/writer2latex/
before you get too involved. What might be nice is an import filter for
LaTeX.
--
G. Roderick Singleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenOffice.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
to shortcut keys would be a candidate).
Keep up the good work
Regards'
Austin
From: G. Roderick Singleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: austin DuBrulle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: discuss@openoffice.org
Subject: Re: accented characters in Writer
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 14:57:30 -0500
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 11:24
Singleton wrote:
Before filing an issue, I thought I should ask if disabling use of
system fonts by OOo under Linux intentional with 2.x or an ommission?
1.1.x does pick up the system fonts.
--
G. Roderick Singleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenOffice.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic
Before filing an issue, I thought I should ask if disabling use of
system fonts by OOo under Linux intentional with 2.x or an ommission?
1.1.x does pick up the system fonts.
--
G. Roderick Singleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenOffice.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
which I reported
2005-02-02 which was recently closed as workdforme with the examples we
had at the time.
--
G. Roderick Singleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenOffice.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
these
shortcuts and perhaps they are already implemented somewhere.
Why code when
http://documentation.openoffice.org/HOW_TO/various_topics/Howto_special_char.pdf
offers solutions. I use the dead key method on my system for French and
German.
--
G. Roderick Singleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenOffice.org
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 17:16 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi G.,
On Thursday, 2006-11-09 08:18:21 -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/development_at_a_glance_weekly
These links do not appear to be reachable outside Sun.
I've no problem accessing them
the calendar to get the older information.
--
G. Roderick Singleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenOffice.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 17:16 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi G.,
On Thursday, 2006-11-09 08:18:21 -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/development_at_a_glance_weekly
These links do not appear to be reachable outside Sun.
I've no problem accessing them
are already familiar with the nomenclature.
--
G. Roderick Singleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenOffice.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
of these or both can be answered yes then you could perhaps
invoke both from the fileserver.
--
G. Roderick Singleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenOffice.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- /opt/openoffice.org2.1/share/xdg/qstart.desktop
Once I found the directory, I was able to get OOo to re-enable qs by
simply using $touch qstart.desktop
--
G. Roderick Singleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenOffice.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
specific, WM specific (e.g. Gnome vs. KDE vs. ...) or mimics
Windows integration?
TIA
--
G. Roderick Singleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenOffice.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
from http://specs.openoffice.org/.
So you are saying the *NIX version behaves in exactly the same way?
--
G. Roderick Singleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenOffice.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
support? I ask because I cannot
reproduce the problem under FC5 and cups-1.2.4.
--
G. Roderick Singleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenOffice.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
The work of maintaining online help has been isolated from the community
but today, we are asking those who are interested to subscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] , introduce themselves and
identify those areas to which they think they can contribute. Initially,
issues and this list, will be the best
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 23:33 -0600, Andrew Ziem wrote:
On Sat, 2006-07-29 at 22:28 -0600, Andrew Ziem wrote:
What would be the minimal acceptable function and code quality that
OpenOffice.org would accept for a Microsoft Works import filter?
Right now I have about 500 lines of
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 10:50 +0100, Zé wrote:
Unable to build openoffice-2.0.3 (cvs snapshot) in x86_64 cause it looks
in /usr/lib instead in /usr/lib64
At some point of build i get this error:
/bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=link
gcc -O2 -O2 -g -pipe -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 11:59 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 23:41 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 17:33 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
Mikhail Voitenko wrote:
Implementing
On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 16:32 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have some specialist shapes that I would like to create in Draw and
drag? into the shapes tab so that they become tools in the future..
Is there as easy way to drag a shape into the tab ..
I think these have to be built-in.
I am
On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 23:41 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 17:33 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
Mikhail Voitenko wrote:
Implementing of this feature is possible in general. But it would
require time to design and develop a reliable
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 11:46 +0200, Christoph Wunder wrote:
Hallo ,
I want to use OpenOffice in an area where data should be kept confidential.
Therfore i wrote an own File Dialog that permits users to access and work
only in a predefinded directory.
I could easyly integrate my File Dialog
reybuzz,
As our newest member, let me say, Welcome to you.
As you have joined our merry little group today, I encourage you to
subscribe to dev@documentation.openoffice.org mailing list (low volume)
then take a pass through the task list http://tinyurl.com/ohdbn and
see if anything attracts
My apologies for this. Wrong list. Blame it on the 33C temperature.
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 15:56 -0400, G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
reybuzz,
As our newest member, let me say, Welcome to you.
As you have joined our merry little group today, I encourage you to
subscribe to dev
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 13:30 -0500, Joe Byers wrote:
Does anyone know of a reference to OO2.0 default configuration files?
The users list is probably not the best place to ask questions on the
internals. You may get an answer you may not from this list; however, I
would like to direct you to
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 14:02 +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
it seems that my email is misused to spread some viruses around the
world. Sorry for that but this spam doesn't come from me.
Juergen
it is. However it appears from the headers below that the offender is
external:
Return-Path:
On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 20:40 +0200, michal wrote:
Hi
Encryption is deeply explained in Oasis specs. Is there documentation
covering
siging? Used standartds, signing algorithms, magic numbers passed to
funstions etc.
From what perspective? For users see
I have encountered a problem with Times disappearing from my available
font list. I noticed this with 2.0.1 and later versions. Times New Roman
does get loaded but not Times using FontOOo. I use FC4 and have
completely removed the FC release and loaded Pavel's
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:45:09 +0100, Joost Andrae wrote:
Hello G. Roderick,
please read my comments inline.
Better would be to include minor release numbers on the splash screen as
well.
The splashscreen is a bitmap...
Not certain I understand. Are you saying that the bitmap is fixed
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 16:50 +0100, Joost Andrae wrote:
Hello G. Roderick,
having the version information displayed within the bitmap is a feature
that simply hasn't been implemented.
Adding the version information to that splash screen would mean that the
bitmap has to be changed for
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 09:59 +0100, Rüdiger Timm wrote:
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Here I disagree. The version shound contain only the regular version
number, but why not showing the build version directly in the About
dialog below the version (instead of asking
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 19:18 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi G.,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:22:37 -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
I have been trying to establish whether or not the Analysis addin is
built-in to OOo2.x. I this true?
It isn't built-in (otherwise it wouldn't be an Add
On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 19:52 +0330, Farzaneh Sarafraz wrote:
Hi,
The OpenOffice.org in the new Fedora Core 4 update is called
Openoffice.org-2.0.1.1-4.1. I was wondering what milestone it is.
Furthermore, the source is called OOA680_m1, unlike the old ones which
had names like SRC680_m143. I
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 12:10 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Jurgen,
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 09:24 +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
I am flexible when we think we need it i am willing to support it. But
of course the VBA API is not better than our existing API (far from it),
Of course -
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 13:20 -0600, Mary Leete wrote:
Hello!
Congratulations to all who worked on OOo 2.0! It's fabulous!
If anyone is looking for a great manual, Free Software For Dummies,
includes about 200 pages on OpenOffice.org 2.0. It's newly published and
received excellent
was thinking more of how to do this quickly and efficiently.
Since scripting exists it requires very little to make it work for the
goals described. However I do see that naming is a consideration.
--
G. Roderick Singleton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PATH tech
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 13:53 +0200, Joerg Barfurth wrote:
Hi,
G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
The setup guide needs to address the situation where a user wishes only
to install a single module, say writer. I know that the steps should be:
1. Install core
2. install module
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 06:07 -0700, Freewolle Voluntar wrote:
Dear OpenOffice.Org developer’s team!
I tender you to create the dictionary for your remarkable office system
on a similarity/such as “Ding” – a dictionary lookup program
(http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~fri/ding), such as an Everest
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 13:35 +0200, Victoria, Sven wrote:
Hi,
Could someone point me to the correct usages of StrCmp in StarBasic?
With:
strcmp(s1,s2)
I get the following error:
Basic syntax error. Symbol StrComp already defined differently.
But where is it defined?
Please
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 01:08 +0100, CPHennessy wrote:
On Thursday 25 August 2005 12:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
How to uncheck optionnals options in Setup (in source) ?
Where can i set the value ?
I like to uncheck quickstart install (per default checked).
I think that this is
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 14:53 +0200, Urska Colner wrote:
hi
i have two questions for you regarding the response file installation:
1. where can I find info on how to use the response file for silent
uninstall?
2. how do I remove the Register window after the first installation? we
could
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 14:53 +0200, Urska Colner wrote:
hi
i have two questions for you regarding the response file installation:
1. where can I find info on how to use the response file for silent
uninstall?
2. how do I remove the Register window after the first installation? we
could
Please excuse the cross postiing. I am not certain which team can
answer.
Now my question. Since installing 1.1.x with response files is and was
an option, the use of native installers with 2.0 appears to preclude
this option/ Is it still available? If not then what option(s) is
available to
You message is better suited to dev@openoffice.org so I have forwarded
it to that list. Please look for your answers there.
Forwarded Message
From: Robert Volke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: users@openoffice.org
To: users@openoffice.org
Subject: [users] They Need to update some
First apologies for the cross posts. The reply-to header points to
documentation for ease of collecting the information.
Help is needed on how to add javamail for mail merges in OOo 2.0 to the
setup guide. Please add a step-by-step to
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=37513 so
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 06:35 -0800, Michael A Chase wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:50:08 -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 06:31 -0800, Michael A Chase wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 07:21:59 -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 18:40 -0800
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 22:52 +0100, Age Bosma wrote:
Hi,
Because you're in the process of changing the OOo site I though I might
as well point a thing out that has been annoying me for a while.
The behaviour of logging in on the OOo site isn't as what can be
expected of logging in on a
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 18:40 -0800, Michael A Chase wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 12:39:17 -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 12:33 -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
I would like to increase my picklist. I have tried all the 1.1.x
locations but haven't found the same
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 06:31 -0800, Michael A Chase wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 07:21:59 -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 18:40 -0800, Michael A Chase wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 12:39:17 -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 12:33 -0500, G
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 12:33 -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
I would like to increase my picklist. I have tried all the 1.1.x
locations but haven't found the same structure. Is there a new way to
increase this?
Dum as dirt. THis is for 1.9/2.0beta. I know about 1.1.x. Sorry
50 matches
Mail list logo
