritized as 4.0.1 show stoppers and they have already been resolved. Please locate your interested bugs in below list[1] and do verification as soon as possible, your help means much to this release candidate! Quick steps on how to do: 1. Work on the Language bugs: Product is Native-LANG 2. Change the Status: from RESOLVED to VERIFIED and add the comment. [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremremaction=runnamedcmd=4.0.1_release_blocker%2B%3Fsharer_id=18list_id=89656 Regards, Yu Zhen
Testing for OpenOffice 4.0.1 (RC) Start! Call for volunteers!
Hi All, The Release Candidate build is announced, and we can start doing RC acceptance test now. This is the call for volunteers on the final tests. Any one who can contribute to the testing before this Wednesday(09/18), please provide your TestLink ID and preferred platforms, and I will send you the general testing list. Thanks! Please note, the RC is based on the SNAPSHOT tag, rev. 1521921 (corresponding AOO401 branch, rev. 1521908). Regards, Yu Zhen
[QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20130913
Hi All, We continue doing the AOO 4.0.1 showstopper defect verification this week, here is the weekly update (09/09 - 09/13): *Test execution:* impacted area testing when doing bug verification, almost complete for Writer, Impress and Calc auto-filter * Defect summary:* 1. Defect verification(with flag 4.0.0_release_blocker+/?) : there are 44 bugs in backlog now, among of them, 27 are for translation, 7 are for code, which need actions from native reporters and development, respectively https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremremaction=runnamedcmd=4.0.1_release_blocker%2B%3Fsharer_id=18list_id=85231 Accomplished this week (only for Function UI) Verified/FixedReopenedWait for buildLook for env/platform New fixed/added in backlog 90006 Backlog at end of this week TotalL10NFunction CodeFunction UI 4427710 *Issues quality highlight:* 1. Code is frozen, the first RC will be announced later Friday 2. There is no critical new defect found so far when testing Calc auto-filter *Volunteer status:* 1. 6 volunteers are on defect verification work for 4.0.1 showstopper 2. No volunteers are for left translation defects' verification *Plan for next week:* 1. Work with volunteers to verify showstopper defects (total 44, function 10) 2. Work with volunteers to do general testing on RC1 3. Run GUI PVT against RC build when it is ready (scheduled on 09/14) Thanks you all for effort this week, we are towards to the release candidate of AOO 4.0.1, let's continue and make progress next week! Regards, Yu Zhen
[QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20130906
Hi All, We continue doing the AOO 4.0.1 showstopper defect verification this week, here is the weekly update (09/02 - 09/06): *Test execution*: we run PVT against AOO.4.0.1_r1518667 and compare to the baseline AOO4.0_r1503704 (the performance on XLS saving time is improved), please see detail on separate PVT report * Defect summary:* 1. Defect verification(with flag 4.0.0_release_blocker+/?) : there are 27 bugs in backlog now, among of them, 5 are for translation, 8 are for code, which need actions from native reporters and development, respectively https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremremaction=runnamedcmd=4.0.1_release_blocker%2B%3Fsharer_id=18list_id=85231 Accomplished this week (only for Function UI) Verified/FixedReopenedWait for buildLook for env/platform New fixed/added in backlog 80819 Backlog at end of this week TotalL10NFunction CodeFunction UI 275814 *Issues quality highlight:* 1. We cannot contain fixing bugs after Sep 6(the deadline of bugfix), except defects related to Spreadsheet auto-filter https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremremaction=runnamedcmd=4.0.0_regression_confirmedsharer_id=18list_id=84503 2. The risk on defect verification is catabatic as 5 volunteers join this work, however, it is sitll tight for more testing around the impact areas after defect verification *Volunteer status: * 1. 5 volunteers are on defect verification work for 4.0.1 showstopper 2. No volunteers are for left translation defects' verification * Plan for next week:* 1. Work with volunteers to verify showstopper defects (total 27) 2. Play more testing around the impact areas (e.g. Spreadsheet auto-filter) 3. Run GUI PVT against RC build when it is ready (scheduled on 09/14) Thanks you all for effort this week, we are towards to the release candidate of AOO 4.0.1, let's continue and make progress next week! Regards, Yu Zhen
[QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20130830
Hi All, We start doing the AOO 4.0.1 showstopper defect verification this week, here is the weekly update (8/26 - 08/30): *Test execution:* N/A * Defect summary:* 1. 15 defects are fixed and 5 defects are verified this week, so we have 25(15+15-5) in the backlog to verify - https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremremaction=runnamedcmd=4.0.1_release_blocker%2B%3Fsharer_id=18list_id=85231 2. In backlog, 30 regression defects are candiate to be showstopper - https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremremaction=runnamedcmd=4.0.0_regression_confirmedsharer_id=18list_id=84503 * Issues quality highlight:* 1. 30 + 14 defects are waiting for fix or triage before Sep 6(the deadline of bugfix) 2. Defect verification is with risk as no volunteer is on this work considering potential work load on candidate defects for showstopper * Volunteer status:* we have 0 volunteers on showstopper verification * Plan for next week:* 1. Continue to verify showstopper defects 2. Continue to call for volunteers on defect verification Any one who can contribute on showstopper defect verifcation, please let me know! Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: [RELEASE]: propose translation deadline for AOO 4.0.1
If 09/14(Saturday) is for RC1 and 09/16(Monday) is for optional RC2, we will actually have 1 RC and do RC testing for 2 days, from 9/17 - 9/18. I think it's OK for a bugfix release, but it really depends on the quality of bug fixes and the stability of the RC build. I have updated the release schedule in wiki [1] [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0.1 Regards, Yu Zhen On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.comwrote: On 8/28/13 5:02 PM, Yuzhen Fan wrote: Juergen, Based on above proposed translation deadline and referring the principle in 4.0 release schedule, I have listed below checkpoints as 4.0.1 release schedule in wiki, could you please check and I will correct in wiki for any inaccuracy. 08/05 - 09/06 bugfix and stabilization, no feature development 08/05 - 09/06 translation 08/26 - 09/13 bugfix verification and regression testing on related areas 09/16 RC1 09/23 RC2 09/27 GA Taking into account that I will go on vacation from Sep. 20 - Oct. 7 I would like to have the release in front of my vacation if possible. 09/14 RC1 optional 09/16 RC2 09/19 GA I hope that the bug fixes are made careful and that we concentrate on the most serious bugfixes only. Fixes can be tested already and we will have a further build at the end of this week. Juergen Regards, Yu Zhen On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, it seems that besides new languages some communities are working on fixes/improvements of the existing translation which is fine for me. To coordinate this work with the rest I would like to propose a general translation deadline for new languages as well as updates of existing ones. I propose September 6th, 2013 - 12:00 UTC at noon Please take this date into account of any translation related planning. Changes after this date won't make it into AOO 4.0.1 and the earlier you have finished the work the better it is and you will have more time for testing and potential further fixes. The general workflow is to create an issue, assign it to me and request the showstopper flag. When the translation is ready put a comment in the issue to signal that it can be integrated. Thanks Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [RELEASE]: propose translation deadline for AOO 4.0.1
Juergen, Based on above proposed translation deadline and referring the principle in 4.0 release schedule, I have listed below checkpoints as 4.0.1 release schedule in wiki, could you please check and I will correct in wiki for any inaccuracy. 08/05 - 09/06 bugfix and stabilization, no feature development 08/05 - 09/06 translation 08/26 - 09/13 bugfix verification and regression testing on related areas 09/16 RC1 09/23 RC2 09/27 GA Regards, Yu Zhen On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, it seems that besides new languages some communities are working on fixes/improvements of the existing translation which is fine for me. To coordinate this work with the rest I would like to propose a general translation deadline for new languages as well as updates of existing ones. I propose September 6th, 2013 - 12:00 UTC at noon Please take this date into account of any translation related planning. Changes after this date won't make it into AOO 4.0.1 and the earlier you have finished the work the better it is and you will have more time for testing and potential further fixes. The general workflow is to create an issue, assign it to me and request the showstopper flag. When the translation is ready put a comment in the issue to signal that it can be integrated. Thanks Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Call for volunteers to verify 4.0.1 resolved defects
Hi All, Currently we have about 15 resolved showstopper bugs in 4.0.1[1], if you have interest in joining the bug verification work, could you please let me know your Bugzilla ID and platforms you have, I will assign bugs to you. Thanks very much! [1] all proposed showstopper issues for AOO 4.0.1(proposed and already approved) https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremremaction=runnamedcmd=4.0.1_release_blocker%2B%3Fsharer_id=18list_id=84504 [2] build download website https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshotfullsets Regard, Yu Zhen
Call for volunteers to confirm 4.0 defects
Hi All, Currently we have about 45 unconfirmed bugs in 4.0[1], if you have interest in joining the bug confirmation work, could you please let me know your Bugzilla ID and platforms you have, I will assign bugs to you. Thanks very much! [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremremaction=runnamedcmd=Unconfirmed_Defects_on_4.0sharer_id=249089list_id=78518 Regard, Yu Zhen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC2)
+1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 I have successfully installed RC2 on Win7, Mac, Ubuntu and RHEL. I play with the Writer, Calc, Impress for a while, there are no new critical issues to prevent releasing it. Regards, Yu Zhen On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.comwrote: On 7/17/13 9:40 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate (RC2 revision 1503704) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. It is a key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice. This release candidate provides the following important changes compared to former OpenOffice releases: (1) a major UI change/improvement by introducing a new sidebar concept where the idea is the comes from IBM's Symphony. It's the combination of reimplementing a complete new framework for sidebars and merging the existing sidebar in impress and code of various content panels from the Symphony grant in OpenOffice. (2) 190 fixes from Symphony are merged and integrated, mainly interoperability issues (3) 600 defects are fixed (4) many more features and improvements are integrated For a detailed feature overview please see the release notes under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Notes . But keep in mind that the release notes are not yet final and will be updated and polished ... The release candidate artifacts (source release, as well as binary releases for 23 languages) and further information how to verify and review Apache OpenOffice 4.0 can be found on the following wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshot The related and updated RAT scan for this RC can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/aoo-4.0.0_rat/aoo-4.0.0_rat-output.html The RC is based on the release branch AOO400, revision 1503704! Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. The vote starts now and will be open until: UTC 3:00pm on Friday, 19 July: 2013-07-19 3:00 UTC. But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would like to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project members. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... +1 from me I have done my normal test routine, have built the src release , have played with the SDK and the office. Looks fine for to me. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
[QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20130719
Hi All, We complete release candidate acceptance test on RC1 and RC2, as well as the defect verification we can do, here is the weekly update (07/15 - 07/19): *Test execution:* 1. Release candidate acceptance test - please see detail in TestLink We have completed 76 executions dedicated for release candidate, no new critical issues are found in RC2 2. Release candidate acceptance test - test guidance here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+RC+Acceptance+Test+Guidance *Defect summary:* 1. Defect verification(with flag 4.0.0_release_blocker+) : there are 39 bugs in backlog now, among of them, 16 are for translation, 11 are for code, which need actions from native reporters and development, respectively Accomplished this week (only for Function UI) Verified/FixedReopenedWait for buildLook for env/platform New fixed/added in backlog 90015 Backlog at end of this week TotalL10NFunction CodeFunction UI 39161112 *Issues quality highlight:* 1. Windows 8 crash is reported on RC1 and get fixed in RC2 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122752 2. There are no new critical issues are found on RC2, Vote for RC2 will being closed this Friday(7/19) * Volunteer status: * 1. 6 volunteers are on test execution work for RC 2. No volunteers are for left translation defects' verification * Plan for next week:* 1. Work with volunteers to verify defects as release blocker (total 39) Thanks you all for effort this week, we are towards to the release of AOO 4.0, we are almost there!! Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: Possible show stopper on Windows 8, please verify
Simon, Juergen and all, I have checked the dll on Windows 7 in Writer/Calc/Impress, with steps: enter Hello World, Ctrl-A to select all, Ctrl-C to copy, Ctrl-X to cut, Ctrl-V to paste, and also using menu, like 'Edit' - 'Copy', 'Cut' or 'Paste'. All above function work without regression. Regards, Yu Zhen On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com wrote: Juergen, I believe it is a right decision to respin and include this fix. While besides verifying it on Windows 8, I also asked Yu Zhen to help verify the dll on Windows 7 to ensure the fix is no impact to Windows 7. Yu Zhen will update the result within hours. Thanks very much for your quick turn around on this critical issue! - Shenfeng (Simon) 2013/7/16 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com On 7/16/13 2:03 PM, Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: On 7/16/13 1:06 PM, Peter Junge wrote: On 7/16/2013 6:55 PM, Max Merbald wrote: Hi Jürgen, I just tried the same action with both AOO 4 without your dll file and with it, using even the very same file where I had that crash on June 22, but in neither case did I have a crash this time. I think I'll work a bit more with Openoffice 4 now and if anything of the kind happens again I'll report right away and write down the exact circumstances. I think it might be possible that it happens only in very special circumstances, maybe dependant on which other software you're running while working with AOO 4. I also gave it a try on Windows 8 (64 bit) and there's no sign of a crash. Elaborating further on particular conditions. Maybe it's related to specific hardware, e.g. graphics card? @Samer: As you seem to be able to reproduce the issue constantly, do you have any special hardware? it is not easy for me to decide at the moment. What do others think? A respin means rebuilding all platforms, signing and uploading the new files. And then another vote cycle of 72 hr. Do we need another 72-hour vote? If there are no objections I'd support making a patch without triggering a full vote. from my point of view not, I know the code, what we change and I can live with reviewing the generated patch between the RC and the new build. And the longer I am thinking about the issue and that it is now known that there is a potential problem I am getting more confident that we should do the respin. I will check what other potential important uncritical fixes can we include as well. But I would like to have it at a minimum to reduce the testing effort for the respin. Juergen -Rob I personally will run into a time problem because I have to move into a new flat and will be offline for some days until Thursday of next week. It's no big deal and somebody else can do the work and a good release is of course important ;-) If we want a respin than we have to decide today and ideally until 3:00 pm (UTC +2). Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
[QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20130712
Hi All, We continue doing the AOO 4.0 Final Regression test this week as well as the defect verification, here is the weekly update (07/08 - 07/12): *Test execution:* 1. Final Regression test We have assigned 1804 text executions to about 20 volunteers, and completed about 68% in execution (1221 test executions done). We are closing this test window this week Sub TotalAssignedNot Assigned SubTotalRunNot Run Mac66446136695203 Win75254423529083 Redhat5145141283860 Ubuntu37537537500 Debian12120120 Total209018041221583286 2. Release candidate acceptance test - test plan is ready, wait for RC build, test guidance here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+RC+Acceptance+Test+Guidance *Defect summary:* 1. Defect verification(with flag 4.0.0_release_blocker+) : there are 59 bugs in backlog now, among of them, 31 are for translation, 11 are for code, which need actions from native reporters and development, respectively Accomplished this week (only for Function UI) Verified/FixedReopendWait for buildLook for env/platformNew fixed/added in backlog 182548 Backlog at end of this week TotalL10NFunction CodeFunction UI 59311117 *Issues quality highlight:* 1. We need to clean up 59 resolved/fixed release blocker defects, there is gap on translation defects' verification 2. Some of these defects were late changes, and we may have to wait for RC to verify some of them * Volunteer status: * 1. No volunteers are for left translation defects' verification 2. No new volunteers(total 20 so far) on test execution work 3. 2 volunteers are on defect verification work, make little progress * Plan for next week:* 1. Work with volunteers to verify defects as release blocker (total 59) 2. Continue to do Drawing exploration test on Mac and Linux 3. Start to do RC acceptance test providing RC build is ready Thanks you all for effort this week, we are towards to the release candidate of AOO 4.0, let's continue and make progress next week! Regards, Yu Zhen
Testing for OpenOffice 4.0 (RC) Start! Call for volunteers!
Hi All, The Release Candidate build is just announced, and we can start doing RC acceptance test now. This is the call for volunteers on the final tests. Any one who can contribute to the testing, please send me your TestLink ID and preferred platforms, and I will assign test cases to you. The test plan is ready with test cases having been added in TestLink, here is the test guidance[1]. Please note, the RC is based on the release branch AOO400, revision 1502185. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+RC+Acceptance+Test+Guidance Regards, Yu Zhen On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the report, Yu Zhen! Juergen just annoucned the RC build. Let's call for volunteers and start the RC build testing! - Shenfeng (Simon) 2013/7/12 Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com Hi All, We continue doing the AOO 4.0 Final Regression test this week as well as the defect verification, here is the weekly update (07/08 - 07/12): *Test execution:* 1. Final Regression test We have assigned 1804 text executions to about 20 volunteers, and completed about 68% in execution (1221 test executions done). We are closing this test window this week Sub TotalAssignedNot Assigned SubTotalRunNot Run Mac66446136695203 Win75254423529083 Redhat5145141283860 Ubuntu37537537500 Debian12120120 Total209018041221583286 2. Release candidate acceptance test - test plan is ready, wait for RC build, test guidance here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+RC+Acceptance+Test+Guidance *Defect summary:* 1. Defect verification(with flag 4.0.0_release_blocker+) : there are 59 bugs in backlog now, among of them, 31 are for translation, 11 are for code, which need actions from native reporters and development, respectively Accomplished this week (only for Function UI) Verified/FixedReopendWait for buildLook for env/platform New fixed/added in backlog 182548 Backlog at end of this week TotalL10NFunction CodeFunction UI 59311117 *Issues quality highlight:* 1. We need to clean up 59 resolved/fixed release blocker defects, there is gap on translation defects' verification 2. Some of these defects were late changes, and we may have to wait for RC to verify some of them * Volunteer status: * 1. No volunteers are for left translation defects' verification 2. No new volunteers(total 20 so far) on test execution work 3. 2 volunteers are on defect verification work, make little progress * Plan for next week:* 1. Work with volunteers to verify defects as release blocker (total 59) 2. Continue to do Drawing exploration test on Mac and Linux 3. Start to do RC acceptance test providing RC build is ready Thanks you all for effort this week, we are towards to the release candidate of AOO 4.0, let's continue and make progress next week! Regards, Yu Zhen
Towards AOO 4.0 Release Candidate - 61 show stopper bugs are waiting for verification
Dear all, We have verified 20 resolved show stopper bugs since this Monday(July 8), there are now *61 *bugs in backlog which need us to do the verification as soon as possible. If you have a piece of time, please pick up your interested bugs from this list to verify. If you are the reporters for the bugs, it may only take your about 10 minutes for one bug. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremremaction=runnamedcmd=4.0.0_release_blocker%2B%2C%20Resolvedsharer_id=251929list_id=72804 Also, these bugs' fix are code related, the verification are expected from development. Bug ID Product Component Assignee StatusResolution Summary 122192 Native-Lang pt-br iss...@openoffice.apache.org RESOLVED FIXED Some strings directing to Oracle 122356 App Dev sdk j...@apache.org RESOLVED FIXED SDK broken after 3 layer removal 122444 Installation update notifications o...@apache.org RESOLVED FIXED Update Code to Reflect Final Update Server Destination for AOO 4.0 122478 General ui j...@apache.org RESOLVED FIXED Remaining of basis-link after 3-layer removal 122482 App Dev sdk j...@apache.org RESOLVED FIXED Impossible to build SDK C++ examples 122483 App Dev sdk j...@apache.org RESOLVED FIXED unoapploader sets wrong LD_LIBRARY_PATH 122500 Build Tools code o...@apache.org RESOLVED FIXED Impossible to build with Visual C++ 2008 Express Edition 122504 Installation code j...@apache.org RESOLVED FIXED Rename the source files to apache-openoffice-... to show clearly the affiliation for this project 122586 App Dev api j...@apache.org RESOLVED FIXED fix awt GridControl refresh 122647 General code h...@apache.org RESOLVED FIXED Python linked against system OpenSSL 122692 General code iss...@openoffice.apache.org RESOLVED FIXED boost build fixes for OS/2 We are in the build of AOO 4.0 RC build now, your help means much to it! Regards, Yu Zhen
Call for verification on resolved show stopper issues for AOO 4.0
Hi All, There are about 70 4.0 show stopper bugs are resolved/fixed, we need to verify them as soon as possible. Please bug reporters verify your bugs from this list. Thanks for your time in advance, if every one clean his own bugs timely, we can get an awesome achievement quickly! https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremremaction=runnamedcmd=4.0.0_release_blocker%2B%2C%20Resolvedsharer_id=251929list_id=71839 Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: Drawing testing of AOO4 snapshot
Hi, I have seen your test results on Win7 in the wiki page, it's very good. You don't have to include everything from detail in depth, we need to ensure the coverage as wide as possible in this exploration test. http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/AOO40_Drawing Regards Yu Zhen On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 2:08 AM, bugreporte...@hushmail.com wrote: Hi Yu Zhen, seems like my first email wasn't delivered (does not appear in the mailinglist), here is the second attempt. Here are my results from some testing on Drawing. Should I include everything into the wiki page? http://pastebin.com/ZnkTFKJc regards
[QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20130705
Hi All, We continue doing the AOO 4.0 Final Regression test this week, here is the weekly update (07/01 - 07/05): *Test execution:* 1. Exploration testing of Base on Mac, Covered Database, Table, Query, Form, Report with embedded database, DB2 via JDBC and Text(CSV files) New bugs found (No Mac special): 122667 Unable to update(but able to delete) table's existing fields in a Text(CSV) table 122668 Unable to add a field in a Text(CSV) table 122669 Undo toolbar button is not enabled after delete a field from a Text(CSV) table 122680 Test alignment in table cell changes from left to right after copy number text from Writer to Calc Detail report/scenarios: http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/AOO40_Database 2. Exploration testing of Drawing on Win7, no obvious issues are found so far Detail report/scenarios: http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/AOO40_Drawing 3. Full/Final Regression test We have assigned 1804 text executions to about 20 volunteers, and completed about 68% in execution (1219 test executions done). We will retest the failed/blocked test executions as the defects get fixed *Defect summary:* 1. There are 78 release blocker (with flag 4.0.0_release_blocker+) now, 69 need verification (30 for translation) 2. 4 more Base defects are opened this week, no platform specific * Issues quality highlight:* 1. We have managed to complete Base exploration test with basic function defects exposed 2. From the current test results on Drawing exploration test, no obvious issues are found 3. We need to clean up 69 resolved/fixed release blocker defects, this is the first priority work next week 4. QAs are reminded to retest the failed/blocked test executions as the defects get fixed * Volunteer status: * 1. No new volunteers(total 20 so far) on test execution work 2. 2 volunteers are on defect verification work, make little progress 3. 1 volunteer on Drawing exploration test, make good progress this week (on Win7) * Plan for next week:* 1. Work with volunteers to verify defects as release blocker (total 69) 2. Continue to do Drawing exploration test on Mac and Linux 3. Retest the failed/blocked test executions as the defects get fixed Thanks you all for effort this week, let's continue and make progress next week! Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: Call for volunteers to do exploration test on Base / Drawing and write test cases for Base / Drawing:
Hi bugreporter99, To answer your questions: #using winXP (or if preferred 7) - Please use Win7 if it is convenience for you #some instructions what to test or I can just do some random stuff - There is no existing test cases so far, please do some general or exploration test. How is your Drawing test going on? Please record your test result in this link: http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/AOO40_Drawing for Drawing. You can refer the test result in this link for Base http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/AOO40_Database for Base Thanks a lot for your time offering help on testing! Regards, Yu Zhen On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:34 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.orgwrote: bugreporter99 wrote: where to get the latest snapshot?? what I used before does not work: https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/OOOUSERS/** Development+Snapshot+Builds#**DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-** AOOSnapshotfullsetshttps://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshotfullsets They were being uploaded. You will find them on that page now. Happy testing! Can we have a link to the latest snapshot on the Download page: http://www.openoffice.org/**download/index.htmlhttp://www.openoffice.org/download/index.html This has been discussed, but by policy we don't link to development installation packages from the official download page. Regards, Andrea. --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Call for volunteers to do exploration test on Base / Drawing and write test cases for Base / Drawing:
Hi All, Here is the update about exploration test on Base as of July 1st: I have completed Base exploration test on Win7, Covered Database, Table, Query, Form, Report with embedded database, DB2 via JDBC and Text(CSV files), here are the new bugs found (red ones are marked with flag 4.0.0 release blocker ?) 122589 AOO Base crash when delete table from query design and close the design window 122596 Unable to edit table's existing fields in a db2 table 122603 Date field displays incorrect value as number text in Base report 122604 Data sort does not work for Asc and Desc with group field when set it in Base report wizard 122605 value of sort by is not stored when click back in Base report wizard 122611 Unable to edit CSV table 122612 Unable to add more than one table in query design window for CSV database Detail report/scenarios: http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/AOO40_Database I start to testing it on Mac today with the planning on DB2, Text. At the same time, it would be great if you could offer helping on other type of databases and drivers, on all platforms (Redhat, Mac and Windows), if you have interest and time, please contact me! Regards, Yu Zhen On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Here is the update about exploration test on Base: Today, I test Base on Win7, focus on creating a new database, connecting existing DB2 database via JDBC, and also do some basic operations on table and query. One crash issue is exposed when delete tables in query. I have recorded 5 related test scenarios and the defect found in report web links: http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/AOO40_Database We now need your support on exploration test on Base and Drawing on Redhat, Mac and Windows, if you have interest and time, please don't hesitate to offering help! Regards, Yu Zhen On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, This is call for volunteers to do exploration test on Base / Drawing and write test cases for Base / Drawing: 1. About exploration test on Base and Drawing, please could volunteers report in QA mail group on (1) covered platform/build/database; (2) tested scenario/steps; (3) test result/defect found, by updating these two web links: http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/AOO40_Database for Base, and http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/AOO40_Drawing for Drawing. Reference: Base test matrix http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Tescase 2. About writing test cases for Base, I have completed to create hierarchies of test suites in TestLink based on the finalized test matrix http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Tescase. Please could volunteers navigate the test suite tree view in the Test Specification (Test Project is Apache OpenOffice testproject), and let's following below process to organize test case writing: 1) Volunteers provide their TestLink ID and list of their preferred test suites to Yu Zhen Fan (fanyuz...@gmail.com) (Currently I have Anil Kumar's TestLink ID and confirmation to write test cases) 2) Yu Zhen specifies the test suites' assignment to the individual volunteer 3) Volunteers write test cases in the assigned test suites, in TestLink. For test cases related to connectivity testing, please attach the live test DB(s) and provide steps to set up test environment in Preconditions. It's encouraged test cases' author to test his/her test cases in execution stage. 3. I will work with Liu Ping Tan on test matrix for Drawing later this week, if you have interest on Drawing test case writing, please let me know, I will put you in the pipeline. Regards, Yu Zhen
[QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20130628
Hi All, We started doing the AOO 4.0 Final Regression test this week, here is the weekly update (6/24 - 6/28): *Test execution:* 1. Exploration testing of Base on Windows 7, Covered Database, Table, Query, Form, Report with embedded database, DB2 via JDBC and Text(CSV files) New bugs found: (red ones are marked with flag 4.0.0 release blocker ?) 122589 AOO Base crash when delete table from query design and close the design window 122596 Unable to edit table's existing fields in a db2 table 122603 Date field displays incorrect value as number text in Base report 122604 Data sort does not work for Asc and Desc with group field when set it in Base report wizard 122605 value of sort by is not stored when click back in Base report wizard 122611 Unable to edit CSV table 122612 Unable to add more than one table in query design window for CSV database Detail report/scenarios: http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/AOO40_Database 2. Full/Final Regression test We have assigned 1804 text executions to about 20 volunteers, and completed about 66% in execution (1189 test executions done). We will retest the failed/blocked test executions as the defects get fixed *Defect summary:* 1. 40 proposed release blocker (with flag 4.0.0_release_blocker+), 22 more this week (18 last week) - can we contain? 2. 3 Base critical defects (in red above) are opened this week, we need review to decide if add them in release blocker list or switch with the existing ones - how many people use Base? *Issues quality highlight:* 1. We have execution gap in Base exploaration test as lack volunteers in testing 2. The number of AOO 4.0.0 release blockers is increased to 40 this week, do we contain or re-triage? 3. QAs are reminded to retest the failed/blocked test executions as the defects get fixed *Volunteer status: * 1. No new volunteers(total 20 so far) on test execution work, 2 person ask for more as they have completed their assignment 2. Assign 2 volunteers(1 from testing work) on defect verification work 3. Check possible volunteers on Base exploration test to see if they are avaiable, we have execution gap here *Plan for next week:* 1. Continue to do Base exploration test on Mac and Linux 2. Work with volunteers to verify defects with severity as blocker or critical (total 86) 3. Retest the failed/blocked test executions as the defects get fixed Thanks you all for effort this week, let's continue and make progress next week! Regards, Yu Zhen
