Re: [dev] Butler Office Pro - really a violation ?

2008-02-08 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Juergen, I really did not want to step into this thread, but: On Thursday 07 February 2008 23:22, Juergen Schmidt wrote: All people who don't like it as it is are free to leave the project and should spare us with this kind of discussion as long as the situation doesn't change. Sorry,

Re: [dev] Butler Office Pro - really a violation ?

2008-02-08 Thread Pavel Janík
Sorry, but this is a really dangerous attitude. Please don't feel offended, but it very much reminds me what we used to have in our country in the communist era. You don't like it here? Emigrate. And don't be surprised if you get shot during that. Please emigrate to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [dev] Where our products install to

2008-02-08 Thread Caolan McNamara
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 14:05 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: I think that the best solution would be to get rid of share/dict/ooo and look for the dictionaries into a common place, for example /usr/share/myspell. It would be nice get rid of share/dict/ooo/dictionary.lst. The dictionaries have

[dev] Removing external header guards

2008-02-08 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi fellow devs, kendy and me now intend to execute the once-postponed plan to remove external header guards (that #ifndef STUFF #include STUFF #endif ugliness). A bit more background: http://blog.thebehrens.net/2008/02/05/obsolete-external-header-guards/ Ideally, we'd want to land this in HEAD

Re: [dev] Butler Office Pro - really a violation ?

2008-02-08 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Allen Pulsifer wrote: All people who don't like it as it is are free to leave the project and should spare us with this kind of discussion as long as the situation doesn't change. This attitude is very telling. Some people might think that the whole reason Sun set up OpenOffice.org is to

Re: [dev] Butler Office Pro - really a violation ?

2008-02-08 Thread sophie
Hi all, I answer here but this is not an answer to Michael's mail and this is why I top post. Please all, there is no need for more provocations. The world is not perfect, but it can be worse and it has been in the past. May I remember you that we didn't have the JCA at the beginning of the

Re: [dev] Where our products install to

2008-02-08 Thread Petr Mladek
On Friday 08 February 2008, Oliver Braun wrote: Hi Stephan, Stephan Bergmann wrote: The planned new (OOo 3.0) structures are as follows: On Unix (Linux, Solaris): - The URE product still by default will install to /opt/openoffice.org/ure (but only the /opt prefix is relocatable). -

Re: [dev] Where our products install to

2008-02-08 Thread Oliver Braun
Hi Stephan, Stephan Bergmann wrote: The planned new (OOo 3.0) structures are as follows: On Unix (Linux, Solaris): - The URE product still by default will install to /opt/openoffice.org/ure (but only the /opt prefix is relocatable). - The OOo product by default will install its three layers

Re: [dev] Butler Office Pro - really a violation ?

2008-02-08 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Jan Holesovsky wrote: Hi Juergen, I really did not want to step into this thread, but: On Thursday 07 February 2008 23:22, Juergen Schmidt wrote: All people who don't like it as it is are free to leave the project and should spare us with this kind of discussion as long as the situation

Re: [dev] Butler Office Pro - really a violation ?

2008-02-08 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Mathias, On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 16:05 +0100, Mathias Bauer wrote: I don't want to kill the thread - I'm not even empowered to do that. :-) Good 'oh :-) personally I think the discussion is helpful. Jurgen is right, of course, that we discussed this 3 months ago, and that there has

RE: [dev] Butler Office Pro - really a violation ?

2008-02-08 Thread Allen Pulsifer
I see that Allen wants to continue in developing the project and product, so please everyone lets Allen do it... That would be great. As soon as the project is ready to accept LGPL contributions, then we can make that happen.

RE: [dev] Butler Office Pro - really a violation ?

2008-02-08 Thread Allen Pulsifer
All people who don't like it as it is are free to leave the project and should spare us with this kind of discussion as long as the situation doesn't change. This attitude is very telling. Some people might think that the whole reason Sun set up OpenOffice.org is to get free