Hi all,
Download seems to be working again.
Regards,
Matthias
Am 27.11.21 um 13:55 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi all,
>
> While working on the buildbots with Gavin we suddenly had problems
> downloading dmake 4.13.1 from Jim's file location:
>
> https://github.c
Hi all,
While working on the buildbots with Gavin we suddenly had problems
downloading dmake 4.13.1 from Jim's file location:
https://github.com/jimjag/dmake/archive/v4.13.1/dmake-4.13.1.tar.gz
It gives a 404.
As a workaround I have uploaded dmake 4.13.1 to oooextras on SourceForge:
Hello Peter,
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 03:46:19PM +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> On 30.01.21 14:48, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> >
> > The configure script sets $INPATH and $OUTPATH to the same value when
> > it receives the parameter "--enable-dbgutil". In such case, on my
> > system, everything goes
On 30.01.21 14:48, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
The configure script sets $INPATH and $OUTPATH to the same value when
it receives the parameter "--enable-dbgutil". In such case, on my
system, everything goes into directory unxlngx6 instead of
unxlngx6.pro
Does this make sense? why would I want to w
100, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
> > Dear All,
> >
> > we recently fixed the "dmake clean" problem that deleted the whole
> > source tree, in certain condition, instead of the $INPATH directories
> > [1].
> >
> > Shall the co
Hello All,
I could finally make sense of my own message from January 1st.
Please see below.
On Fri, Jan 01, 2021 at 06:41:33PM +0100, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> we recently fixed the "dmake clean" problem that deleted the whole
> source tree, in certain con
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 08:40:51PM +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 01.01.21 18:41, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > we recently fixed the "dmake clean" problem that deleted the whole
> > source tree, in certain condition
Hi
On 01.01.21 18:41, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Dear All,
we recently fixed the "dmake clean" problem that deleted the whole
source tree, in certain condition, instead of the $INPATH directories
[1].
Shall the command also delete the "$INPATH.pro" directories? On my
syste
Dear All,
we recently fixed the "dmake clean" problem that deleted the whole
source tree, in certain condition, instead of the $INPATH directories
[1].
Shall the command also delete the "$INPATH.pro" directories? On my
system, they are:
./main/apache-commons/unxlngx6.pro
./
Hi Jim,
I spotted an "error" while building dmake (on Windows and Linux).
Maybe it is only cosmetic, but I just wanted to report it:
In file included from extern.h:95:0, from dmake.c:79: vextern.h:37:0:
warning: "EXTERN" redefined #define EXTERN In file included from
extern.
Pilot-Pirx merged pull request #113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/113
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
Hi Jim,
Am 22.12.20 um 14:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> merge away
I will do it, but other could do that as well... ;-)
BTW, I am just trying to build AOO on Windows with BeanShell 2.1.0.
Regards,
Matthias
>
>> On Dec 22, 2020, at 6:28 AM, GitBox wrote:
>>
>>
>> Pilot-Pirx commented on pull
merge away
> On Dec 22, 2020, at 6:28 AM, GitBox wrote:
>
>
> Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #113:
> URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/113#issuecomment-749494181
>
>
> Is there any reason not to merge this PR?
>
>
> --
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/113#issuecomment-749494181
Is there any reason not to merge this PR?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respo
leginee commented on pull request #113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/113#issuecomment-747527573
Worth a test. :)
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please lo
ardovm commented on pull request #113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/113#issuecomment-747509362
By the way, I followed that "pattern" as is it the same for the `install`
target in the same file:
```Makefile
install .PHONY :
@test "$(DESTDIR)$(prefix)" != "
ardovm commented on pull request #113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/113#issuecomment-747507745
@leginee I was also surprised it works :-)
Proof:
```
$ echo Hello world; echo Hallo Welt
Hello world
Hallo Welt
$
```
-
leginee commented on pull request #113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/113#issuecomment-747446201
hmm, that echo needs no quotes in
` echo Build environment not set; works without Quotes?`
looks strange. Is it special on make files that they can omit these?
ardovm opened a new pull request #113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/113
As per a recent thread on the dev@ mailing list, the "dmake clean" command
may wipe out the whole source tree, if the build environment was not set by
sourcing the appropriate `.E
>
>> > > > > On 12/13/20 4:29 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> > > > > > Hi Carl,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Am 13.12.20 um 19:02 schrieb Carl Marcum:
>> > > > > > > Hi all,
>> > > &g
gt; > Hi Carl,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Am 13.12.20 um 19:02 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Just ran into something.
> > > > > > >
Carl Marcum:
Hi all,
Just ran into something.
I ran 'dmake clean' from main probably without having ran source
and it removed all of my directories under main.
Tried to do that on Windows (Cygwin64), went into main, did
"autoconf",
"dmake clean":
$ dmake clean
-
something.
I ran 'dmake clean' from main probably without having ran source
and it removed all of my directories under main.
Tried to do that on Windows (Cygwin64), went into main, did "autoconf",
"dmake clean":
$ dmake clean
-bash: dmake: command not found
Only after
9:02 schrieb Carl Marcum:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Just ran into something.
>>>>
>>>> I ran 'dmake clean' from main probably without having ran source
>>>> and it removed all of my directories under main.
>>
Hi Carl,
Am 13.12.20 um 23:43 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 12/13/20 4:29 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Carl,
>>
>> Am 13.12.20 um 19:02 schrieb Carl Marcum:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Just ran into something.
>>>
>&
Hi Matthias,
On 12/13/20 4:29 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Carl,
Am 13.12.20 um 19:02 schrieb Carl Marcum:
Hi all,
Just ran into something.
I ran 'dmake clean' from main probably without having ran source
and it removed all of my directories under main.
Tried to do that
Hi Carl,
Am 13.12.20 um 19:02 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> Hi all,
>
> Just ran into something.
>
> I ran 'dmake clean' from main probably without having ran source
> and it removed all of my directories under main.
Tried to do that on Windows (Cygwin64), went into main,
Hi all,
Just ran into something.
I ran 'dmake clean' from main probably without having ran source
and it removed all of my directories under main.
Looks like it ran 'rm -rf */'
Best regards,
Carl
-
To
Hi Jim,
Now dmake (4.13.1) was successfully built on Windows!
Thanks!
Am 27.11.20 um 21:59 schrieb j...@apache.org:
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> jim pushed a commit to branch trunk
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/op
Try w/ https://github.com/jimjag/dmake/archive/v4.13.1/dmake-4.13.1.tar.gz
> On Nov 27, 2020, at 3:50 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 27.11.20 um 21:38 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> I don't think that patch is needed anymore... IIRC it removed
>&g
Hi Jim,
Am 27.11.20 um 21:38 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> I don't think that patch is needed anymore... IIRC it removed
> cygwin_conv_to_posix_path, which is already done in dmake-4.13
Now I get this error and dmake does not build (in Cygwin 64):
---
sysintf.c: In function ‘cygdospath’
I don't think that patch is needed anymore... IIRC it removed
cygwin_conv_to_posix_path, which is already done in dmake-4.13
> On Nov 27, 2020, at 1:14 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Additionally, since this happens when building on Windows, the patch
> seems to be:
&
Additionally, since this happens when building on Windows, the patch
seems to be:
/main/solenv/src/dmake-cygwin64.patch
It was made by Damjan for the planned Windows 64 build.
Regards,
Matthias
Am 27.11.20 um 18:41 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Tried with dmake 4.13.0:
&
Hi Jim,
Tried with dmake 4.13.0:
making and entering
C:/Source/openoffice/main/solenv/wntmsci12.pro/misc/build/
unpacking
/cygdrive/c/Source/openoffice/ext_sources/07927163cc251770d2624d816f2e9b9e-dmake-4.13.0.tar.gz
entering dmake-4.13.0
patching file path.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 317.
1 out of 1
t;
>>> ---
>>>
>>> (This is Cygwin64)
>>> gcc was updated yesterday. I even downgraded to 7.3.0-3 with no effect.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>> Am 24.02.20 um 17:40 schrieb Matthias Seidel
3.0-3 with no effect.
Regards,
Matthias
Am 24.02.20 um 17:40 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi all,
After updating a lot of packages (incl. gcc) in Cygwin64 yesterday I can
no longer build AOO for Windows.
I get errors in bootstrap while building dmake:
make[2]: Verzeichnis
„/cygdrive/c/Source/
---
>
> (This is Cygwin64)
> gcc was updated yesterday. I even downgraded to 7.3.0-3 with no effect.
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
>
>> Am 24.02.20 um 17:40 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> After updating a lot of packages (incl. gc
t;
>> Regards,
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>> Am 24.02.20 um 17:40 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> After updating a lot of packages (incl. gcc) in Cygwin64 yesterday
>>>> I can
>>>> no longer bui
updated yesterday. I even downgraded to 7.3.0-3 with no effect.
Regards,
Matthias
Am 24.02.20 um 17:40 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi all,
After updating a lot of packages (incl. gcc) in Cygwin64 yesterday I can
no longer build AOO for Windows.
I get errors in bootstrap while building dmake
rds,
Matthias
>
> Am 24.02.20 um 17:40 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After updating a lot of packages (incl. gcc) in Cygwin64 yesterday I can
>> no longer build AOO for Windows.
>>
>> I get errors in bootstrap while building dmake:
>
can you post what g++ -v prints on bash?
Am 24.02.20 um 17:40 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi all,
After updating a lot of packages (incl. gcc) in Cygwin64 yesterday I can
no longer build AOO for Windows.
I get errors in bootstrap while building dmake:
make[2]: Verzeichnis
„/cygdrive/c/Source
Hi all,
After updating a lot of packages (incl. gcc) in Cygwin64 yesterday I can
no longer build AOO for Windows.
I get errors in bootstrap while building dmake:
make[2]: Verzeichnis
„/cygdrive/c/Source/openoffice/main/solenv/wntmsci12.pro/misc/build/dmake-4.12“
wird betreten
depbase=`echo
ou
> Damjan
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> On 16 Jan, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 01/11/2018 11:24 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>> >> The patch below moves the calculation of $CCNUMVER and some other
&g
t;
> >
> > On 01/11/2018 11:24 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
> >> The patch below moves the calculation of $CCNUMVER and some other
> >> variables from main/solenv/inc/tg_compv.mk, where it is only usable by
> >> dmake, to configure, where it can be used by both dmake a
On 01/17/2018 11:17 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
On 16 Jan, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 01/11/2018 11:24 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
The patch below moves the calculation of $CCNUMVER and some other
variables from main/solenv/inc/tg_compv.mk, where it is only usable by
dmake, to configure, where it can be used by
On 16 Jan, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 01/11/2018 11:24 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>> The patch below moves the calculation of $CCNUMVER and some other
>> variables from main/solenv/inc/tg_compv.mk, where it is only usable by
>> dmake, to configure, where it can be used by
On 01/11/2018 11:24 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
The patch below moves the calculation of $CCNUMVER and some other
variables from main/solenv/inc/tg_compv.mk, where it is only usable by
dmake, to configure, where it can be used by both dmake and gbuild. This
is a requirement for me upstream some
The patch below moves the calculation of $CCNUMVER and some other
variables from main/solenv/inc/tg_compv.mk, where it is only usable by
dmake, to configure, where it can be used by both dmake and gbuild. This
is a requirement for me upstream some compiler bug workaround patches
from the FreeBSD
gt;> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net
>>>> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>
>>>> I wanted to validate build instructions. Should I take these two from
ter is required. Note
that epm is under GPL license.
Any reason to make changes in configure, or should we warn?
Regards,
Dave
> On Oct 25, 2017, at 5:34 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> You can. I used the downloads mentioned in the macOS build script
> for AOO414.
>
> Th
Dave
>>
>>> On Oct 23, 2017, at 5:38 PM, Dave Fisher >> <mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
>>> I wanted to validate build instructions. Should I take these two from your
>>> github for my MacOS Sierr
You can. I used the downloads mentioned in the macOS build script
for AOO414.
The version of dmake isn't important. The version of epm *is*
(it must be 4.3 or later) because it allows for direct building
of dmg's w/o requiring a long deprecated support application
which is no longer
omcast.net>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> I wanted to validate build instructions. Should I take these two from your
>> github for my MacOS Sierra environment?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>>
n Oct 20, 2017, at 7:31 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> Just a FYI that I am tracking dmake and epm on the
>> below Github pages:
>>
>> o https://github.com/jimjag/epm
>> o https://github.com/jimjag/dmake
>>
>> I know we are moving away from dmake,
Hi Jim,
I wanted to validate build instructions. Should I take these two from your
github for my MacOS Sierra environment?
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 20, 2017, at 7:31 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Just a FYI that I am tracking dmake and epm on the
> below
Just a FYI that I am tracking dmake and epm on the
below Github pages:
o https://github.com/jimjag/epm
o https://github.com/jimjag/dmake
I know we are moving away from dmake, but IMO it'll take
some time for that to be complete. Plus, updating to the
latest version of EPM is useful
Damjan
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 2:20 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>>
>> I am trying to set up a new debug environment, incorporating the recent
>>> changes to how debug works. Unfortunately, my configure-and-bootstrap
>>> cannot find dmake. It looks for it
p.
Damjan
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 2:20 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I am trying to set up a new debug environment, incorporating the recent
changes to how debug works. Unfortunately, my configure-and-bootstrap
cannot find dmake. It looks for it in a different URL from the one
specified as DMAK
Try "source winenv.set.sh" between ./configure and ./bootstrap.
Damjan
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 2:20 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> I am trying to set up a new debug environment, incorporating the recent
> changes to how debug works. Unfortunately, my configure-and-bootstrap
>
I am trying to set up a new debug environment, incorporating the recent
changes to how debug works. Unfortunately, my configure-and-bootstrap
cannot find dmake. It looks for it in a different URL from the one
specified as DMAKE_URL from configure.
run_configure.sh contains my configure
Am 09/18/2016 12:30 AM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:57:10PM +0200, Marcus wrote:
it breaks again at the same place:
...
[ info ALL ] LinkTarget Library/libxcr.so not defined: Assuming headers to
be there!
R=/share/linux2/AOO413&& S=$R/main&& O=$S/solver/413/unx
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:57:10PM +0200, Marcus wrote:
> it breaks again at the same place:
>
> ...
>
> [ info ALL ] LinkTarget Library/libxcr.so not defined: Assuming headers to
> be there!
> R=/share/linux2/AOO413 && S=$R/main && O=$S/solver/413/unxlngx6.pro &&
> W=$O/workdir && mkdir -p $W/E
61157 !).
Configure was successful but bootstrap throws an error:
download from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
failed
download failed
making and entering
/share/linux2/AOO413/main/solenv/unxlngx6.pro/misc/build/
can not find the dmake package
It do
l but bootstrap throws an error:
download from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
failed
download failed
making and entering
/share/linux2/AOO413/main/solenv/unxlngx6.pro/misc/build/
can not find the dmake package
It doesn't matter if it's a HT
but bootstrap throws an error:
>
>
>
> download from
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
> failed
> download failed
> making and entering
> /share/linux2/AOO413/main/solenv/unxlngx6.pro/misc/build/
> can not find the dmake package
&g
M, schrieb Marcus:
Hi all,
I want to build the current 4.1.3 source.
Therefore I've checked out today the new AOO413 branch (incl. Ariels
last commit r1761157 !).
Configure was successful but bootstrap throws an error:
download from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/dma
Hi all,
I want to build the current 4.1.3 source.
Therefore I've checked out today the new AOO413 branch (incl. Ariels
last commit r1761157 !).
Configure was successful but bootstrap throws an error:
download from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/dmake-4.12.ta
Patricia Shanahan has granted Ariel Constenla-Haile
's request for 4.1.3_release_blocker:
Issue 127118: Update dmake URL in configure
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127118
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-uns
Ariel Constenla-Haile has asked for
4.1.3_release_blocker:
Issue 127118: Update dmake URL in configure
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127118
--- Description ---
configure help points to an URL that does not work:
AC_ARG_WITH(dmake-url,
[ --with-dmake-url= Specify the location
> On Sep 15, 2016, at 12:31 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
> wrote:
>
>
> Note that we could also update the AOO patch to make epm get rid of the
> PackageMaker, the patch already fixes the path:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/main/epm/epm-3.7.patch?revision=1413471&view=markup#l38
Here's what I have so far:
https://github.com/jimjag/epm/tree/aoo
> On Sep 15, 2016, at 10:48 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
>> On Sep 15, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Sep 15, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>>
>>> That would be challenging but usefu
Hi Jim,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:13:08AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> It looks like most of the epm patch is not related to OSX (except for
> some minor things)...
last time I tried on Linux some years ago with the latest upstream, it had
several bugs; looking at the release notes, it seems
> On Sep 15, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
>> On Sep 15, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>
>> That would be challenging but useful then. For epm, as Ariel already
>> explained to you, we use a patched version so it's not a trivial task to
>> replace it, but probably
> On Sep 15, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> That would be challenging but useful then. For epm, as Ariel already
> explained to you, we use a patched version so it's not a trivial task to
> replace it, but probably it's feasible.
>
It looks like most of the epm patch is not rel
>
>
> It wasn't meant to be rude. I hope you agree that starting a new project
> under your name at Github for a non-issue (we don't have actual issues with
> dmake right now; or I never heard about them) is not top priority, even
> though it might have advantages in the l
t wasn't meant to be rude. I hope you agree that starting a new project
under your name at Github for a non-issue (we don't have actual issues
with dmake right now; or I never heard about them) is not top priority,
even though it might have advantages in the long term.
We digress, but
> On Sep 14, 2016, at 6:40 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
> epm is required and not under our control. In fact, epm 4.3 is out
> and work much better for AOO since it removes the need for the
> long-since deprecated PackageMaker app and instead uses the
> official pkgbuild stuff. Part of my confi
> On Sep 14, 2016, at 5:28 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Tarballs are at:
>> https://github.com/jimjag/dmake/releases
>> My goal was to try to combine all the flavors of dmake into one
>> "canonical" version we can use.
&g
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Tarballs are at:
https://github.com/jimjag/dmake/releases
My goal was to try to combine all the flavors of dmake into one
"canonical" version we can use.
Is there a reason for that?
So far it has been enough for us to get a specific dmake tarball from
Tarballs are at:
https://github.com/jimjag/dmake/releases
My goal was to try to combine all the flavors of dmake into one
"canonical" version we can use.
> On Sep 14, 2016, at 3:12 PM, John D'Orazio
> wrote:
>
> I myself just ran into the problem of the
I myself just ran into the problem of the missing apache-extras link, I've
used a sourceforge link for my build:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2.
Most of the links indicated in your github repo's README are dead links...
I believe a downloadable
Seeing that there is a dependency, still, on dmake, I've gone
ahead and created
https://github.com/jimjag/dmake
based on what I've been using... Suggestions and patches
welcome. Hoping we can use this to replace the apche-extras
links.
It's based on (https://github.co
at last Don?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> That url comes up oops 404
> >> >>
> >> >> I last tried that in the last few weeks, but have been using a cached
> >> >> copy since then.
> >> >>
> >> >> This pag
gt; >>
>> >> I last tried that in the last few weeks, but have been using a cached
>> >> copy since then.
>> >>
>> >> This page lists lots of mirrored copies:
>> >> <http://www.filewatcher.com/m/dmake-4.12.2.tar.bz2.461738-0.html>
last few weeks, but have been using a cached
> >> copy since then.
> >>
> >> This page lists lots of mirrored copies:
> >> <http://www.filewatcher.com/m/dmake-4.12.2.tar.bz2.461738-0.html>
> >>
> >> It looks like development has moved to Git
>
>> This page lists lots of mirrored copies:
>> <http://www.filewatcher.com/m/dmake-4.12.2.tar.bz2.461738-0.html>
>>
>> It looks like development has moved to GitHub:
>> <https://github.com/mohawk2/dmake/releases>
>
> and this is exactly what I was going to say ...
On 28 Aug, Gav wrote:
when did you try that last Don?
That url comes up oops 404
I last tried that in the last few weeks, but have been using a cached
copy since then.
This page lists lots of mirrored copies:
<http://www.filewatcher.com/m/dmake-4.12.2.tar.bz2.461738-0.html>
It look
On 28 Aug, Gav wrote:
> when did you try that last Don?
>
> That url comes up oops 404
I last tried that in the last few weeks, but have been using a cached
copy since then.
This page lists lots of mirrored copies:
<http://www.filewatcher.com/m/dmake-4.12.2.tar.bz2.461738-0.html>
u tell me what you intend to do with 'dmake' please - we cant build
> > without it currently. Is there an alternative uri we get it from?
>
> The bootstrap script can build dmake and epm on the fly if these flags
> are passed to configure:
>
> --with-dmake-
On 28 Aug, Gav wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> We have set up a new 14.04 LTS 64 bit VM and are in the process of testing.
>
> Can you tell me what you intend to do with 'dmake' please - we cant build
> without it currently. Is there an alternative uri we get it from?
The boot
Hi Guys,
We have set up a new 14.04 LTS 64 bit VM and are in the process of testing.
Can you tell me what you intend to do with 'dmake' please - we cant build
without it currently. Is there an alternative uri we get it from?
Thanks
Gav...
On 06/17/2015 04:03 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Hi Kay;
>
> You want to check this email in the archives:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-dev/201408.mbox/%3C540130E6.3060709%40apache.org%3E
Ok, yes, this is where I ended up downloading from. OK, I *thought* I
had download
Hello;
On 17/06/2015 06:03 p.m., Pedro Giffuni wrote:
...
BTW, we will have to do something about OOo-extras.
I will probably just have the apache-extras project deleted
before the deadline since there is no repository history
to preserve.
FWIW, "delete" means the website and the svn reposit
I also don't see a reason to delete them manually before Apache Extras
is really going down. Please keep the content alive as long as possible.
Marcus
Am 06/18/2015 08:19 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 18/06/2015 Pedro Giffuni wrote:
I will probably just have the apache-extras project dele
On 18/06/2015 Pedro Giffuni wrote:
I will probably just have the apache-extras project deleted
before the deadline since there is no repository history
to preserve.
Why deleted? When is the deadline and what options do we have? The main
reason for me to see this as problematic is that we have
Hi Kay;
You want to check this email in the archives:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-dev/201408.mbox/%3C540130E6.3060709%40apache.org%3E
Also note that Apache extras (and google code) is
basically dying this year.
BTW, we will have to do something about OOo-extras.
I will
Hello all--
I'm in the process of redoing my OS, and wanted to reinstall dmake
locally which I had done before.
OK, here's out url ref:
http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
This actually still downloads dmake 4.12 but the main url:
http://dm
Hi guys;
I have been, rather reluctantly, maintaining the Dmake thing we
inherited from SUN in Apache Extras.
I am glad to announce that a new maintainer stepped in (see below) and
has already made a great job transferring the *complete* history in a
github repository here:
https
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 23.05.2014 00:05, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> Does someone have a link to an actual reference guide for dmake? I found
>> one at one time but now, not so easy, and I didn't save it. :(
>>
>> Thanks.
>&
On 23.05.2014 00:05, Kay Schenk wrote:
Does someone have a link to an actual reference guide for dmake? I found
one at one time but now, not so easy, and I didn't save it. :(
Thanks.
Strangely enough, OpenOffice.org seems to be the best source of
information regarding dmake:
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo