Op 11-10-2016 om 23:11 schreef Marcus:
Am 10/04/2016 10:29 PM, schrieb Marcus:
OK, binary and source code testing is on a good way.
What about the release notes. Are these somewhere reachable/readable
already?
Hi Dirk and Joerg,
we have finished the release notes. Please check if you need to
Hello Marcus,
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> Hi Dirk and Joerg,
>
> we have finished the release notes. Please check if you need to
> incorporate the latest changes into your translations.
OK, the german version ist ready.
Greetings,
Jörg
-
Am 10/04/2016 10:29 PM, schrieb Marcus:
OK, binary and source code testing is on a good way.
What about the release notes. Are these somewhere reachable/readable
already?
Hi Dirk and Joerg,
we have finished the release notes. Please check if you need to
incorporate the latest changes into yo
On 10/6/2016 5:29 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/05/2016 12:23 AM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
Could people working on the bugzilla entries check the status and update
as appropriate?
I've seen now all issues as "Resolved - Fixed" - or "Verified - Fixed".
Note that I did not include the Mac Tables
Am 10/05/2016 12:23 AM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
Could people working on the bugzilla entries check the status and update
as appropriate?
I've seen now all issues as "Resolved - Fixed" - or "Verified - Fixed".
Note that I did not include the Mac Tables and Queries issue,
https://bz.apache.o
On 10/5/2016 2:52 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 04/10/2016 Mechtilde wrote:
Apache OpenOffice is a project with a wide user base, who only use the
binaries. So it is important to release well defined and tested binaries.
Yes, this is important. As we did for 4.1.2, I would leave PMC members
fr
On 04/10/2016 Mechtilde wrote:
Apache OpenOffice is a project with a wide user base, who only use the
binaries. So it is important to release well defined and tested binaries.
Yes, this is important. As we did for 4.1.2, I would leave PMC members
free to vote and specify what they have done. N
Sorry for highjacking this thread...
I would like to promote some issues as release blocker for 4.1.4. The
issues are fixed in trunk and the code changes are minimal.
What would be the best way, as I see no possibility in my bugzilla-account?
regards
Matthias
Am 05.10.2016 um 00:23 schrieb Pa
Could people working on the bugzilla entries check the status and update
as appropriate?
Note that I did not include the Mac Tables and Queries issue,
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126622, in the release notes
because I did not see enough confirmation that it is fixed. I have now
Am 10/04/2016 10:31 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3+Release+Notes
ah, thanks. I've updated some text (e.g., separated the sec issue into
an own paragraph) and updated the link for the BZ issue list as it still
points to 4.0.1.
I'
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3+Release+Notes
On 10/4/2016 1:29 PM, Marcus wrote:
OK, binary and source code testing is on a good way.
What about the release notes. Are these somewhere reachable/readable
already?
Marcus
--
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I have built and run from the zip. I have also decompressed and
extracted each of the tarballs, and used "diff -r" to confirm they are
each identical to the zip. I do plan to do the signature and hash checks
for each of the three files.
You may want to add your own sign
Am 10/04/2016 06:39 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
On some of my Windows builds, I get a failure, but doing a new "build
--all", without cleaning, works. That may be worth trying while you are
waiting for more expert advice.
I think there may be problems in whatever is supposed to be enforcing
d
On 10/4/2016 4:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Oct 3, 2016, at 3:49 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 10/3/2016 12:45 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/03/2016 09:40 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
Testing seems to be going well, but there is a very specific requirement
for a release.
A PMC member, t
Sorry for the delay: Building OSX as we speak.
A build the week-before-last had no regressions.
> On Sep 25, 2016, at 10:33 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>
> I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there
> are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote per
On some of my Windows builds, I get a failure, but doing a new "build
--all", without cleaning, works. That may be worth trying while you are
waiting for more expert advice.
I think there may be problems in whatever is supposed to be enforcing
dependency order, so that a module gets built too
Am 04.10.2016 um 00:30 schrieb Marcus:
Am 10/03/2016 11:26 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
On 10/3/2016 2:02 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Marcus wrote:
wow, *all signed source code packages* ?
I assume that this does not literally mean that you must test the .bz2,
the .gz and the .zip. They a
Am 10/04/2016 10:04 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Marcus wrote:
@Andrea:
Can you please check the
"apache-openoffice-4.1.3-r1761381-src.tar.gz.sha256" file? It's in
binary mode and not useable for checksum comparsion.
It can be used if you download it.
sorry, no. That's the reason why I poste
> On Oct 3, 2016, at 3:49 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>
>
> On 10/3/2016 12:45 PM, Marcus wrote:
>> Am 10/03/2016 09:40 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
>>> Testing seems to be going well, but there is a very specific requirement
>>> for a release.
>>>
>>> A PMC member, to cast a binding +1 vot
Marcus wrote:
@Andrea:
Can you please check the
"apache-openoffice-4.1.3-r1761381-src.tar.gz.sha256" file? It's in
binary mode and not useable for checksum comparsion.
It can be used if you download it. But I've now forced all checksum
files to be treated as text, which should allow you to cli
Testing the reference builds is indeed extremely important, and should
be most of the testing.
The significance of the builds from source is that a PMC member can only
cast a binding +1 vote if they have done one, and we need at least three
binding +1 votes to release. They also need to have a
Hello,
Jan (a member of the local german community) asks me to say the following:
he has tested 4.1.3 under MS Windows and no errors are found, the installation
works also properly.
Jörg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubsc
Hello,
for my understanding, beside doing a good build it is necessary to have
and totest defined reference builds.
The way I see it, it is not easy to do a good build if you didn't have
enough practice doing it.
I didn't myself any C/C++ build before. So IHMO I will waste time to
improve my bui
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 12:52:50PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> There were German dictionary changes.
In this case, we only update the dictionaries to the latest version
available at the time, but there is nothing else to check here, the
dictionaries do not belong to the AOO source nor this p
Am 03.10.2016 um 21:52 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
> There were German dictionary changes. Can you tell the difference
> between de, de_AT, and de_CH? If so, could you perhaps do a test in each
> of the other dialects?
>
There are differences between the german languages spoken and written
(offici
On 10/03/2016 10:20 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi Carl,
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 09:58:25PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote:
On 09/25/2016 10:33 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there
are binaries they can run. I can't start the fo
Hi Carl,
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 09:58:25PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote:
> On 09/25/2016 10:33 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> >I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there
> >are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period until we
> >have a complete rel
On 10/03/2016 09:58 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
On 09/25/2016 10:33 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as
there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period
until we have a complete release candidate.
--
On 09/25/2016 10:33 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as
there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period
until we have a complete release candidate.
--
On 10/3/2016 3:30 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/03/2016 11:26 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
On 10/3/2016 2:02 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Marcus wrote:
wow, *all signed source code packages* ?
I assume that this does not literally mean that you must test the .bz2,
the .gz and the .zip. They are eq
Am 10/03/2016 11:26 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
On 10/3/2016 2:02 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Marcus wrote:
wow, *all signed source code packages* ?
I assume that this does not literally mean that you must test the .bz2,
the .gz and the .zip. They are equivalent. This sentence is for when a
On 10/3/2016 2:02 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Marcus wrote:
wow, *all signed source code packages* ?
I assume that this does not literally mean that you must test the .bz2,
the .gz and the .zip. They are equivalent. This sentence is for when a
project makes a release composed of different parts
Marcus wrote:
wow, *all signed source code packages* ?
I assume that this does not literally mean that you must test the .bz2,
the .gz and the .zip. They are equivalent. This sentence is for when a
project makes a release composed of different parts. For the record,
trunk is already set to a
No problem so far with some use with Writer, Impress and Calc (not much).
Both with EN-US core install with French package (on kids account).
Hagar
Le 25/09/2016 à 20:33, Marcus a écrit :
Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1
Do you know which particular changes I should look for?
The dictionaries are from december 2015, so I had them already in use in
4.1.2.
But I can confirm that the difference between "schließen" (de/de-AT) and
"schliessen" (de-CH) is recognised.
Am 03.10.2016 um 21:52 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as
> there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period
> until we have a complete release candidate.
Testing latest 4.1.3 Development en-US on Windows with the following
configuration:
S
Am 10/03/2016 09:49 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
On 10/3/2016 12:45 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/03/2016 09:40 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
Testing seems to be going well, but there is a very specific requirement
for a release.
A PMC member, to cast a binding +1 vote approving a relese, needs
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 10/3/2016 12:45 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/03/2016 09:40 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
PMC members please indicate when they have done that test, to help me
decide when to start a vote.
Done on Linux-64, successful.
I've build today that branch with release options
There were German dictionary changes. Can you tell the difference
between de, de_AT, and de_CH? If so, could you perhaps do a test in each
of the other dialects?
On 10/3/2016 12:19 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hello,
I installed and tested the german version (de) on:
- Ubuntu 16.04.1 (64bit)
On 10/3/2016 12:45 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/03/2016 09:40 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
Testing seems to be going well, but there is a very specific requirement
for a release.
A PMC member, to cast a binding +1 vote approving a relese, needs to
have built the software from source and tested it
Am 10/03/2016 09:40 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
Testing seems to be going well, but there is a very specific requirement
for a release.
A PMC member, to cast a binding +1 vote approving a relese, needs to
have built the software from source and tested it on a machine under the
PMC member's co
Am 10/03/2016 09:19 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel:
I installed and tested the german version (de) on:
- Ubuntu 16.04.1 (64bit)
- Xubuntu 16.04.1 (32bit)
Everything is working as expected.
I got a mail from Jan that his tests on Win 7 were successful, too. I
hope he can post this also on h
Hello,
I installed and tested the german version (de) on:
- Ubuntu 16.04.1 (64bit)
- Xubuntu 16.04.1 (32bit)
Everything is working as expected.
regards
Matthias
Am 03.10.2016 um 13:29 schrieb Mechtilde:
> Hello,
>
> I did the same tests for Linux x86-64 deb de.
>
> I did also some work wit
Out of an irresistible curiosity I built my own ApacheOO in Debian
Unstable (Sid). It took me several build iterations, starting out with
trunk and proceeding to:
svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO413
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 4:50 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Mon,
On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:29:26 +0200
Mechtilde wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I did the same tests for Linux x86-64 deb de.
>
> I did also some work with it without problems
>
> Regards
>
> Mechtilde
I installed the Linux x86-64 DEB en-GB and am using it for routine text editing
on reasonable sized file
Hello,
I did the same tests for Linux x86-64 deb de.
I did also some work with it without problems
Regards
Mechtilde
Am 03.10.2016 um 12:57 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 09/25/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus:
>> Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
>>> I suggest that people start downloadin
Am 09/25/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus:
Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as
there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period
until we have a complete release candidate.
thanks for the point
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> The release candidate binaries, if the release is approved, will be uploaded
> exactly as is to SourceForge. They need to do what a release would do.
>
> You do have the option, if building yourself, of generating an archive that
> can be
For those of us in Debian, remove/install ApacheOO is not too painful.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> The release candidate binaries, if the release is approved, will be uploaded
> exactly as is to SourceForge. They need to do what a release would do.
>
> You do hav
The release candidate binaries, if the release is approved, will be
uploaded exactly as is to SourceForge. They need to do what a release
would do.
You do have the option, if building yourself, of generating an archive
that can be run without installing.
On 9/28/2016 1:30 PM, Hagar Delest wr
Thanks, up and running.
BTW, I noticed that it installed over my 4.1.2.
I don't remember if the RCs used to install in lieu of the production version
in the past but it may be surprising for some users.
Shouldn't it be installed in parallel (with no desktop-integration)? More
hassle but if it's
On 25/09/2016 Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as
there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period
until we have a complete release candidate.
It seems that the message where I said the upload had completed was not
-Original Message-
> From: Hagar Delest [mailto:hagar.del...@laposte.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 11:16
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Testing 4.1.3
>
> Sorry for the stupid question but is there a link to the builds???
> Not able to find any on th
Hagar Delest wrote:
> Sorry for the stupid question but is there a link to the builds???
> Not able to find any on the web site or even in the mail...
> Or should we wait for the RC (there used to be links on the website for
> the RCs).
>
> Hagar
>
>
> Le 26/09/2016 à 22:51, Marcus a écrit :
>>
Sorry for the stupid question but is there a link to the builds???
Not able to find any on the web site or even in the mail...
Or should we wait for the RC (there used to be links on the website for the
RCs).
Hagar
Le 26/09/2016 à 22:51, Marcus a écrit :
Am 09/25/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus
Am 09/25/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus:
Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as
there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period
until we have a complete release candidate.
thanks for the point
Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as
there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period
until we have a complete release candidate.
thanks for the pointer, I'll wait for the Linux 64-bit and Wi
57 matches
Mail list logo
