Hi.
In the
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/To-Dos#Replace_code_with_3rd_party
there is section about Replace self made containers with STL containers.
SvPointerArray, BigPointerArray
But in higher section there is Remove duplicate code: BigPointerArray vs.
SvPointerArray
So should we
On 13/06/2010 22:36, Bartosz Kosiorek wrote:
Hi.
hi Bartosz,
In the
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/To-Dos#Replace_code_with_3rd_party
there is section about Replace self made containers with STL containers.
SvPointerArray, BigPointerArray
But in higher section there is Remove
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 11:22 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
the SvArrays should be replaced by appropriate STL types (mostly vector, i
guess, but probably in some cases stacks or deques or something else).
deques I think was the best option in general the last time I looked at
this. Probably best
I thought I had a patch somewhere to do some of the conversion, but I
can't find it now. I remember that I didn't go ahead with it at the time
because my first cut at it left OOo larger than it was before hand,
which was an annoying result.
Great. If you could find this patch, it will be very
On 14/06/2010 13:05, Bartosz wrote:
I thought I had a patch somewhere to do some of the conversion, but I
can't find it now. I remember that I didn't go ahead with it at the time
because my first cut at it left OOo larger than it was before hand,
which was an annoying result.
Great. If you
Hi all,
while testing the new SfxItemSets in cws new_itemsets I came across a
few interesting uses of itemsets which I had considered to be illegal
(but I might be wrong there). I assumed:
- non-void items should only be put at the same which id in a set as the
which id on the item itself.
-
Hi Bjoern,
Björn Michaelsen wrote, On 06/14/10 13:34:
Hi all,
while testing the new SfxItemSets in cws new_itemsets I came across a
few interesting uses of itemsets which I had considered to be illegal
(but I might be wrong there). I assumed:
- non-void items should only be put at the same
Am Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:11:57 +0200
schrieb Malte Timmermann malte.timmerm...@sun.com:
Hi Bjoern,
Björn Michaelsen wrote, On 06/14/10 13:34:
Hi all,
while testing the new SfxItemSets in cws new_itemsets I came across
a few interesting uses of itemsets which I had considered to be
Björn Michaelsen wrote, On 06/14/10 16:09:
Am Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:11:57 +0200
schrieb Malte Timmermann malte.timmerm...@sun.com:
Hi Bjoern,
Björn Michaelsen wrote, On 06/14/10 13:34:
Hi all,
while testing the new SfxItemSets in cws new_itemsets I came across
a few interesting uses of
Hi.
I have created patch which replace svarray to stl containers.
Patch is in attachment in issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112395
Feel free to test it.
How I could test the highlight?
Best Regards
Bartosz
On 6/13/2010 1:55 PM, Mathias Bauer wrote:
On 06/10/2010 08:19 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
add_depend is used to express depends that the build system can not
figure out. For most cases, it is not needed. add_library(a ...)
target_link_library(a b), a now depends on library b. It is when you use
On 6/11/2010 1:14 PM, bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg
Germany wrote:
Hi all,
see
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/make/Remaking-Makefiles.html#Remaking-Makefiles
for details:
To this end, after reading in all makefiles, make will consider each as
a goal target and
On 06/14/2010 07:05 AM, Bartosz wrote:
I thought I had a patch somewhere to do some of the conversion, but I
can't find it now. I remember that I didn't go ahead with it at the time
because my first cut at it left OOo larger than it was before hand,
which was an annoying result.
Great. If
Am Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:32:27 -0400
schrieb Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and...@pitonyak.org:
Changing out SvArray, will fix this long standing bug, which will
bring great joy and happiness to my life.
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84159
Getting rid of SvArray might not be
14 matches
Mail list logo
