[dev] When? (was Re: [dev] License Simplification)

2005-09-02 Thread cono
Hi, Martin Hollmichel wrote: Hi, [...] I expect that this cws is ready for integration next week in time for OOo 2.0 release. [...] Some of my customers want to plan their migration to 2.0. Can someone pls give an estimate of the expected release week? Thanks a lot, -- Cor Nouws http:

Re: [dev] License Simplification

2005-09-02 Thread Martin Hollmichel
Hi, the child workspace ooo19126 (http://eis.services.openoffice.org/EIS2/cws.ShowCWS?Id=3007&Path=SRC680%2Fooo19126) has been created for all the necessary changes in the source code. I expect that this cws is ready for integration next week in time for OOo 2.0 release. The pages http://www

Re: [dev] License Simplification

2005-09-02 Thread Éric Bischoff
Le Vendredi 2 Septembre 2005 19:02, Louis Suarez-Potts a écrit : > All, > > On 2 September 2005 Sun Microsystems announced that it was retiring > the Sun Industry Standards Source License (SISSL), an Open Source > Initiative (OSI)-approved software license. Sorry in advance if these are stupid que

[dev] menu bar and toolbars listener

2005-09-02 Thread Pam Z
Hi, how can I obtain the references to the menu bar and toolbars of a text document?Because I want to register a XActionListener to that objects, if it is possible, in order to receive all the events thrown by the toolbar buttons and the menu items. Thanks! --

[dev] Standalone XSLT tranformation to HTML

2005-09-02 Thread Miles Bernie
Please let me know if this is not the most suitable mail list for this question as I'm new to open office. I'm trying to transform from open office doc to HTML in a standalone XSLT process. I've found useful info and tools on the following site http://books.evc-cit.info/oobook/apc.html However w

[dev] License Simplification

2005-09-02 Thread Louis Suarez-Potts
All, On 2 September 2005 Sun Microsystems announced that it was retiring the Sun Industry Standards Source License (SISSL), an Open Source Initiative (OSI)-approved software license. In recent weeks, the OSI, which authorises open-source licenses, has been discussing limiting license pro

Re: [dev] Programmatic control of Toolbar Items: ComboBox possible?

2005-09-02 Thread Carsten Driesner
Matthias Benkmann wrote: Hi Carsten, Do you have any specific example(s) in mind? It depends on your goal. If you want to create an add-on with a toolbar containing a combo box, you can select an example which has sample code for all the other work (command dispatching, toolbar definition, .

Re: [dev] csc.exe

2005-09-02 Thread David Fraser
That's great, thanks! For general reference, I'm going to try and put this kind of info in http://www.go-oo.org/wiki/index.php/Windows David Joachim Lingner wrote: Have a look at C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v1.1.4322 Joachim David Fraser wrote: Hi all I'm trying to build OOo under

[dev] Strange Bug in StarBasic? Function returning null instead of empty

2005-09-02 Thread Matthias Benkmann
I have a problem with a recursive function in one of my macros. The function is supposed to either return an array of strings or Empty (in case there's not enough input data). However, under some circumstances the function mysteriously returns Object/Null instead of Variant/Empty. I'd like to kn

Re: [dev] csc.exe

2005-09-02 Thread Joachim Lingner
Have a look at C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v1.1.4322 Joachim David Fraser wrote: Hi all I'm trying to build OOo under Windows. I have a full version of Visual Studio.NET 2003 installed However I can't seem to find csc.exe configure outputs the following: checking for csc.exe... no conf

[dev] csc.exe

2005-09-02 Thread David Fraser
Hi all I'm trying to build OOo under Windows. I have a full version of Visual Studio.NET 2003 installed However I can't seem to find csc.exe configure outputs the following: checking for csc.exe... no configure: error: csc.exe not found. Make sure it's in the path or use --with-csc-path Where

Re: [dev] Warning-Free Code

2005-09-02 Thread Christian Junker
Another reason not mentioned is that few compilers complain a lot about such compact constructs as assignments in if statements, which leads to another reason why warning-free code is much better (I didn't see this in the introduction post by Stepahn): What gives warnings on one Operating System, m

[dev] Error-handling concept [Was: [dev] assertions, again. Sigh.]

2005-09-02 Thread Joerg Barfurth
Hi Kay, Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote: Propagating errors is the broader concept, comparing assertions and error propagation. So, if in doubt, propagate! Never swallow unclear situations (especially _not_ in _production_ code, following effects may destroy valuable data), upper leve

Re: [dev] compiler warnings: STLport; doubunder; OSL_VERIFY

2005-09-02 Thread Joerg Barfurth
Hi, Eike Rathke wrote: Hi Stephan, On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 10:04:47 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Sorry for the (may be stupid) question, but why not just change OSL_VERIFY to emit nothing, in case OSL_DEBUG_LEVEL == 0? I would expect that only weird code would relay on the evaluation in c

Re: [dev] Programmatic control of Toolbar Items: ComboBox possible?

2005-09-02 Thread Matthias Benkmann
Hi Carsten, thanks for the info. Pretty complicated but I think I'll at least give it a try. These are the first steps to add a custom combo box into a toolbar. You > should adapt an add-on example from the SDK, so don't have to start from > the scratch. > Do you have any specific example(s) i

Re: [dev] compiler warnings: STLport; doubunder; OSL_VERIFY

2005-09-02 Thread Nikolai Pretzell
Hi Stephan and all, this is an answer to the _original_ posting! Stephan Bergmann wrote: 1 STLport I already wrote this before, but maybe it did not get the necessary attention. To ensure that all spurious warnings from within any STLport headers are suppressed, the following changes are n

Re: [dev] Warning-Free Code

2005-09-02 Thread Nikolai Pretzell
Hi all, * Initially I would suggest -Wno-reorder (I think) There are a HUGE number of errors caused simply by the order of the variables in the class declaration and I have only found one instance where it indicated a real error (parent initialisation depended on child data). The needle for t

Re: [dev] Warning-Free Code

2005-09-02 Thread Nikolai Pretzell
Hi, Ken Foskey wrote: I am also concerned that then process will become a template fix. if( fp = fopen( "file", "r" )) { can become: if( (fp = fopen( "file", "r")) ) { If I assign someone to clean up the error, say a junior programmer because it is menial, and we have this code: if( x = 4

Re: [dev] Warning-Free Code

2005-09-02 Thread Nikolai Pretzell
Hi all, > Ken Foskey wrote: So I would actually recommend against an all out warnings push unless everyone is VERY clear the objective is to highlight bugs not to remove warnings. The difference in objectives is very important. Yes, but given the mass of code we have, the only way I see to re

Re: [dev] Programmatic control of Toolbar Items: ComboBox possible?

2005-09-02 Thread Carsten Driesner
Matthias Benkmann wrote: On 8/31/05, Carsten Driesner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That would be great as I'm currently evaluating different implementation options for one of our projects. Hi Matthias, Sorry for the late answer, but I was very busy. I give you a first draft how you can add a