Hi Kirill,
you have used the right list.
The ODF TC is tracking all the comments/requests/questions coming in on
this mailing list. Unfortunately, the backlog on working on these items
has grown in the past, because the ODF TC is concentrating on finishing
ODF 1.2
Best regards, Oliver.
Hi Kirill,
thanks a lot for sending the proposal. It will surely get my vote.
Unfortunately, it's unlikely, that you get feedback from the ODF TC
there. There's is a policy, that OASIS comment lists are exclusively for
public comments, but it's not intended to be used for discussions
between a
Hello Peter, Mathias, everybody.
I have submitted first part of my proposal -
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200907/msg3.html
Seeing that it did not generate a lot of feedback I would like to ask if
I used the right list.
TIA.
WBR,
KP.
Peter Junge wrote:
Hi
Hi,
please let me add that posting a comment and - if possible - a proposal
to the list is the fastest way to move things forward. This way
everybody else in the TC (e.g. those interested in OOo) can pick it up
and help getting this into the standard.
If you wait for someone else doing this,
Hi Kirill,
I will not have the time to take action on these issues myself, but I
would like to briefly summarize how you (and of course others) can get
heard by the OASIS ODF TC.
For each standards TC, OASIS is offering a public comment list and they
have a policy, that each comment submitted
Hello everybody.
We have highly desired issues
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5560 and
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8275 , which require
amendments for ODF specification. Issue 5560 is even implemented in
code.
So could somebody, who is member of OASIS ODF
