Re: [dev] convert Netbeans OOo project to eclipse project

2009-09-30 Thread Cédric Bosdonnat
Hi Karl, Le mardi 29 septembre 2009 à 23:33 +0200, Karl Weber a écrit : This is not quite true. I have started to develop such a plugin, but did not manage to finish it. Unfortunately, I will not have time in the near future to so. In order to not have done my work in vain, I could sponsor

Re: [dev] Errors using gsicheck on DEV300_m60

2009-09-30 Thread Ruediger Timm
On 09/30/09 00:12, Kristján Bjarni Guðmundsson wrote: I tried running gsicheck on the en-US.sdf file for the DEV300_m60 release and I am getting these errors: Error: File format, Line 72253, UniqueID uui/source\ids.src/title/)///: Source Language entry double. Treating as Translation. Error:

Re: [dev] --enable-lockdown

2009-09-30 Thread David Tardon
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 04:29:21PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: OOo appears to have support for an --enable-lockdown configure switch. In the configmgr gconf backend, it enables pulling settings for various configuration items from gconf. Is this still relevant, or is this dead code? (I am

Re: [dev] --enable-lockdown

2009-09-30 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 09/30/09 10:24, David Tardon wrote: On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 04:29:21PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: OOo appears to have support for an --enable-lockdown configure switch. In the configmgr gconf backend, it enables pulling settings for various configuration items from gconf. Is this still

Re: [dev] --enable-lockdown

2009-09-30 Thread Carsten Driesner
Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 09/30/09 10:24, David Tardon wrote: On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 04:29:21PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: OOo appears to have support for an --enable-lockdown configure switch. In the configmgr gconf backend, it enables pulling settings for various configuration items

[dev] boostrap issue with Bootstrap::getFrom()

2009-09-30 Thread eric b
Hi, To customize the UI on powerless machines (like XO), I adapted a change I did on Mac OS X some years ago. The idea is to provide configuration files, to allow the customization (we'll probably have one dedicated for the XO). If the user config file is not found, we'll use one in

[dev] security Open Office Writer

2009-09-30 Thread Brian Bennett
Hello! I have a file Easterly.odt. I have used save/as with password to protect it. However, I am not sure how secure it is when opened in OpenOfficeWriter.I assume that it is in memory when editing. Can you please advise. This file is the text of a book that I am writing. I am also running

Re: [dev] Errors using gsicheck on DEV300_m60

2009-09-30 Thread Sgauti
HI, Kristján Bjarni Guðmundsson wrote: I tried running gsicheck on the en-US.sdf file for the DEV300_m60 release and I am getting these errors: Error: File format, Line 72253, UniqueID uui/source\ids.src/title/)///: Source Language entry double. Treating as Translation. Error: File format, Line

Re: [dev] boostrap issue with Bootstrap::getFrom()

2009-09-30 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 09/30/09 12:25, eric b wrote: Hi, To customize the UI on powerless machines (like XO), I adapted a change I did on Mac OS X some years ago. The idea is to provide configuration files, to allow the customization (we'll probably have one dedicated for the XO). If the user config file is not

Re: [dev] --enable-lockdown

2009-09-30 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 09/30/09 11:52, Carsten Driesner wrote: Stephan Bergmann wrote: 1 The gconf backend provides data for a non-existent configuration entry /org.openoffice.Office.Common/Misc/DisableUICustomization. The old configmgr implementation probably just ignores it. Can somebody confirm that this

[dev] Re: [porting-dev] MinGW port build guide

2009-09-30 Thread Jens-Heiner Rechtien
Hi Takashi, the OpenOffice.org build guide in the Wiki is licensed under PDL, you can do with it pretty much what you want as long as the resulting document stays under PDL and it's clear where it did come from and what your modification are. Of course, IANAL. The exact terms can be found

[dev] Re: [tools-dev] should we drop gcc3 support ?

2009-09-30 Thread Jens-Heiner Rechtien
Hi, there is not yet a need to drop gcc-3.4 support I think, the usual compile problems happen with gcc-3.3 or older versions. GCC made a major (and very necessary) parser update from 3.3 to 3.4 and should have bumped up the major version at that time. We have discussed dropping gcc-3.3

[dev] Re: [tools-dev] should we drop gcc3 support ?

2009-09-30 Thread Jens-Heiner Rechtien
Hi Yuri, thanks for the update! Bye Heiner Yuri Dario wrote: Hi, We have discussed dropping gcc-3.3 support for quite some time now, but we refrained from officially obsoleting it because OS/2 and MACOSX 10.3 support still depend on gcc-3.3, at least according to this list:

[dev] Re: [tools-dev] should we drop gcc3 support ?

2009-09-30 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Jens-Heiner Rechtien jens-heiner.recht...@sun.com wrote: there is not yet a need to drop gcc-3.4 support I think, the usual compile problems happen with gcc-3.3 or older versions. GCC made a major (and very necessary) parser update from 3.3 to 3.4 and

Re: [dev] boostrap issue with Bootstrap::getFrom()

2009-09-30 Thread eric b
Hi Stephan, Le 30 sept. 09 à 14:54, Stephan Bergmann a écrit : I guess rtl::Bootstrap needs an absolute file URL for the bootstrap ini-file (if your Midnight Commander has OOo's brand program dir as current working dir, that might explain why this relative URL magically happens to work

[dev] [DUH - solved] Problem building M60 on Windows XP (w/ VS2005).

2009-09-30 Thread Jan Holst Jensen
My mistake - I had the Windows Server 2003 Platform SDK installed and not the Windows Server 2008 Platform SDK. With the 2008 SDK and VS 2008 Express installed it is now building and building and building... so far so good at least. Cheers -- Jan Hi All. I have

[dev] Long file names

2009-09-30 Thread Wei Min Teo
Hi all, It seems that openoffice has a maximum path name of 260 chars? However, I think the maximum path name for windows is 32,767 and file name is 260 in unicode. Is it possible to pass in to the loadComponentFromUrl function using a relative path instead of an absolute path? Are