Hi Phil
Am 20.03.13 16:19, schrieb Phillip Rhodes:
IRC is great and all, and I'm all for having as many channels as
people feel a need for. Just keep in mind that the ASF approach to
projects is to ensure that decision making is done
in public and very openly. I think the implication of that
gt; one can use chat in a sidebar.
>
> I am not objecting to IRC. But it is not a panacea.
>
> - Dennis
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Phillip Rhodes [mailto:motley.crue@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 08:19
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Su
From: Phillip Rhodes [mailto:motley.crue@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 08:19
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: What I miss a bit at the project
IRC is great and all, and I'm all for having as many channels as
people feel a need for. Just keep in mind that the ASF a
Well said, Rob. I should have been more explicit in explaining that
when I say "decision making" I mean "big decisions" for some value of "big".
It's a little bit subjective and will always be a judgment call, but I
think your
example is perfect. "How to fix the broken build" can absolutely be
do
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Phillip Rhodes
wrote:
> IRC is great and all, and I'm all for having as many channels as
> people feel a need for. Just keep in mind that the ASF approach to
> projects is to ensure that decision making is done
> in public and very openly. I think the implicati
IRC is great and all, and I'm all for having as many channels as
people feel a need for. Just keep in mind that the ASF approach to
projects is to ensure that decision making is done
in public and very openly. I think the implication of that is that
most discussion that leads directly to a decis
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
> Hi all
>
> At the old OpenOffice project we have had different IRC Channels. Same were
> more active then others, but we have had a load more activity then now. The
> fact, that not a load Apache Projects use IRC does not mean that we are n
Hi Rafael,
as you know we had several channels on freenode.net
#openoffice.org (user channel)
#dev.openoffice.org (developer channel)
#qa.openoffice.org (qa channel)
+1 to use IRC and not to use tools like Google+ or Facebook or the like...
I realy would like a more active IRC Channel. I prop
Hm. Why use #openoffice.org when, say, #openoffice or the like, would do?
louis
On 20 March 2013 09:28, Raphael Bircher wrote:
> Hi all
>
> At the old OpenOffice project we have had different IRC Channels. Same were
> more active then others, but we have had a load more activity then now. The
> f