[dev] [Fwd: Re: [users] What does this mean?]

2007-10-12 Thread Mark Hull-Richter
It was suggested I ask this question here (from the users list). Please reply to me personally as I am not currently a member of the dev list (not sure I should be...). Thanks. mhr Forwarded Message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Mark Hull-Richter

[dev] [Fwd: Re: [qa-dev] Tinderbox in EIS]

2007-03-16 Thread Bernd Eilers
Hi there! If I understood Kay Ramme correctly there is demand to discuss on how to react to tinderbox build breaks in development (which are now visible in EIS also) on this list, so I am forwarding a mail from the qa list to this list here. Kind regards, Bernd ---BeginMessage--- Kay

[dev] [Fwd: Re: accented characters in Writer]

2007-03-03 Thread G. Roderick Singleton
Forwarded Message From: austin DuBrulle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: accented characters in Writer Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:33:27 -0800 Thank you for the pointer. I should find in the documentation a imple way to solve my problem (macros assigned to

[dev] [Fwd: Re: Vorschlag zur Versserung in der Handhabung des OO]

2006-10-23 Thread Ralf Krüger
-- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Ralf Krüger Dr.-Karl-Senft-Str. 7 93142 Maxhütte-Haidhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---BeginMessage--- Hallo Ralf, Am Freitag, 22. September 2006 22:30 schrieben Sie: Hallo Andreas, ich weiß nicht, ob ich bei Dir an der richtigen Adresse für meinen

Re: [dev] [Fwd: Re: Contributions to the default icon set used by OO.o/StarOffice]

2006-07-26 Thread Tom Verbeek
Hi, Michael Meeks wrote: The traditional way to solve this is to have a responsive maintainer that approves (and/or rejects - with suitable comments) changes to the icon set. Yes. That would be the idea Martin posted. It's also normal in such a situation for some received

Re: [dev] [Fwd: Re: Contributions to the default icon set used by OO.o/StarOffice]

2006-07-26 Thread Jörg Jahnke
Hi, Tom Verbeek schrieb: IMHO if the use of this web tool causes pain, and is unusable by others, Sun should shoulder the burden here; and ultimately [ AFAIR ] good icons take ~3 hours each to draw ; [ in 2 sizes ], and as such it's unlikely that inserting 4 or 5 per day in some web tool

Re: [dev] [Fwd: Re: Bug#369924: soffice in PATH missing - automatic soffice starting from jar not possible]

2006-06-08 Thread Stephan Bergmann
Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, Am Mittwoch, 7. Juni 2006 17:08 schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: it can't work. The bootstrap mechanism searches for an soffice in the path, links are resolved and when a executable is found (binary or script) the mechanism expects that the executable is found in a office

Re: [dev] [Fwd: Re: Bug#369924: soffice in PATH missing - automatic soffice starting from jar not possible]

2006-06-07 Thread Stephan Bergmann
Tobias Krais wrote: Hi Stephan, [..] What makes the soffice execuable so specific that the Debian ooffice executable does not work? Please help us answering this question to solve this Bug in Debian. Is it the case that on Debian there is an executable named ooffice in $PATH but not an

Re: [dev] [Fwd: Re: Bug#369924: soffice in PATH missing - automatic soffice starting from jar not possible]

2006-06-07 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
Tobias Krais wrote: Hi Stephan, [..] What makes the soffice execuable so specific that the Debian ooffice executable does not work? Please help us answering this question to solve this Bug in Debian. Is it the case that on Debian there is an executable named ooffice in $PATH but not an

Re: [dev] [Fwd: Re: Bug#369924: soffice in PATH missing - automatic soffice starting from jar not possible]

2006-06-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am Mittwoch, 7. Juni 2006 17:08 schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: it can't work. The bootstrap mechanism searches for an soffice in the path, links are resolved and when a executable is found (binary or script) the mechanism expects that the executable is found in a office program directory and

[dev] [Fwd: Re: Bug#369924: soffice in PATH missing - automatic soffice starting from jar not possible]

2006-06-06 Thread Tobias Krais
Hi together, I submitted a bug against the Debian OpenOffice package and we need your help to solve it. Problem description: In my Java application I use the OO bootstrap mechanism with the classloader classes as described here:

Re: [dev] [Fwd: Re: Bug#369924: soffice in PATH missing - automatic soffice starting from jar not possible]

2006-06-06 Thread Stephan Bergmann
Tobias Krais wrote: Hi together, I submitted a bug against the Debian OpenOffice package and we need your help to solve it. Problem description: In my Java application I use the OO bootstrap mechanism with the classloader classes as described here:

Re: [dev] [Fwd: Re: Bug#369924: soffice in PATH missing - automatic soffice starting from jar not possible]

2006-06-06 Thread Tobias Krais
Hi Stephan, [..] What makes the soffice execuable so specific that the Debian ooffice executable does not work? Please help us answering this question to solve this Bug in Debian. Is it the case that on Debian there is an executable named ooffice in $PATH but not an executable named

Re: [dev] [Fwd: Re: Bug#369924: soffice in PATH missing - automatic soffice starting from jar not possible]

2006-06-06 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Tobias, On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 03:40:08PM +0200, Tobias Krais wrote: I submitted a bug against the Debian OpenOffice package and we need your help to solve it. Problem description: In my Java application I use the OO bootstrap mechanism with the classloader classes as described here:

[dev] FwD: Re:

2005-05-02 Thread daniel . naber
ok ok ok, here is it - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]