On 12/08/08 17:56, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
I'd like to keep truck of some CWS activities in EIS (well, mostly when
they get integrated), are there RSS channels to this kind of info? I've
been searching with no luck, so I guess there is none, but...
You get a truckload of data via RSS
Hi all,
I noticed that the same enum name TT_COMMENT is used both in DEV300
_m37/svtools/inc/svtools/syntaxhighlight.hxx and DEV300
_m37/sw/source/ui/docvw/srcedtw.cxx. It is detected and breaks the build if and
only if
pecompiled header is enabled.
I will raise an issue for it soon but I
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:
Hi Ariel,
Hi there!
[...]
so this means: No there is no such a functionality.
Uhm - well yes, I really wasn't too explicit here :)
Well this is wrong we have at least 5 nice RSS feeds that help you to
track ChildWorkspaces and
Hi Bernd,
Well the fine grained control suggestes by you Frank is not as easy to
implement as it might first look like: there´s lot of places where
different kinds of changes to data in EIS is being made and each one
would have to be reviewed and decided upon wether and what kind of mail
Hi *,
Bernd Eilers escribió:
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:
Hi Ariel,
Hi there!
[...]
so this means: No there is no such a functionality.
Uhm - well yes, I really wasn't too explicit here :)
Well this is wrong we have at least 5 nice RSS feeds that help you to
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:
Btw. I'd also say that members of a CWS, as well as the owner/QA-rep,
should be handled as if they were subscribed to the CC list.
-1 the QA-Rep at least is not going to profit from these mails in the
least. Even as a member I don't want these
hi all, we work at NSI (Information System Research Group) in Cefet-Campos,
Brazil. We had just developed a table converter that does more stuff than
the current html2odf.
I would like to know what am I supposed to do to upload this solution to the
site, so that people can use and improve it. Here
Hi Philipp,
Btw. I'd also say that members of a CWS, as well as the owner/QA-rep,
should be handled as if they were subscribed to the CC list.
-1 the QA-Rep at least is not going to profit from these mails in the
least. Even as a member I don't want these notifications, there is
enough
