On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 7:20 AM, m*sh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Lauri Hahne wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> 1. Ways
>>
>> - There are one kind of ways in the database. Ways can have attributes
>> (tags) but aren't required.
>> - The tagging scheme suggest
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Jon Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 09:59 +0100, Andy Allan wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Would it be possible to add md5sums alongside the files on
>> planet.openstreetmap.org? Especially for the planet files where having
>> osm2pgsql bail a few
Dave Stubbs wrote:
>Sent: 04 July 2008 9:14 AM
>To: m*sh
>Cc: dev@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] [OSM-talk] When mental models go wrong:
>OpenStreetMap
>
>On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 7:20 AM, m*sh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Lauri Hahne
Dave Stubbs wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Jon Burgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I got the impression that sha1sum is now preferred over md5sum, do we
>> want to use that instead?
>>
> Only if you're aiming for security. If you're just trying to figure
> out whether the file
Hi,
I'm watching the areas I'm interested in by downloading daily excerpts
from osmxapi and building a diff via osmosis.
For the delete actions, the diffs show the wrong user. In one example
node, the user "djanda" deleted a node, but the diffs show the last user
that manipulated node, in this c
> But kudos to you, most people try to normalise the data model onto
> relations, but normalising to nodes is thinking outside the box.
I didn't say that we do not need relations.
> Of
> course it's basically a tag version of segments which were ditched due
> to the extra processing requirements
>> "Freizeiteinrichtungen"
>
> To me, that translates back to English as "Leisure Amenities", making
> it overspecific. Think of courthouses, fire stations, fuel stations,
> none of which are strictly related to leisure.
>
> Dermot
True!
What about "Öffentliche Einrichtungen"?
:)
___
Hakan Tandogan wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm watching the areas I'm interested in by downloading daily excerpts
> from osmxapi and building a diff via osmosis.
>
> For the delete actions, the diffs show the wrong user. In one example
> node, the user "djanda" deleted a node, but the diffs show the last us
Am Fr, 4.07.2008, 12:39, schrieb Erik Johansson:
> This has come up before, in different ways each time. I know started
> thinking that any editor would first let you choose the type, and then
> let you draw it, like in Google Map Maker. But since we had the
> segments untagged in the beginning I
m*sh wrote:
>Sent: 04 July 2008 3:05 PM
>To: dev@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] [OSM-talk] When mental models go wrong:
>OpenStreetMap
>
>
>Am Fr, 4.07.2008, 12:39, schrieb Erik Johansson:
>> This has come up before, in different ways each time. I know started
>> thinking that any editor
El Viernes, 4 de Julio de 2008, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) escribió:
> m*sh wrote:
> >Why should there be any order at all? [...]
>
> If its not ordered logically, how would you route over it?
Easy:
http://xkcd.com/407/
Cheers,
--
--
Iván Sánchez Ortega <
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 3:05 PM, m*sh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am Fr, 4.07.2008, 12:39, schrieb Erik Johansson:
>> This has come up before, in different ways each time. I know started
>> thinking that any editor would first let you choose the type, and then
>> let you draw it, like in Google M
Hi All,
I've just released osmosis 0.29.
It has some new features which might interest people:
* Plugin support. It is now possible to register a plugin which allows
new tasks to be used within osmosis without requiring a full osmosis
recompile.
* Lazy string parsing. For processing xml files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave Stubbs wrote:
> Yeah, there's no really good reason why you need to edit in that
> order, other than it's easier to program, and probably more how most
> people think.
No it's not.
> Our dynamic ontology, and largely tag ambivalent editors are w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave Stubbs wrote:
> Yeah, there's no really good reason why you need to edit in that
> order, other than it's easier to program, and probably more how most
> people think.
No it's not.
> Our dynamic ontology, and largely tag ambivalent editors are w
Hello,
I've written a program called Open CityMap.
It is programmed in Qt for Qtopia compatible devices. (unfortunately this
wasn't accepted as GSOC application)
Some of the features:
* GPLv2 license.
* Can display OSM data (XML)
* Can display OSM tiles (thanks to QMapControl)
* C
Very interesting. I'm one if the contributor to Merkaartor, which is
QT based also.
Furthermore, we are using QMapcontrol for tiles , too.
As I always wanted to develop a PDA based application, I'm pretty sure
we'll find synergies, here.
My target is clearly WinCE, but QT working on CE, now, this
17 matches
Mail list logo
