[dev] Re: Promoting the ODF-Story (or how to break it)

2009-10-02 Thread Alan Lord (News)
On 02/10/09 12:20, Michael Stahl wrote: it seems there is hope that the weird situation of the ISO standard being based on the outdated OASIS standard 1.0 will be improved: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/group_public/email/office/200909/msg00162.html * Rob and Dennis reported on the recent me

Re: [dev] --enable-lockdown

2009-10-02 Thread Mathias Bauer
Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Mathias Bauer wrote: >> > 2 The gconf backend provides data for configuration set member >> > properties >> > /org.openoffice.Setup/Office/Factories/com.sun.star.XXX.XXXDocument/ooSetupFactoryDefaultFilter, >> > >> > for XXX in Presentation, Spreadsheet, Text. Stric

Re: [dev] Promoting the ODF-Story (or how to break it)

2009-10-02 Thread Niklas Nebel
On 10/02/09 11:55, Andre Schnabel wrote: While doing translations for OOo 3.2 I just came across, that we introduced a "ODF 1.2 *extended*" file format in OOo. From a technical point of view I have some ideas, why this is usefull and needed. But from a users POV, this is rather puzzling. At the

[dev] Re: Promoting the ODF-Story (or how to break it)

2009-10-02 Thread Michael Stahl
hi André, Andre Schnabel wrote: [snip some stuff that i unfortunately know nothing about] > But from a users POV, this is rather puzzling. At the one hand we > try to promote ODF as standard - we even go that far to introduce > venodr independet icons for ODF files (as we want to show, that ODF

[dev] Re: [marketing] Promoting the ODF-Story (or how to break it)

2009-10-02 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi André, thanks for pointing this out. Unfortunately, due to the work with the OOo Congress in Wiesbaden, I'm rather short on time, this is why I didn't coment much on the issues with 3.2 - but I'm glad that Volker, Mechtilde, you and others pointed out this problems so often. It seems that

[dev] Promoting the ODF-Story (or how to break it)

2009-10-02 Thread Andre Schnabel
Hi, most of you might be aware of the discussion about ODF-icons which is very controversal at the moment. I don't want to go into this discussion again, but this issue showed, how important the "ODF-Story" is and that many people around take this serious. While doing translations for OOo 3.2

[dev] Linux solenv/inc/.mks merging

2009-10-02 Thread Caolán McNamara
>From m61 (I think) onwards issue 89237 is implemented to simply remove the linux .mks which are no longer in use and modify the rest of them to stick the arch-independent bits which should be the same across all platforms into a single unxlng.mk and include this from the arch-dependant .mks which